Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
: 1 of 3
k x k• := max {| x1 |, | x2 |, · · · , | xn |}
5.1. [1 points] Rewrite the equation such that the appropriate matrix is converted into
Jordan form.
5.2. [1 points] In the above Jordan form matrix, which eigenvalues are equal to which?
5.3. [1 points] What is the algebraic multiplicity mi of each of the eigenvalues?
5.4. [1 points] What is the geometric multiplicity qi of each of the eigenvalues? qi is the
dimension of the nulll space of A li I.
⇤ Instructor:
Ramprasad Potluri, Office: WL217A, Lab: WL217B, Phones: (0512) 259-8837, 259-7735, E-mail:
potluri@iitk.ac.in
EE 650A, IIT Kanpur Mid Semester Exam, 17-IX-2018, L10 & L11 (OROS) 1800 – 2000 hours
Student’s name: Roll No.: 2 of 3
6. [3 points] What are the geometric multiplicity (G.M.) and algebraic multiplicity (A.M.) of
each of the eigenvalues of the following matrix? Fill the table with your answers.
2 3
2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 7
6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
6 7
6 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 l A.M. G.M
6 7
6 7
6 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 7
6 7
6 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7
6 7
6 7
6 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 7
6 7
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 7
4 5
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
7. We have studied sliding model control theory as applied to SI models of the form
)
xn = f (x) + b(x)u
| (1)
where x = x, ẋ, · · · , x (n 1)
EE 650A, IIT Kanpur Mid Semester Exam, 17-IX-2018, L10 & L11 (OROS) 1800 – 2000 hours
Student’s name: Roll No.: 3 of 3
x´ = y
y´ = -0.5x-y²
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
y 0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
x
Each time start
I
from C- o . s
,
o ) I
trace I
slightly different taagectory ,
that leads to me to a
different conclusion
about the behavior
of the system in
this Thus
region .
,
i ) we need to use
analytical methods
such as
.mg
linearly the
system about
the equilibrium point Co ,
o
) ,
and deciding
the nature of the
stability of this equilibrium
point based this
on
linearized version .
Cii ) we can
perform an analysis of the sensitivity ss this an
of the hand -
based
threading of the trajectories opportunity
research
direction for
to the nature
of
the field ( DF ) or has this
,
conclusions
specifically ,
some Df s allow
drawing already been
induced
hand -
errors in
threading .
EE 650A, IIT Kanpur Mid Semester Exam, 17-IX-2018, L10 & L11 (OROS) 1800 – 2000 hours
Another way
d-
do
⇒
tano =
-
2.424 t
:?¥
IF
so
I
arctan
(2-414)×1*0=67.50
O
360° - 67.50
292.50
) -18 sinocosotscososino
ddfp-z-e8foso-coso-sino-sr.no
= 8 cost -0 -
8sin20-16sinocos.to
that has
d¥
see a
p
16.97 -16.97 -16.97
.
value
dot
minimum of 0.172
at -0=22.50
p 0.172 5.828 5.828 This value of 0.172
is not small
negligibly .
V=zr2xp
.
• . → a with r -2 a .
. .
-
so -20 .