Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Lug Analysis
Calculator (/calculators/lifting-lug-analysis/)
A lug, also known as a lifting lug or a padeye, is essentially a plate with a hole in it where the hole is
sized to fit a clevis pin. Lugs are used in combination with clevis pins to transmit load between different
mechanical components. Common applications where lugs are used include:
Advantages of lugs over other types of connections that are used to transmit load include:
Contents
Related Pages:
• Lug Calculator (https://mechanicalc.com/calculators/lifting-lug-analysis/)
• Strength of Materials (https://mechanicalc.com/reference/strength-of-materials)
• Mechanical Properties of Materials (https://mechanicalc.com/reference/mechanical-properties-
of-materials)
The failure modes for the lug are listed below. The numbers correspond with the labeled sections from
the above figure:
• Simplified analysis - This method is based on first principles and involves making simplifying
assumptions about the nature of the failure and calculating factors of safety. This has the
advantage of being relatively easy, but it only gives an approximate determination of the
adequacy of the lug.
• Air Force Method - This method considers most of the failure modes above, and uses empirical
curves to determine more accurate allowable loads. This method allows for lugs under axial
loading, transverse loading, or oblique loading. This method also accounts for the interaction
between the lug and the pin.
• ASME BTH - This method considers most of the failure modes above, and uses simplified
equations with correction factors based on empirical data to determine more accurate allowable
loads. This method is simpler than the Air Force Method, but it only allows for lugs under axial
loading and does not account for the interaction between the lug and the pin.
Simplified Analysis
This method is based on first principles (as well as on the simplified method outlined in Bruhn
(https://www.amazon.com/Analysis-Design-Flight-Vehicle-Structures/dp/0961523409/ref=as_li_ss_tl?
ie=UTF8&linkCode=ll1&tag=mechanicalc-20&linkId=07e81dbba299931f7bd1e56051ab5df7)) and
involves making simplifying assumptions about the nature of the failure. While it is relatively easy to
perform, it only gives an approximate determination of the adequacy of the lug and should not be
employed for critical structure.
• Dh = hole diameter
• Dp = pin diameter
• R = edge distance (distance from center of hole to edge of lug in direction of applied load)
• r = radius of curvature of edge of lug (greater than or equal to R)
• a = distance from edge of hole to edge of lug = R − 0.5Dh
• w = width
• t = thickness (not shown in figure -- thickness is into the page)
• Z = loss in shear plane length due to curvature at end of lug
• ϕ = shear plane locating angle = 40°
At = (w − Dh )t
The ultimate tensile load is the load that would result in tensile failure across the net section, and is
given by:
Ptu = Stu At
where Stu is the ultimate tensile strength (https://mechanicalc.com/reference/mechanical-properties-
of-materials#stress-strain-curve) of the lug material. The equation above assumes a uniform tensile
stress (https://mechanicalc.com/reference/strength-of-materials#stress-and-strain) over the cross-
section. In reality there will be a stress concentration (https://mechanicalc.com/reference/strength-of-
materials#stress-concentration) due to the flow of stress around the hole.
Ptu
F Stu =
Fapp
As = 2Lsp t
where Lsp is the length of the shear plane and t is the lug thickness. A simple and conservative
approach is to calculate the length of a single shear plane as:
Lsp = a
where a = R − 0.5Dh , as shown in the figure above. If it is desired to account for a slightly longer
shear plane, it is common practice to consider a 40 degree line extending from the center of the shear
pin. At the point where that 40 degree line intersects the pin hole, extend the shear plane horizontally
to the outer edge of the lug. In this case, Lsp is calculated as:
Dp
Lsp = a + (1 − cos(ϕ)) − Z
2
where ϕ is the shear plane locating angle of 40° and Z is the loss in shear plane length due to the
curvature at the end of the lug. This loss is calculated as:
−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−
Z = r − √r − (
2
2 Dp
sin(ϕ))
2
Note that if the lug end is flat then r is infinity and Z is zero.
The ultimate shear load is the load that would result in shear tear out along the two planes, and is given
by:
Psu = Ssu As
where Ssu is the ultimate shear strength of the lug material.
