Csp21 - Upstream Facilities Handover Manual Rev1

PROCEDURE NO: CSP-21
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 2 of 155
Document Revision History
Rev Date: Version: Summary of Changes: Revised by:
March 2014 Rev. 1 Newly enhanced process Department of Commissioning,

flow, change of terms and Construction Department
gatekeeper, the (DC), P&E, PCSB.
introduction of new
punchlist definition,
demarcation between
Project & Asset and
emphasizing in project’s
handover best practices.
Document Classification
SECRET or RAHSIA
CONFIDENTIAL or SULIT
INTERNAL USE or UNTUK DALAMAN
OPEN or TERBUKA X
All documents MUST be classified by the level of sensitivity according to the Document Security
Classification Scheme as detailed in APPENDIX V of the PETRONAS Records Management
Guidelines for Active Records.
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 3 of 155
Acknowledgment
This is dedicated especially to those who have shared their materials from various
Departments and those who have participated and supported the development and review
of this document. The individuals have shown commitments and continuous support
throughout the whole process from inception to final issuance of this procedure. The
constructive and comprehensive contributions to the content of the procedure have been
proven invaluable in the process of developing and completing the procedure.
No Name Department
1 Akbal B Abu DCC, Advisor
2 Izrie B Ghazali DCC, Team Leader
3 Zaharah Lim Chui Yean DCC, (Co-Team Leader)
4 Nurul Atyqah Anis DCC, (Co-Team Leader)
5 Abdullah B Azmi DCC, Technical Writer
6 Armi Faizal B Awang SBO ORSA
7 Hussein Sulaiman SKO ORSA
8 Yushafidi B Yusof PMO ORSA
9 Asmawi B Rashid PMO ORSA
10 Adzuan Faizal B Ahmed PMO ORSA
11 Muhammad Raflin Well Integrity
12 Azwan B Ashari DFIN
13 Adam Hareezi B A Aziz DDR
14 Leong Chai Yin DSE
15 Ramzi B Kadri EP PMI
16 Robert Veitch Tait EP PMI
17 Teh Mei Li DCHD
18 Mareney Bt Yahya DCHD
19 Ruzaidi B A Aziz DCHD
20 M Gaberalla B Mohamed DCHD
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 4 of 155
Content
Document Authorisation .............................................................................................................. 1

Document Revision History .......................................................................................................... 2
Document Classification ............................................................................................................... 2
Acknowledgment ......................................................................................................................... 3
Content ....................................................................................................................................... 4
1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 6
1.1 Purpose...................................................................................................................................... 6
1.2 Scope ......................................................................................................................................... 7
1.3 User ........................................................................................................................................... 7
2.0 References ......................................................................................................................... 8
3.0 Abbreviation ...................................................................................................................... 9
4.0 Definitions ........................................................................................................................ 11
5.0 Upstream Facilities Handover Procedure ........................................................................... 17
5.1 Handover Philosophy .............................................................................................................. 17
5.2 Handover In Project Phases..................................................................................................... 18
5.3 Project Handover Elements ..................................................................................................... 20
5.4 Application of Handover Process ........................................................................................... 29
6.0 General Requirement........................................................................................................ 36
6.1 Leadership & Commitment .................................................................................................... 36
6.2 Commissioning and Start-Up (CSU) Team ............................................................................. 46
6.3 Point of Responsibility Transfer ............................................................................................. 47
6.4 Commissioning and Start-Up Related Procedure .................................................................. 49
6.5 Commissioning Computerized Completion Management System (CMS) .............................. 63
6.6 Key Elements for Safe and Smooth Start-up and Handover ................................................. 67
6.7 Warranty ................................................................................................................................. 77
6.8 Operation Change Request (OCR) ......................................................................................... 79
6.9 Spare Parts ............................................................................................................................. 80
6.10 Punchlist ............................................................................................................................... 82
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 5 of 155
7.0 Records ............................................................................................................................ 83

7.1 Handover Certificates .............................................................................................................. 83
Appendix I - HANDOVER RACI MATRIX ..................................................................................... 106
Appendix II - Handover Requirement Matrix Summary ............................................................. 109
Appendix III – Warranty Call-Out Form ..................................................................................... 117
Appendix IV - OCR Call Out Form .............................................................................................. 120
Appendix V – HSE Matrix .......................................................................................................... 123
Appendix VI – Start Up and Operations Manual Example .......................................................... 128
Appendix VII – Commissioning Plan Example ............................................................................ 133
Appendix VIII – Perfromance Acceptance Test Plan Example ..................................................... 137
Appendix IX – Handover Procedure Example ............................................................................ 140
Appendix X – Inerting Procedure For Offsite Facilities Example................................................. 143
Appendix XI –Commissioning Philosophy Plan Examples ........................................................... 148
Appendix XII –Performance Test Run Example .......................................................................... 151
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 6 of 155
1.0 Introduction
CSP-21 was written to provide a minimum requirement in handover process from

Project Execution Phase to Operation Phase and to be read in conjunction with CSP-20,
where both procedure compliments each other. CSP-20 will cover the technical aspect
of acceptance criteria in a system basis, while CSP-21 is a management process to
create a smooth transition through system handover. This handover process is
engineered to create a step-by-step process and it is most suited with the
implementation of Integrated Commissioning Team (CSU Team) between Projects and
Operation. The Handover Process Flow in this procedure covers for both, onshore and
offshore upstream facilities. It is also to cater for various types of contracting strategy,
where large scale stakeholders management would be the main concern. However,
every project is unique, thus a mix and match to tailor the process is required to suit
your project. Although actual handover process would only occured at the very end of
a project phase, planning and stakeholders engagement would commence as early as
detailed design stage. This is to ensure minimum scope changes or scope creep.
Furthermore, this guideline also addressed the point of responsibility transfer between
Project team and Operation Team through RACI Matrix and highlights the roles and
responsibilities of key stakeholders. Overall, this guideline is aligned to Smooth Start-
Up Programs (SSP) and recommends the implementation of Commissioning and Start-
Up Philosophy, Testing, Precommissioning and Commissioning Procedure for each
system, Commissioning Execution Plan, Facility Performance Test Run, and Initial Start-
up Procedure. On top of that, CSP-21 also outline the requirements for Commissioning
Computerized Completion Management System (CMS), the process of managing
warranty issue, the process to manage operation change request during execution and
common practice in managing the procurement of spare parts for new equipments.
1.1 Purpose
The objective of this Upstream Facilities Handover Procedure, to be referred to as CSP-
21 hereafter, is to provide a standardised handover guideline to ensure smooth
handover of facilities from project team (consist of members from Project &
Emgineering Division, Drilling Division and Petroleum Engineering Division) to Operation
Division. This procedure is a minimum requirement which assemble from previous best
practices collabrating people, processes, systems and tools for smooth handover
process throughout project implementation phase and operation.
This procedure also forms the basis for execution, verification and documentation of
handover activities. It provides the general and specific guidelines and requirements
that shall be used together with Project Execution Plan when planning and performing
the work.
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 7 of 155
1.2 Scope
This procedure is applicable for both green and brown field projects, and covers the
handover of the following Upstream Facilities: -
 Offshore facilities – Topsides, Jacket, Hull/Floater, Subsea
 Onshore facilities – Oil/Gas Terminals
 Pipelines/ Flexible Hoses/ Umbilical – Gas, Liquid, Multiphase
 Wells
1.3 User
This procedure shall serve as a standard procedure and reference for all parties involved
in the handover process. The intended users of this procedure include, but not limited
to: -
1.3.1 Project Management Team (PMT)

 Project & Engineering (P&E)
 Drilling Division (DDR)
 Petroleum Engineering Division (PED)
1.3.2 Production Malaysia/ Production International (PM/PI)

 Peninsular Malaysia Operations (PMO)
 Sarawak Operations (SKO)
 Sabah Operations (SBO)
 International Operations
1.3.3 Contractors
 EPCC/EPCIC/PCC Contractors
 Fabricator Contractors
 HUC Contractors
 Transportation &Installation Contractors
 Drilling Contractors
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 8 of 155
2.0 References
No. Title Revision/Issued Custodian

PPMS Commissioning & Start-up (CSU) Rev V0.2, 25 May
1 GTS
Management Manual, Section 2 & 3 09(Working Draft)
Project Management Guide Manual (PMGM),
2 Rev 2, March 2010 PCSB-DFAB
Section 3 Item 10 and Appendix 2
CSP-20 Testing, Pre Commissioning &
3 Rev 1, March 2014 DFAB/DFHD
Commissionig Guideline
Hook-up & Commissioning Engineer
Rev 1, October
4 Handbook, Section 11.5-11.7, Appendix B DFHD
2012
HUC-07-G/H, HUC-08-B/C, HUC-11-E/F
PETRONAS Procedure and Guideline for
5 Rev 3, July 2013 PMU
Upstream Activities (PPGUA)
6 Malaysia Production Operation Philosophy Rev 2, Oct 2000 PCSB
7 CSP-03 Final Documentation Rev 3, Nov 2008 DFAB
PCSB PASR Procedure doc. no. WW ALL S 04
8 Rev. 0, Dec 2009 PCSB CHSE
010
PTS 61.10.08.11 Field Inspection Prior To
9 Rev. 0, Sept 2009 GTS
Commissioning of Mechanical Equipment
PTS20.081 & PTS 31.38.01.11 Piping General Rev. 2, October
10 GTS
Requirements 2011
11 PPMS Way We Work 2013 Rev.0, Nov 2013 PCSB-DPRM
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 9 of 155
3.0 Abbreviation
CSP Carigali Standard Procedure
CMS Completion Management System
CSU Commissioning and Start-Up
DCHD Department of Hook-Up, Commissioning and Decommissioning
DFIN Department of Offshore Installation
DDR Drilling Division
DMC Discipline Mechanical Certificate
EPCC Engineering, Procurement, Construction and Commissioning
EPCIC Engineering, Procurement, Construction, Installation and

Commissioning
EP PMI Exploration & Production, Project Management Institute
FFH Final Facilities Handover
FMC Fabrication Mechanical Completion
HC Hydrocarbon
HUC Hook Up and Commissioning
IFH Initial Facilities Handover
ITR Inspection Test Records
IMC Installation Mechanical Date
JH Jacket Handover
NFA Notice of Final Acceptance
NPA Notice of Provisional Acceptance
OCR Operation Change Request

HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 10 of 155
ORSA Operation Readiness Strategy & Assurance
PASR Pre Activity Safety Review
PCC Procurement, Construction and Commissioning
PCSB PETRONAS Carigali Sdn Bhd
PED Petroleum Engineering Division
PH Pipeline Handover
PIR Project Independent Review
PM/PI Production Malaysia/ Production International
PMO Peninsular Malaysia Operations
PMT Project Management Team
PPGUA PETRONAS Procedures & Guidelines for Upstream Activities
PPMS PETRONAS Project Management System
PSC Production Sharing Contract
PTR Performance Test Run
PTS PETRONAS Technical Standard
RACI Responsibility, Accountability, Consult & Inform
RFC Ready for Commissioning
SBO Sabah Operations
SH System/Sub-system Handover
SKO Sarawak Operations

HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 11 of 155
4.0 Definitions
Commissioning Act of putting certain items into active service for the first time as
intended by design and specifications. It includes dynamic
functional testing and documentation of an assembly, system or
sub-system independently or together with associated systems
and facilities to ensure that it fulfils its designed purpose and
services.
Completion Computerized system for recording, tracking and reporting status

Management System for DMC, RFC, System Handover, Initial Facilities Handover and
(CMS) Final Facilities Handover by system, sub-system, equipment and
individual tag items.
Demobilisation Departure of Contractor personnel from Worksite to the Point of

Origin, upon completion of assignment or termination of works.
The personnel are considered as demobilised when they leave the
Worksite and all charges will cease at this time unless otherwise
stipulated.
Discipline Mechanical An official declaration that the specific discipline construction

Certificate (DMC) scope has been completed, inspected and accepted as per the
project drawings and specifications and ready for pre-
commissioning.
Drilling The act of drilling a well until it reaches targeted depth.
Facility or Facilities Platform, jacket, topsides, structure, helideck, bridge, pipelines,

onshore facilities, vent boom, crane, other appurtenances and
any items to be incorporated in the project.
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 12 of 155
Final Facilities An official declaration that the facility has been fully
Handover (FFH) commissioned, steady state operations has been achieved,
punchlist has been closed, any carry over or incomplete works has
been detailed and agreement reached on how this will be
managed and that all final documentation has been handed over
to operations.
Final Facilities Handover is normally issued in line wth Notice of

Final Acceptance where the warranty period stipulated in contract
expired. PMT can then be disbanded.
First Oil or Gas A milestone where the project has successfully delivered the
production product to the receiving point for 72 hours uninterrupted and at
agreed available throughput and quality.
However, the definition stated in PSC Terms and Condition or

specified in agreed Facility Performance Test Run (PTR) Procedure
will prevails.
Hook-up The tie-in of all components of the facilities together at offshore

prior to execution of pre-commissioning, commissioning and
start-up.
Initial Facility An official declaration that the facility has been successfully
Handover (IFH) commissioned, steady state operations has been achieved and to
allow for Operations to operate the facilities. PMT can be
demobilize from the facility after IFH and shall arrange for a focal
person supported with minimum crew to cater for punchlist killing
activity and/or finishing up incomplete works.
Installation An act of fixing completed or partially completed pre-fabricated

facilities or equipment during the construction stage.
Integration An act of assembling two or more equipment together before a

particular system can achieve mechanical completion.
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 13 of 155
Introduction of A milestone where operation is allowed to open up wells to

Hydrocarbon supply hydrocarbons for commissioning of hydrocarbon systems.
The commissioning activity might be short or long depending on
facilities complexity. This can only be achieved once PIR04
Category C (significant integrity issue) rating findings are closed
and Pre-Activity Safety Review (PASR) critical findings are closed.
Inspection Test Construction check-sheets forms which will be the basis of

Record–A (ITR-A) Discipline Mechanical Completion (DMC) documentation.
Inspection Test Pre-commissioning check-sheets forms which will be the basis of

Record–B (ITR-B) Ready For Commissioning (RFC) documentation.
Inspection Test Commissioning check-sheets forms which will be the basis of

Record–C (ITR-C) System/ Sub-system Handover (SH).
Mechanical The actual date by which the fabrication/construction works, as

Completion Date stipulated in the contract, are completed, inspected, tested and
(MCD) pre-commissioned by Contractor.
Notice of Final A document to be issued by PETRONAS Carigali within thirty (30)

Acceptance (NFA) working days after completion of the warranty period of the
works and after all repairs, rectification, replacements and making
good thereto have been carried out in accordance with the
contract, and all requirements of this contract have been
satisfactorily met.
This is part of PCSB obligation to issue NFA to contractor as

specified in the contract requirement. PMT should target to align
NFA issuance to Final Facilities Handover.
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 14 of 155
Notice of Provisional A document to be issued by PETRONAS Carigali signifying

Acceptance (NPA) PETRONAS Carigali’s conditional acceptance in accordance with
the CONTRACT, and all requirements of the CONTRACT have been
satisfactorily met; that all known deficiencies identified have been
corrected or subject to qualifications that may be stated in the
Notice of Provisional Acceptance and whereupon the warranty
period shall commence.
This is part of PCSB obligation to issue NPA to contractor as

specified in the contract requirement. PMT should target to align
NPA issuance to Initial Facilities Handover.
Offshore Turnover A document to be issued by PETRONAS Carigali specifying the

Notice works has been properly installed on the designated offshore
platform and the date that custody and legal title of one or more
components of the works has passed from PETRONAS Carigali to
contractor.
Performance Test An act to prove and demonstrate overall plant reliability and
Run (PTR) operability, in accordance with agreed Performance Test
Procedure which shall be depend on available throughput but not
lower than plant turndown ratio.
Pre-commissioning An act of ensuring that the functions and operations of system/

sub-systems are in accordance to the designed purpose and
intended services and meet all applicable specifications,
regulations, codes and standards. On successful completion of the
activity the system/sub-systems shall be ready for commissioning
activities.
Preservation Methods to ensure that equipment, plant, system and areas are
maintained and protected against any external factors and are
preserved as per manufacturer’s recommendations, as a
minimum
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 15 of 155
Punchlist A list of non-completed or non-accepted scope items, that is to be

completed or resolved upon date of verification inspection.
Punchlist Cat-A Punchlist items shall be completed before it is safe to proceed to

pre-commissioning.
Punchlist Cat-B Punchlist items shall be completed before it is safe to proceed to

commissioning.
Punchlist Cat-C Punchlist items shall be completed before it achieved system/sub-

system handover.
Punchlist Cat-D Punchlist items that shall be completed before final acceptance.
Ready for An official declaration that the specific system/sub-system has

Commissioning (RFC) completed Inspection Testing Records-B required and ready for
commissioning.
Ready For Start-up An official declaration that the relevant hydrocarbon system has
(RFSU) Certificate been pre-commissioned and relevant utility/non-hydrocarbon
system have been fully commissioned to allow for safe
introduction of hydrocarbon.
Reliability Test An act to prove and demonstrate facility/system reliability and

operability as specified and agreed in Performance Test Run (PTR)
procedure.
Start-Up Integration of individual systems and introduction of hydrocarbon

to the facilities to initiate Commissioning and Performance Test
Run (PTR) of the facilities. The activities include purging the
system, leak checks, circulation of service fluids and bringing
facilities into productions. The operating parameters are tuned
and de-bottlenecked for optimum plant performance based on
designed parameters.
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 16 of 155
Turnover Notice An official notification that the topside, jacket or floater has
achieved onshore Contractual Mechanical Completion, loaded out
and sea fastened on barge, completed custody transfer
documents and certified safe for sailaway.
Sub-System Functional groupings which can be commissioned and handed
over to Operations independently from the total system.
System Handover Official declaration that the system/sub-system has been

successfully commissioned, achieved steady state and ready for
operation. Signify custodianship transfer of the sub-system from
project to PM/PI. This means that operation shall be responsible
for the operation, maintenance and provision of spares for the
sub-system.
All relevant essential non-hydrocarbon sub-systems shall be full

handover before RFSU, except for hydrocarbon system/sub-
systems (100, 200 and 600) shall be fully handover after RFSU.
Testing An act of examination, trial or proof to prove and validate the

correct and complete execution of the WORKS.
Warranty A written guarantee issued by CONTRACTOR ensuring the quality

of design, manufacturing quality or workmanship, promising to
repair, rectify or make good within a specified period of time.
There are many types of warranty that cover services, materials

and equipment. The terms and conditions of such items is based
on contractual agreements between PETRONAS Carigali and
CONTRACTOR.
Well Completion An act of completing a constructed well with installation of

