Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Liberation
How much a devotee is seriously attached to the devotional service of the
Supreme Personality of Godhead can be understood from the statement of
Mahārāja Pṛthu (Ādi-rāja) which is described in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, Fourth
Canto, Twentieth Chapter, verse 24. He prays to the Supreme Personality of
Godhead thus: "My dear Lord, if after taking liberation I have no chance of
hearing the glories of Your Lordship, glories chanted by pure devotees from
the core of their hearts in praise of Your lotus feet, and if I have no chance
for this honey of transcendental bliss, then I shall never ask for liberation or
this so-called spiritual emancipation. I shall simply always pray unto Your
Lordship that You may give me millions of tongues and millions of ears, so
that I can constantly chant and hear of Your transcendental glories."
The impersonalists desire to merge into the existence of the Supreme, but
without keeping their individuality they have no chance of hearing and
chanting the glories of the Supreme Lord. Because they have no idea of the
transcendental form of the Supreme Lord, there is no chance of their chanting
and hearing of His transcendental activities. In other words, unless one is
already beyond liberation, one cannot relish the transcendental glories of the
Lord, nor can one understand the transcendental form of the Lord.
The purport of this statement by Indra is that beginning from Brahmā down
to the insignificant ant, no living entities are meant for enjoying the material
opulences. They are simply meant for offering everything to the supreme
proprietor, the Personality of Godhead. By doing so, they automatically enjoy
the benefit. The example can be cited again of the different parts of the body
collecting foodstuffs and cooking them so that ultimately a meal may be
offered to the stomach. After it has gone to the stomach, all the parts of the
body equally enjoy the benefit of the meal. So, similarly, everyone's duty is
to satisfy the Supreme Lord, and then automatically everyone will become
satisfied.
A devotee who is attached to a particular form of the Lord does not wish to
redirect his devotion to other forms. For example, Hanumān, the devotee of
Lord Rāmacandra, knew that there is no difference between Lord
Rāmacandra and Lord Nārāyaṇa, and yet he still wanted to render service
only unto Lord Rāmacandra. That is due to the specific attraction of a
particular devotee. There are many, many forms of the Lord, but Kṛṣṇa is still
the original form. Though all of the devotees of the different forms of the
Lord are in the same category, still it is said that those who are devotees of
Lord Kṛṣṇa are the topmost in the list of all devotee