Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
BASICS OF SEDIMENT
TRANSPORT HYDRAULICS
Tarek Salaheldin, Ph.D., P.E.
Irrigation and Hydraulics Department
Faculty of Engineering - Cairo University
SPRING 2016
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
Content
Part 1 (Theory)
1. Definition of sediment transport
2. Sediment particles
3. Hydrodynamics of Fluid - particle System
4. Settling Velocity of particles
5. Effect of Particles on viscosity
6. Threshold of Sediment movement (Scour Criteria - Shield Diagram)
7. Total Sediment Load = Bed Load + Suspended Load + Wash Load
8. Bed-forms and Armouring
9. Cohesive Sediment (very Brief)
10. Sediment Measurements
11. River Geomorphology
Part 2 (Applications)
1. Design of Stable Channels
2. Bridge Scour (Pier + Abutment)
3. Scour Countermeasures
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
Sediment Transport
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
Scour
General Scour
(Degradation)
Original Bed
Degradation
Pier
Bridge
Constriction Local
Scour Scour
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
I-90 bridge collapse on Schoharie Creek, NY state, Failure of Bridge on the Enoree
April 5, 1987 (Courtesy of Sid Brown, Schenectady river in SC due to pier scour
Gazette)
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
Sediment Particles
According to US Department of Agriculture and Atterberg’s Limits
Boulders > 64 mm
Gravel (64 mm – 2 mm) (Coarse – medium – fine)
Sand (2 mm – 0.075 mm) (Coarse – medium – fine)
Silt (0.075 mm – 0.006 mm)
Clay < 0.006 mm 100.0
Geometric Standard
Deviation measures the soil
homogeneity
D50
g = d84/d16 0.0
Fall Velocity
Semi-theoretical (spherical particles)
uplift ds
4 gd s 24
Vf C d
(s 1) 1 .5
3C d Vf d s weight Vf
g is acceleration of gravity = 9.81 m/s2
s is the sediment particle relative density (s = 2.65)
Cd is the drag coefficient
Fall Velocity
Effect of Concentration on Vf
Vf estimated for single particle is modified and slow down by the
presence of surrounding particles. Experiments showed that the
thick suspension have slower Vf than the single particle.
(modified Empirically by Van Rijn 1993 for Cs< 0.35)
Fall Velocity
Effect of Suspension on the viscosity
The existence of sediment particle affects the viscosity. The
viscosity of sediment-water suspension differs from that of
clear water.
sus
1 keCs
Fall Velocity
Empirical Formula (Detriech Formula 1984)
(spherical and non-spherical particles)
From Laboratory experimentation on natural sediment suspensions
d 3s
D * g 2
log w * 3 .7617 1 .92944 (log D * ) 0 .09815 (log D * ) 2 0 .00575 (log D * ) 3 0 .00056 (log D * ) 4
Vf ( g w * )1 / 3
is the excess sediment particle relative density ( = s-1=1.65)
µ and are dynamic and kinematic viscosity
= 10-6 m2/sec
µ= 0.001 N.sec/m2
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
Soil is continually being removed from land surface and transported downstram
until it deposits in lakes or seas or at man-made structures.
Erosion in watershed is the detachment of soil particles by the impact of
raindrops.
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
Qw + Q s
Suspended
load
Flow
Bed load
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
Q s R.K.L.S.C
1
length _ of _ slope 2
Qs in average annual soil loss in ton/acre L
72.6
Slope length is in ft
0.43 0.3s 0.04s 2
s is land slope in % S
6.613
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
Friction Equations
Chezy Equation
C is Chezy Coefficient (40-70 m0.5/sec)
2g
S is the longitudinal Slope (NOT %) V C RS RS
R is the Hydraulic Radius (R=A/P) f
2 1
a
Manning Equation V R 3
S 2
n is the Manning Coefficient (Text Books) n
a = 1 in Metric system
a = 1.486 in English system 1
1
C R 6
n
It was found that
ks roughness height D50 1
n D 50
6
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
Friction Equations
Strickler Equation
1 1 1
nD 6 D 50 6
D 50 6
50
n n
30 24 . 6
English System Metric System
o
V* gRS Shear Velocity
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
Incipient Motion
(Hjulstrom
Diagram)
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
Incipient Motion
(Shields Diagram)
Deposition
Scour
2 1 1
a D 50 6
V R 3
S 2
n
n 30 or 24 . 6
0
o RS *
w
Ss 1D 50
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
Example 1
A rectangular channel is to be deigned with slope S = 0.01 and is
supposed to carry 30 m3/s of clear water and should be free of
sediment. The vertical banks are to be made of wooden boards
and the soil analysis shows that D50 = 50 mm (gravel) and the
Manning value is 0.025. What should be the dimension of the
channel?