Christmas tree
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 17 of 155
5.0 Upstream Facilities Handover Procedure
5.1 Handover Philosophy
The fundamental principle of Upstream Project Processes defined within this document
is based upon the Phases and High Level Activities defined in PPMS. The two major
phases covered are Execution Phase and Operation Phase (refer to Figure 1). In
Execution Phase the key activities are construction, testing, pre-commissioning,
installation, drilling, hook-up, commissioning and start-up. Once an upstream facility
has been successfully started up and meeting the acceptance criteria during the
performance test run it is now ready to enter the Operation Phase.
CSP-21 Scope
and Focus
Figure 1. Upstream Facilities Handover Philosophy according to PPMS.
In most cases, the key activities are handled by various contractors depending on the
project’s Overall Contracting Strategy. This increase the complexity PMT having the
overall responsibility towards achieving the project objectives would need to have a
clear handover guideline.
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 18 of 155
5.2 Handover In Project Phases

This handover guideline acts as a project management process to support the technical
requirements stated in CSP-20 (refer to Figure 2). The Inspection Test Records (ITR) are
the supporting documents for handover certificates. The handover would occurred at
system by system basis until to the point of Initial Facility Handover (IFH) and Final
Facility Handover (FFH). The review sessions associated during the handover process
are typically PIR04 and PASR, where it is conducted before the introduction of
hydrocarbon. PMT also has the option to get IFH to be endorsed in FIRC04 and FFH to
be endorsed in FDPRC Closure. As stated in PDP PPMS Way We Work 2013, these two
sessions are recommended.
Figure 2: General Handover Process Flow
5.2.1 Construction Stage

During construction stage, the work progress is monitored by discipline and
facilitated by system as defined in CSP 20 Testing, Pre-Commissioning &
Commissioning Guideline. The check list and records are captured under Inspection
Test Record (ITR) – A for each of the discipline.
Stakeholders:
From – PMT Engineer /Inspector
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 19 of 155
To – Resident Engineer
NOTE: For details please see RACI in Appendix I
Critical Acceptance Criteria for ITR-A to be accepted to issue Discipline Mechanical

Certificate:
1. Consolidated Punchlists (Construction/vendor/materials) have been identified

and recorded in Punchlist Form. ALL punchlist CAT A must be closed.
2. Red-line construction drawings mark-up are available for the specific discipline.
3. Piping – NDT, Hydrotest, Cleaning, Painting, bolt tensioning, proper supports are
completed and ready for reinstatement
4. Mechanical – Installation, tie-in, cleaning, leveling, alignment, balancing are
completed and is ready for solo run
5. Electrical – Cable glanding, termination, meggering (IR)/hi-pot, continuity check
and dressing/support are completed . Panel cleaning, busbar/cable termination
torquing are completed and system is ready for energization
6. Instrument - Cable glanding, termination, meggering(IR), impulse tubing,
continuity check and dressing/support are completed. Panel cleaning,
busbar/cable termination torquing are completed. Instrument device calibration
completed and ready for energization
5.2.2 Pre-commissioning Stage

During pre-commissioning stage, the work progress is still monitored by discipline
and facilitated through system defined in CSP 20 Testing, Pre-Commissioning &
Commissioning Guideline. The check list and records are captured under Inspection
Test Record (ITR) – B for each of the discipline.
Stakeholders:
From – PMT Engineer / Inspector
To – Commissioning Engineer
Critical Acceptance Criteria for ITR-B to be accepted to issue Ready For

Commissioning:
1. Consolidated Punchlists (Pre-commissioning/vendor/materials) have been

identified and recorded in Punchlist Form. ALL Cat-A and Cat-B punchlist for
specific discipline must be closed.
2. Red-line construction drawings mark-up are available for the specific discipline.
3. Piping – Reinstatement and cleaning completed
4. Electrical – Motor solo run completed
5. Instrument – Loop check completed
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 20 of 155
5.2.3 Commissioning Stage

During commissioning stage, the work progress will be monitored by sub-systems as
defined in CSP 20 Testing, Pre-Commissioning & Commissioning Guideline. The check
list and records are captured under Inspection Test Record (ITR) – C for each of the
system/sub-system.
Stakeholders:
From – Commissioning Engineer
To – Operation Representative
Critical Acceptance Criteria for ITR-C to be accepted to issue System Handover:

1. Consolidated Punchlists (Commissioning/vendor/materials) have been identified
and recorded in Punchlist Form. No CAT A, CAT B and CAT C punchlist.
2. Red-line construction drawings mark-up are available for the specific system.
3. Piping – Reinstatement leak test / service test completed
4. Electrical – Load test completed
5. Instrument – Cause and Effect Matrix Test / live deluge test completed
5.3 Project Handover Elements

This guideline is tailored for the Handover of Upstream Facilities, both offshore and
onshore. The dynamic and complication of handover process depends on the
spectrum of stakeholders involved. For an example, a typical offshore facilities would
have fabricator, installation contractor, hook-up & commissioning contractor and
drilling contractor involvement. Handling multiple interface handover would require
a structured system simplified in Figure 3.
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 21 of 155
Figure 3: Typical Upstream Facilities Handover Flow

HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 22 of 155
5.3.1 Discipline Mechanical Completion
Discipline Mechanical Completion (DMC) is an official declaration that the specific

discipline construction scope for the particular system/sub-system has been
completed, inspected and accepted as per the project drawings and specifications
and ready for pre-commissioning. It signifies the transfer between Construction
phase and Pre-commissioning phase.
Stakeholders:
From – Project Construction Engineer (Discipline)

To – Project Commissioning Engineer (Discipline)
Critical Acceptance Criteria to allow Discipline Mechanical Certificate to occur: -

1. Completeness of ITR-A Checksheets to proceed with pre-commissioning (piping
hydrotest, mechanical alignment and levelling, cable continuity and IR check,
instrument calibration)
2. Red line marked-up construction drawings
3. Vendor data (e.g. datasheet, drawings, FAT Report, SAT Report)
4. All discipline Cat-A punchlist for the particular system/ sub-system had been
closed.
NOTE: For ITR-B activity that does not require DMC issuance as a pre-requisite,the
activity may commence directly after the completion of ITR-A, as long as the activity
is safe to be carry out e.g. loop check activity.
The requirement stated below needs to be completed before sail away: -

1. PTI approval from DOSH
2. SISO/ SIPCOM/ SIPROD availability
3. Project Risk Assessment (PRA), Project Independent Review (PIR) and HAZOP
close out
4. Operation HSE Case & CIMAH (If applicable) approved
5. FPSO/ FSO/ MOPU/ FPS requirement closed out and met
6. Malaysian Marine Department (MMD) requirement closed out and met
7. Malaysia Communication and Multimedia Commission requirement closed out
and met
8. Port Health Authority requirement closed out and met
9. Port office requirement closed out and met
10. Helideck Certificate requirement closed out and met
11. Operation concerns met
12. Data population to SAP/ MMS/ BOM are complete and verified by operations
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 23 of 155
5.3.2 Ready For Commissioning
System Mechanical Completion is an official declaration that the system construction

and pre-commissioning scope have been completed inspected and accepted as per
the project drawings and specifications and ready for commissioning. It signifies
custody transfer between Construction and Commissioning.
Stakeholders:
From – Project Construction Manager
To – Project Commissioning Manager/ Project CSR (HUC)
Critical Acceptance Criteria to allow Ready for Commissioning to occur: -

1. Completeness of ITR-B Checksheets to proceed with commissioning (piping
reinstatement and cleaning, pump solo run, instrument loop check)
2. Commissioning Procedure
3. Red-line Marked-Up Drawings
4. Spading and isolation drawing
5. All CAT-A and CAT-B punchlist has been closed.
6. Vendor data (e.g. datasheet, drawings, FAT Report, SAT Report, Operation &
Maintenance Manual)
7. For Hydrocarbon System, RFC shall require PIR04 and PASR close-out.
5.3.3 System/ Sub-system Handover

Official declaration that the system/ sub-system has been successfully
commissioned, achieved steady state and ready for operation. It is also the
commence of operation and maintenance by PM/PI for the particular system. In
offshore facility projects, onshore work optimization strategy shall be the adopted
due to the limitations posed in offshore environment and the higher cost elements in
challenging environment. Henceforth, some non-hydrocarbon utility system can be
commission onshore prior to sail away. To ensure that the system/ sub-system is still
in good condition after installation campaign, the system must go through basic
checks and re-run at normal operating condition.
Stakeholders:
From – Project CSR (HUC)
To – OIM
Critical Acceptance Criteria to allow Sub-system Handover to occur: -

1. Completeness of ITR-C Checksheets to proceed with commissioning
(reinstatement leak test, Cause and Effect Matrix test, service test, load test for
non-HC, live deluge test)
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 24 of 155
2. Agreed on acceptable punchlist for a particular system (Cat-D only) which does
not affect a safe operation of the system.
3. Red line marked-up commissioning drawings
4. Vendor data (e.g. datasheet, drawings, FAT Report, SAT Report, Operation &
Maintenance Manual)
5. All instrument/certificate shall be valid for a minimum 3 months.
5.3.4 Topside / Jacket Structural Handover
Official declaration that the topside / jacket structure has been successfully installed
and ready for operation.
Stakeholders:
From – Project CSR (Installation)
To – OIM/ CSR of HUC
Critical Acceptance Criteria to allow Topside / Jacket Structural Handover to occur:

1. Completeness of Topside / Jacket Structural Handover Certificate
2. Agreed Punchlist with work completion plan
5.3.5 Pipeline Handover
Official declaration that the pipeline has been successfully commissioned.
Stakeholders:
From – Project CSR (Installation / HUC)
To – OIM
Critical Acceptance Criteria to allow Pipeline Handover to occur:

1. Completeness of Pipeline Handover Certificate
2. No Cat-A, B and C punchlist for the installed pipeline
3. Completion of pipeline commissioning
5.3.6 Well Handover
Official declaration that the well construction and well completion scope have been
inspected and ready for well start up.
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 25 of 155
Stakeholders:
From – Company Man of Drilling Campaign
To – Production Team/ OIM
Critical Acceptance Criteria to allow Well Handover to occur:

1. Completeness of Well Construction Checksheet
2. Completeness of Well Barriers Element Report, Well Operating Limit Report,
Manual Operated X-Mas Tree Valves Leak Test Report, Surface Safety Valve Slam
and Leak Test Report and Surface Controlled Subsurface Safety Valve Leak Test
Report
3. Completeness of Well Handover Certificate and Well Handover Checklist
4. Well Bean up / down Sequence Procedure
5.3.7 Total Well Handover
Official declaration that the well start up scope has been successfully completed and
flow as per agreed throughput
Stakeholders:
From – Petroleum Engineer
To – OIM
Critical Acceptance Criteria to allow Total Well Handover to occur:

1. Completion of Well Bean-Up Actvity
2. Wells are operating in stable mode
5.3.8 Platform Turnover
Official declaration that a brown field drilling platform have been handed over from
PM / PI to Drilling and back to PM / PI after completion of drilling activity
Stakeholders:
From – Company Man from Drilling Campaign
To – OIM / Project CSR
Critical Acceptance Criteria to allow Platform Turnover to occur:

1. Captured platform conditions prior to platform handover activity by both party
2. Platform had been reinstated to its original state
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 26 of 155
3. Completeness of Platform Handover Certificate
5.3.9 Ready For Start Up
Ready for Start-up is an official declaration that the relevant hydrocarbon system has
been pre-commissioned and relevant utility / non-hydrocarbon system has been fully
commissioned to allow for safe Introduction Of Hydrocarbon. This official declaration
grants Operations authority to open wells / introduce hydrocarbon to the system
and subsequently allow Commissioning to proceed with commissioning of the
hydrocarbon systems.
Stakeholders:
From – Project CSR (HUC)
To – Operation OIM
Technical Authority:
1. Commissioning TP / Authorised Snr. Commissioning Engineer (Subsea Engineer
for Subsea System)
2. Operations TP or Authorised Operation Engineer
Critical Acceptance Criteria to allow RFSU: -

1. All relevant system / sub-system handover (non-hydrocarbon system) and RFC
certificate (hydrocarbon system) have been signed off by PMT and Operation.
2. Consolidated Construction / Vendor / Commissioning Punchlist is attached.
3. Initial Facility Start-up Procedure and Positive Isolation/Spading
4. Facility Performance Test Run (PTR) Procedure. Ramping up and tuning will be
covered in the procedure.
5. Pre-Start-up PIR has been done and closed-out
6. Pre-Activity Safety Review (PASR) has been done and closed-out (Includes Line
Check)
7. Completed Matrix Safety Shutdown Test for SIS / FGS together with DCS
8. Firewater system is functioning with live deluge test conducted
9. All instrument/equipment certificate is valid for minimum 3 months.
10. Purging activity completed with Oxygen content <4%
11. Red line mark-up drawings issued to Operation
12. List of MOC
13. RFSU certificate sign off by respective parties and OIM
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 27 of 155
5.3.10 Initial Facility Handover
Initial Facility Handover is an official declaration that the facility has been
successfully commissioned as per Project Specific PTR Procedure and as per Project
Specific Handover Procedure, achieved steady state operations to allow for
Operations to operate safely and achieve sustainable production. Initial custody
transfer of facility from P&E to PM / PI, where punchlist freezed at system handover
compiled and the point of warranty claim/ defect liability claim shall follow. P&E
PMT can be demobilized from the facility and maintained lower scale of resources to
close all the punchlist or remaining work. Refer Appendix II- for the sample of Initial
Facility Handover Certificate.
Stakeholders:
From – GM Regional Project
To – PM / PI Region Country Head
NOTE: Different levels of LOA for brownfield and greenfield.For details please refer
RACI in Appendix I
Critical Acceptance Criteria to allow Initial Facility Handover to occur: -

1. All relevant System Handover, Well handover, Pipeline Handover, and Structural
/ Jacket Handover Certificates have been completed and sign-off by
Commissioning & Operations (exception for systems that was identified to be
done later).
2. Consolidated Punchlists (construction / commissioning / vendor / materials)
have been identified, recorded in Punchlist Form and attached with System
Handover Certificates.
3. Initial Handover Certificate is sign-off by Project and Operations.
4. Agreed punchlist for the facility and detail plan to complete the WORKS.
5. 1st Hydrocarbon has been achieved
6. Live ESD test has been conducted
7. Performance Test Run (PTR) for equipment / train / facility has been completed
(exception for facility that has feedstock / hydrocarbon constraint or export
commitment with gas buyer) and agreed by both parties.
8. Remaining start-up & operating spares have been handed over to operations
9. Endorsed by FIRC 04 (Project Close Out & Handover)
The handover parties shall also ensure the completion of the close-out report
detailing the preliminary close-out as well as the Project’s Lessons Learned (PLL). The
requirement for FIRC04 will be PMT’s call, aligning with PDP PPMS Way We Work
2013 where FIRC04 is an optional review gate.
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 28 of 155
5.3.11 Final Facility Handover
Facility Final Handover is an official declaration that the facility has been fully
commissioned, steady state operations has been achieved and to allow for
Operations to operate the facilities. It signifies the final custody transfer of facility
from P&E to PM / PI, and marks the end of the role of P&E PMT. The Final Facility
Handover Certificate shall be issued at the end of warranty period.
An official handover ceremony between P&E GM Projects and P&E GM Assets should
be conducted with the presence of both P&E and PM / PI SGM. This final handover
shall involve the Commissioning and Operations Technical Authority.
Stakeholders:
From – P&E Head
To – VPPM / VPPI
NOTE: Different levels of LOA for brownfield and greenfield For details please see
RACI in Appendix I
Technical Authority:
Commissioning TP / Authorised
Snr. Commissioning Engineer (Subsea Engineer for Subsea System)
Operations TP or Authorised Operation Engineer
Critical Acceptance Criteria to allow Final Facility Handover to occur: -

1. All System Handover Certificates have been completed and sign-off by
Commissioning & Operations.
2. No punchlist for the entire facility (unless agreement have been achieved with
Operations for special cases)
3. Completion of baseline IP for pipeline
4. Final documentation as per CSP-03
5. Final Handover Certificate is sign-off by Project and Operations.
6. Reliability (endurance) test has been completed for all systems
7. Performance Test Run (PTR) for equipment/train/facility has been complete
(applicable for system in IFH exclusion)
8. Warranty duration coverage has expired.
9. Endorsment by FDRC Closure
NOTE: The requirement for FDRC Closure Seating will be PMT’s call, aligning with PDP
PPMS Way We Work 2013 where FDRC Closure is an optional review gate.
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES PAGE 29 of 155
5.4 Application of Handover Process
The following subsections shall describe in details the handover procedure for each
type of facility.
5.4.1 Topside and Floater Handover Process
Topside and floater structures generally consist of living quarters, gas processing,
storage, drilling, and riser facilities. These groups of facilities are normally fabricated
at the onshore fabrication yard, transported to offshore location, installed, hooked-
up, commissioned and started-up.
The generic topside handover process flow during construction stage onshore is as
Figure 4 below. If the commissioning activity can be completed for the sub-system
before sail away, the system handover will occur at offshore prior to RFSU, but
operation representative will be requested to be available for witnessing of the
commissioning activity to smoothen the sub-system handover offshore.
Figure 4: Typical Topside Construction Handover Flow
At these project phases, the handover usually involves three independent party;
(1)fabricator; (2)load-out contractor, and; (3)transportation and installation
contractor. However, if they are in single entity, the point of activity risk ownership
transfer is called turnover instead, to signify an internal handover process.
The generic floater handover process flow during construction and commissioning
stage in the shipyard is as Figure 5 below. The commissioning activity for the marine
system must be completed prior to sail away and sub-system handed over to
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
operation. Other non-marine sub-system can be completed after sail away, only if
the activity unable to be completed prior to sail away.
Figure 5: Typical Floater Construction and Commissioning Handover Flow
The generic topside handover process flow during hook up and commissioning stage
offshore is as Figure 6 below. Non-HC sub-system is required to be System / Sub-
system Handover (SH) before RFSU, while HC sub-system is required to achieve
Ready For Commissioning (RFC) before RFSU and System / Sub-system Handover
(SH) after RFSU.
Figure 6: Typical Topside Hook Up and Commissioning Handover Flow
Take note that this is applicable for sub-systems that is required for RFSU. If other
sub-systems are not available on time and not required for RFSU or in other words,
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
does not jeopardize the safe operation and production, RFSU can still occur. The
requirement for Start-up shall be specify in details in the following documentation
and agreed by PMT and PM/PI:
 Project Specific Handover

 Project Specific Testing, Pre-Commissioning & Commissioning Procedure
 Project Specific Performance Test Procedure
 Project Specific Initial Start-Up Procedure
System / sub-system Handover (SH) also signifies the acceptance of PM / PI on a

particular sub-system and hence PM / PI shall be operating and maintaining the sub-
system. For a Greenfield project, the facilities control transfer point from PMT /
Contractor to PM / PI is at issuance of RFSU Certificate, where it signifies the
commence of operational activity. However, the responsibility of completing and
executing the works in safely manner shall still remains on PMT / Contractor until
Final Facilities Handover.
Meanwhile, for a brownfield project the risk ownership remains on PM / PI whilst

having PMT / Contractor is responsible to complete and execute works in safely
manner.
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
5.4.2 Jacket Handover Process
A jacket is a fixed offshore structure that acts as the foundation of topside.

