Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Acaricides
Franz Müller (formerly Novartis Crop Protection AG, Basel), Allschwil, Switzerland (Chaps. 2, 3, 4)
Hans Peter Streibert, Novartis Crop Protection AG, Basel, Switzerland (Chap. 1; Chaps. 2 and 3 in part)
Saleem Farooq, Novartis Crop Protection AG, Basel, Switzerland (Chap. 1; Chaps. 2 and 3 in part)
1. Phytophagous Mites and Their this increase of mites are manifold and not yet
Control completely understood. Intensified agricultural
production methods, such as monocultures, ex-
Mites belong to the phylum Arthropoda, the tensive use of fertilizers, improved irrigation
class Arachnida, and the order Acarina. They systems, and cultural practices such as pruning
have developed an astonishing variety of feeding have improved the vigor and nutritional value
habits. Some mites are predators, while others of the plants. However, these conditions also are
feed on detritus in soil or water. The economi- beneficial to the development of phytophagous
cally important species are parasitic on either an- mites and may result in higher rates of repro-
imals (e.g., ticks, scab mites) or plants (e.g., spi- duction. Furthermore, the indiscriminate use of
der mites, eriophyid mites). Phytophagous mites pesticides in the past may have reduced or even
are found in all parts of the world on practi- eliminated the populations of natural enemies
cally all crop plants and may cause consider- of the mites (predatory mites and beneficial in-
able damage. Approximately 8 – 10 % (annually sects) thereby encouraging the development of
ca. $ 400×106 ) of the total insecticide-acaricide certain phytophagous mite species. In addition,
market is spent on the control of phytophagous some insecticides (e.g., DDT, Carbaryl) used for
mites. the control of insect pests, may promote the re-
production of phytophagous mites [6–8].
leaves, and fruit, and they also transmit viruses. become problematic. Because of the large num-
They may cause serious economic damage, es- ber of generations per season, selection may oc-
pecially in citrus fruits. cur very rapidly in a mite population. Resistance
After a heavy attack of citrus rust mites is induced by repeated application of the same
(Phyllocoptruta oleivora), the fruit turns reddish or closely related chemicals. To compensate for
brown and shrinks because of the loss of wa- this effect, higher dosages are needed, but this is
ter. The citrus bud mite (Aceria sheldoni) causes not a long-term solution to the resistance prob-
malformation of citrus fruits. lem. New compounds with new modes of ac-
tion must continue to be developed to replace
the older ones, that have decreased in effective-
1.3. Possibilities for Mite Control ness.
New control concepts, such as integrated pest
Chemical treatment can be aimed either at over- management, have made it possible to reduce
wintering eggs (e.g., those of Panonychus ulmi) the number of acaricide treatments in many sit-
or at the mobile stages of the mites. Winter eggs uations, and this has slowed development of re-
often are treated with mineral oils. For the effec- sistance in mite populations.
tive control of mites during the vegetative period,
a number of chemicals are available. However,
compounds that are effective against all develop- 2. Older Acaricides
ment stages and have a long-term residual effect
are preferred. Products introduced at the beginning of the pes-
The compounds used should be well toler- ticide era still find limited use as acaricides in
ated by the plants, and the effects on environ- various parts of the world.
ment and beneficial insects should be minimal. Nitrophenols , in combination with mineral
The population of these natural enemies, which oil, were used to fight mites in orchards by elim-
could control mite populations effectively, has inating their overwintering eggs. However, the
been reduced severely or eliminated in most or- phytotoxicity of these compounds has been a
chards, vineyards, and citrus groves as a result drawback [16, p. 527]. For a review of nitrophe-
of the use of broadspectrum pesticides aimed at nols with acaricidal activity see [17, p. 2] and
targets other than mites. [18, p. 537].
Biological control of phytophagous mites by Sulfur [7704-34-9], used mainly as a protec-
releasing their natural enemies, such as preda- tive fungicide to control powdery mildews, is
tory bugs or coccinellids, has been successful effective against the mobile stages of various
in greenhouses or in plastic tunnels. However, mite species. It is used in combination with other
only limited success has been achieved under fungicides and insecticides mainly in vineyards
field conditions [13–15]. [17, p. 2].
Integrated pest management, which makes Azobenzene [103-33-3] has been used as a fu-
use of a variety of possible techniques, includ- migant in greenhouses against insects and mites,
ing chemicals, to keep the pest population be- especially against eggs [17, p. 2].
low the economic threshold, is far more promis- Binaparcryl [485-31-4] has been used as a
ing than simple biological control. In integrated nonsystemic acaricide, mainly against all stages
pest management systems, chemicals are used of spider mites and powdery mildew of apples,
only when the population density reaches a cer- citrus fruits, cotton, etc. [19, p. 73].
tain level (economic threshold) and if possible, Chlorfenson [80-33-1] has been used as a
selective acaricides are chosen so as not to harm nonsystemic acaricide with long residual ovici-
beneficial insects and predatory mites. dal activity. It is effective against mites of citrus
and other fruits [19, p. 150].