Psu
F Stu =
Fapp
Bearing Failure
Bearing occurs between the surface of the pin and the inner surface of the hole in the lug, as shown in
the figure below:
Abr = Dp t
Note that since the length of the bearing surface is equal to the diameter of the pin, and since the
circumference of a circle is given by C = πD , then:
• the length of the bearing surface is also equal to 1/π times the circumference of the pin
• the swept angle of the bearing surface is equal to 2 radians ≈ 115°
The ultimate bearing load is the load that would result in bearing failure, and is given by:
Pbru
F Sbru =
Fapp
If a bushing is pressed into the lug, then bearing needs to be calculated for both sets of contact:
• Pin on bushing
• Bushing on lug
Mailing List
Subscribe to receive occasional updates on the latest improvements:
Email Address
Subscribe
Air Force Method
The Air Force Method is widely used in industry and is documented in the Stress Analysis Manual of the
Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (FDL). This method follows closely with the methods presented in
Melcon & Hoblit and Bruhn (https://www.amazon.com/Analysis-Design-Flight-Vehicle-
Structures/dp/0961523409/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=ll1&tag=mechanicalc-
20&linkId=07e81dbba299931f7bd1e56051ab5df7), and it relies heavily on curves generated by
empirical data. Although this method is somewhat more complex than other lug analysis methods, it is
incredibly useful because it allows for lugs under axial loading, transverse loading, or oblique loading,
and because it accounts for the interaction between the lug and the pin.
This section discusses axial loading, transverse loading, and oblique loading separately. These sections
disregard the effect of the pin on the lug strength. A discussion of the pin and lug interaction is given at
the end.
Axial Loading
For axially loaded lugs, the Air Force method evaluates the lug for bearing failure, shear-out failure,
hoop tension failure, and failure across the net section. Three of the failure modes are actually
combined into a single failure mode -- the "bearing strength" accounts for bearing, shear-out, and hoop
tension. This is consistent with Bruhn (https://www.amazon.com/Analysis-Design-Flight-Vehicle-
Structures/dp/0961523409/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=ll1&tag=mechanicalc-
20&linkId=07e81dbba299931f7bd1e56051ab5df7) and Melcon & Hoblit.
The dimensions of interest for an axially loaded lug are shown in the figure below:
where D is the hole diameter, t is the lug thickness, and Stu and Sty are the lug material's ultimate and
yield tensile strengths, respectively. Fbru.L and Fbry.L are the lug ultimate and yield bearing stresses,
respectively, and are given by the following equations:
a
Ultimate Bearing Stress, Fbru.L : K Stu KStu
D
a
Yield Bearing Stress, Fbry.L : K Sty KSty
D
The equation for ultimate bearing load can be condensed down to:
The factor K in the equations above is the allowable axial load coefficient which accounts for the
interaction effects between the different failure modes (bearing, shear-out, and hoop tension). The
value of K is read off of one of the following two plots. The first plot is used for D/t ≤ 5 , which is the
most common case. If D/t > 5 then the lug is thin, and in that case the value of K is read off of the
second plot below. (Note 2) (https://mechanicalc.com/reference/lug-analysis#note-axial-load-coefficient-plot)
where Dp is the pin diameter, t is the bushing thickness (assumed to be equal to the lug thickness), and
Scy.B is the compressive yield strength of the bushing material. The Air Force manual assumes the
compressive ultimate strength of the bushing material, Scu.B , to be equal to 1.304 Scy.B .
If there is no bushing in the lug, then the calculation should still be performed assuming that the lug
material is the bushing material.
The equation for net section ultimate load can be condensed down to:
The factor Kn in the equations above is the net tension stress coefficient which is a knock-down on the
allowable stresses. The value of Kn is determined by interpolating between the following plots:
In the curves above, Fty and Ftu are the material's yield and ultimate strengths, respectively, E is the
elastic modulus, and εu is the ultimate strain (https://mechanicalc.com/reference/mechanical-
properties-of-materials#ductility) (i.e. the total strain at failure).