Fabrication of a jacket is done onshore, transported and installed offshore. The
generic jacket handover process flow is depicted in Figure 7 below. The jacket
handover process is structural scope, and as such does not require commissioning to
be carried out and can be handed-over directly to operation before Transportation &
Installation contractor demobilise from location so that monitoring and maintenance
program can start immediately.
Figure 7: Typical Jacket Handover Process Flow
5.4.3 Pipeline Handover Process
Pipelines are installed and pre-commissioned in-situ. However, the commissioning

activity will be carried out together with topsides and/or onshore terminal.
Therefore, the pre-commissioning requirement would depend on the project
strategy and sequence, whether the pipeline to be purge and preserved with
nitrogen or filled with inhibit water.
A third party contractor might be required during pipeline commissioning to assist in

the operation (e.g. export to receiving platform/onshore terminal). This could only
commence once the connecting system, such as launcher and receiver system is
hook-up and acheived RFC state. The generic pipeline handover process flow is
shown in Figure 8 below.
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
Figure 8: Typical Pipeline Handover Process Flow
For typical pre-commissioning of gas pipelines, where dewatering and drying is

required, a turnover from offshore installation to HUC would be needed to allow
riser tie-in activity with the launcher / receiver prior to the commencement of pre-
commissioning activity (dewatering & drying).
5.4.4 Well Handover Process
This well handover process covers the wellhead, well and subsurface equipment. A
well is constructed through drilling activity until it reaches the target depth. Well
completion then takes place before it is tested for leak tightness. The generic well
handover process flow is presented in Figure 9 below.
The handover of the facilities such as Wellhead, subsurface accessories and

subsurface equipment, upon work completion, will be handed over to PM / PI for
both brownfield and greenfield regardless of the timing. HUC contractor will need to
liase with PM / PI to ensure the wellhead is safe for well tie in activity. This is to
ensure a smooth handover transition by having the appropriate technical expertise
to assess the work. This also will allow PM / PI team to gain historical information
required for immediate operation prior to final documentations submission. The
production team from PM / PI shall be assisted by Well Integrity Team for technical
supports. Additionally, the open-up of the well during RFSU shalll be assisted by the
Sub-surface team, advising the bean-up procedure to ensure reservoir performance.
Simultaneous Production and Drilling (SIPROD) preparation is required to be carried

out prior to drilling rig arrival for brownfield or for greenfield that is not designed for
SIPROD mode. Conversion to/from SIPROD mode is usually performed by HUC
contractor.
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
Figure 9: Typical Well Handover Process Flow
For brown field, operation is required to carry out joint line walk with drilling team to
establish the condition of the platforms handed over to drilling. The line walk shall
cover the process condition (i.e. which facilities have been depressurized, drained,
flushed and etc) and the condition of facilities (i.e. cleanliness, handrail, lighting pole
etc.). This exercise is to identify any repair, rectification or reinstatement work to be
made good by Drilling team prior to drilling rig being demobilised from location. This
is one of the criteria for the platform to be handed over back to operation / PMT
again (applicable to both green and brown fields).
Typically for brownfield projects, the facilities owner are PM / PI thus, custody
transfer of the platform for SIPROD preparation activities is between OIM and HUC
CSR and during rig entry / demob is between OIM and Drilling Supervisor. Facilities
owner shall be the point of custody transfer of the facilities between HUC CSR and
Drilling Supervisor.
However, for greenfield projects, the custody transfer party would depend on the rig
entry and rig demob timing. Typically during rig entry, the platform is still under
project custody and therefore the stakeholders for facilities handover is between
HUC CSR and Drilling Supervisor. Meanwhile, the rig demob usually occurs after the
introduction of hydrocarbon and henceforth, the platform handover shall follow
brownfield mode i.e. between Drilling Supervisor and OIM. In the event of rig demob
prior to the introduction of hydrocarbon, the platform handover could occur
between HUC CSR and Drilling Supervisor.
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
5.4.5 Subsea Handover Process
Subsea system is normally installed in deepwater field. The topside subsea package
(TUTA,HPU, EPU,MCS) is installed. The subsea installation package includes the
umbilical, manifold, jumper, Subsea Control Module (SCM). Installation work will be
carried out by the Transportation and Installation contractor, while subsea Christmas
tree / wellhead installation is done by drilling. Therefore, the pre-commissioning
works will be done together with topside since it cannot be done independently. The
generic subsea handover process flow is shown in Figure 10 below.
Figure 10: Typical Subsea Handover Process Flow
5.4.6 Onshore Facilities / Terminal Handover Process
An onshore gas or crude oil terminal is constructed, tested, pre-commissioned,

commissioned and started-up at location, or may include offsite fabrication for
modularised and packaged equipment. The handover process of an onshore terminal
is illustrated in Figure 11 below.
Figure 11: Typical Onshore Terminal Handover Process Flow

HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
6.0 General Requirement
6.1 Leadership & Commitment

The key success factors to ensure the smooth transition and handover of
upstream facilities from projects to operations are visible leadership from
PETRONAS Carigali Management and commitments from various key
stakeholders within P&E Division’s project personnel, PM / PI and
contractors. The leadership should inspire, motivate and empower the
Project Management Team (PMT), In-house Service Providers and Field
Management to deliver the target performance in all matters related to
handover of upstream facilities.
The roles and responsibilities of each stakeholders were further simplified

inside the Upstream Facilities RACI Matrix (refer Appendix I).
 “R” represents Responsible meaning people who perform an acitivity and

responsible to fulfill the acceptance criteria. Responsible parties must
sign-off on the Milestone or Handover Certificate.
 “A” represents Accountable meaning person who is ultimately
accountable for the acceptance of activity. Accountable person must sign-
off on the acceptance column of the Milestone/Handover.
 ”C” represents Consult meaning people whose input is used to complete
the task where it involves a two way communication.
 “I” represents Inform meaning people who are informed as to the status
of the task where it involves a one way communication.
6.1.1 Project & Engineering Head
During project execution, Project & Engineering Division is the owner of the
project and therefore, P&E Head would be accountable for the overall
success of Facilities Handover from P&E to PM/PI. This is done through
business strategic directions to ensure facilities final handover criterias are
fulfilled prior to issuance and acceptance of Final Facilities Handover (FFH)
Certificate. Typically, the FFH would be issue post FDRC06 and FFH would be
endorsed by the FDRC Committee.
6.1.2 Project Head
All projects under P&E Division is monitored by the Project Head and
performance is usually measured through cost and schedule. On top of that,
handover acceptance by PM / PI shall also be a part of measurement for a
project’s quality. Therefore, he / she shall ensure all projects under P&E
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
Division had successfully achieved smooth handover process prior to project

close-out.
6.1.3 Region Head (Project)
As the Project Owner, Region Head shall be accountable to ensure the PMT
had fulfilled their KPI in implementing Handover Procedure effectively. In
addition, the Region Head shall ensure that the acceptance criteria for Initial
Facilities Handover (IFH) and Final Facilities Handover (FFH) are met before
issuing the handover certificates through operational strategic directions.
6.1.4 PMT
One of the PMT’s KPI is to implement the handover successfully with various
party during the project execution phase and the transition to operation
phase. This is done through the establishment of project specific procedures
recommended in this guideline coupled with engagement sessions with
various stakeholders in a periodic manner. The key success of facilities
handover is a positive relationship with stakeholders supported by good
documentations of the project’s deliverables. The key project personnel
involved in the handover of upstream facilities and their respective roles and
responsibilities are described below.
6.1.4.1 General Manager (Project)
 Accountable for the overall success of Facilities Final Handover from

P&E to PM/PI
 Responsible to ensure final handover criteria are fulfilled through the
issuance of Final Facilities Handover Certificate
 Responsible to liaise with P&E in ensuring smooth handover from P&E
to PM / PI
6.1.4.2 Project Manager
 Main driver for the successful handover of project’s facilities from

project to PM / PI
 Oversee the implementation of the Handover of Upstream Facilities
process including Smooth Start-Up Programme
 Responsible to liaise with Field Manager in ensuring facilities
handover requirements are fulfilled through the issuance of Initial
Facilities Handover Certificate
 Responsible in ensuring facilities final handover requirements are
fulfilled prior recommendations to General Manager Projects to issue
Facility Final Handover Certificate
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
6.1.4.3 Head of Facilities
 Coordinate and interface between various parties and assist Project

Manager to drive smooth Handover process throughout project
implementation phase and operations transition phase
 Responsible for assurance of smooth start up procees during RFSU
stage in project execution
6.1.4.4 Drilling Manager
 Shall be informed during the Drilling and Completion Stages in

ensuring well handover requirements are fulfilled
 Shall be informed during well start-up activities to assist total well
handover by providing technical support and operational assistance
6.1.4.5 Subsea Team Leader
 Shall be consulted during Initial Facilities Handover of brownfield

projects involving Topside / Floater facilities from Projects to
Operations
 Shall be informed throughout the entire process of subsea activities
starting from Subsea Installation, followed by Well Installation /
Testing using IWOCS, Offshore Hook-up, Pre-commissioning and
Commissioning & Start-up to ensure smooth transition across each
stage and to assist for the successful completion of system handover
6.1.4.6 Construction CSR / Resident Engineer
 Accountable for the successful transition between construction, pre-

commissioning and commissioning stages
 Responsible to liaise with Commissioning Manager to ensure that
System Handover requirement are fulfilled through issuance of
System Handover Certificate and any equivalent certificate
6.1.4.7 Installation Engineer / CSR
 Responsible to liaise with OIM / PMT CSR during the Offshore

Installation stage in ensuring jacket and topside installation scopes
are completed through the issuance of Jacket Handover Certificate
and Topside Turnover Certificate respectively
 Responsible to liaise with OIM / PMT CSR during the pipeline
installation stage in ensuring pipeline installation scopes are
completed through the issuance of Pipeline Handover Certificate
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
6.1.4.8 Hook-Up & Commissioning CSR
 Accountable for the successful transition between construction, pre-

commissioning, commissioning, start-up and operation stages
 Responsible to liaise with Construction Manager or Resident Engineer
in ensuring Discipline Mechanical Completion requirement are
fulfilled prior acceptance of Discipline Mechanical Completion
Certificate
 Responsible to ensure that system is ready for commissioning
Handover requirement are fulfilled through issuance of System
Handover Certificate and any equivalent certificate
6.1.4.9 Construction Engineer
 Responsible to Construction Manager during the construction stage

and liaise with Commissioning Engineer in ensuring System Discipline
Acceptance requirements are fulfilled through the issuance of System
Discipline Acceptance Certificate
 Responsible during the pre-commissioning stage in ensuring System
Mechanical Completion requirement is fulfilled prior to
recommending to Construction Manager to issue System Mechanical
Completion Certificate
6.1.4.10 Commissioning/ Hook-up & Commissioning Engineer
 Responsible to Construction Manager during the construction stage

and liaise with Construction Engineer in ensuring System Discipline
Acceptance requirements are fulfilled prior to acceptance of System
Discipline Acceptance Certificate
 Responsible to Commissioning Manager during the pre-
commissioning stage in ensuring System Mechanical Completion
requirement is fulfilled prior recommendation to Commissioning
Manager to accept System Mechanical Completion Certificate
 Responsible during the Commissioning Stage and liaise with Offshore
Installation Manager (OIM) in ensuring system handover requirement
is fulfilled through the issuance of System Handover Certificate
 Responsible prior to Facilities Start-up and liaise with OIM in ensuring
Ready for Start-up (RFSU) is achieved through the issuance of
Introduction of Hydrocarbon / Start-up Notice
 Responsible during Start-up to rectify any leaks, carry-out fine tuning
and liaise with OIM in ensuring first oil or gas target and
 Requirements are achieved through recommending to Project
Manager to issue First Oil or Gas Declaration
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
 Responsible during the performance test in ensuring the facilities

initial handover requirements are fulfilled through recommending to
Project Manager to issue Facility Initial Handover Certificate
6.1.4.11 Discipline Engineer
 Accountable to ensure successful transition between construction,

pre-commissioning, commissioning, start-up and operation stages
 Shall be consulted throughout various stages of project execution
starting from pre-commissioning to commissioning and start-up based
on technical expertise in equipment or system design based on
respective discipline
6.1.4.12 Drilling Supervisor / Engineer
 Responsible to liaise with OIM during the Drilling and Completion

Stages in ensuring well handover requirements are fulfilled through
the issuance of Well Handover Certificate
6.1.4.13 Interface / Subsea Engineer
 Responsible to liaise with Commissioning CSR in ensuring subsea

installation and integration scopes are completed through the
issuance of Discipline Mechanical Completion and Sub-system
Handover Certificate for subsea system respectively
6.1.4.14 Inspector
 Responsible to ensure that all checksheets for construction are

fulfilled in accordance with CSP-20 prior issuance of Discipline
Mechanical Completion (DMC)
 Responsible to ensure that all checksheets for commissioning are
fulfilled in accordance with CSP-20 prior issuance of Ready for
Commissioning (RFC)
6.1.4.15 P-Tech
 Shall be consulted during well handover to ensure smooth handover

for well construction and completion activities
 Shall be consulted during Offshore Well Installation / Testing using
IWOCS activities to etablish Discipline Mechanical Completion (DMC)
for subsea portion
 Responsible in ensuring total well handover for well start up activities
by providing technical support and operational assistance
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
6.1.5 VPPM
As the acceptance party of the facilities, VPPM shall be accountable for the
overall success and smooth Facilities Handover from P&E to PM/PI without
jeopardizing the division business goals. This is done through business
strategic directions to ensure facilities final handover criterias are fulfilled
prior to issuance and acceptance of Final Facilities Handover (FFH) Certificate.
Typically, the FFH would be issue post FDRC06 and FFH would be endorsed by
the FDRC Committee.
6.1.6 ORSA (Operation Readiness Strategy & Assurance)
ORSA team are PM / PI representative during project execution and

henceforth shall be ensuring the interests of PM / PI team are protected.
ORSA shall ensure that relevant and competent representatives are always
available to participate in meetings, discussions, trainings and testing activity
at the earliest phase of the project. The main function of ORSA is to ensure
smooth and safe handover of the facilities between PMT and PM / PI team.
ORSA representative shall ensure effective two-way communication is
established with the intended operation team.
6.1.7 Production Malaysia / Production International
In Handover process, PM / PI is the overall acceptance party for the facilities.

The handover process was structured based on system / sub-system to help
the team to have a smooth transition. This approach will allow ample time
for PM / PI team familiarise with the facilities and to build up the team
capacity over time. In principal, step-by-step custody transfer occur during
System / Sub-System Handover (SH) and the full handover of the facilities
commence at Initial Facilities Handover (IFH). The following are the key
personnels accountable for smooth facilities handover from P&E to PM / PI.
6.1.7.1 Region / Country Head

 Accountable for Initial Facility Handover (IFH) acceptance from Project
Manager for Greenfield Projects
 Accountable for Final Facility Handover (FFH) acceptance from Project
Manager for Brownfield Projects
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
6.1.7.2 Head of Production Department
 Responsible to liaise with Project Manager in ensuring facilities

handover requirements are fulfilled prior to acceptance of Initial
Facilities Handover Certificate
 Responsible in ensuring facilities final handover requirements are
fulfilled prior to recommending to General Manager Operations to
accept Facility Final Handover Certificate
6.1.7.3 Offshore Installation Manager (OIM)
 Responsible during the Commissioning Stage to liaise with

Commissioning CSR in ensuring system handover requirements are
fulfilled prior to acceptance of System Handover Certificate
 Responsible to liaise with Commissioning CSR prior to Facilities Start-
up in ensuring Ready for Start-up (RFSU) is achieved prior to
acceptance of Introduction of Hydrocarbon / Start-up Notice
 Responsible for overall facilities start-up operations. Initiate PASR for
start-up. Liaise with Commissioning CSR in ensuring first oil or gas
target and requirements are achieved prior to recommending to
Project Manager to issue First Oil or Gas Declaration
 Responsible during the performance test run in ensuring the facilities
initial handover requirements are fulfilled prior to recommending to
Field Manager to accept Facility Initial Handover Certificate
 Responsible in ensuring well handover requirements are fulfilled prior
to acceptance of Well Handover Certificate
 Responsible in ensuring jacket and topside installation scopes are
completed prior to acceptance of Jacket Handover Certificate and
Topside Turnover Certificate respectively
 Responsible in ensuring pipeline installation scopes are completed
prior to acceptance of Pipeline Handover Certificate
6.1.7.4 Operations / Maintenance Supervisor
 Responsible to Platform / Terminal Superintendent/ OIM during the

Commissioning Stage to liaise with Commissioning CSR in ensuring
system handover requirements are fulfilled prior to acceptance of
System Handover Certificate
 Responsible to Platform / Terminal Superintendent/ OIM in ensuring
Ready for Start-up (RFSU) is achieved prior to acceptance of
Introduction of Hydrocarbon / Start-up Notice
 Responsible to Platform / Terminal Superintendent/ OIM for facility
start-up operations and liaise with Commissioning CSR in ensuring
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
first oil or gas target and requirements are achieved prior to

recommending to Project Manager to issue First Oil or Gas
Declaration
 Responsible to Platform / Terminal Superintendent / OIM during
performance test run, well handover and jacket, topsides & pipeline
installation in ensuring all requirements have been fulfilled prior to
the acceptance
6.1.7.5 Field Engineer
 Shall be responsible to give input during early stage of the project and
provide technical support to field operators in commissioning and
start up works
6.1.7.6 DisciplineEngineer (DE) / TA
 Shall be consulted throughout various stages of project execution

starting from pre-commissioning to commissioning and start-up based
on technical expertise in equipment or system design based on
respective discipline
 Act as a technical supports for OIM during reviews and PASR to ensure
technical integrity in terms of design and work executions
(procedures).
6.1.7.7 Structural Engineer / TA
 Shall be consulted upon acceptance of topside/jacket structural

handover from projects during offshore construction and installation
activities
6.1.7.8 Pipeline Engineer / TA
 Shall be consulted Prior to Ready For Commissioning (RFC) Stage for