Tetrasul [2227-13-6] has been used as a non-
1.4. Mite Resistance systemic acaricide, particularly suitable for the
control of various phytophagous mites which hi-
In many areas, mites have developed resistance bernate in winter egg form. It has been used on
to certain chemicals: their control therefore has vegetables and fruits [19, p. 790].
4 Acaricides
3. Insecticides with
Acaricidal Activity
3.1. Organophosphates and Chlorfenvinphos is produced by reaction of
(Oxime)Carbamates 2,4-dichloroacetophenone with triethyl phos-
phite [22].
Organophosphates and carbamates, used as Chlorfenvinphos (announced in 1952) is used
broad-spectrum insecticides but also exhibiting for soil application to control root flies, root
acaricidal action, were able to contain the mite worms, and insects in vegetables and fruit flies
problem for some time. However, development in maize.
of mite resistance toward these compounds has Trade Names. Birlane (Cyanamid); Apachlor
made them less and less effective as acaricides. (Rhône-Poulenc).
product with phosphenyl chloride to give the by reaction of an excess of dichlorobutane with
thiophosphonic acid, which is converted to ethyl phenol in the presence of potassium hydroxide
phenyl thiophosphonate chloride by treatment [30].
with ethanol, followed by condensation of the Fenothiocarb (announced in 1985) is a non-
product with the sodium salt of p-nitrophenol systemic acaricide used to control eggs and
[28]. young stages of Panonychus citri, Panonychus
EPN (announced in 1948) is used against a ulmi, and other Panonychus spp.
broad range of Lepidoptera larvae, especially Trade Name. Panocan (Kumiai).
ballworms and Alabama argillacea in cotton,
Chilo spp. in rice, and other leaf-eating larvae Formothion [2540-82-1], O,O-dimethyl S-
in fruit and vegetables. [formyl(methyl)carbomylmethyl] phosphoro-
Trade Name. EPN (Nisson). dithioate, C6 H12 NO4 PS2 , M r 257.3, mp
25 – 26 ◦ C, is a pale yellow viscous liquid or
Ethion [563-12-2], O,O,O ,O -tetraethyl crystalline mass which is moderately soluble
S,S -methylene bis(phosphorodithioate), in water but completely miscible with common
C9 H22 O4 P2 S4 , M r 384.5, bp 164 – 165 ◦ C organic solvents [20, p. 625].
(40 Pa), is a colorless to amber liquid which is
practically insoluble in water but miscible with
most common organic solvents [20, p. 480].
fruit flies, and spider mites on pome fruit, stone followed by reaction with dimethylphosphoryl
fruit, citrus fruit, ornamentals, and vines. chloride [47].
Trade Names. Prolate (Gowan); Fosdan (Gen- Pirimiphos-methyl (announced in 1966) is
eral Quimica); Inovat (Productos OSA). used for control of a wide range of insects
and mites in warehouses, stored grain, and an-
Phosphamidon [13171-21-6], O,O-di- imal houses, as well as industrial and domestic
methyl O-(2-chloro-2-diethylcarbamoyl-1- premises.
methyl)vinyl phosphate, C10 H19 ClNO5 P, M r Trade Names. Actellic (Zeneca); Actellifog
299.7, bp 162 ◦ C (2 kPa), is a pale yellow liquid (Hortochem).
which is miscible with water and many organic
solvents with the exception of aliphatic hydro- Profenofos [41198-08-7], O-4-bromo-2-
carbons [20, p. 965]. chlorophenyl O-ethyl S-propyl phosphoro-
thioate, C11 H15 BrClO3 PS, M r 373.6, bp 100 ◦ C
(1.8 Pa), is a pale yellow liquid which is spar-
ingly soluble in water but readily miscible with
most organic solvents [20, p. 1006].
Quinalphos (announced in 1969) is used to is a pale yellow oil which is sparingly solu-
control many insect pests such as Lepidoptera, ble in water and readily soluble in acetone,
Coleoptera and Diptera on fruit trees, cotton, dichloromethane, methanol, isopropanol, ethyl
vegetables, peanuts, and many other crops. acetate [20, p. 1226].
Trade Names. Ekalux (Novartis); Hubelux
(Sanonda); Starlux (Shaw Wallace).
stages of Panonychus ulmi and Tetranychus spp. Dienochlor is produced by the catalytic
on pome fruit, stone fruit, nuts, vines, and hops. reduction of hexachlorocyclopentadiene [82],
Trade Name. Apollo (AgrEvo). [83].