Design Strength Under Axial Load
The design ultimate load for an axially loaded lug is the minimum of the ultimate bearing load, the
ultimate bushing load, and the ultimate net-section load:
Transverse Loading
The analysis for a transversely loaded lug is similar to that for an axially loaded lug. However, the failure
mode for transverse loading is more complicated than for axial loading, and different dimensions are
critical for determining lug strength. The dimensions of interest for a transversely loaded lug are shown
in the figure below:
where h1 , h2 , h3 , and h4 are failure planes of interest. If the lug is symmetric, then the values for
these dimensions can be easily obtained from the dimensions for an axially loaded lug:
h2 = 0.5 (w − D)
h1 = h4 = h2 + 0.5 D (1 − cos 45∘ )
h3 = a
It should be noted that h3 is defined as the smallest dimension on any radial section around the hole,
but it will typically be equal to a . From the above dimensions, the effective edge distance is calculated:
6
hav =
3/h1 + 1/h2 + 1/h3 + 1/h4
The equation above is simply a "reciprocal average" that gives more weighting to dimension h1 since
that section takes most of the load. (Note 3) (https://mechanicalc.com/reference/lug-analysis#note-reciprocal-average)
Lug Strength Under Transverse Load
The ultimate transverse load is given by:
∣ Fbru.L D t if Stu ≤ 1.304 Sty
Ptru.L =∣
∣ 1.304 Fbry.L D t otherwise
where D is the hole diameter and t is the lug thickness. Fbru.L and Fbry.L are the lug ultimate and yield
bearing stresses, respectively, and are given by the following equations:
where Ktru and Ktry are the transverse ultimate and yield load coefficients and are determined from
the following plot:
Ptru.B = Pu.B
where Pu.B is the bushing bearing strength for an axially loaded lug
(https://mechanicalc.com/reference/lug-analysis#air-force-bushing-bearing-axial).
Design Strength Under Transverse Load
The design ultimate load for a transversely loaded lug is the minimum of the ultimate lug load and the
ultimate bushing load:
(https://mechanicalc.com/calculators/lifting-lug-analysis/)
Oblique Loading
In an obliquely loaded lug, the applied load has both axial and transverse components, as shown in the
figure below:
For an obliquely loaded lug, the applied load should be broken out into the axial and transverse
components, Pax and Ptr , and the strengths in the axial and transverse directions should be calculated
as discussed in the previous sections. An allowable load curve can then be defined which takes the form
of an interaction equation, and is given below:
The allowable load curve defines the limits at which the lug is expected to fail -- it defines the ultimate
load for a given combination of applied axial and transverse load. In the equation above, Pax.ult is the
axial component of the ultimate load, Ptr.ult is the transverse component of the ultimate load, Pu.L.B is
the design strength under axial load (https://mechanicalc.com/reference/lug-analysis#air-force-axial-
design-strength), and Ptru.L.B is the design strength under transverse load
(https://mechanicalc.com/reference/lug-analysis#air-force-transverse-design-strength). The allowable
load curve is shown below:
In the figure above, the values along the y-axis are the ratios of the transverse applied load to the
transverse strength, and the values along the x-axis are the ratios of the axial applied load to the axial
strength.
The point for the applied load with coordinates of (Rax , Rtr ) should be plotted. Any point that falls
within the allowable load curve has a factor of safety (https://mechanicalc.com/reference/strength-of-
materials#allowable-stress-design) ≥ 1 with respect to the ultimate load. Note that if the applied load is
completely axial, then the value for Rtr is 0 and the point (Rax , Rtr ) lies along the x-axis, and so the
ultimate load is simply the axial design strength. Likewise for a completely transverse applied load; in
this case, the point lies along the y-axis and so the ultimate load is the transverse design strength.
For an applied load with both axial and transverse components, the ultimate load is calculated by
drawing a line from the origin, through the point (Rax , Rtr ) , and then through the allowable load
curve. This is the load line, and it has a slope of:
Pax.ult Ptr.ult
Rax.ult = Rtr.ult =
Pu.L.B Ptru.L.B
It should be noted that the equation for the slope given above disagrees with the slope specified in the
Air Force Manual. A discussion is given in the Appendix (https://mechanicalc.com/reference/lug-
analysis#oblique-discrepancy).
Instead of determining the ultimate values by plotting, they can be calculated directly by noting that the
ultimate load components, Pax.ult and Ptr.ult are related by:
where α is the angle of the applied load with respect to the axial direction. (Note 4)
(https://mechanicalc.com/reference/lug-analysis#note-ultimate-components-oblique)
The equation defining the allowable load curve
can then be solved for the ultimate axial load, with the relationship above substituted for the ultimate
transverse load:
⎛ ⎞
0.625
=⎜ ⎟
1.6 1.6
1
( ) +( ) ⎜ ⎟
Pax.ult Ptr.ult
=1 → Pax.ult
⎝ ( Pu.L.B ⎠
Pu.L.B Ptru.L.B 1.6 1.6
) + ( Ptru.L.B )
1 tan (α)
Pult
FS =
Papp
One effect that helps the situation is that as the load concentrates near the shear planes, the bending
arm is reduced, and therefore the bending moment in the pin is reduced. However, a study cited by
Molcon and Hoblit found that this decrease in bending moment is "seldom more than 25 percent and
usually much less."