Pipeline Installation and Pre-Commissioning activities.
 Shall be consulted upon system handover of Pipeline during
Commissioning and Start Up activities
6.1.7.9 Operation Technician
 Shall be consulted throughout various stage of project execution to

provide technical support and ensure smooth transition of project
precommissioning stage to ready for commissioning stage
 Responsible for approval of ITR-C checksheets upon fulfilment of the
acceptance criteria agreed between projects and PM / PI
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
6.1.7.10 Well Integrity Engineer / TA
 Shall be consulted during various well handover stages starting from

Well Construction and Completion until pre-commissioning stage
followed by well start up activities
 Well Integrity Engineer shall provide input or technical support in
order to ensure smooth transition of project handover across each
stage
6.1.8 Contractors
Contractor is responsible to deliver the facilities as per the contract

requirements. Detailed roles of individual key personnel in a project shall be
clearly stated in the project specific handover procedure and shall be in line
with the roles and responsibilities of PCSB’s Development in ensuring the
facilities are constructed, commissioned and handed-over to PCSB’s
Operations safely and smoothly.
6.1.8.1 Fabricator / Construction Contractor
 Responsible to fabricate items as per design specification in order to

achieve successful transition of projects from Discipline Mechanical
Completion (DMC), followed by Ready for Commissioning up until
System Handover
 Responsible to install, precommission and commission equipment /
package in fabrication yard and optimize work completion at onshore
 Accountable to complete scope of work as per contract and complete
punchlist killing activity prior to sail away
6.1.8.2 Transportation & Installation Contractor
 Responsible for the successful installation of topside, jacket and

subsea facilities as per design specification to achieve structural
handover
 Responsible for the Installation and Pre-commissioning of pipeline
from riser to riser to achieve Ready For Commissioning
 Responsible to complete scope of work as per contract and remove
any temporary installations prior to turnover / handover or
demobilization from site
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
6.1.8.3 HUC / Commissioning Contractor
 Responsible for the successful completion of Hook-up, Pre-

Commissioning and Commissioning & Start-up of Onshore and
Offshore facilities to achieve system handover
 Responsible for the smooth transition of project starting from
achievement of Discipline Mechanical Completion (DMC), followed by
Ready For Commissioning (RFC) until System Handover and Readiness
For Start-up (RFSU)
 Shall be informed during the Initial Facility Handover stage for
brownfield and greenfield activities
 Responsible of housekeeping of work area at all times and adhere to
PCSB requirement on HSE
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
6.2 Commissioning and Start-Up (CSU) Team

During the introduction of hydrocarbon, the project would require a combination of
skilled resources from PMT and PM/PI. PMT would have the technical expertise in the
facilities or equipment design and fully supported with manpower leak check and
rectification works (if required). PMT would also be responsible to provide support for
special equipment through Vendor Field Service Representative (FSR). Meanwhile,
PM/PI would provide skilled resources in Operation and handling hydrocarbons. The
combination of both resources would lead to a successful start-up (see Figure 12).
Figure 12. Generic Commissioning and Start-up Organization Chart
Typically during Start-up and beyond, OIM would be the lead at site where it is his / her
responsible to control all activity on the platform and his jurisdiction is extended to 500
meter radius from the platform. At this stage of the project, PETRONAS Permit To Work
is fully enforced and managed by PM/PI Team. This is done to ensure the safety of the
facilities, people and environment once hydrocarbon is introduced. Henceforth, HUC
CSR shall be reporting to OIM for any works to be executed on the facilities.
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
6.3 Point of Responsibility Transfer

It is a known fact that oil and gas facilities are complex and consist of several process
system or sub-systems. The ideal case of clean slate acceptance for an oil and gas
facilities often does not meet the business requirement. Henceforth, to achieve the
Company’s goal and business values both Project and Asset must work hand-in-hand
and ensure a smooth transition between the Project Phase and Operational Phase.
Figure 13. Responsibility Demarcation for Greenfield Project
After the acceptance of System Handover (SH), Asset would accept the responsibility
to operate and maintain (O&M) the system/sub-system. The commencement
depends on the type of system and commissioning sequence for the facilities. All
non-hydrocarbon system required for Start-Up shall achieve System Handover and
thus, the transfer of care and responsibility commence before Ready For Start-Up
(RFSU). In other hand, all hydrocarbon system required for 1st Hydrocarbon would
acheived SH after RFSU. Punchlist for each system shall be freezed at System
Handover to avoid OPEX scope creep. Henceforth, any findings after System
Handover shall be treated as defect list where warranty claims process applies and
shall be in line with project’s approved Defect Liability Period Refrence.
On the other hand, the control of the facilities would be handover to operation
during RFSU. This is the point where the facilities are fully controlled by the Asset
Team whilst Project Team leads the commissioning activities. Although the point of
transfer occurred as early as System Handover, the initial overall facility transfer
between PMT and PM/PI will only occur after the fulfilment and acceptance of Initial
Facilities Handover Certificates. After the achievement of IFH, the PMT team could
demobilize the marine spread from location and a smaller team and resources would
be assigned to closed the agreed punchlists. For system/sub-system that is planned
to be handed over prior to RFSU, it is recommended that the effective date of
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
System Handover shall be aligned with RFSU acceptance date to ensure smooth
project delivery.This however, is not necessarily applicable for marine system and
accommodation of FSO/FPSO as most of the system are expected to be up and
running prior to sail away. These system can be handed over upon readiness for sail
away.
The overall facility transfer between Project team and Asset team will only occur
after the fulfilment and acceptance of Final Facility Handover Certificates. This
includes the completion of remaining works, closed all punchlist items, the expiry of
warranty period and solving defect/ warranty claims during warranty period. It also
signifies the accomplishment of project’s scope and the end of PMT’s custodianship
on project delivery.
Similar principal applies to brownfield except for the control of the facilities, which
remains under Asset’s team during the entire project phases.
Figure 14. Responsibility Demarcation for Brownfield Project

HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
6.4 Commissioning and Start-Up Related Procedure

To ensure a smooth start-up and handover, it is recommended that the PMT develop
the following project specific procedure:
 Commissioning and Start-Up Philosophy

 Project Specific Handover Procedure
 Testing, Pre-Commissioning and Commissioning Procedure for each sub-system
 Commissioning Execution Plan
 Facility Performance Test Run
 Initial Start-up Procedure (inclusive of Ramp-Up Procedure and Inerting
Procedure)
These procedures shall be reviewed and approved by the main stakeholders for
handover, which are PMT and PM / PI representatives. The Level of Authority for these
live documents is listed in table below.
Procedures Reviewed By Endorsed By Approved By

Commissioning and PMT Commissioning ORSA
Project Manager
Start-Up Philosophy Engineer Representative
Project Specific
PMT Commissioning ORSA
Handover Project Manager
Engineer Representative
Procedure
Testing, Pre-
P&E Technical
Commissioning and Discipline Engineer
Authority (DCHD) &
Commissioning & Commissioning PMT CSR
PM/PI Technical
Procedure for each Engineer
Authority1
sub-system
Commissioning PMT Commissioning
ORSA Head of Facilities
Execution Plan Engineer
PMT Commissioning P&E Technical
Facility Project Manager
Engineer Authority (DCHD)
Performance Test
PM/PI Technical
Run OIM Head of Production
Authority
Initial Start-up PMT Commissioning
OIM HUC CSR
Procedure Engineer
NOTE:
1: PM/PI Technical Authority is only for Commissioning Procedure
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
6.4.1 Commissioning and Start Up Philosophy
Each project shall prepare a specific Commissioning and Start Up Philosophy

procedure during FEL-3 by FEED engineering company. As a guideline, the
procedure shall consist of the following TOC as a minimum: -
Item Topics Description
1 Introduction  Brief description of the project

 List facilities applicable for the project (ie
number of platforms, numbers of wells,
number of pipelines)
2 Project Specific  Definition of 1st. Oil/Gas – covers how

Definition and constraint many wells available for 1st. oil, agreed
throughput, delivery point etc.
 Initial Handover plan – indicate agreed
strategy with operation target timing,
target production, performance test
condition any constraint that disallowed
project to fully compliance to design
requirement i.e due to long drilling
campaign, unavailability of gas etc.
 Any agreement that operations would take
over some portions of the project scope
3 Commissioning & Start  Organization Chart

Up (CSU) Manpower  Roles and Responsibility
Management  RACI Chart (Responsibility, Accountability,
Consult and Inform Chart)
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
4 Commissioning & Start  Discipline Mechanical Certificate

Up (CSU) Handover  Ready for Commissioning
System & Schedule  System Handover
 Topside / Jacket Structural Handover
 Pipeline Handover
 Well Handover
 Total Well Handover
 Platform Handover
 Ready For Start Up
 Initial Facility Handover
 Final Facility Handover
5 Training Development  Training/ Course Requirement and

Program Manuals for operation
 Trainings schedule and number of pax with
the discipline required
6 Procedure Development  List of Site Specific Procedures and

drawings that is required (includes the
below procedure): -
o Project Handover Procedure
o Development of Operation and
Maintenance Manual
o Project Specific Testing, Pre-
commissioning & Commissioning
Procedure
o Project Specific CSU Execution Plan
o Facility Performance Test Run (PTR)
o Initial Start Up Procedure (including
startup sequence and different
start up sequence scenario)
o Trainings / Course Requirement
and Manuals for operation
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
7 Vendor Support and Mob  List of Vendor

Plan Procedure  Vendor Call-Out Matrix (Vendors required
Development Program during installation, Pre-Commissioning
and Commissioning)
8 Site Commissioning  Site mob date

Requirement:  Aligned with Commissioning Sequence
 Vendor Field Site Representative scope of
-Vendor Support and
work for each call out, such as: -
Mob Plan
o No. of personnel
o Qualification of personnel
(discipline)
o Duration and schedule
o Work scope
o Vendor Procedure & Checklist
o Special Tools
o Logistics & Accommodation terms
and condition
9 Site Handover  Spare Parts

Requirement  Warranty Terms and Condition (include
preservation requirement for systems not
in operation)
 Commissioning Sequence
10 Project Specific Handover  Indicate any specific initiatives that project

Initiative would embark to further enhance
handover process such as computerized
Completion Management System, online
construction & commissioning tracking
system (i.e. Win PCS)
 Premium Warranty Terms and Condition
(include preservation requirement for
systems not in operation)
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
6.4.2 Project Specific Handover Procedure
Each project shall prepare a specific handover procedure for their project as
recommended below during detail design by engineering company. As a
guideline, the procedure shall consist of the following TOC as a minimum: -
Item
Topics Description
1 Introduction  The Introduction will refer on the procedure
objective, scope, and listed party involved in
the handover activity
 The objective of which is to give clear
instructions for the activities to be carried
out to handover the facility by stages
2 Handover Battery Limit  Details on the boundary of the particular

& Systemization project, system and subsystem
 The major and critical items of equipment
involve should also be included.
3 Handover Process Flow  General Process flow

 Process Flow for each system/ sub-system
4 Acceptance Criteria for  Acceptance Criteria agreed by both party

each Certificate/ System/ must be feasible during project execution
Sub-System
5 RACI Matrix  List out all RACI assignments up to personnel
designation.
 ‘Responsible’ and ‘Accountable’ person
MUST be one party ONLY for PCSB
personnel.
6 Reference Drawings  Reference drawing shall be in reference to

relevant documents and discipline drawings
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
6.4.3 Testing, Pre-Commissioning and Commissioning Procedure for each

sub-system
Each project shall prepare the procedure below during detail design by
engineering company. As a guideline, the procedure shall consist of the
following TOC as a minimum: -

1 Introduction  The Introduction will refer on procedure; its
system coverage and how commissioning
activities is to be implemented
 The objective of which is to give clear
instructions for the activities to be carried
out to complete the commissioning activities
2 Commissioning Scope of  Commissioning Scope of Work will cover the

Work boundary of the particular subsystem and its’
description
 The major items of equipment involve should
also be included.

relevant documents and discipline drawings
4 Safety  All safety measures shall be strictly adhered

to, so as to avoid injury or endanger the life
of the personnel concerned
 All testing equipment to be used must be
certified by authorized parties and with “IS”
certification whenever hydrocarbon is
present
 Permit to Work and JHA must be prepared
and approved prior to test execution
 Proper inter-discipline cooperation and
coordination shall be practiced
 Pre-job planning and discussion shall take
place prior to every commencement of work
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
5 Offshore Vendor Support  The Offshore vendor support shall be

provided from the start of construction &
hook-up, through to the end of performance
testing and acceptance by operations
 Number of personnel should be determined
based on project requirement. As a
minimum, vendor shall provide the
following:
o Detail scope of Work and Schedule
o Manpower mobilization plan for
Technician/Specialist
o Site Acceptance Test (SAT) procedure
and acceptance criteria
o Special tools and any temporary
equipment requirements
6 Tools and Test  Only safe and PETRONAS certified tools and
Equipment equipment applicable for commissioning
work shall be allowed for use by the
Contractor
7 Commissioning Spare  Applicable spare parts and first fill shall be

Parts/First Fill provided by Contractor in accordance with
contractual obligations
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
8 Offshore Pre-Start-up  Ensure that Permit to Work (PTW) system

/Pre-Commissioning has been reviewed and is it in place prior to
Checks commencement of work
 Confirm/Verify that the required function /
pre-commissioning check have been
completed
 Verify the system is in fully operational and
ready for commission.
 Perform functional test for related
equipment.
 Perform Controlled logic functional test:-
 Check the control logic sequence in
comparison to schematic.
 Perform instrumentation loop check
including Cause and Effect matrix.
 Perform test for simulated failure of normal
power supply and confirm alternative supply
available.
9 Commissioning Detailed commissioning procedures shall be

developed by the Contractor’s commissioning
team and shall contain the following:
 Reference Documents
 Marked-up P&ID’s indicating system limits
 Check sheet matrix
 Spading & Isolation plan
 Step-by-step instructions with sign-off
column
 Data record sheets
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
10 Endurance and A specific Endurance Test shall be performed

Performance Test on all newly installed equipment as per CSP20
requirement, such as pumps and package
units, following the commissioning phase.
Sample of critical parameters and snap shots
from the DCS should be attached for reference
(Appendix XII)
 FAT report / References

Manufacturer shall issue the following as a
minimum:-
 Record of test including log of field
parameters
 Analysis
 Punch lists
 Essential documents related to
preservation requirement, handling, and
3rd party endorsement (if required)
 Training (Contractor is responsible to
organize for class room and in-site training
for company’s operation personnel)
11 FAT report/Reference
12 Training
13 Appendices
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 58 of 155
6.4.4 Commissioning Execution Plan
Each project shall prepare the procedure below during construction stage. As
a guideline, the procedure shall consist of the following TOC as a minimum: -
Item
Topics Description
1 Background  The background refers to project overview,
status update and the number of sub-system
available for the Facilities including
remaining sub-system to be handed over
after first gas acquisition.
2 Manpower Staffing  The manpower staffing should be kept to a

minimum level during Start-up and
Commissioning of Hydrocarbon system to
reduce Safety Risk exposure to personnel.
3 Start-up and  Start-up and Commissioning Schedule will

Commissioning Schedule encompass how the CSU work is to be
executed in stages or sequence, the
mobilization schedule for vendor and third
party support requirement, preparation for
Introduction of Hydrocarbon and
Commissioning of Hydrocarbon system / sub-
system.
4 References  References is to be made to CSP-21 for

Upstream Facility Handover Procedure
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 59 of 155
5 Acceptance Criteria  All equipment / system and facilities shall be

commissioned to the maximum practical
extent in order to verify the systems and
equipment function and perform according
to design specifications
 The HUC contractor shall arrange to provide
the acceptance criteria for accepting the
equipment as commissioned and ready for
start-up. Example of Pre-commissioning:
Alignment & Levelness Check
 The parallel and angular alignment of

shafts will be within 0.002 inch or
otherwise specified in vendor dossiers
Diesel Firewater Pump
 Perform simulation test for Engine

Controller to verify status indication
alarm, starting and shutdown function.
 Perform Engine Test run to verify the
following functions:
 Local / Remote manual Starting.
 Automatic Start due to low
firewater loop pressure or remote
signal from the Deluge System.
 Lead / Lag Operation.
 Conduct a 4 hours continues test run
and record all data at half hour
intervals.
6 Close-out Report  Construction/Hook-Up Completion
Certificate
 System Handover Certificate
 RFSU
 Outstanding Works Punch List
 Project Final Documentation
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 60 of 155
7 Appendices  System Handover Status

 Manpower Staffing Information
 Start-up and Commissioning Schedule
 Spading and Isolation Plan with cross
reference to drawings, i.e., P & ID, Isometric
drawing
6.4.5 Facility Performance Test Run (PTR)
1 Scope of Report during  The equipment / packages to be tested at

this Facilities site and their performance data
Performance Test Run  Test procedures necessary to validate the
(FPTR) performance data and log-sheets required to
collect and to record all significant
parameters
 Requirements for instrumentation,
laboratory facilities and necessary to conduct
the tests on site
2 Assumptions  State conditions available during the

commissioning and start up activities (i.e.
quantity and quality of HC)
 If the quantity and quality differs from the
design condition, a new “Test Run Process
Simulation Report” shall be produced by
process team
 Performance Data expected during the
commissioning and start up activity
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 61 of 155
3 Overall Approach for the  General Requirements

execution of the  Performance Test Duration
Facilities Performance  Data Recording and Frequency
Test Run  Required Instrumentation
 Required Laboratory Facilities
 Performance Test Procedure for the
equipment / packages that is covered under
the FPTR scope
 Facilities Performance Test Run Report
 References to applicable SAT
 Collected data (forms)
 Comparison Table between site and
performance values
 Conclusions & Recommendations
 Attachments (any mentioned documentation
will be attached, except for documents that
have already their own numbering system, to
be cross referenced
4 Data Collection and  Completed proposed log-sheets

