Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
UNOG-OHCHR
CH-1211 Geneva 10 (Switzerland)
Via email: cerd@ohchr.org
2 of 5
These arguments are consistently diminishing the rights of First Nations and freezing those rights
in the past. This is harmful not only for the Treaty 8 First Nations, but for all First Nations across
British Columbia and Canada. A few examples from the injunction hearing are outlined below
that illustrate how far this Crown corporation’s legal arguments are from the espoused
commitments of the BC government:
• BC Hydro explicitly claimed in court that Treaty 8 was never intended to protect First
Nations' "practical, traditional, cultural, or spiritual connection to any land." This is an
arbitrary, one-sided interpretation of the Treaty that runs contrary to the principles of
Treaty interpretation already recognized by the courts, and contrary to the spirit of
reconciliation.
BC Hydro is asserting, in effect, that the "meaningful right" protected by the Treaty can
be reduced to the simple act of hunting, fishing or trapping devoid of the traditional
knowledge, protocols and oral histories that make these acts so meaningful and essential
to First Nations. This cynical denial of Indigenous peoples' own understanding of their
rights is the basis for BC Hydro's unscrupulous denial of the crucial importance of the
Peace River Valley to Treaty 8 Nations.
BC Hydro actually goes so far as to claim that a right can still be meaningfully protected
even when the practice is disrupted for a generation or longer. This is what BC Hydro is
saying when it claims that fishing rights are "compatible" with the flooding of the Peace
Valley because the people of West Moberly will be able to fish in the reservoir that is
created - something that BC Hydro knows may not be safe or possible.
• In its oral arguments, BC Hydro has also demonstrated disrespect for the wisdom of First
Nations elders and tradition keepers, treating their oral evidence as little more than
hearsay.
• BC Hydro has also repeatedly characterized West Moberly’s concerns about the clearing
of forests as an aesthetic issue, not a rights issue. In response to Justice Milman’s
question about planned clearcutting interfering with the exercise of fishing rights, the BC
Hydro lawyer stated, “Perhaps you have to draw a distinction between aesthetics and
harvesting rights.” Diminishing peoples’ human rights’ as an “aesthetic” concern is
demonstrative of the ongoing discrimination against Indigenous peoples perpetuated by
Canadian governments.
These examples illustrate just how far the Crown’s actions are from the commitments that the
Government has made to the people of BC. UBCIC has called on the government of BC to
publicly denounce these statements that diminish Indigenous rights in an open letter to the BC
Supreme Court, and to apologize formally for the disrespect shown to the Treaty 8 First Nations.
As of the date of this submission, there has been no meaningful response from the provincial
government.
3 of 5
The injunction hearings outlined that the affected First Nations have been clear that their goal is
protect the Peace Valley and the ability of future generations to exercise their rights. UBCIC is
concerned is that as the province and BC Hydro succeeded in their arguments, and the injunction
was denied, that irreparable harm will be done before the court is able to rule on this crucial
outstanding issue of the impact on Treaty Rights. Furthermore, we anticipate that in the event of
the court concluding that the dam does violate Treaty rights, the province will use any additional
public investment in the construction of the dam as an argument that remedy should be in the
form of compensation and not in the form of protecting the Valley as the First Nations want.
UBCIC firmly believes that the Site C dam is a profound violation of the Treaty
relationship and, as stated your Committee, a violation of the human rights of First
Nations. Consistent with the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the dam
simply should not proceed when free, prior and informed consent has not been given.
BC Hydro has consistently defended itself by claiming that its meetings with First Nations
constitute meaningful consultation. However, BC Hydro's arguments in court demonstrate a
profound disrespect for Indigenous knowledge and an inability to listen to and learn from our
elders. BC Hydro's arguments in court cast doubt on the corporation's ability or intent to engage
in anything resembling meaningful consultation. BC Hydro's actions also clearly illustrate why
government cannot rely on consultation processes controlled by project proponents to protect
First Nations’ rights. We have long insisted that governments must uphold the minimum
standard of free, prior and informed consent as set out in the UN Declaration.
Regarding Recommendation 20(f), four and a half years have passed since the Mount Polley
Mine disaster, and yet since then no fines, no charges, and no penalties have been levelled
against the company at fault. Certainly, no findings of studies or investigations have been made
public, as CERD so strongly recommended. It seems that the company is getting away scot free.
This is unacceptable when the people and environment are directly impacted by this spill.
There can be no lasting reconciliation while Indigenous peoples’ rights are being trampled
upon, diminished, and frozen in the past. There can be no trust in these governments while
the words they say to the public ring false in the court rooms where Crown corporation
lawyers perpetuate neo-colonization.
We are gravely concerned at Canada’s disregard for the CERD recommendations and the rights
of Indigenous peoples in general. We urge you to take this under the deepest consideration, and
we look forward to your response on this pressing concern.
On behalf of the UNION OF BC INDIAN CHIEFS
Grand Chief Stewart Phillip Chief Robert Chamberlin Kukpi7 Judy Wilson
President Vice-President Secretary-Treasurer
4 of 5
CC: Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada
Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Minister of Justice and Attorney General, Canada
Honourable John Horgan, Premier of British Columbia
Honourable David Eby, Attorney General of British Columbia
National Chief Perry Bellegarde, Assembly of First Nations
Regional Chief Terry Teegee, BC Assembly of First Nations
First Nations Summit Task Group
Kim Minkyong, Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights
Chief Roland Willson, West Moberly First Nation
Chief Kirk Tsakoza, Prophet River First Nation
Reidar Mogerman, West Moberly Legal Counsel
Tim Thielmann, West Moberly Legal Counsel
5 of 5