managers speciality

n1= 14 n2= 15
x1 bar= 1.84 x2 bar= 1.99
sigma1= 0.38 sigma 2= 0.51
alpha= 0.02
var1/n1 0.010314 var2/n2 0.01734
std error= 0.166296
zalpha/2= 2.326348
MOE= 0.386862

mean diff= -0.15 point estimate

98% CI for population mean difference

LL -0.53686
UL 0.236862
Seattle Atlanta (b) H0: mu1-mu2=0 v/s Ha: mu1-mu2<>0 (a) 99% CI
2.55 2.25 stderror= 0.047559
2.67 2.3 z-Test: Two Sample for Means MOE= 0.122505
2.5 2.49 mean diff= 0.140317
2.61 2.41 Seattle Atlanta
2.43 2.39 Mean 2.521429 2.381111 LL 0.017812
2.36 2.26 Known Variance 0.03 0.015 UL 0.262823
2.5 2.4 Observations 21 18
2.36 2.33 Hypothesized Mean Dif 0
2.54 2.29 z 2.950357
2.54 2.48 P(Z<=z) one-tail 0.001587
2.8 2.59 z Critical one-tail 2.326348
2.61 2.38 P(Z<=z) two-tail 0.003174
2.56 2.39 z Critical two-tail 2.575829
2.64 2.4
2.43 2.23 Zobs lies in rejection region
2.43 2.29 Reject Ho
2.38 2.53 Accept Ha
2.49 2.45
2.57 p<alpha
2.71 Reject Ho
2.27 Accept Ha
A B
n1= 50 n2= 38
x1 bar= 8.05 x2 bar= 7.26
sigma1 1.36 sigma2= 1.06
alpha= 0.1
std error= 0.257993

H0: mu1-mu2<=0 v/s Ha: mu1-mu2>0

Zobs= 3.062098

Zcric= 1.281552

Zobs lies in rejection region

Reject Ho
Accept Ha
Sample 1 Sample 2 F-Test Two-Sample for Variances t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances
2 10
9 9 Sample 1 Sample 2
11 11 Mean 5.333333 9.444444 Mean
10 12 Variance 12 2.026144 Variance
1 8 Observatio 18 18 Observations
2 10 df 17 17 Pooled Variance
7 8 F 5.922581 Hypothesized Mean Difference
8 9 P(F<=f) one0.000321 df
4 7 F Critical o 3.24193 t Stat
8 7 P(T<=t) one-tail
0 10 p<alpha t Critical one-tail
5 8 Reject Ho P(T<=t) two-tail
2 9 Accept Ha. Ie variances are not equal t Critical two-tail
2 11
3 10 As the question says variances are equal use the formula
5 11 for equal variance
8 10
9 10 p<alpha
Reject Ho
Accept Ha

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

Sample 1 Sample 2 std error=

Mean 5.333333 9.444444 MOE=
Variance 12 2.026144
Observatio 18 18 mean diff =
Pooled Var 7.013072
Hypothesiz 0 LL
df 34 UL
t Stat -4.65722
P(T<=t) one2.38E-05
t Critical o 2.135581
P(T<=t) two4.76E-05
t Critical tw 2.44115
suming Equal Variances

Sample 1 Sample 2
5.333333 9.444444
12 2.026144
18 18
7.013072
0
34
-4.65722
2.38E-05
2.44115
4.76E-05
2.728394

0.88274
2.154901

-4.11111

-6.26601
-1.95621
 Co-ops Interns F-Test Two-Sample for Variances
15.34 15.10
14.75 14.45 Co-ops Interns
15.88 16.21 Mean 15.645 15.43917
16.92 14.91 Variance 1.194718 0.917699
16.84 13.80 Observations 12 12
17.37 16.02 df 11 11
14.05 16.25 F 1.301862
15.41 15.89 P(F<=f) one-tail 0.334676
16.74 13.99 F Critical one-tail 2.81793
14.55 16.48
15.25 15.75 p> alpha
14.64 16.42 fail to reject Ho. The variances are equal

Ho: mu1-mu2=0 v/s Ha: mu1-mu2<>0

mean diff= 0.205833 t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances
std error= 0.419565
MOE= 0.720454 Co-ops Interns
Mean 15.645 15.43917
Variance 1.194718 0.917699
Observations 12 12
Pooled Variance 1.056209
Hypothesized Mean Differe 0
df 22
t Stat 0.490587
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.314288
t Critical one-tail 1.321237
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.628576
t Critical two-tail 1.717144