Recording
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 62 of 155
6.4.6 Initial Start-up Procedure
1 Introduction  Introduction refers to the overview of

procedure; its system coverage and how
initial start-up activities are to be
implemented. The objective of which is to
give clear instructions for the activities to
be carried out to complete the initial start-
up activities as well as to reduce Safety
Risk exposure to personnel.
 Start-up checklists encompass the
description of systems and sub-systems for
Initial Start-Up. ( i.e. Tag No, Description,
Line No, P&ID No, Valve Position)
2 Start-up checklist /  Start-up checklists encompass the

procedure description of systems and sub-systems for
Initial Start-Up. ( i.e. Tag No, Description,
Line No, P&ID No, Valve Position)
3 Start-up sequence  Start-up sequence embodies the general

steps required during start-up activities.
 Each step represents specific instructions
for start-up activities with respect to each
subsystem that is required prior to
handover.

relevant documents and discipline
drawings
5 Appendices  Tables of Operating Parameters &

Emergency Shutdown
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 63 of 155
6.5 Commissioning Computerized Completion Management System

(CMS)
Commissioning Completion Management System (CCMS) is a computerized online tools

to manage, track and verify the system completion from construction, pre-
commissioning, start-up, commissioning till handover to operation. The system records
the testing documentation, punchlist, procedures, drawings, technical assurance review
findings close-out and preservation requirement for each stage to ensure that it is safe
to proceed from one stage to the next stage of project completion.
The completion stages shall follow CSP21 procedure in which addressing the
requirement for Discipline Mechanical Completion (DMC), Ready For Commissioning
(RFC), Ready For Start-Up (RFSU), System Handover, Initial Facility Handover (IFH) and
Final Handover (FH).
The system definitions, procedures and Inspection Test Records (ITR) shall be in line with
CSP20 requirement. The system contains hierarchical database from facilities,
areas/modules, system, sub-system, sub-sub system, equipment and components with
tag. no. The development of the database shall start latest during detailed design and
shall be updated based on the latest drawings and vendor data throughout the
subsequent project phases.
The system shall be assessable at contractor commissioning, QA/QC, construction and

client offices and be able to view real time progress. Level of accessibility shall be pre-
defined and protected by password.
The following list outlines the minimum functional requirements of CMS that
CONTRACTOR shall provide:
 Standard Functionalities
a) Ability to adopt full set of CSP20 check sheets and Walk Down Checklists for
all disciplines for Construction, pre-commissioning and Commissioning
b) Capability to create certificates when systems completion has been achieved

as per CSP21 (DMC, RFC, SHO, RFSU, IFH, FFH)
b) Completion and Commissioning shall be integrated within the application and

allow allocation to individual tags requiring the check either manually, by tag
function or by collection of tags
c) Capability to view System / Sub-system tag relationships as well as area tag

relationships and establish these and new relationships rapidly
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 64 of 155
d) Capability to create or use standard reports. This includes the Discipline /

System Mechanical Completion Status, Ready For Commissioning Status,
System Handover Status, Punch List status, Overall Systems Completion
progress, preservation status reportsand administrative reports for data
management
f) Capability to associate commissioning procedures to Subsystems and System

alike
h) Capability to start, maintain and retain Preservation activities and allocate

preservation check sheets to any tagged item
i) Capability to bridge work methodologies from “by area” to “by systems”

completions processes
j) Capability to allow multiple views into the same organized data – by area, by
system, by Subsystem, by discipline, by skid, by device type etc.
k) Data-import utility to import engineering data quickly from various

engineering tables or databases
l) System should be capable of issuing Mechanical CompletionCertificates when

all A-Check sheets, all preservation, and all outstanding Punch Lists have
been completed. This also applies to the other stages
n) Capability to create Milestone Completions records with specific collection of

discipline components or Subsystems that represent stage completion
o) Capability to create and manage Punch Lists raise during construction. Pre-
commissioning and commissioning / start-up. This should include reports on
Punch List completion and progress. An integrated Punch List management
system is desired
p) Major reports are to include the MC Status Index Reports, Punch List Reports,
Project Mechanical Completion and Commissioning Checklists, Progress
reports and flexibility to add custom reports
q) Specific reports shall also include loop completion status, pipe test
completion status and leak test completion status
r) User friendly Graphical User Interface providing multiple hierarchical views

by Facility / Area / System / Subsystem / Module / Package, etc., with report
options at each hierarchy level
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 65 of 155
 Punchlist
a) Ability to capture and store walk-down check lists and punch items with
picture
b) Capability to clear, verify and dispute punch list items online via intranet or
internet from different jobsites/geographic work locations
c) Capability to trigger for Punch List required verification to inform client
d) Capability to trigger to stop user Issuing certificates if punch items and check
sheets are still outstanding
e) Capability to trigger for overdue punch items daily to designated person /
punch coordinator
f) Capability to store or link any attachment such as drawings, documents and
photo
g) Capability to send daily progress reports automatically via email to
designated person at specific time
 Hardware & System

a) Redundant Server shall be provided by contractor to store& safeguard the
system database
b) System shall be web-based application and can easily be accessed and ability
to handle multiple Jobsites/geographic work locations in a collaborative
system through common web browser such as Internet Explorer or Firefox
c) System shall be protected by hierarchical level of passwords to support the
system functionality
d) Check-sheets shall be bar-coded and system shall capable to scan the check-
sheets and update the progress accordingly
 Optional Functionalities
a) Capability to export final Equipment and Tag data and create data export
queries for subsequent import into the Company Computerized Maintenance
Management System (CMMS)
b) Capability to create Request for Inspection (RFI) and print associated check
sheets for inspection work. This capability may be created and recorded
electronically
c) A single database integrated system for Factory Acceptance Test (FATs),
Punch Lists, Preservations, Pre-Mechanical Commissioning, Commissioning,
and Start-up procedures thereby maintaining a complete dossier against each
Commissioning System
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 66 of 155
d) Capability to link with Construction and Pre-commissioning Work Packages

or construction execution contractors’ project management system or
planning system in order to manage milestones
e) Capability to manage and create reports for the Project Warranty Claims
System
f) Capability to create Inspection Test Plan (ITP) and print associated check
electronically
g) Capability to create Request for Acceptance (RFA) and print associated check
electronically
h) Capability to Track RSPL (Recommended Spare Parts Lists)
i) Welding Monitoring – This is to monitor the status of all the NDT records of
each weld for a particular isometric lines grouped under a line lists making up
the hydro-test packs. The endorsement of the NDT records within the
proposed hydro-test pack together with approval of all other specified
inspection and test records would allow the hydrotest to proceed
j) Job Cards Development – This is pre-commissioning job for each tag detailing
out the tasks; manhours; manpower required; checksheets required; QA/QC
requirements; JSA etc.
k) It is also a Turnover tool set up to allow Turnover and Acceptance completion
status to be received and sent from the Fabrication Yards / Project Sites to
the main Project server located at the site and Home Office across the
Project internet system. Current information must be available in all these
locations
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 67 of 155
6.6 Key Elements for Safe and Smooth Start-up and Handover
Smooth Start-up Program (SSP)is a PETRONAS initiative that is mentioned in PETRONAS
Project Management System (PPMS) Commissioning and Start-up Management
Manual. It aims to achieve the followings: -
 Safe start-up and operation
 Early Start-up
 Sustain production with minimize trips, interruptions, shutdown
 Early Steady State Operation
 Smooth handover
The intent of SSP covers Front End Development phase until Start-up and Normal
Operation phase as below. It states both the responsibility of PMT and Operations to
make it work: -
Figure 15: Timing of SSP
The implementation schedule is as below: -

HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 68 of 155
Figure 16: SSP Implementation Schedule Overview
There are 6 main components of SSP: -
Figure 17. SSP Framework

HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 69 of 155
6.6.1 Operation Implementation Manual (OIM)
The objective of this component is to establish proper communication

pertaining to commissioning start up and acceptance criteria early on during
the project. Part of the purpose is to: -
 It aligns project and operation team
 Secures the understanding of operation roles and responsibility during
project phase and secures understanding of project roles and
responsibility during commissioning start up and operation phase
 Share and establish Key Success Areas to ensure smooth start up
PCSB can implement this in order to improve our current commissioning start
up practice. This can be done by developing the commissioning and start up
related procedures mentioned in Section 6.2.
6.6.2 Flaw Identification Exercise (FIE)
The objective of this component is to identify potential flaws and mitigation

that will affect Key Success Areas. In PCSB we have a series of audits being
practiced that captures HSE, Operations, and maintenanceand technical
inputs such as the below: -
 Project Risk Assessment / Cost Risk Assessment / Schedule Risk
Assessment during Project Basic Design stage
 7 sessions ofLine Department Review (LDR) from Conceptual Design
Engineering until load out stage excluding HAZOP and HAZID review
 4 sessions of Project Independent Review (PIR) from pre-Issue To Bid (ITB)
to pre-start up stage
 Testing, pre-commissioning and commissioning inspection according to
CSP 20 during construction and commissioning execution stage
6.6.3 Health Check
The objective of this component is to see that the gaps identified by OIM /
FIE is closed out. This is equivalent to close out of Project Risk Assessment /
Cost Risk Assessment / Schedule Risk Assessment / LDR / HAZOP / HAZID /
PIR / punchlist for PCSB.
6.6.4 Smooth Start Up Execution Plan
The objective of this element is to establish verification process and

systematic ways for systemised commissioning approach. The below table
are activities that are carried out in PCSB to ensure SSP KSA elements are
addressed: -
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 70 of 155
QA/Safety
Procedures/
SSP Elements Description Assurance Activities
References
Involved
The ability of a  Hydrotest  CSP-13 Bolt
system to contain  Bolt Tensioning Tightening
the process medium  Leak/Reinstateme Procedure
from leaking in nt Test  CSP-20 Testing &
between process Pre-Commissioning
units, systems, Line check & valves Guideline
equipment and/or line-up prior to start-  FSP-XX-T21 Valve
leaking to up Leak Test
Tightness
environment. Piping, Procedure
flanges, valves,  FSP-XX-24
vessels, columns, Hydrotest/Flushing
rotating equipment, Procedure
instruments, pumps  FSP-XX-T25
and compressors Reinstatement Test
casing, relieve valves, Procedure
etc
Cleanliness In general the Piping cleaning :  FSP-XX-24
removal of debris, Hydrotest/Flushing
dirt, foreign  Water Flush Procedure
materials from piping  Chemical cleaning  FSP-XX-T23
and process  Steam flush Chemical Cleaning
equipment. This  Lube Oil Flushing Procedure
includes removal of
water pocket and
gas/air pocket from
low loop and high
elbow respectively
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 71 of 155
Integrity Mechanical– No loss E&I :  CSP-T20 Testing &

of containment from Pre-Commissioning
pipes &  Continuity / cold Guideline
equipmentRotating– loop check  Commissioning
No loss of  Cable IR test Procedure
containment by  Tubing (impulse  Start-up &
operating at correct line) leak test Operation
characteristics.Instru  Loop Check Procedure
ment– Correct  Matrix Shutdown 
performance of Test
control systems such
as process control Mechanical :
loops, safe guarding
system. No nuisance  Alignment
alarmsElectrical–  Reinstatement
Electrical distribution Leak test
systems and system  Line check
components such as
motors, motor
control systems
correctly
functionOperations–
Operating team not
operating beyond
design envelop or
safe limit window.
Relieving system is
adequately designed
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 72 of 155
Operability The rapidity and ease  HAZOP  HAZOP Report

in effort to get and  Line Check
maintain a functional
system. Examples
are:-
 Reaching out for

valve wheel,
emergency push
button
 Accessibility to
pumps, drains,
vents, ESDV
 Rapidity of lining
up system after
upset.
Scaffoldings
and/or open
trenches are
often blocking
the way
 Critical in time to
response during
emergency
HSE The requirement is  ERP  HUC Workpack
to put in place the  PTW
necessary health,  PPE
safety and  HAZID
environment
precautions and  JHA
system to avoid
incidents. Hazards to
personal health are
also managed
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 73 of 155
Maintainability The availability of  Maintainability  Maintainability

personnel, space, Study Study Report
appropriate tools  RAM
and parts to carry-  Operating spares
out the repair work availability
of critical equipment  Mechanical
so that the operation catalog
is not interrupted.  Spare parts list
 Consumables list
The specifications
and rate for
consumables are
determined and
available.
Prototypes Any process system,  Engineering

piece of equipment, Review
or component in a  Class-room &
piece of equipment Hand-on
which has not been Training/Exposure
used commercially in  FAT
at least two similar
applications.
Complexity Any function of  Engineering  Mechanical

which the operation, Review catalog/Vendor
the function or the  Involvement in Data
internal mechanics is Pre- Final
not obvious to an Comm&Comm Documentation
experienced  Involvement on
operator and that FAT
would require him to  Training
consult documents
like plant/equipment
manuals and
drawings for full
understanding of it
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 74 of 155
Competency Skills and experience  People  HUC Contract

are required to lead development & Document
and deliver the recruitment
activities. Need to  Putting right
take into account people at the
resource availability right position
Coinciding Result of planned  SIMOP  HUC Workpack
Events and unplanned  SIPCOM
behavior of the  SIPROD
organisation and
facilities in which
several activities
occur at same time
typically in a day
period
Data Data and information  Maintenance  CSP-04
management required for Management  PMCS
managing System Data
computerised population
maintenance  Completion
management system Management
for spare parts and System
work order e.g.  Final
equipment documentation
specifications, 
quantity, vendor
data, etc
Organization Group of competent  Project  Project PEP
personals has clear Organisation
line of reporting Chart
structure and  Start-up Org-
responsible. Single Chart
point responsibility  Line of Visibility
for overall activities  LOA
is clearly defined
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 75 of 155
Additional Requirement for Smooth Offshore HUC Execution: -
Reference(Ensure
Elements Description Impact requirements are
captured)
Detailed  PEP  Minimize  HUC Contract
Planning  Organisation Chart WOM Document
 Job Cards  Minimize WOP  HUC Engineer
 Detailed schedule (Level Handbook
5/6)  CSP-07
 Man-power loading Shiploose/
 Detailed MTO/Shiploose Packing
List Procedure
 Tools/Equipment List  HUC Workpack
 Consumables list
 Marine spreads selection
Effective  Logistic coordinator –  Minimize  HUC Contract

Logistic Support people & materials WOM Document
 Liaison with custom,  Minimize WOP  HUC Workpack
immigration, port/airport  Minimize
authorities WOW
 Adequate & reliable
marine spreads available
 Optimized planning i.e.
early notification to
vendors schedule & early
preparation of OSP
 Synergized operation
with nearby activities i.e.
operations/ drilling
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 76 of 155
Maximize  Commissioning all  Minimize  Fabrication

Onshore systems to the fullest WOM Contract
Commissioning extent to minimize  Minimize WOP Document
offshore work i.e.   CSP-T20 Testing
duration and cost for & Pre-
offshore vs. onshore is commissioning
approx. 3-6 times more. Guideline
(Due to limited work  PSP-T18 Project
space, limited/expensive Detailed Testing
accommodation, limited & Pre-
lifting/equipment, prone Commissioning
to weather condition, procedure
logistic constraint etc.
 Early detection of
problem and ample time
to rectify/wait for parts
lead time
repair/replacement and
much easier to mob
technical support
onshore.
Early  Senior operation  Minimize  Project Execution

Operation/Com representative (s) as part Rework (Early Plan
missioning of project team, starting incorporation
Involvement at FEL-3 Full Time of operation
 Senior operation requirement.
personnel involved in  Avoid last
FEL-2 minutes
changes –
 Senior HUC engineer WOM & WOP
involved in FEED and  Capturing
detailed design on part hook-up and
time basis start-up
requirement in
design
Note:
1. WOM – Wait On Materials

2. WOP – Wait On People
3. WOW – Wait On Weather
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 77 of 155
6.6.5 Commissioning Risk Assessment (CRA)
The objective of this component is to identify the potential risk and

mitigation action associated with commissioning activities. The inputs can be
taken from Commissioning Procedure / Operation and Maintenance Manual.
These documents are reviewed and commented during the audits mentioned
in Section 9.2 Flaw Identification Exercise (FIE).
6.6.6 Operational Readiness Assessment (ORA)
The objective of this component is to assess status of preparation for

commissioning. In PCSB we have Operation Readiness and Operations
Readiness & Strategic Assurance (ORSA) Department to handle interface
issues between project and operation.
6.7 Warranty
Warranty is a means to protect Company interest through a written guarantee
where Contractor is providing assurance on their deliverables quality. The
deliverables can be a form of service, materials or equipment. However, warranty is
bounded by terms and conditions stated in the contract such as:
 The time period (usually limited to 12 months after Notice of Provisional

Acceptance)
 Type of guarantee i.e. factory warranty, fabrication warranty, workmanship
warranty, design warranty, etc. (usually based on fault base principle)
 Battery limit of warranty for Company Supplied Items installed and
commissioned by Contractor
6.7.1 Warranty Scope
Issues related to process after NPA is not covered under warranty, nor
equipment wear and tear issues occurred during operation, misuse or
operating not as per design intended.
6.7.2 Warranty Call Out Process
The below is the Warranty Claim methodology where it is clearly demarcate

the actions required by the originator, Warranty Claim Focal Person,
Contractors and Vendors. PMT shall appoint a Warranty Claim Focal Person
until project has acheived Final Facilities Handover (FFH). The process flow is
as per Figure 18 below and assisted with Warranty Call-Out Forms in
Appendix III.
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 78 of 155
Figure 18. Warranty Call Out Process
A typical contract would govern for a 12 month warranty from the issuance of
Notice of Provisional Acceptance (NPA). Only at the end of the warranty period, the
contract holder would issue Notice of Final Acceptance (NFA). In the case of a valid
warranty claim and components are replaced, an extension of 12 month warranty
shall be given for the replaced component.
To ensure a smooth close out of the project, the Project Engineer shall ensure an
alignment between NPA and IFH. Similarly goes to NFA and FFH. Bare in mind that
NPA and NFA is a declaration of work completion as stated in the contract between
Contractor and Contract Holder. Meanwhile, IFH and FFH is a declaration of work
completion between Project and Asset, where any dispute or complications in this
handover process would be escalated to the higher management. Such alignment
would reduce project risk through risk transfer method. Thus, the warranty
duration shall cover until the acceptance of FFH.
For cases where CSP21 is included as part of ITB documents for projects with single
contractor, IFH shall be issued after NPA issuance and FFH shall be issued after NFA.
In the event that commissioning and start-up work is delayed beyond the warranty
period, PMT shall ensure an alternative method (e.g. transfer risk through premium
warranty period or mitigate risk through sparing) is adopted based on the project’s
priority on Iron Triangle (i.e. schedule, cost and quality).
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 79 of 155
Based on this principle, PM/PI shall ensure that the maintenance contract is
established before IFH in order to have a smooth handover. PMT shall declare the
warranty expiry date for all contracts/ purchase order to PM/PI.
6.8 Operation Change Request (OCR)