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
0 RS
0 . 056 For large sediment
s gD 50 s gD 50 particles
0 . 056 D ( 1)
R 50
0 . 462 m
S
2 1
1
V R 3
S 2
2 . 39 m / s
n
Q
A 12 . 55 B .y
V
B .y
R 0 . 462 m
B 2y
B 26 . 25 m & y 0 . 48 m
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
Example 2
An irrigation canal is to carry 100 ft3/sec (2.83 m3/sec) through soil
consists of coarse gravel with size 5 cm. The canal is to be laid
along slope of S = 0.01 and is supposed to protect the banks
from scour by grass. Find the width of the canal.
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
0 . 056 D ( 1)
R 50
1 . 52 ft
S
1
D 50 6
n 0 . 023
30
2 1
1
V R 3
S 2
8 . 55 ft / s
n
q 1 . 52 x 8 . 55 13 ft 2
/ s
width Q / q 7 . 7 ft
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
3
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
Bed
Forms
4
6
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
Frictional Resistance
The total frictional resistance is divided into (skin friction +
bedform resistance
R b
R '
b
R ''
b
V *
2
V *
'2
V *
'' 2
1- Meyer-Peter-Mulleur Formula
2 2
q 3
b 39 . 25 q 3
.S e 9 . 95 D 50
Foot system
q s 1 D 35
35
s s
s
3
sD 2
35 s
1 R 'b S e
35
• Determine Rb’ from Manning
Equation
• Determine 35
• get from curve
• get qs
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
d y
Z
c a
y
.
ca d a y
Vf Bed
Z
.V * layer
a=2D
Integration of Suspension
d
q s C y V y .dy
2D
Vy 2.3 y 2D
log 10 ( 30.2 ) Bed
k ks layer
V*
q total q b q s
Integration of Suspension
0 .4
q s q b PI 1 I2
k
0 .4 d
P log e 30 . 2 • Parameter of total transport
k D
Ss .S e RS e
C t 0 . 05
Ss 1 S s 1 gD 50
1
2
S S 1 D 50
• Ct is total sediment concentration by weight (kg/m3)
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
C(in PPM )
• To get Qsed-total kg/sec Q sed total Q water 6
x1000
10
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
APPLICATIONS
FLOW FIELD
FLOW FIELD
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
FLOW FIELD
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
FLOW FIELD Y
a a X
Flow
Z Z
Flow X Y
FLOW FIELD
When flow approaches the pier it deflects upward and downward at the upstream edge of
the pier.
The upward flow causes heading up (rise of water level at the upstream edge of the pier)
and causes circulation near the water surface (standing bow wave).
The deflected downward flow at the upstream edge of the pier form small vortex
(horseshoe vortex) beside the bottom. This horseshoe vortex start to impact the
sediment particles and start scour at the upstream edge of the pier. Once the scour
hole is formed, the horseshoe vortex shift inside the scour hole. It removes more
sediment, deepens the scour hole and increase the scour hole size. This increase
the strength of the horseshoe vortex it removes more sediment and it has more
space since scour hole is increasing
The horseshoe vortex at the upstream edge of the pier which started the scour hole and
deepens it, it moves towards the pier sides forming and increasing scour hole
around the pier side edges.
The circulation of the horseshoe vortex at the sides of the pier is towards outside.
Once the horseshoe vortex leave the side edges of the pier on both sides it starts to
deflects upward again forming wake vortex behind the pier
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
FLOW FIELD
The wake vortex is flowing upward at the downstream edge of the pier. The wake vortex
drops the sand and non-cohesive particles which it cannot carry forming some
deposits downstream of the pier.
Equilibrium (maximum) scour depth in non cohesive soil is formed at the upstream edge
of the pier and at the side edges of the pier.
In cohesive soil the flow interacts differently with the bottom. The downward flow causes
small circulation near the bottom (small horseshoe vortex)
The small horseshoe vortex near the bottom cannot overcome cohesive soil resistance
The small horseshoe vortex moves around the pier and when it leaves the pier sides it
deflects up forming the wake vortex. The wake vortex acts as vacuuming effect on
the cohesive soil surface (as tension). Cohesive soil surface cannot resist tension
so the wake vortex removes considerable amounts of cohesive sediment particles
and most of the scour in cohesive soil is formed downstream of the pier. No
deposition occurs downstream of the pier.
The wake vortex and its vacuuming (tension) effect cannot suspend or even keep the
eroded sediment into suspension.
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
2.5
Mass Erosion
Shear Stress (Pa)
2
Particle Erosion
1.5
0.5
0
0 5 10 15 20
Time (hr)
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
3
Mass Erosion
Shear Stress (Pa)
2
Particle Erosion
1.5
0.5
0
0 5 10 15 20
Time (hr)
0.65
ds b
2k1k 2 k3 F 0.43
z z
where k3 is factor for bed condition and F is the Froude number. The
different factors introduced in the previously discussed scour predictors (e.g.
k1, k2, k3, kd, ky, k, ks) were evaluated in several studies (e.g. Melville 1997,
Melville and Sutherland 1988 and Raudkivi 1986).