Since bending in the pin affects the strength of the lug, it is critical to account for the pin strength when
analyzing the joint. In this section, a method for calculating the allowable load for a double shear joint is
presented. An example of a double shear joint is shown below:
In a double shear joint, there are two outer (female) lugs, a single inner (male) lug, and a pin.
The overall process of determining the allowable load is illustrated in the diagram below:
where Pult.M is the ultimate load for the male lug and Pult.F is the ultimate load for a single female lug.
Since there are 2 female lugs supporting the load, then the ultimate load with respect to the female lugs
is 2 ⋅ Pult.F .
where DP is the pin diameter and Ssu.P is the ultimate shear strength of the pin material. Note that
twice the area is used in calculating pin shear strength since there are two shear planes.
The ultimate bending load is the applied load that would result in bending failure of the pin, and is
calculated by:
2Mu.P
Pub.P =
Larm
where Larm is the moment arm and Mu.P is the ultimate failing moment for the pin. If the load is
distributed evenly across the entire width of the lugs, then the moment arm is calculated by:
Larm = (
t1 t2
+ + g)
2 4
where t1 is the thickness of a single female lug, t2 is the thickness of the male lug, and g is the gap
between the male and female lugs when the male lug is centered between the female lugs.
πD3P
Mu.P = ⋅ kb.P ⋅ Stu.P
32
where Stu.P is the ultimate tensile strength of the pin material and kb.P is the plastic bending
coefficient. According to the Air Force Manual, "the value of kb.P varies from 1.0 for a perfectly elastic
pin to 1.7 for a perfectly plastic pin, with a value of 1.56 for pins made from reasonably ductile materials
(more than 5% elongation)."
Strong Pin
If the pin is strong, the joint strength will be limited by either the pin shear strength or by the nominal
joint strength. In the case of a strong pin, the pin ultimate bending load is calculated assuming that the
load distributes evenly over the full width of the lugs:
πD3P ⋅ kb.P ⋅ Stu.P
=
16 ( 21 +
t t2
4
+ g)
Pub.P
The equation above is the same as the equation presented earlier for the ultimate pin bending load, but
with the terms combined into a single equation.
For a strong pin, the pin bending does not affect the joint strength and the ultimate joint load is equal to
the nominal ultimate joint load:
Pu.J = Pu.J.nom
Weak Pin
If the pin is weak in bending, then the load will not be distributed evenly over the lug widths. Instead,
the load will concentrate toward the shear planes, and the inner portions of the lugs will be relatively
unloaded. Because of this, the lugs will fail at a lower load than predicted.
To account for the low pin bending strength, a "balanced design" ultimate load is calculated. The goal is
to determine the actual bearing widths over which the lugs support the load. Instead of the load being
supported over the full lug thicknesses, t1 and t2 , the load will instead be distributed over some
smaller widths, b1 and b2 , as shown in the figure below. It is assumed that the load is uniformly
distributed over these widths.
• The ultimate load is reduced for the lugs (the lugs fail at a lower load).
• The moment arm for the pin is reduced, which increases the pin's ultimate bending load (the pin
fails at a higher load).
The new, increased value of the pin ultimate bending load is calculated by:
where, in the equation above, b1 and 2b2 were substituted for t1 and t2 from the previous pin bending
equation.
The trick is to find the values of b1 and b2 that result in the "balanced design" ultimate load. To
determine the balanced design ultimate load, reduce the bearing widths of each of the lugs until the
ultimate load for the lugs are equal to one other as well as equal to the ultimate bending load of the
pin. This requires an iterative process.