Operation requests for changes shall be freeze at the completion of Detail Design of the
facilities. However, if there are any requests or comments after Detail Design stage, the
requests must go through a stringent process of OCR.
Requestor would need to fill up and submit the form to an appointed focal person from
P&E PMT. The focal person shall verify wether the request is within Project’s scope by
referencing it to Design Basis Memorandum. Bare in mind, that changes in scope or
design philosophy is governed by MOC procedure.
Figure 19. Operation Change Request Methodology
OCR Committee consist of decision makers i.e. leadership team from both P&E (GM
Regional) and PM/PI (Region/Country Head). The committee’s objective is to ensure that
the requests is aligned with Company’s priority and business value. At the end of the
convention, the committee would need to:
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 80 of 155
 Approved or rejected the request for changes

 Decide the division that shall borne the cost (CAPEX or OPEX)
 Decide on the timing to execute the chage
 Decide the action party to execute the changes (if approved)
To assists the committee on making the right decision, the originator or requestor shall
present a proposal paper to the committee, which should be at minimum consist of:
 Background
 Change Request
 Concern on the request
 Proposal
 Risk Assessment (Before & After)
 Cost & Schedule Assessment (Endorsed by Project Planner)
 Recommendation
OCR Focal person shall be appointed to coordinate committee seatings and facilitate
requestor or originator through OCR Form in Appendix IV.
6.9 Spare Parts

Spare Parts are interchangeable parts that is kept in an inventory and used for
replacement or refurbishment of existing faulty parts. As specified by the PTS there
are four types of spares namely Commissioning Spares, Insurance Spares, Initial 1
year Spares and 2 years Operating Spares. Commissioning spares are required for
commissioning of the plant which shall be made available during the course of
commissioning and start-up. Commissioning spare list shall describe make, model
and the quantity of units to be supplied for each spares. These spare parts include
spares for equipment supplied by supplier that may be damaged or lost during
construction activities. All commissioning spares that are not utilised shall be
converted into initial operating spares and handover at the end of start-up.
Commissioning spares shall be procured by PMT utilizing the allocated CAPEX budget
as stated inside the Spare Parts Responsibility Demarcation (refer to Figure 20).
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 81 of 155
Type of Spares Budget Procured By Remarks

Commissioning Spares CAPEX PMT -
Insurance Spares CAPEX PMT Spares to be identified in
DBM
Initial One Year Operation OPEX PMT/ If PMT to procure, it will be
Spare Operation back charge to OPEX
Second Year Operation OPEX Operation PMT to deliver SPIR List
Spare upon project MCD to Asset
Figure 20. Spare Parts Responsibility Demarcation
For insurance spares, spares are to be identified inside the Design Basis
Memorandum (DBM) . These Insurance Spares are to be prepared as a contingency
for such cases there are any failure or upsets to the existing parts of an equipment.
Initial one year operation spares are spares that exist during the first year of
operation after System Handover. For greenfield projects, the initial one year
operation spares are being procured by the PMT due to unavailability of OPEX cost
allocation prior to first hydrocarbon. However, these initial one year operation
spares will later be back charge to OPEX. Second years operating spares are spares
that are make available upon completion of the initial one year operation. PMT is
required to deliver SPIR List during detailed design to Asset, enable the team to
procure these items on time.
Figure 21. Overview of Commissioning, Initial and Operating Spares

HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 82 of 155
Point of responsibility and scope demarcation of spares are clearly spelled out inside
the overview of Commissioning, Initial and Operating Spares (refer to Figure 21). For
commissioning spares, project team is held responsible for the readiness and
availability of the spares prior to start-up utilizing the project budget. For the initial
one year spares followed by subsequent two years operaiting spares, operations
team is accountable for the readiness of the spare parts utilizing the stock /
maintenance budget which will only be introduced after the introduction of
hydrocarbon for greenfield projects.
6.10 Punchlist
Punchlist is a list of non-completed or non-accepted scope items, that is to be

completed or resolved upon date of verification inspection. There are four category
of punchlist which are;
Cat – A Punchlist items shall be completed before it is safe to proceed to pre-

commissioning
Cat – B Punchlist items shall be completed before it is safe to proceed to

commissioning
Cat – C Punchlist items shall be completed before it achieved system/sub-

system handover
Cat – D Punchlist items that shall be completed before final acceptance

HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 83 of 155
7.0 Records
7.1 Handover Certificates

7.1.1 Discipline Mechanical Completion Certificate
7.1.2 Ready for Commissioning Certificate
7.1.3 System/ Sub-System Handover Certificate
7.1.4 Platform Handover Certificate
7.1.5 Ready For Start-Up (RFSU) Certificate
7.1.6 Initial Facility Handover (IFH) Certificate
7.1.7 Final Facility Handover (FFH) Certificate
7.1.8 Jacket Mechanical Completion Certificate
7.1.9 Platform Structure Handover Certificate
7.1.10 Pipeline Mechanical Completion Certificate
7.1.11 Pipeline Handover Certificate
7.1.12 Well Construction Checklist
7.1.13 Well Barrier Element
7.1.14 Well Operating Limit
7.1.15 Well Handover Certificate

Space for
DISCIPLINE MECHANICAL
CONTRACTOR logo COMPLETION CERTIFICATE
Space for Contract Number and Contract Title
A GENERAL
Contract No/Title
Work Order
Work Order No
Title
Sys No Sys Desc
Discipline Location
Reference
Drawings
B DISCIPLINE ACCEPTANCE
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT
1) The specific DISCIPLINE for the SYSTEM has been fully constructed, inspected and accepted as per Project Drawings and
Specifications to the extent that the SYSTEM/SUB-SYSTEM is now ready for DISCIPLINE precommissioning.
2) All test /check sheets have been compiled into a Discipline Acceptance Dossier attached to this certificate.
3) There is no outstanding work or anything on the Punchlist that shall compromise the safe execution of DISCIPLINE
precommissioning of the SYSTEM/SUB-SYSTEM.
By virtue of the above, PCSB Commissioning accepts the above SYSTEM/SUB-SYSTEM and henceforth shall be responsible
for the DISCIPLINE Pre Commissioning of the SYSTEM. Acceptance of the SYSTEM/SUB-SYSTEM by PCSB Commissioning
does not relieve the CONTRACTOR of his responsibility to fully comply with his contractual obligations such as but not limited
to clearing the Punchlist.
C PUNCHLIST
D NOTES
CONTRACTOR PCSB
SIGN OFF Presented by Reviewed by Reviewed by Accepted by
CONSTRUCTION COMMISSIONING CONSTRUCTION COMMISSIONING
Name
Contractor Contractor PCSB Construction PCSB Commissioning

Designation
Construction Commissioning Engineer Engineer
(Discipline) (Discipline)
Signature
Date Signed
Space for READY FOR COMMISSIONING
CONTRACTOR
logo CERTIFICATE
A GENERAL
Contract No/Title
Work Order No Work Order Title
Facility Name Facility Owner
B HAND-OVER
1) The SYSTEM/SUB-SYSTEM had been fully precommissioned and ready to undergone commission activity.
2) There is neither outstanding work nor any Punchlist that shall compromise the safe commissioning of the SYSTEM/SUB-
SYSTEM as per approved Commissioning Procedure.
3) All temporary equipment had been remove and if the commissioning activity is designed with the assistance of temporary
equipment, the temporary equipment installation and checks had been conducted and declared safe and suitable for
commissioning activity.
4) The site is clear of hazards and positive isolations/ LOTO (if required) is in place.
5) System boundary had been clearly demarcated and the activity had been announced.
6) Exclusions and exceptions listed below does not jeopardize the safe commissioning of the SYSTEM/SUB-SYSTEM.
By virtue of the above PCSB acknowledge the readiness of SYSTEM/ SUB-SYSTEM for commissioning activity. However, this
does not relieve the CONTRACTOR of his responsibility to fully ensure the safety of personnel, equipment and environment
during Commissioning activity. CONTRACTOR shall comply with his contractual obligations such as but not limited to clearing
the Punchlist.
C EXCLUSION/ EXCEPTIONS/ NOTES
No Description Reference Doc.
D SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
CONTRACTOR PCSB
SIGN OFF
Presented ByCONTRACTOR Reviewed ByPCSB PMT Accepted by PCSB OPERATIONS
Name
Operations/ Maintenance
Designation Contractor Representative HUC Engineer
Supervisor
Signature
Date Signed
Space for SYSTEM/ SUB-SYSTEM
CONTRACTOR
logo HAND-OVER CERTIFICATE
A GENERAL
Contract
No/Title
Work Order
Work Order No
Title
Sys
Sys Desc Location
No
Reference
Drawings
B SYSTEM HAND-OVER
1) The SYSTEM has been fully commissioned and its performance proven against the approved Acceptance Criteria.
2) All test / check sheets and required documents have been compiled into a System Acceptance Dossier attached to
this Certificate.
3) Special tools, equipment, and surplus commissioning spares if any have been handed over to PCSB PM/PI
4) By virtue of the above PCSB PM/PI accepts the handover of the SYSTEM/ SUB-SYSTEM and henceforth shall be
responsible for the operation and maintenance of the SYSTEM.
5) This acceptance by PCSB PM/PI does not relieve the CONTRACTOR of his responsibility to fully comply with his
contractual obligations such as but not limited to clearing the Punchlist.
6) The liability from this point herewith would be based on “Fault Base Principle” and full control and custody of the
SYSTEM/ SUB-SYSTEM is transferred to PCSB PM/PI
7) The exclusion listed below shall NOT compromise the safe operation and production by PCSB PM/PI and has been
agreed upon by both party.
C LIST OF AGREED EXCLUSIONS
No. Descriptions Reference Doc.
CONTRACTOR PCSB
SIGN OFF
Presented By CONTRACTOR Acknowledged By PCSB PMT Accepted by PCSB PM/PI
Name
Designation Contractor CSR PCSB Commissioning CSR OIM
Signature
Date Signed
Space for
CONTRACTOR PLATFORM HANDOVER CERTIFICATE
logo Space for Contract Number and Contract Title
A GENERAL
Platform Location
Project
Handover From Handover To
Platform Owner
Work Description
B
DE-
SYSTEM DRAIN FLUSH PURGE ISOLATE OPERATIONAL REMARKS
PRESS.
Process Line
Wellhead
Process Pump/
Compressor
Gaslift
Vent/ Drain
Process Utilities
Oil Treatment
Diesel Fuel
Instrument Air
Power
Material Handling/
Crane
Pipelines
Control (PMCS)
FGS/ SIS
Caisson
Others
C PLATFORM HANDOVER (please strikethrough wherever applicable)
1) The PLATFORM has been jointly inspected, properly preserved/ reinstated and found in a satisfactory condition to the
extent that the PLATFORM is now ready for Drilling/ Operation.
2) Handover Checklist and other supporting documents to indicate the status of the PLATFORM are attached to this
certificate.
3) There is no outstanding work or Punchlist that shall compromise the safe Drilling of the PLATFORM.
By virtue of the above, PCSB DDR/ PCSB PM/PI/ PCSB PMT accepts the above PLATFORM and henceforth shall be
responsible for/ had completed the Drilling activity of the PLATFORM.
Acknowledged By
SIGN OFF CONTRACTOR Agreed By PCSB, DDR PCSB PMT/
PCSB PM/PI
Name
Designation CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE COMPANY MAN OIM/ PMT CSR
Signature
Date Signed
Space for READY FOR START-UP(RFSU)
CONTRACTOR
logo CERTIFICATE
A GENERAL
Contract No/Title
B HAND-OVER

1) All start-up readiness review have been conducted and the findings/ recommendations have been closed/ completed
for this FACILITY as per PCSB Requirement, which are:
i. Pre-Activity Safety Review (PASR)
ii. Project Independent Review (PIR) 03
2) All commissioning that can be performed without the introduction of hydrocarbons has been completed
3) Surveillance / Safety systems are operational (required unless noted below)
4) All start-up, operating and maintenance procedures for the facility have been approved.
5) All necessary operations training courses and competency evaluation have been completed.
6) This certificate is accompanied by all system dossier documentation as agreed upon for this project.
7) Final System Restrictions / Notices / MOC’s has been approved, listed in Section C and attached as a supporting
documents.
8) Final Line Walk has been executed to verify positive isolations and full reinstatement to start-up positions.
Upon acceptance and sign-off of this certificate, this facility is safe and ready for start-up.
C EXCLUSIONS AND EXCEPTIONS
No. Description Reference Docs.
CONTRACTOR PCSB
SIGN OFF
Presented ByCONTRACTOR Acknowledged By PCSB PMT Accepted by PCSB PM/PI
Name
Designation Contractor Project Manager PCSB Project Manager Operations Asset Manager
Signature
Date Signed
Space for INITIAL FACILITY HANDOVER
CONTRACTOR
logo CERTIFICATE
A GENERAL
Contract No/Title
B HAND-OVER
1) The FACILITY had been fully commissioned and ready for safe operation and production.
2) The Performance Test Run had been successfully executed as per agreed PTR procedure.
3) ESD Live Test had been successfully conducted.
4) There is neither outstanding work nor any Punchlist that shall compromise the safe operation and production of the FACILITY
except for those listed in Section C, which has been agreed by both party.
5) All temporary equipment had been removed except for those that has been approved by MOC.
6) The site is clear of hazards, debris and construction equipment/ materials.
7) Any positive isolations, LOTO or temporary bypass during Start-Up is documented and handover to PM/PI.
By virtue of the above PCSB PM/PI acknowledge the readiness of FACILITY to operate and produce safely. PCSB PM/PI shall
accept full custody and liability of the FACILITY and PMT & CONTRACTOR may be demobilised from site. However, this does
not relieve the CONTRACTOR of his responsibility to fulfil their contractual obligations as per attached Work Completion &
Punchlist Killing Execution Plan.
No. Description Reference Docs.
Presented By Acknowledged By
SIGN OFF Accepted by PCSB PM/PI
CONTRACTOR PCSB, P&E
Name
Designation Contractor Project Manager PCSB Project Manager Operations Asset Manager
Signature
Date Signed
Space for FINAL FACILITY
CONTRACTOR
logo HAND-OVER CERTIFICATE
A GENERAL
Contract No/Title
B HAND-OVER
1) The FACILITY has completed all the Outstanding Work and had closed the agreed punchlist listed in the IFH
Certificates.
2) The exceptions and exclusions listed below has been tabled out in FDRC 06.
3) The warranty for all associated contracts had expired for all materials, equipment and services.
4) Final Documentations have been submitted to PCSB PM/PI including As-Built Drawings.
5) Performance Test Run test has been completed for the FACILITY as per the agreed PTR Procedure
By virtue of the above PCSB OPERATIONS accepts the completion of WORK from PCSB PMT.
No Description Reference Doc
Presented By Acknowledged By
SIGN OFF Accepted by PCSB PM/PI
CONTRACTOR PCSB, DD
Name
Designation Contractor Project Director P&E Head VPPM
Signature
Date Signed
Space for
JACKET MECHANICAL COMPLETION
CONTRACTOR
logo
CERTIFICATE
A GENERAL
Project Description
Designation
Field Platform Location
B INSTALLATION DETAILS
1) The Jacket for the above facility had been installedand completed by the following details:
 DATE:
 METHOD:
 ORIENTATION:
2) The Jacket Installation is acceptable and all punchlist has been cleared except for those list in Section C.
Presented By Acknowledged By Accepted by

SIGN OFF
INSTALLATION CSR PCSB PMT PCSB PM/PI
Name
Designation INSTALLATION CSR PMT Representative OIM
Signature
Date Signed
Space for PLATFORM STRUCTURE HANDOVER
CONTRACTOR
logo CERTIFICATE
A GENERAL
Project Description
Designation
Field Platform Location

1) The above facility had been installedand completed by the following details:
JACKET
NO. OF JACKET LEGS WATER DEPTH
INSTALLATION METHOD JACKET WEIGHT(LIFTING)
CONDUCTOR PILES
PENETRATION NO OF PILES PENETRATION
DEPTH DEPTH
TOPSIDE
MSF/ MODULES/
TYPE (CPP OR WHP)
INTEGRATED
FLARE/ VENT BOOM
TOPSIDE WEIGHT (LIFTING)
LENGTH
OTHER STRUCTURES
2) The Jacket Installation is acceptable and all punchlist has been cleared except for those list in Section C.
3) This Certificate signifies the handover of the platform substructure from PCSB Offshore Installation to PCSB PM/PI.
4) It is hereby established that the work specified in the abovementioned offshore installation scope has been SUCCESSFULLY
COMPLETED and ACCEPTED.