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
b V
t e (days) 48.26 0.4 (y/b)>6
V Vc
b V y
0.25
t e (days) 30.89 0.4 (y/b)6
V Vc b
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
W2 0.323d s 0.016 Z
Flow X
W1
W2
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2016
2- Turbidity Currents
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2015
Turbidity Currents
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2015
Turbidity Currents
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2015
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2015
Shared Water Resources
Presentation Diploma
of Sedimentation Pattern in Nasser Lake (High Aswan Dam Lake) May 2015
Coordinates of HAD
23 58 13.32 N
32 52 35.30 E
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2015
DELTA FORMATION
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2015
Alluvium and Alluvial fans: On land in arid regions, mountains can channel
rain water into intermittent streams which may empty onto a valley floor. Flow
tends to be flashy and intermittent, at times resembling mudflows more than
streams. These streams carry much sediment but lose competence as soon
as they are not confined by mountains
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2015
Delta
•A subaqueous and subaerial accumulation of river-derived sediments at the mouth of a river.
•The receiving basin is the base level for the fluvial system and may be an ocean, sea or lake.
•Once base level is reached deposition results from the loss of momentum and the ability of the
river to carry sediment.
•Deltas form wherever sediment at a river mouth is being supply faster than it can be removed
by marine processes.
•Most deltas have a wide range of morphologies and features that reflect the environment of the
receiving basin.
•Numerous variables, such as the hydrographic regime of the receiving basin, influence delta
formation As a result delta morphology is extremely variable.
Importance of deltas
•Deltas have historically been fertile regions for agriculture, and harbor productive estuaries for
fishing.
•More recently deltas have been exploited for oil , gas, and fresh water.
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2015
Deltas
• Flow velocity decreases as water flows
into lakes or oceans
– deposition occurs and may lead to
the origin of a delta, which can
prograde as sediment is continually
supplied by the stream
– topset, foreset, and bottomset beds
are typical
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2015
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2015
Deltas
CHANNEL PATTERN
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2015
Channel Types
Straight channels
Meandering channels
Meandering channels
Because meandering streams
are continually eroding on the
outer meander bends and
depositing sediment along the
inner meander bends,
meandering stream channels
tend to migrate back and forth
across their flood plain.
If erosion on the outside
meander bends continues to take
place, eventually a meander
bend can become cut off from
the rest of the stream. When this
occurs, the cutoff meander bend,
because it is still a depression,
will collect water and form a type
of lake called an oxbow lake.
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2015
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2015
Braided channels
Inglis (1949)
Wave length L = CL. (Qmax)0.5
CL = Cosntant = 33-76 SI units
Canal Intake
When flow approaches a diversion, we
have a condition similar to a bend
Remedies:
Construct a sill at the entrance to
prevent the sediment from entering the
intake and with periodical cleaning.
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2015
Shoreline
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2015
Littoral Process
Physiographic Unit
It is the unit of the shoreline which shall be studies. Usually the boundaries of
this unit consist of headland, man made sediment barrier, etc...
Nearshore wave
processes terminology
Shared Water Resources Diploma May 2015
Nearshore Region
The littoral zone is the dynamic interface between the ocean and the land.
Bounded on one side by the landward limit of the beach and extending
seaward to just beyond the zone of wave breaking, it is the region where
wave energy dissipates over a distance of tens to hundreds of meters.
Nearshore Region
Modifications to the system such as changing wave conditions, introduction of
engineering structures, and altered quantity or type of sediment all
cause the dynamic balance to readjust.
Rapid and undesired beach changes have been caused by some coastal
engineering works.
Seaward of the dunes is the littoral zone, consisting of the backshore which is
rarely submerged; the foreshore, which extends from the limit of uprush of
waves at high tide to the backrush of waves at low tide; and the inshore,
where energy of spilling and plunging breakers is dissipated.
H = wave height
L = wave length
SWL = Still water level
d= water depth
Wave processes.
In terms of wave processes, the littoral zone is divided into the offshore and
nearshore zones. Within the nearshore zone, waves become unstable and begin to
break in the breaker zone.
Broken waves propagate as bores in the surf zone. The limits of water oscillation on
the beach face define the swash zone.
Beach profiles. A sandy beach tends toward an equilibrium profile for swell waves.
This equilibrium profile, called a summer or swell profile, has been thesubject of much
field and laboratory investigation and occurs when the depth increases exponentially
with distance from shore. Under certain combinations of wave height, period, and
sand fall velocity, the profile develops a shore-parallel bar at the location of wave
breaking. A trough just shoreward of the bar or underthe plunge point of the breaker
is also common. If waves reform after initial breaking to break a second time, the
nearshore zone may contain multiple bartrough systems. This profile is called the
storm profile or winter profile. The size and location of the bar and trough are related
to wave height and period. As a longshore bar grows, its location shifts, as does the
wave break point. Material forming the bar is removed