Once the balanced design ultimate load is found, the ultimate joint load and the pin ultimate bending
load are each equal to the balanced load:
The overall ultimate load accounting for both the ultimate joint load and the ultimate pin shear load is
calculated by:
Pult
FS =
Papplied
(https://mechanicalc.com/calculators/lifting-lug-analysis/)
The dimensions of interest for the lug analysis are shown in the figure below:
• Dh = hole diameter
• Dp = pin diameter
• be = net width (distance between the edge of the hole and the edge of the lug in the transverse
direction)
• R = edge distance (distance from the center of the hole to the edge of the lug in the direction of
applied load)
• r = radius of curvature of edge of lug (greater than or equal to R )
• a = distance from the edge of the hole to the edge of the lug = R − 0.5Dh
• t = thickness (not shown in figure -- thickness is into the page)
• Z = loss in shear plane length due to curvature at the end of the lug
• ϕ = shear plane locating angle
Correction Factors
The analysis in ASME BTH is very similar to the simplified analysis
(https://mechanicalc.com/reference/lug-analysis#simplified-analysis), with the exception of several
correction factors that are calculated based on test results. These correction factors are discussed
below.
A larger value of ϕ results in a larger shear plane area. Other methodologies commonly take ϕ as a
constant value (typically 40°), but ASME relates it to the ratio of the pin diameter to the hole diameter
such that a loose-fitting pin has a smaller shear plane area than a tight-fitting pin:
Dp
ϕ = 55∘
Dh
Effective Width
The term be is referred to as the net width and is the distance between the edge of the hole and the
edge of the lug in the transverse direction, as shown in the figure:
In the tension calculations, an effective width is calculated and is the smallest of the following:
• beff.1 = be The effective width should not be larger than the actual net
width.
• beff.2 = 4t This limit is intended to protect against dishing failure (once
the lug thickness drops below 1/4 of the net width be , the
effective width is driven down). This limit can be ignored if the
lug is stiffened or constrained against buckling.
−−
−
• beff.3 = 0.6be Stu √ Dh This equation is empirical, fitted to test results.
Sty be
Design
Condition
Factor
Design Category A lifters (predictable loads, accurately defined or non-severe
Nd = 2.00
environmental conditions, no more than 20,000 load cycles)
Design Category B lifters (unpredictable loads, uncertain or severe environmental
Nd = 3.00
conditions)
A service class is used to account for fatigue life and is defined based on the table below:
To determine whether the lug has sufficient strength, calculate a factor of safety
(https://mechanicalc.com/reference/strength-of-materials#allowable-stress-design) for each of the
failure modes described below. As long as the applied force is within the allowable load, and as long as
each factor of safety is acceptable, then the lug can be considered to pass.
Tensile Strength
The ultimate tensile load is the load that would result in tensile failure across the net section, and is
given by:
Pt.u = Cr ⋅ Stu ⋅ At
where Cr is the strength reduction factor (https://mechanicalc.com/reference/lug-analysis#asme-
strength-reduction-factor) and Stu is the ultimate tensile strength of the lug. At is the area of the net
section and is calculated by:
At = 2 ⋅ t ⋅ beff
The allowable tensile load is based on the design factor, Nd , and is given by:
Pt.u
Pt =
1.20Nd
Note that the allowable tensile load is based on the design factor multiplied by 1.20. ASME requires the
design factor for some of the strength calculations to be higher than the nominal value. The factor of
safety is given by:
Pt.u
F St =
Fapp
To meet ASME BTH, the factor of safety must be at least 1.20Nd , but the required factor of safety may
be larger depending on customer requirements or engineering judgement.
Pb.u = Cr ⋅ Stu ⋅ Ab
where Cr is the strength reduction factor (https://mechanicalc.com/reference/lug-analysis#asme-
strength-reduction-factor) and Stu is the ultimate tensile strength of the lug. Ab is an effective area that
is calculated as:
0.92be
Ab = [1.13 (R − )+ ]⋅t
Dh
2 1 + be /Dh
where R is the edge distance, Dh is the hole diameter, be is the net width, and t is the lug thickness.
The allowable single plane fracture load is based on the design factor, Nd , and is given by:
Pb.u
Pb =
1.20Nd
The factor of safety is given by:
Pb.u
F Sb =
Fapp
Pv.u = 0.70Stu Av
where Cr is the strength reduction factor (https://mechanicalc.com/reference/lug-analysis#asme-
strength-reduction-factor) and Stu is the ultimate tensile strength of the lug. Av is the total area of the
two shear planes and is given by:
Dp
Av = 2 ⋅ [a + (1 − cos (ϕ)) − Z] ⋅ t
2
The allowable double plane shear load is based on the design factor, Nd , and is given by:
Pv.u
Pv =
1.20Nd
The factor of safety is given by:
Pv.u
F Sv =
Fapp
Bearing Strength
The ultimate bearing load is the load that would result in bearing failure on either the lug or the pin.
