Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
interaction is something that could reinforce good behavior for younger children or those
children who struggle with a disability (Chazin, 2016a). Different types of preference
assessments are Multiple Stimulus without Replacement, Multiple Stimulus with Replacement,
Paired Stimulus Preference Assessments, Single Stimulus Preference Assessments, and Free
Preference assessments are used because they allow the assessor an opportunity to
evaluate the student and what will motivate them (Chazin, 2016a). The information a preference
assessment produces is whether the items were most desirable, least desirable or moderately
desirable (Chazin, 2016a) The information received from the preference assessment is used for
determining which item the assessor will use to reward or encourage good behavior (Chazzin,
2016a). The preference assessment used within this study was Multiple Stimulus without
Replacement. Multiple Stimulus without Replacement is when the assessor places multiple items
in a row and presents them to the student (Chazin, 2016b). Multiple Stimulus without
Replacement includes the same items throughout all of the trials, making it without replacement
(Chazin, 2016b).
The student is a third grade male, he is a Caucasian student. The student seems to be
behind in reading but understands math. Within the classroom, the student feels bullied by his
peers and struggles with being confident. The student mentioned that his father left, leaving the
The student’s communication is very clear and he really enjoys talking. The student was
very engaged with this preference assessment and was very grateful he could participate. The
student is energetic and communicates how he feels and what goes through his mind. The student
seems be very functional, at times the student can be considered to get overwhelmed and
discouraged, but is well driven. The student had a positive behavior, but needed to be affirmed in
his actions.
The assessment was given in a hallway where there were many kindergarten and
the assessment, people walked by and distracted the student. Luckily, the student was not phased
The people present at the assessment were the assessor and the student, as well as those
who walked by. The assessment took place at a table facing the wall, with two chairs. The wall
the table was against included art work of the classrooms surrounding the assessment. At times,
the student would get distracted and begin discussing the art work.
The items that were on the table included the paper towel for the items, the items in their
entirety, those not used for the specific trial were not in view of the student but remained on the
table, as well as the assessor’s paper to record the data. The student was seated next to the
assessor, both facing the wall. This assessment took place about an hour before school would be
The items used for the assessment included three edible items and two toys. The edible
items were skittles, M&M’s and Haribo gummy bears. The toys included in the assessment was a
little transformer toy as well as a little bit of glow in the dark silly putty. These items were
decided upon by the assessor, the assessor did not have an opportunity to speak with the
student’s corresponding teacher. The assessor had other edible items available in case the student
did not want the three above. The other materials were stored in the far right corner by the
The assessor began to set up and explained what was going to happen to the student as
setting up. The assessor than placed the items on a napkin and covered it and then presented the
items. As the items were presented, the items were received well from the student. The plan for if
the student started to go off-task was to reintroduce the procedure and to encourage the student to
try it again. What occurred was the opposite. The student was very involved and ready to
continue to the next trial. The student was almost surprised and sad in a way when he heard it
Throughout the assessment the student would share his thoughts on the items and his
favorites and continued to share about his life. The student at some points tried to use the two
toys at once to play with them together, but the assessor redirected the student’s attention. For
each trial, the assessor set them up with a paper hiding them, removed the paper, allowed the
student to pick an item, praised the student, covered the remaining items, switched their order
around and then recorded the item that was chosen. This method was repeated for nine trials.
PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT IN 3RD GRADE 5
The results of the assessment were extremely clear. The student had a specific item he
enjoyed the most and always had the same second favorite. The last two or three always seemed
to be whatever he felt like. Even though there were the distractions of the noise and people
walking around, the student stayed very focus and it did not break his concentration.
0
Transformer M&M Gummy Bear Silly Putty Skittle
The formula used to determine the hierarchy was recording the data in a chart, writing
down next to the item what number in the lineup it was per trial. The data was then added up and
created the data shown above and below. The graph above is showing the placement of when
they were picked. For example, the transformer was picked third for the first trial and was picked
The graph below shows which items were picked as first through fifth throughout all of
the trials. As it shows in this chart, and the chart above, clearly the gummy bear was the favorite
PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT IN 3RD GRADE 6
because it was chosen seven times as the first pick, as shown below. Or above we can see that as
the gummy bear’s bars remain on the one for trials two through 8.
The Number of Times the Item Was Chosen and In What Order
8
6
How Many Times Chosen
0
Chosen First Chosen Second Chosen Third Chosen Fourth Chosen Fifth
When it was Chosen
Seen above in the two graphs, we notice that the gummy bear was the first pick and the
second pick was most frequently silly putty. Clearly, one can see that the gummy bear or the silly
putty would be very helpful with redirecting or encouraging the student. This would be followed
by the skittle, and the transformer was favored just a bit more than the M&M’s.
Discussion
Throughout this preference assessment, it is noted how the student was very well
motivated to just please the assessor, that could be considered as one of the reinforcers for this
student, praise. Though, the data shows that gummy bears and the silly putty should help
PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT IN 3RD GRADE 7
motivate the student to try harder the next time. Continuing into the future, studies need to have
as much background as possible to really look into providing the best possible reinforcers for
If I were to use these two with this student, I would encourage him when he is
procrastinating school work with mentioning the possibility of gummy bears at snack time, or
after he finished the work sheet. While with the silly putty, I would probably try to save that for
an end of the day reward and use the gummy bears throughout the day. Moving forward, since I
was not that familiar with this student, it is hard to say how frequent these assessments should be
done. Since he is older, it may be important to do it about every three months since their opinions
do not change as frequently as those younger than them. But I also do not feel it would be
If I were to do this again, I would try to get more information about the student
beforehand, including what motivates them. I would try to pick out less edible items to just
expand to see what would be something the student could play with rather than fill up on. After
doing this assessment I realize how important these reinforcers are. Toner speaks about the
importance of reinforcers. Reinforcers are there to motivate the student to continue a desired
behavior (Toner, n.d.). Reinforcers are the best way to reach that desired behavior (Toner, n.d.).
In the student’s case for this preference assessment, the best result will come when encouraged
with a gummy bear or use of the silly putty for a bit. Overall, this was an excellent experience
with a preference assessment because of the student’s willingness to listen and be involved.
PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT IN 3RD GRADE 8
Bibliography
Chazin, K.T. & Ledford, J.R. (2016). Multiple stimulus without replacement (MSWO)
stimulus-without-replacement
Chazin, K.T. & Ledford, J.R. (2016). Preference assessments. In Evidence-based instructional
practices for young children with autism and other disabilities. Retrieved from
http://vkc.mc.vanderbilt.edu/ebip/preference-assessments
Toner, N. (n.d.). Conducting preference assessments on individuals with autism and other
parents_corner/conducting_preference_assessments_on_individuals_with_autism_and_ot
her_developmental_disabilities