Dienochlor is used mainly for control of mites
Cymizaol [61676-87-7], N-2,3-dihydro- on ornamentals and may act as an inhibitor of
3-methyl-1,3-thiazol-2-ylidene-2,4-xylidine, oviposition.
C12 H14 N2 S, M r 218.3, mp 44 ◦ C, forms col- Trade Name. Pentac (Novartis).
orless crystals which are sparingly soluble
in water but soluble in benzene, methanol, Endosulfan [115-29-7], 6,7,8,9,10,10-
dichloromethane, and hexane [20, p. 197]. hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-6,9-
methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepine 3-oxide,
C9 H6 Cl6 O3 S, M r 406.9, mp > 80 ◦ C, consists
of colorless crystals which are sparingly solu-
ble in water but readily soluble in ethyl acetate,
dichloromethane, toluene, ethanol, and hexane
[20, p. 459].
Cymizaol is produced by cyclocondensation
of N-2,4-dimethylphenyl-N -methylthiourea
with chloroacetaldehyde [78].
Cymizaol (announced in 1977) is used in dips
or as a spray to control all Acarina species,
including strains resistant to organochlorines,
organophosphates, and carbamates. Endosulfan is produced by reaction of
Trade Name. Tifatol (Novartis). 1,2,3,4,7,7-hexachloro-5,6-dihydroxymethyl-
bicylo[2,2,1]-hept-5-ene, obtained by con-
Dienochlor [2227-17-0], perchlorobi(2,4-
densation of cis-1,4-dihydroxybut-2-ene with
cyclopentadienyl), C10 Cl10 , M r 474.6, mp
hexachlorocyclopentadiene, with thionyl chlo-
122 – 123 ◦ C, tan crystalline solid, vapor pres-
ride [84].
sure 10−6 kPa at 25 ◦ C, is insoluble in water,
Endosulfan (announced in 1956) acts as an
slightly soluble in ethanol, acetone, and aliphatic
antagonist of the GABA receptor chloride chan-
hydrocarbons, and moderately soluble in aro-
nel complex, and is used to control sucking,
matic hydrocarbons [16, p. 186], [18, p. 529].
chewing, and boring insects and mites on a broad
range of crops.
Trade Names. Fan (FMC); Thiodan (AgrEvo);
Thionex (Makhteshim-Agan).
18 Acaricides
4. Toxicology
Pyridaben is produced by reaction of The following summary gives an overview of the
mucochloric acid with 4-tert-butylmercapto- toxicological profile of various acaricides. The
toluene, followed by cyclocondensation of the data were assembled by searching the literature
resulting malealdehydic acid derivative with N- and databanks available to the public. Because
tert-butylhydrazine [92]. most of these compounds are proprietary prod-
Pyridaben (announced in 1988) is active ucts, many of the toxicological data are not pub-
against all developing stages, especially against lished. Information in well-documented mono-
the larval and nymph stages, and is used for con- graphs, (e.g., WHO/FAO), in which the original
trol of Acari, Aleyrodidae, Aphididae, Cicadel- data from the companies are available, were pre-
lidae and Thysanoptera on field crops. ferred to other published data, (e.g., handbooks),
Trade Name. Sanmite (Nissan). because the studies submitted to WHO/FAO
were performed according to internationally ac-
Tebufenpyrad [119168-77-3], cepted test protocols and good laboratory prac-
N-(4-tert-butylbenzyl)-4-chloro-3-ethyl-1- tices. The values presented should be viewed as
methylpyrazole-5-carboxamide, C18 H24 ClN3 O, a broad estimate of human toxicity as limited by
M r 333.8, mp 61 – 61 ◦ C, consists of colorless strain, number of animal tested, study design,
crystals which are sparingly soluble in water and applicability of the biological model.
but soluble in acetone, methanol, chloroform,
acetonitrile, hexane, and benzene [20, p. 1148].
4.1. Organophosphates and
(Oxime)Carbamates
Methacrifos [62610-77-9]
Fenothiocarb [62850-32-2]
LD50 (rat, oral) 678 mg/kg [106,
LD50 (rat, oral) 1150 – 1200 mg/kg [20, p. 276]
p. 517] LD50 (mouse, oral) 58 – 66 mg/kg [106,
LD50 (mouse, oral) 4875 – 7000 mg/kg [20, p. 276]
p. 517] LD50 (dog, oral) 573 mg/kg [106,
LD50 (mouse, dermal) > 8000 mg/kg [20, p. 276]
p. 517] LD50 (chicken, oral) 101 mg/kg [106,
LD50 (rat, dermal) 2075 – 2425 mg/kg [20, p. 276]
p. 517] LD50 (rat, dermal) > 3100 mg/kg [106,
LC50 (rat, 4-h inhalation) > 0.79 mg/L air [20, p. 276]
p. 517] LD50 (rabbit, dermal) 2732 mg/kg [106,
NOEL/NOAEL: p. 276]
Chronic. LC50 (rat, 6-h inhalation) 2.5 mg/L air [106,
Rat (2-year feed): 1.86 – 1.94 mg kg−1 d−1 [20, p. 276]
p. 517] Rabbit: mildly irritating to skin [106,
Dog (one-year feed): 1.5 – 3.0 mg kg−1 d−1 [20, p. 276]
p. 517] Rabbit: nonirritating to eyes [106,
p. 276]
ADI: 0.0075 mg kg−1 d−1 [20, p. 517]
Guinea pig: not a skin sensitizer [106,
p. 276]
Nonmutagenic [106,
p. 276]
24 Acaricides
NOEL/NOAEL:
Methidathion [950-37-8]
Reproduction.