This ultimate load is dependent on the number of load cycles that the connection will be subjected to,
and is given by:
where Sty.min is the minimum yield strength between the lug and the pin (i.e.
Sty.min = min (Sty.lug , Sty.pin ) ). Ap is the pin bearing area and is calculated by:
Ap = Dp t
The allowable bearing load is based on the design factor, Nd , and is given by:
Pp.u
Pp =
Nd
The factor of safety is given by:
Pp.u
F Sp =
Fapp
(https://mechanicalc.com/calculators/)
Appendix
Pu.L
m=
Ptru.L
where Pu.L is the ultimate load for an axially loaded lug and Ptru.L is the ultimate load for a
transversely loaded lug.
The problem with using the above equation for the slope is that the intersection line is the same
regardless of the angle of the applied force. This problem is illustrated in the figure below:
If the applied force is at an angle of 5° such that it is almost entirely axial, then the point for the applied
load would lie along the blue line as shown in the figure, and the intersection point should reflect a
factor of safety that is very close to that of a pure axially loaded lug. Likewise, if the applied force is at an
angle of 85° such that it is almost entirely transverse, then the point for the applied load would lie along
the red line as shown in the figure, and the intersection point should reflect a factor of safety that is
very close to that of a pure transversely loaded lug. Based on this reasoning, the slope of the line should
reflect the applied loading condition:
Notes
The variable names used in the Axial Load Coefficient plot (https://mechanicalc.com/reference/lug-
analysis#plot-axial-load-coeff-thin) from the Air Force Manual are inconsistent with the rest of the
variable names throughout the manual. This plot originated in Melcon & Hoblit, and the variable names
from the plot were not updated to match. The Air Force Manual uses the variable e for edge distance
(center of hole to edge of lug) and a for the distance between the edge of the hole to the edge of the
lug. However, the plot uses a for the edge distance (center of hole to edge of lug).
Rtr Rtr.ult
=
Rax Rax.ult
Express the ratios in terms of the load components and simplify:
Ptr Ptr.ult
tan (α) = =
Pax Pax.ult
Note 5: Factor of Safety for Oblique Loading
It should be noted that the factor of safety for an obliquely loaded lug
(https://mechanicalc.com/reference/lug-analysis#air-force-oblique-lug) can be incorporated into the
⎛ ⎞
0.625
FS = ⎜ ⎟
1
⎜ ⎟
⎝( ⎠
1.6 1.6
) + ( Ptr.allow )
Pax.allow P
Pu.L.B tru.L.B
Mailing List
Subscribe to receive occasional updates on the latest improvements:
Email Address
Subscribe
References
1. ASME BTH-1, "Design of Below-the-Hook Lifting Devices," The American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, 2014.
2. Bruhn, E.F., "Analysis and Design of Flight Vehicle Structures," June 1973.
(https://www.amazon.com/Analysis-Design-Flight-Vehicle-
Structures/dp/0961523409/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=ll1&tag=mechanicalc-
20&linkId=07e81dbba299931f7bd1e56051ab5df7)
3. Melcon, M.A and F.M. Hoblit, "Development in the Analysis of Lugs and Shear Pins," Product
Engineering, June 1953.
4. Niu, Michael C., "Airframe Stress Analysis and Sizing," October 2011.
(https://www.amazon.com/Airframe-Stress-Analysis-Sizing-
Michael/dp/9627128120/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=ll1&tag=mechanicalc-
20&linkId=26f036fabf25f12b0ef3e84bcaa55668)
5. "Stress Analysis Manual," Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, October 1986.
Analysis and
Design of...
Shop now
Airframe Stress
Analysis and...
© 2014-2018 MechaniCalc, Inc.
$75.00
(https://www.linkedin.com/company/mechanicalc)
(https://www.facebook.com/MechaniCalcEng) (https://twitter.com/MechaniCalcEng)
(http://google.com/+MechaniCalcEng)