90% CI
LL -0.51462
UL 0.926287
 Men Women F-Test Two-Sample for Variances
107.48 125.98
143.61 45.53 Men Women
90.19 56.35 Mean 110.9167 75.483
125.53 80.62 Variance 828.9558 930.7244
70.79 46.37 Observatio 9 10
83.00 44.34 df 8 9
129.63 75.21 F 0.890657
154.22 68.48 P(F<=f) one 0.44049
93.80 85.84 F Critical o 0.169187
126.11
p>alpha
fail to reject Ho
ie variances are equal

Ho: mu1-mu2<=0 v/s Ha: mu1-mu2>0

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

Men Women
Mean 110.9167 75.483
Variance 828.9558 930.7244
Observatio 9 10
Pooled Var 882.8333
Hypothesiz 0
df 17
t Stat 2.595501
P(T<=t) one0.009427
t Critical o 2.566934
P(T<=t) two0.018855
t Critical tw 2.898231

tobs lies in rejection region

reject Ho
Accept Ha
p< alpha
reject Ho
Accept Ha
Before After diff
32 40 -8
28 25 3
35 36 -1
32 32 0
26 29 -3
25 31 -6
37 39 -2
16 30 -14
35 31 4

dbar= -3
sd bar= 5.634714
alpha= 0.1
tcric= 1.859548
std error= 1.878238
MOE= 3.492674

90% CI for mean difference

LL -6.49267
UL 0.492674
Before After Ho:D>=0 v/s Ha: D<0
2 4
4 5 t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means
1 3
3 3 Before After
4 3 Mean 2.444444 4.222222
2 5 Variance 1.277778 1.194444
2 6 Observatio 9 9
3 4 Pearson Co-0.19112
1 5 Hypothesiz 0
df 8
t Stat -3.10811
P(T<=t) one0.007243
t Critical o 1.859548
P(T<=t) two0.014487
t Critical tw 2.306004

tobs lies in rejection region

Reject Ho
Accept Ha
the visits has improved after the seminar

p<alpha
Reject Ho
Accept Ha
the visits has improved after the seminar
n= 27
dbar= 3.71
sdbar= 5
alpha= 0.01

Ho: D <= 0 v/s Ha:D> 0

tobs= 3.855545

tcric= 2.47863

tobs lies in rejection region

Reject Ho
Accept Ha
the value decrease after merger
n= 15
dbar= -2.85
sdbar= 1.9
alpha= 0.01

Ho: D=0 v/s Ha:D<>0

tobs= -5.80948

tcric= +- 2.976843

tobs lies in rejection region

Reject Ho
Accept Ha
A B
n1= 35 n2= 35
x1= 5 x2= 7
p1 cap= 0.1428571429 p2cap= 0.2
q1 cap= 0.8571428571 q2 cap= 0.8
std error= 0.0898330165
alpha= 0.02
Zcric= 2.326347874
MOE= 0.2089828468

proportion diff= -0.05714

98% CI

LL -0.266125704
UL 0.1518399897
n1= 780 n2= 915
p1 cap= 0.09 p2cap= 0.06

p bar= 0.0738053097 q bar= 0.926195

std error= 0.0127415408

alpha= 0.1
proportion diff= 0.03

Ho:P1-P2=0 v/s Ha: P1-P2<>0

Zobs= 2.3545033071

Zcric 1.644853627
Houston Chicago Ho: Variance1= Variance2 v/s Ha: Variance1<>Variance2
132 118
138 85 F-Test Two-Sample for Variances
131 113
127 81 Houston Chicago
99 94 Mean 123.6923 87.90909
126 93 Variance 393.3974 702.6909
134 56 Observatio 13 11
126 69 df 12 10
94 67 F 0.559844
161 54 P(F<=f) one0.169344
133 137 F Critical o 0.232772
119
88 F RT 5.661326
F Lt 0.176637

Fobs lies in acceptance region

fail to reject Ho
there is no significant difference in the Variances of
number of days between Houston & Chicago
n1= 15 n2= 15
var 1= 91.5 var 2= 67.3
alpha= 0.01

Ho: Var1=var2 v/s Ha:var1<>var2

Fobs= 1.359584

F LT 0.232597
F UT 4.299287