Sunteți pe pagina 1din 22

Barnes & Noble, Inc.

The Yucaipa Proxy Challenge


Synopsis
• Ron Burkle is an activist investor and stockholder of Barnes & Noble

• Burkle’s Yucaipa Companies (Yucaipa) filed a “Definitive Proxy” to challenge


BN’s slate of board-of-director nominees at the upcoming stockholder
meeting.

• Proxy was made in response to a ruling against Yucaipa by Delaware Court


concerning a lawsuit that challenged BN poison-pill provision

• preventing outsiders becoming majority stockholders.

• Burkle disagreed with BN’s founder, chairman and owner of the majority
stake in the company, Leonard Riggio, concerning BN’s long-term strategy.

• Burkle wanted the company to cede ground to Amazon in the digital


reader marketplace and instead concentrate on BN’s physical stores
Definitions
• activist investor - individual or group that purchases
large numbers of a public company's shares and/or tries
to obtain seats on the company's board with the goal of
effecting a major change within the company

• proxy - materials provided to shareholders before


meeting to disclose information and allow them to vote

• poison pill- maneuvers made to try to prevent hostile


takeovers (e.g., allowing existing shareholders to buy
more stock at a discount in the event of a takeover
attempt)- more in next few slides
Investopedia
B & N Poison Pill
If an outsider acquired a 20
percent interest in the
company, existing
stockholders could buy
stock at a 50 percent
discount without board
approval
Incorporated in B&N Bylaws
More on Poison Pills
• tactic used by Corporation to thwart an unwelcome or “hostile”
takeover bid

• examples:

• preferred stock option to current stockholders making cost


of acquisition unattractive

• employee stock ownership plans that vest upon acquisition

• golden parachutes for company executives

• stagger election of board of directors

• preventing outsider from becoming majority stockholder


Objective(s) & Environment

• Riggio’s task is to frame a response to this


immediate threat by activist shareholder

• Riggio in parallel needs find ways to retain long-


term control of the company

• Set against the backdrop of an industry that needs


to respond to being reshaped by technology
What is Burkle’s beef?
• Yucaipa is a fund that invests in undervalued
companies and hopes to profit from a turnaround

• Yucaipa believes that Riggio in his agent role is not acting


in the principal’s best interests

• Stock price has declined from fiscal 2008 high of 34.89


down to the teens in 2010.

• Believes poison-pill provision added by BN goes


against basic stockholder rights

• particularly the right to elect independent directors.


What does Burkle want?
• BN shareholders to elect three Yucaipa nominees

• act in the best interests of the principals and will


not take decisions that further their self-interest

• accusing Riggio of furthering his self-interest to


continue to control BN

• Riggio is wearing two hats: that of a principal (as


a shareholder) and that of an agent (as the
chairman)
Who should decide
Company’s strategy?

• top managers?

• outside shareholders?

• don’t principals delegate to agents?


What is Corporate
Governance?
• Systems by which owners of firms direct and
control the affairs of the firm

• addresses the distribution of rights and


responsibilities among different participants

• board, managers, shareholders, and other


stakeholders

• spells out the rules and procedures for making


decisions on corporate affairs

Carpenter & Sanders


BN Board (Ex 4)
2 Insiders
(Leonard & Stephen
Riggio)

7 Outsiders

Tenure of Outsiders?
Dillard - 18 years
Miller - 18 years
Monaco - 16 years
Other Board Observations

• CEO, Lynch, is not on Board

• Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

• two (Dillard and Monaco) of three are long-


tenured board members

• is this committee truly “independent”?


Key Role of BoD

• advise managers or corporate strategy

• firms in stable environments best served by


members from strategically related firms

• firms in unstable environments often best served


by members from strategically dissimilar firms
Questions

• Are Burkle and Yucaipa trying to usurp Board’s


role in strategic advising of Company?

• Is Burkle’s focus too short-term given the role of


his Fund?

• Can he act in the best interest of long-term


stock performance?
Options open to Riggio

• “defeat” Yucaipa’s board nominees by bolstering


support for nominating Committee nominees.

• Should the board unilaterally support Riggio on


this issue?

• How independent should the board be in matter


such as this?
Other Options

• Take BN private to prevent loss of control

• would require a fair buyout price

• Other?
Control of a Board Signal?

• When a firm is the target of a raider or a fight for


control of a board

• it is a potential signal that the firm’s board and its


management has been “ineffective”
Postscript
• Leonard Riggio and BN won the proxy war at the
September 28, 2010, stockholder meeting.

• Their nominees were elected to the company’s


board, and the company’s stock price in late June
2011 was $17.26.

• Riggio and the board were considering taking the


company private
More Recent News
July 23, 2018 3:25 p.m. ET

An investment fund led by Richard Schottenfeld has acquired 5.7% of


bookseller Barnes & Noble Inc. BKS -0.83% and has met with the
bookseller’s senior management to discuss how to improve the company’s
performance, according to a securities filing.

BUSINESS 07/04/2018 05:40 am ET

Barnes & Noble Fires CEO Demos


Parneros For Violating Company
Policies
He will not receive any severance payment and he is no longer a member of the board.
Business Insider June, 2018
Article
• Barnes & Noble is struggling to compete with Amazon .

• Barnes & Noble stores have become places where customers


read, hang out, and have a cup of coffee rather than just shop.

• Revenue from the Nook e-reader, which Barnes & Noble


released to compete with Amazon's Kindle, has reportedly
dropped 85% since 2012.

In the past five years, Barnes & Noble has lost more than $1
billion in value.

It cut 1,800 full-time jobs earlier this year.

S-ar putea să vă placă și