SIGN OFF
Name
Signature
Date Signed
Space for
CONTRACTOR PIPELINE HANDOVER CERTIFICATE
logo Space for Contract Number and Contract Title
A GENERAL
Project Description
Designation
Field Completion Date
1) The above facility had been installedand completed by the following details:
PIPELINE DESCRIPTION
DIAMETER LENGTH
MATERIAL WALL THICKNESS
MEDIUM DESIGN FLOWRATE
DESIGN PRESSURE DESIGN TEMPERATURE
PRE-COMMISSIONING DETAILS
PIGGING & CLEANING HYDROTEST
DEWATERING & DRYING PRESERVATION
APPROVAL AUTHORITY (DOSH - REFER CERT. ATTACHED)
PTI DATE PTO DATE
SITE/ CONSTRUCTION DESCRIPTION (REFER AS BUILT ATTACHED)
FREE SPAN CORRECTION LOCATION
BUCKLE TRIGGER LOCATION
PIPELINE CROSSING LOCATION
2) The Pipeline Installation is acceptable and all punchlist has been cleared except for those list in Section C.
3) This Certificate signifies the handover of the pipeline structure from PCSB Offshore Installation to PCSB PM/PI.
4) It is hereby established that the work specified in the abovementioned offshore installation scope has been SUCCESSFULLY
COMPLETED and ACCEPTED.
E SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS

SIGN OFF
Name
Signature
Date Signed
Space for
CONTRACTOR
WELL CONSTRUCTION CHECKLIST
logo
General Information
Country
Drilling Date (Completion)
Rig Name
Latitude Longitude Offshore Onshore
Location
Platofrm Slot No.
Well Type
Well Designation Exploration/ Appraisal/ Development
Well Design Type Production/ Injection/ Observation
Well Design Life (Years)
1 CASING INFORMATION
Casing Diagram/Scheme Available/ Not available Remarks (If any)
Surface Casing Intermediate Casing

Weight Thread Shoe Weight Thread Shoe
Size Grades Size Grades
(lbs/ft) Type Depth (lbs/ft) Type Depth
Production Casing Liner

Weight Thread Shoe Weight Thread Shoe
Size Grades Size Grades
(lbs/ft) Type Depth (lbs/ft) Type Depth
MAWP Threaded Mini.D MaxO. D

Items Type Model Manufacturer Part No. Remarks
(Psi) Type (inch) (inch)
Prod.Casing Hanger
Prod.Casing Shoe
Intermediate Casing
Hanger
Intermediate Casing
Shoe
Surface Casing Hanger
Surface Casing Shoe
Additional/Remarks(if any) :
2 CEMENT INFORMATION
Prod. To Interm Casing Annular Interm to Surface Casing Annular
Number of Number of
Type TOC(MD) Vol. Pumped Type TOC(MD) Vol. Pumped
Centralizer Centralizer
Prod to Int. Casing-Cement Bond Log (CBL) summary
A. CBL Log Performed by (Service Company)

B. CBL Logging was performed under pressure (psi)
C. CBL Interval ; from ____m to ____m
D. Correlation Reference
E. Copy of CBL Log and Interpretation provided
No. Cement Bond Quality Interval Total Remarks(states possible reason for mentioned quality)
Range Percentage(%)
1 Good
2 Moderate
3 Poor
Formation Isolation
(Highlight the cement quality across Aquifer formation and hydrocarbon formations)
Adequate formation isolations are in place?
Additional remarks (if any):
Int. to Surface Casing - Cement Bond Log (CBL) Summary

A. CBL Log Performed by (Service Company)
B. CBL Logging was performed under pressure (psi)
C. CBL Interval ; from ____m to ____m
D. Correlation Reference
E. Copy of CBL Log and Interpretation provided
No. Cement Bond Interval Range Total Percentage(%) Remarks(states possible reason for mentioned quality)
Quality
1 Good
2 Moderate
3 Poor
Formation Isolation
(Highlight the cement quality across Aquifer formation and hydrocarbon formations)
Adequate formation isolations are in place?
3 MAASP (MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE ANNULARSURFACE PRESSURE)
Annulus B (Prod. Annulus D

Annulus C (Intern
Operational Pressure Limit for Annuli To Intern. (if any Remarks
to Surface Casing)
Casing) additional)
MAASP (psi)
Upper Pressure Threshold (psi)
Lower Pressure Threshold (psi)
PressureVerificationTest
Pressure test to (or equivalent
Item MAWP (Psi) Result Remarks
M.W) (Psi)
Prod Casing Hanger

Prod Casing Shoe
Prod Casing Valve.1
Prod Casing Valve.2
Intermediate Casing Hanger
Intermediate Casing Shoe
Intermediate Casing Valve.1
Intermediate Casing Valve.2
Surface Casing Shoe
Surface Casing Valve.1
Surface Casing Valve.2

4 ANNULUS FLUID
Annulus A (betweenTubing-Prod.Casing)
Fluid Type Density (PPG) Volume (Bbls) Corrosion Inhibitor Oxygen Scavenger
Annular B (between Inter. Casing- Surface)
Annular C(between Prod.Casing- Inter Casing)
5 ANNULUS PRESSURE
No CasingSection Casing Head Pressure (Psi/Kpa) Remarks

1 Annulus A (between Tubing - Prod. Casing)
2 Annular B (between Inter.Casing-Surface Casing)
3 Annular C (between Prod.Casing-Inter.Casing)
Additional remarks(if any):
6 PLUG BACK TD (PBTD)

TD (m-MD) PBTD (m-MD) Press Test to (Psi) PBTD Details Remarks
7 FISH IN THE WELL (IF APPLICABLE)

Stuck/ Hold Max Drift O.D
Description of fish TOF Depth Max O.D of Total Length of Up depth prior to Fish Possible cause of Fish
(MD) Fish (inch) Fish (ft) (MD) (inch)
Additional remarks(if any):
8 RESERVOIR INFORMATION
Reservoir Reservoir Temperature Reservoir Depth (ft)
Pressure (psi) (deg C) Gas
Paraffin Asphaltenes Hydrates Oil Gravity GOR
Gravity
TVD MD
Additional remarks (H2S(ppm),CO2(%),Scalerisk):
9 PERFORATION DETAIL (IF APPLICABLE)

Interval Depth (ft)
Shot Density (SPF) Phasing (deg) Gun Size (inch) Gun Type Remarks
MD TVD
10 APPROVAL
Prepared By : Verified By : Approved By : Accepted By :
Name : Name : Name : Name :

Date : Date : Date : Date :
Space for
CONTRACTOR logo
WELL BARIER ELEMENT
Field WellNo Prepared by Date Primary Well

Barrier
Secondary Well
Well Date
Barrier
(Producer/ GasLift/ Natural) Approved by
Type
Primary Barrier to the Gas Lift
Date Well
(DD/MM/YYYY) X-tree Rating Psi Secondary Barrier to the Gas Lift
Completed
Well Head
Date Workover (DD/MM/YYYY) Psi A- Annulus MAASP Psi
Rating
Well Schematic Tubing Psi B-Annulus MAASP Psi
Ref. No Rating
Current Well Status C-Annulus MAASP Psi
Barrier Element Table
PRIMARY WELL BARRIER TO RESERVOIR
BarrierElement Verification
CapRock/ Prod Casing Equivalent Mud Weight (ppg)
Cement Between Prod to TOC @ _______
ShoeStrengthCasing
Intermediate Total Cement length _____(ft)
Prod Casing Press Test to____Psi(MW ppg)
Prod Packer Press Test to____Psi(MWppg)
Gas Lift Dummy Press Test to____Psi(MWppg)
CIV Press Test to____Psi(MWppg)
SSD Press Test to____Psi(MWppg)
Prod Tubing Press Test to____Psi(MWppg)
TRSCSSV Flapper Press Test to____Psi(MWppg)
SECONDARY WELL BARRIER TO RESERVOIR
Barrier Element Verification
Intermediate Casing Equivalent Mud Weight (ppg)
Cement between Prod Casing TOC@____
to Intermediate Casing
ShoeStrenght Total Cement length______(ft)
Prod Casing Press Test to_____Psi(MWppg)
Prod Casing Hanger Seal Press Test to_____Psi(MWppg)
Tubing Hanger Seal Press Test to____ Psi(MWppg)
Tubing Head Spool Press Test to_____Psi(MWppg)
Tubing Head Spool Casing Press Test to_____Psi(MWppg)
Valves(PCP Valve)
X-tree Connector Press Test to_____Psi(MWppg)
Hydraulic Master Valve Press Test to_____Psi(MWppg)
SECONDARY WELL BARRIER TO GAS LIFT
(SSV) Barrier Element Verification
Intermediate Casing Equivalent Mud Weight (ppg)
Cement between Prod Casing
ShoeStrenght TOC@_________
to Intermediate Casing
Total Cement length ______(ft)
Cement between Intermediate

TOC@_________
to surface Casing
Total Cement length_______(ft)
Intermediate Casing Press Test to_____Psi(MWppg)
ICP Valve Press Test to_____Psi(MWppg)
HangerSeal
SpoolNotes: ANY FAILED OR IMPAIRED WELL BARRIER
ELEMENTSHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED
Remarks (If any):
Prepared by: Approved by:
Name : Name :
Position : Position :
Date : Date :
Space for WELL OPERATING LIMIT
CONTRACTOR logo Space for Contract Number and Contract Title
Update Date
Well Name Reservoir Name
Well Type (Function)
Future Well function (within original design limit)
Well Design Life X-tree Type
Identify any leaking or failed barrier components
Long String Short String
Operational Limit for Tubing Min Max Min Max
H2S
2
CO
Oxigen in the water injection (only for Injector well)
Maximum injection pressure (only for Injector Well)
Gas Oil Ratio
Water Cut
Fluid Density (ppg)
Gas Density (ppg)
Reservoir Pressure (psi)
Reservoir Temperature (deg C)
Well Shut In Tubing Head Pressure (SITHP-psi)
Maximum designed Fluid production/ injection rate(bbls/day)

Maximum designed Gas production/ injection rate(bbls/day)
Artificial Lift (Gas Lift) device design rate
Annulus A Annulus B Annulus C
Annulus D
Operational Limit for Annuli (Tubing to (Prod. To (Interm. To (if any additional)
Prod. Casing) Interm. Surface Casing)
MAASP (Maximum Allowable Annular Surface Pressure) (psi)
Casing)
Upper Pressure Threshold (psi)
Lower Pressure Threshold (psi)
Annulus A Annulus B Annulus A Annulus B Annulus C Annulus D
Fluids Details (Tubing to Prod. (Prod. To (Tubing to (Prod. to Interm. (Interm. to (if any
Casing) Interm. Casing) Prod. Casing) Casing) Surface Casing) additional)
Fluid type/ Mud Gradient (ppg/ft)
Degraded Mud/ Base Fluid
gradient(ppg/ft)
Cement Base Fluid gradient
(ppg/ft)
Fluid additives
Corrosion Inhibitor
Scale Inhibitor
Asphaltene Inhibitor
Bactericide/ Biocide
pH Control Additive
Oxygen Scavenger
H2S Scavenger
Lift Gas inhibitor
Friction Reducer
Foam Agent Injection
Prepared by: Approved by:
Name : Name :
Position : Position :
Date :
Date :
Well Critical Equipment Checklist
General Information
Country
Driling Date (completion)
Rig Name
Latitude Longitude Offshore Onshore Field Platform Slot No
Location
1. Well Type
Field Name :
Platform Name :
Well Name/Number :
Long String/Short String
Well Designation : Exp/App/Dev
Well Design Type : Prod/Injec/Observation
Well Design Life : (Years)
2. Well Construction and Flow Assurance

2.1 Casing Information
Available Not available Remarks (If Any) :
Casing Diagram
Surface Casing Intermediate Casing

Shoe Depth
Size Weight (lbs/ft) Grades Thread Type (MD) Size Weight (lbs/ft) Grades Thread Type Shoe Depth (MD)
Production Casing Liner

Shoe Depth
Size Weight (lbs/ft) Grades Thread Type (MD) Size Weight (lbs/ft) Grades Thread Type Shoe Depth (MD)
Item Type Model Manufacturer Part No. MAWP (Psi) Thread Type Min I.D (Inch) Max O.D (nch) Remarks
Prod Casing Hanger
Prod Casing Shoe
Intermediate Casing Hanger
Intermediate Casing Shoe
Surface Casing Shoe
Additional remarks (if any) :
2.2 Cement Information

Prod. to Interm. Casing Annular Interm. To surface Casing Annular
Vol. Pumped Vol. Pumped
Type TOC (MD) (bbls) Number of Centralizer Type TOC (MD) (bbls) Number of Centralizer
2.3 Tubing Information

Size Weight Thread Grade OD (inch) ID (inch) EOT (MD) Remarks
2.4 Tubing Accessories

Available Not available Available Not available
Tubing Tally Well Completion Diagram
Item Type Model Manufacturer Part No. MAWP (Psi) Thread Type Min I.D (Inch) Max O.D (nch) Remarks
Tubing Hanger
Tubing Hanger Profile
Flow Coupling
TRSCSSV/ SCSSV Nipple
Control Line
Control Line Connection
Expansion Joint
Gas Lift Mandrel
Chemical Injection Valve
Landing Nipple 1
Landing Nipple 2
Landing Nipple 3
Sliding Side Door 1
Sliding Side Door 2
Sliding Side Door 3
Top Packer
Middle Packer
Bottom Packer
Blast Joint 1
Blast Joint 2
2.5 Well Head & X-mass Tree
Available Not available Remarks (if any) :
X-mass Tree Diagram
Solid Block Stack Up Other If other, please specify :

X-tree Type

Pressure Test Certificate

Fusible Cap
Well Head Cap connection Type
Pressure Tested Existing Volume (bbls) Fluid Type Remarks (if any) :
to (Psi) Pressure (Psi)
X-tree Void
Time to close Pressure

Item Manufacturer Model Type Part No. Valve Size Turns to (seconds) Bore Size (inch) Rating Grease
Man./Hyd. Open/Close (SSV only) (Psi) Type
Crown Valve
Upper Master Valve (SSV)
Lower Master Valve
Wing Valve
2.5.1 Manual Operated X-Mas Tree Valves LEAK TEST

A. Well Status Before Testing Date Testing : (DD/MM/YY)
FTHP/SITHP : Psi or Kpa
B. Well Status During Testing
SURFACE LOWER
CROWN KILL WING
SAFETY VALVE MASTER WING VALVE
VALVE VALVE
(SSV) VALVE
1. THP bleed to ( minimum pressure
Psi/Kpa)
2. SITHP (15 mins after attaining min.
pressure [1] Psi/Kpa)
C. WELL STATUS AFTER TESTING

1. Left well close in/open up @ : Hrs
2. FITHP/SITHP : Psi or Kpa
Performed By : Verified By :
2.5.2 Surface Safety Valve (SSV) SLAM TEST

SLAM TEST
1. Opening at exhaust at : Hrs
2. End of Actuator stroke at : Hrs
3. Time to close [ (2) - (1) ] : sec
4. Length of stem protruding : inches
LEAK TEST
1. THP bleed to (min pressure) : Psi or Kpa
2. SITHP (15 mins after attaining : Psi or Kpa
minimum pressure [1])


2.6 TR-SCSSV (Tubing Retrievable SCSSV) and Control Line information
Available Not available
TRSV Signature Curve
Flapper Ball Others If other, please specify :

TRSV Type
Available Not available

Pressure Test Certificate
Maximum . Test Press during Max. Test Press at Manufacture

Pressure Rating(Psi)
TRSCSSV (Hyd. Chamber) Completion (Psi) (Psi)
Maximum . Test Press during Max. Test Press at Manufacture Remarks

TRSCSSV- Self Equalizing check valve Pressure Rating(Psi)
Completion (Psi) (Psi)
(only for Self Equalizing type - TRSCSSV)
TRSCSSV ControL Line Completion (Psi) (Psi)

Completion (Psi) (Psi)
Control Line Connection
Pressure Hydraulic Fluid Hydraulic Oil Time to close

Size Manufacturer Part No. Min I.D (inch) Volume to fully
Rating Type (seconds)
open
2.6.1 TR-SCSSV (Tubing Retrievable SCSSV)
LEAK TEST REPORT

Prod. Casing Pressure : Psi or Kpa
Control Line Pressure : Psi or Kpa
BEFORE BLEEDING CONTROL LINE

1. Shut in well @ : Hrs
2. SITHP (after 15 mins Shut In) : Psi or Kpa
AFTER BLEEDING CONTROL LINE

1. THP bleed to (min pressure) : Psi or Kpa
2. SITHP (30 mins after attaining : Psi or Kpa
minimum pressure [1])
3. Control Line pressure (30 mins after : Psi or Kpa
attaining minimum pressure [1])
4. Prod. Casing Pressure : Psi or Kpa

3. Control Line pressure : Psi or Kpa
4. Prod. Casing Pressure : Psi or Kpa
2.7 Annulus Fluid

Annulus A (between Tubing - Prod. Casing)
Fluid Type Density (PPG) Volume (Bbls) Corrosion Inhibitor Oxigen Scavenger
Annular B (between Inter.Casing- Surface Casing)

Annular C (between Prod. Casing - Inter. Casing)

2.8 Annulus Pressure

No Casing Section Casing Head Pressure (Psi/Kpa) Remarks
1 Annulus A (between Tubing - Prod. Casing)
2 Annular B (between Inter.Casing- Surface Casing)
3 Annular C (between Prod. Casing - Inter. Casing)
3. WELL START UP PROCEDURE
Detail procedure/work that may be required to start up the well (e.g unplugging operation, N2 kick off, Gas Lift etc.) This procedure should account for sand, wax, hydrates as well as
pressure and temperature changes in tubing, annulus, other component parts
4. WELL DEVIATION
Available Not Available TVD MD TVD MD
Deviation Survey Report Max Angle Kick Off Point
Special notes of well deviation related to future well intervention :
5. FISH IN THE WELL

Max Drift O.D
TOF Depth Max O.D of Total Length of Stuck/Hold Up
Description of fish prior to Fish Possible cause of Fish
(MD) Fish (inch) Fish (ft) depth (MD)
(inch)
6. RESERVOIR INFORMATION
Reservoir Depth (ft) Oil

Reservoir Pressure (psi) Reservoir Temperature (deg C) Paraffin Asphaltenes Hydrates Gas Gravity GOR
Gravity
TVD MD
Additional remarks (H2S (ppm), CO2 (%), Scale risk ) :
7. PERFORATION DETAIL
Interval Depth (ft)
MD TVD Shot Density (SPF) Phasing (deg) Gun Size (inch) Gun Type Remarks
8. APPROVAL
Prepared By Verified By
Name : Name :
Signature : Signature :
Date : Date :
Approved By Accepted By
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
Comments
No ITEM CRITICAL ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
1 CV, SSV, LMV, & WV have good integrity (Leak Rate = 0 Psi/min)
2 CV, SSV, LMV, & WV are functional as per manufacture spec

X-Mass Tree
3 Void Area has good integrity (0 Psi)
4 Void Area tested to designed Press. Rating
Notes : ANY FAILED OR IMPAIRED WELL BARRIER ELEMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED
5 All casing has good integrity. All casing pressure are 0 Psi
6 PCP, ICP, SCP valves have good integrity (Leak Rate = 0 Psi/min)
Well Head and Annuli
7 PCP, ICP, SCP valves functional as per manufacture spec
8 PCP, ICP, SCP are installed with needle valves (and pressure gauge)
Control line and connection have good integrity. Tested to designed press
9 rating. Leak off test shown 0 Psi/min.
10 Control Line is functional as per designed. No blocking/Clogging
TRSCSSV
11 Control line valves is functional as per spec.
12 TRSCSSV has good integrity (Leak Rate = 0 Psi/min)
13 TRSCSSV is functional as per manufacture spec
Packer has good integrity . Production Packer/s tested to press. Rating

14
Tubing has good integrity. Tubing tested to Press. Rating, no communication to

other sections of the well
15 Tubing
Tubing Hanger has good integrity. Tubing Hanger tested to Press. Rating. No
16 communication to control line, nor to void area or to PCP.
For Gas Lift Well : Tubing Hanger is rated to designed Gas Lift pressure,
additional seals (extended neck) required to give extra seals againts Gas Lift
17 pressure
Production, Intermediate, & Surface Casings are cemented in place with proven
18 sufficiently good bond.
Casing
All Casing Hangers are tested to Press. Rating. No communication to other
19 annuli
20 All annuli pressure is monitorable
Space for WELL HANDOVER CERTIFICATE
CONTRACTOR logo Space for Contract Number and Contract Title
WELL NO FIELD
PLATFORM SLOT
TIME HANDOVER Hrs DATE HANDOVER (DD/MM/YY)
This is to acknowledge the handover of well by Drilling/ Workover Supervisor to Platform Superintendent (OIM), where the well is
ready for production and final acceptance.
WELL STATUS AT THE TIME OF HANDOVER
Status Long String Short String Remarks
1. Completed Reservoir
2. Producing Reservoir (during handover
3. SITHP (Psi/Kpa)
4. Zone change out required after Clean Up? (Y/N)
5. If Yes, To produce from which reservoir
WELL HEAD EQUIPMENT STATUS
Equipment Status (Good/Faulty) Remarks

1. TR-SCSSV
2. SSV
3. CV
4. LMV
5. WV
6. Kill Line Valve
ANNULUS PRESSURE
Casing Section Casing Head Pressure (Psi/Kpa) Remarks

1. Annulus A (between Tubing - Prod.
Casing)
2. Annular B (between Inter.Casing-
Surface Casing)
3. Annular C (between Prod. Casing -
Inter. Casing)
NOTES:
Prepared By Approved By
Name : Drilling/Workover Supervisor
Signature : Name :
Date : Signature :
Date :
Verified By Accepted By
Production Supervisor Platform Superintendent (OIM)
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
Document Checklist that needs to be handed over from Drilling to Operation before rig demob for
eachwell
Availability
No Document Remarks
Yes No
1 Well Barrier Element
2 Well Operating Limit
3 Well Handover Certificate
4 Well Schematic (complete with casing
diagram)
5 X-Mas Tree & Well Head Diagram (shall
include Section A / B / C)
6 TRSCSSV signature curve
7 Well Critical Equipment Checklist
Final Document Checklist that needs to be handed over from Drilling to Operation one – two months after
each well handover
Availability
No Document Remarks
Yes No
1 Well Design Proposal
2 Drilling / Work over Program
3 Daily Drilling Activity Report
4 Final Well Report / Well Completion Report
 Summary Report
- Cement Job Report
- Casing Run Report & Tally
- Perforation Report
- Plug Back Report
 Deviation Survey Report
 Cement Bond Log Report
5 X-Mas Tree & Well Head Manuals
6 TRSCSSV Operating Manual
7 TRSCSSV Certificate
8 Well Design Purpose
9 Notice of Operation
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 106 of 155
Appendix I - HANDOVER RACI MATRIX

HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 108 of 155
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 109 of 155
Appendix II - Handover Requirement Matrix Summary

CRITICAL ACCEPTANCE CAC RELATED TO OTHER
DESCRIPTION DEFINITION CAC RELATED TOHSE / GOVERNANCE REQUIREMENT
CRITERIA (CAC) REQUIREMENT
DISCIPLINE MECHANICAL  Official declaration  Completeness of ITR-  PTI approval from DOSH  Operation concerns
COMPLETION (DMC) that the specific A Checksheetsto  SISO/ SIPCOM/ SIPROD availability  Data population to SAP/ MMS/ BOM
discipline construction proceed with pre-  Project Risk Assessment (PRA), Project Independent Review (PIR) and HAZOP are complete and verified by
scope has been commissioning close out operations
inspected and (piping hydrotest,  HSE Case
accepted as per the mechanical alignment  Testing and Precommissioning procedure
project drawings and and levelling, cable  Red line mark-up / as built drawings
specifications and continuity and IR  P&ID Line Check
ready for pre- check, instrument  Commissioning spare and first fill list
commissioning. calibration)  Operating spare list
 Equipment dossier
 Signify the  No discipline Cat-A &  Vendor data incorporation / FAT reports
custodianship transfer B punchlist  Hook-up and Commissioning Shiploose List, Material Take-Off and Material
of the system from Status Report, Packing & Layout and Progress Status
Construction to  Preservation procedure
Commissioning  Overall Testing & Precommissioning Progress
 Offshore HUC Work pack
 Vendor Representative Schedule
 Specific personnel required for offshore start-up and commissioning
 International Load line and Tonnage Certs1
 IOPP and OPP Certs1
 SLC, SLE, SLR Certs1
 Sewage PP Cert1
 Cargo GR Cert1
 Anti Fouling Cert1
 Fire Control Plan, Safety Plan and SOPEP Certs1
 Malaysian Marine Department (MMD)1
 Certificate of Malaysia Registry1
 Cert of Survey1
 Crew and safe manning certs1
 Cert of Civil liability1
 ISPS1
 Certs for all radio and communication equipment2
 Deratisation Certificate3
 Port Office
 Helideck Certificate
 Helideck certificate for safe landing
NOTE:
1
For FPSO / FSO / MOPU / FPS
2
Malaysia Communication and Multimedia Commission
3
Port Health Authority
READY FOR  Official declaration  Completeness of ITR-
COMMISSIONING (RFC) that the system B Checksheetsto
construction and pre- proceed with
commissioning scope commissioning
have been inspected (piping reinstatement
and accepted as per and cleaning, pump
the project drawings solo run, instrument
and specifications and loop check)
ready for
commissioning  No discipline Cat-A &
B punchlist
 Signify the
custodianship transfer
of the system from
DFAB to DCHD
PIPELINE MECHANICAL  Official declaration  Completeness of  PTO approval from DOSH

COMPLETION CERTIFICATE that the pipeline Pipeline Mechanical
installation and pre- Completion  EIA/Environmental Management Plans for the Pipeline
commissioning scope Certificate (pigging
have been completed and cleaning,
inspected and baseline IP,
accepted as per the hydrotest,
project drawings and dewatering and
specifications and drying, preservation)
ready for
commissioning  No discipline Cat-A &
B punchlist
 Signify the
custodianship transfer  Draft pipeline
of the system from commissioning
DFIN to DCHD procedure
 Red line mark-up

drawing
 Project reports
(eghydrotest /
pigging)
 Pre / post installation

survey
SYSTEM HANDOVER  Official declaration  Completeness of ITR-
that the system has C Checksheetsto
been successfully proceed with
commissioned, commissioning
achieved steady state (reinstatement leak
and ready for test, Cause and Effect
operation Matrix test, service
test, load test for
 Signify custodianship non-HC, live deluge
transfer of the system test)
from P&E to PM/PI
 No discipline Cat-A &
B punchlist
TOPSIDE / JACKET  Official declaration  Completeness of

STRUCTURAL HANDOVER that the topside / Topside / Jacket
jacket structure has Structural Handover
been successfully Certificate
commissioned,
achieved steady state  No discipline Cat-A &
and ready for B punchlist
operation
 Signify custodianship
transfer of the system
from P&E to PM/PI
PIPELINE HANDOVER  Official declaration  Completeness of
that the pipeline has Pipeline Handover
been successfully Certificate
commissioned
 No discipline Cat-A &
 Signify custodianship B punchlist
from P&E to PM/PI
WELL HANDOVER  Official declaration
that the well
construction and well
completion scope
have been inspected
and ready for well
start up
transfer of the well
from Drilling to
Production
Technologist
TOTAL WELL HANDOVER  Official declaration  Completeness of Well
that the well start up Construction
scope has been Checksheet
successfully
completed  Completeness of Well
Barriers Element
 Signify custodianship Report, Well
transfer of the well Operating Limit
from P&E to PM/PI Report, Manual
Operated X-Mas Tree
Valves Leak Test
Report, Surface
Safety Valve Slam and
Leak Test Report and
Surface Controlled
Subsurface Safety
Valve Leak Test
Report
 Completeness of Well
Handover Certificate
and Well Handover
Checklist
 Well Bean up/down

Sequence Procedure
PLATFORM HANDOVER  Official declaration  Completeness of
(for drilling activity) that a brown field Platform Handover
drilling platform have Certificate
been handed over
from PM/PI to Drilling
and back to PM/PI
after completion of
drilling activity
from PM/PI to Drilling
back to PM/PI again
 Official declaration  Completed Matrix  PIR 4 close out
that the relevant Safety Shutdown Test  System commissioning procedure
hydrocarbon system for SIS/FGS together  Line check from start to end has been conducted and mark-up P&ID showing
has been pre- with DCS the completeness of mechanical completion and testing shall be produced
commissioned and  Safety procedure available on site
relevant utility/non-  Firewater system is  Approved Start-up and Operating manual is available at site and operators are
hydrocarbon system functioning with live familiar with it
have been fully deluge test  Operator training
commissioned to conducted  Readiness of firewater system and other related safety system for SIMOP,
allow for safe shutdown and start-up
introduction of  Purging Certificate  PASR close out
hydrocarbon issued with O2
content <4%.
 To grant Operation to
open wells/start-  No Facility Cat-A
RFSU up/introduce Punchlist
hydrocarbon to the
system and  Facility Start-up &
subsequently allow Operating Manual
Commissioning to
proceed with  Facility Performance
commissioning of the Test Run (PTR)
system upon Procedure
availability of
hydrocarbon  Introduction of
Hydrocarbon
Certificate is
completed and sign-
off by PMT and
Operation.
 Official declaration  1st. Gas/Oil has been
that the facility has achieved
been successfully
commissioned, steady  Live ESD test has
state operations has been conducted
been achieved and to
allow for Operations  Facility reliability 72
to operate the hours test has been
facilities. completed
 Initial Custody  Performance Test

transfer of facility Run (PTR) for
from P&E to PM/PI equipment/train/facil
and P&E PMT can be ity has been
demobilized from the completed
facility (Exception for facility
that has
feedstock/hydrocarb
on constraint or
export commitment
FACILITY INITIAL
with gas buyer) and
HANDOVER
agreed by both
parties
 Remaining start-up &

operating spares
have been handed
over to operations
 No Cat-A/B punchlist
for the entire facility
(Exception for
systems that was
identified to be done
later)
 Meet 72 hrs un-

interruptible
(continuous)
productions at the
agreed throughput
 Official declaration  No punchlist for the Refer to PSI Final documentation has completed and
that the facility has entire facility (except handover to OD
been fully Cat-C and agreed by
commissioned, steady Operations)
state operations has
been achieved and to  Reliability
allow for Operations (endurance) test has
to operate the been completed for
facilities. all systems
FACILITY FINAL HANDOVER
 Final Custody transfer  Performance Test Run
of facility from DD to (PTR) for
OD. P&E PMT can be equipment/train/facil
disbanded. It is ity has been
encouraged to completed
organize handover
ceremony witnessed
by SGM from P&E &
PM/PI)
HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 117 of 155
Appendix III – Warranty Call-Out Form

HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 120 of 155
Appendix IV - OCR Call Out Form

HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 123 of 155
Appendix V – HSE Matrix

HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 128 of 155
Appendix VI – Start Up and Operations Manual Example

HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 133 of 155
Appendix VII – Commissioning Plan Example

HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 137 of 155
Appendix VIII – Perfromance Acceptance Test Plan Example

HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 140 of 155
Appendix IX – Handover Procedure Example

HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 143 of 155
Appendix X – Inerting Procedure For Offsite Facilities Example

HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 148 of 155
Appendix XI –Commissioning Philosophy Plan Examples

HANDOVER PROCEDURE
REVISION: 1
UPSTREAM FACILITIES
PAGE 151 of 155
Appendix XII –Performance Test Run Example

ITEM TOPICS FPTR Content PTR for TTJT-A PTR for BNJT-K PTR for BNCPP-B
1 List of  Flow Capacity  Number of wells  Gas injection flow  Agreed Flow Delivery
Parameters  Operating Condition  Flow Capacity capacity (throughput to E11R-C)
(pressure and  Operating Condition  Water injection flow  Operating Condition
To be temperature) (pressure & Capacity (Pressure & Temperature)
Considered  Mechanical temperature)  Operating Condition  Mechanical Condition
Condition  Process Systems (Pressure & (vibration)
(vibration) Stability Temperature)  Export gas and Condensate
 Export Gas and Performance.  Process Systems Dryness
Condensate Dryness  Utility Systems Stability Performance  Produced Water Discharge
 Water Injection Stability Performance  Utility Systems Quality
volume (later)  Safety Systems Stability Performance  Process Systems Stability
 Gas Injection Stability Performance  Safety Systems Performance
volume (later)  Electrical Systems Stability Performance  Utility Systems Stability
 Produced Water Stability Performance  Electrical Systems Performance
Discharge Quality Stability Performance  Safety Systems Stability
 Process Systems Performance
Stability  Electrical Systems Stability
performance Performance
 Utility Systems  Load
Stability
Performance
 Safety Systems
Stability
Performance
(Safeguarding &
Control)
 Telecom System
Stability &
Performance
 Electrical Systems
Stability
Performance
 Load
2 Execution of  Data recording,  Data recording,  Data recording,  Data recording, monitoring of
PTR within 72 monitoring of the monitoring of the monitoring of the the following parameters:
hours following following following  Flow
parameters: parameters: parameters:  Pressure (S & D)
 Flow  Flow  Flow  Temperature (S& D,
 Pressure (S  Pressure (S &  Pressure (S & Bearings, Inter-stage,
& D) D) D) Turbine spread, etc.
 Temperatur  Temperature  Temperature  Vibration (DE &, NDE,
e (S& D, (S& D, (S& D, Input/output shaft
Bearings, Bearings, Bearings,  Load
Inter-stage, Inter-stage, Inter-stage,
Turbine Turbine Turbine
spread, etc. spread, etc. spread, etc.
 Mechanical  Vibration (DE  Vibration (DE
Vibration &, NDE, &, NDE,
(DE &, NDE, Input/output Input/output
Input/outpu shaft shaft
t shaft
 Electrical
Load
Baseline Survey
3 Documentation • Performance Test • Performance Test • Performance Test • Performance Test Procedure
Procedure for the Procedure for the Procedure for the for the equipment / packages
equipment / equipment / equipment / that is covered under the
packages that is packages that is packages that is FPTR scope.
covered under the covered under the covered under the • Facilities Performance Test
FPTR scope. FPTR scope. FPTR scope. Run Report, i.e., the 72-hr
• Facilities • Facilities • Facilities collected data
Performance Test Performance Test Performance Test FAT attachments ( if any)
Run Report, i.e., the Run Report, i.e., the Run Report, i.e., the
72-hr collected data 72-hr collected data 72-hr collected data
• FAT attachments ( if • FAT attachments ( if • FAT attachments ( if
any) any) any)
4 Reporting  Collation of all Collation of all document and Collation of all document and Collation of all document and test
document and test test recorded with conclusion test recorded with conclusion recorded with conclusion &
recorded with & recommendation & recommendation recommendation
conclusion &
recommendation

Csp21 - Upstream Facilities Handover Manual Rev1

Încărcat de

Informații document

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Csp21 - Upstream Facilities Handover Manual Rev1

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

PROCEDURE NO: CSP-21

Document Revision History

Rev Date: Version: Summary of Changes: Revised by:

March 2014 Rev. 1 Newly enhanced process Department of Commissioning,

INTERNAL USE or UNTUK DALAMAN

Document Authorisation .............................................................................................................. 1

7.0 Records ............................................................................................................................ 83

CSP-21 was written to provide a minimum requirement in handover process from

1.3.1 Project Management Team (PMT)

1.3.2 Production Malaysia/ Production International (PM/PI)

No. Title Revision/Issued Custodian

CSP Carigali Standard Procedure

CMS Completion Management System

CSU Commissioning and Start-Up

DCHD Department of Hook-Up, Commissioning and Decommissioning

DFIN Department of Offshore Installation

DDR Drilling Division

DMC Discipline Mechanical Certificate

EPCC Engineering, Procurement, Construction and Commissioning

EPCIC Engineering, Procurement, Construction, Installation and

FFH Final Facilities Handover

FMC Fabrication Mechanical Completion

HUC Hook Up and Commissioning

IFH Initial Facilities Handover

ITR Inspection Test Records

IMC Installation Mechanical Date

NFA Notice of Final Acceptance

NPA Notice of Provisional Acceptance

OCR Operation Change Request

ORSA Operation Readiness Strategy & Assurance

PASR Pre Activity Safety Review

PCC Procurement, Construction and Commissioning

PCSB PETRONAS Carigali Sdn Bhd

PED Petroleum Engineering Division

PIR Project Independent Review

PM/PI Production Malaysia/ Production International

PMO Peninsular Malaysia Operations

PMT Project Management Team

PPGUA PETRONAS Procedures & Guidelines for Upstream Activities

PPMS PETRONAS Project Management System

PSC Production Sharing Contract

PTR Performance Test Run

PTS PETRONAS Technical Standard

RACI Responsibility, Accountability, Consult & Inform

RFC Ready for Commissioning

SBO Sabah Operations

SKO Sarawak Operations

Completion Computerized system for recording, tracking and reporting status

Demobilisation Departure of Contractor personnel from Worksite to the Point of

Discipline Mechanical An official declaration that the specific discipline construction

Drilling The act of drilling a well until it reaches targeted depth.

Facility or Facilities Platform, jacket, topsides, structure, helideck, bridge, pipelines,

Final Facilities Handover is normally issued in line wth Notice of

However, the definition stated in PSC Terms and Condition or

Hook-up The tie-in of all components of the facilities together at offshore

Installation An act of fixing completed or partially completed pre-fabricated

Integration An act of assembling two or more equipment together before a

Introduction of A milestone where operation is allowed to open up wells to

Inspection Test Construction check-sheets forms which will be the basis of

Inspection Test Pre-commissioning check-sheets forms which will be the basis of

Inspection Test Commissioning check-sheets forms which will be the basis of

Mechanical The actual date by which the fabrication/construction works, as

Notice of Final A document to be issued by PETRONAS Carigali within thirty (30)

This is part of PCSB obligation to issue NFA to contractor as