LD50 (rat, oral) 26 – 43.8 mg/kg [104,
Rat (2-generation feed): 0.5 mg kg−1 d−1 [104,
p. 233]
(parental and p. 101]
LD50 (rat, oral) 26 mg/kg [104,
developmental)
p. 233]
Chronic.
LD50 (mouse, oral) 17 mg/kg [104,
Rat (2-year feed): 0.5 mg kg−1 d−1 [104, p. 233]
p. 101] LD50 (hamster, oral) 30 mg/kg [104,
Mouse (21-22-month 15 mg kg−1 d−1 [104, p. 233]
feed): p. 101] LD50 (guinea pig, oral) 25 mg/kg [104,
Dog (26-week feed): 2.5 mg kg−1 d−1 [104, p. 233]
p. 101] LD50 (rabbit, oral) 80 mg/kg [104,
Human. p. 233]
−1 −1
0.06 mg kg d [104, LD50 (dog, oral) 200 mg/kg [104,
p. 101] p. 233]
−1 −1
ADI: 0.006 mg kg d [104, p. 101] LD50 (chicken, oral) 80 mg/kg [104,
p. 233]
LD50 (rat, dermal) 1546 – 1663 mg/kg [104,
p. 233]
Rabbit: irritating to eyes [104,
Methamidophos [10265-92-6] p. 233]
Rabbit: very slightly irritating to skin [104,
LD50 (rat, oral) ∼ 20 mg/kg [104, p. 233]
p. 105] Guinea pig: not a skin sensitizer [104,
LD50 (rabbit, oral) 10 – 30 mg/kg [20, p. 105]
p. 808] Nonmutagenic [104,
LD50 (dog, oral) 10 – 30 mg/kg [20, p. 233]
p. 808] NOEL/NOAEL:
LD50 (cat, oral) 10 – 30 mg/kg [20, Reproduction.
p. 808] Rat (2-generation feed): 0.43 mg kg−1 d−1 [104,
LD50 (guinea pig, oral) 30 – 50 mg/kg [20, (parental and p. 233]
p. 808] developmental)
LD50 (rat, dermal) 130 mg/kg [20, Teratogenicity.
p. 808]
Rat (gavage): 1.0 mg kg−1 d−1 [104,
LC50 (rat, 4-h inhalation) 0.2 mg/L air [20,
(maternal) p. 233]
p. 808]
Rabbit: nonirritating to skin [20, 2.5 mg kg−1 d−1 [104,
p. 808] (developmental) p. 233]
Rabbit: slightly irritating to eyes [20, Rabbit (gavage): 6 mg kg−1 d−1 [104,
p. 808] (maternal) p. 233]
Guinea pig: not a skin sensitizer [104, 12 mg kg−1 d−1 [104,
p. 105] (developmental) p. 233]
Nonmutagenic [104, Chronic.
p. 195] Rat (2-year feed): 0.16 mg kg−1 d−1 [104,
NOEL/NOAEL: p. 233]
−1 −1
Chronic. Mouse (23-month feed): 1.4 mg kg d [104,
Rat (2-year feed): 0.1 mg kg−1 d−1 [104, p. 233]
−1
p. 105] Dog (one-year feed): 0.1 mg kg d−1 [104,
Mouse (2-year feed): 0.7 mg kg−1 d−1 [20, p. 233]
p. 808] Human.
Dog (one-year feed): 2.5 mg kg−1 d−1 [104, 0.11 mg kg−1 d−1 [104,
p. 105] p. 233]
Neurotoxicity. ADI: 0.001 mg kg−1 d−1 [104, p. 233]
Hen: 0.3 mg kg−1 d−1 [104,
p. 105]
Human.
(21-day): 0.04 mg kg−1 d−1 [104,
p. 105]
−1 −1
ADI: 0.004 mg kg d [104, p. 105]
Acaricides 25
Mevinphos [26718-65-03]
Methomyl [16752-77-5]
LD50 (rat, oral) 3.7 – 7 mg/kg [100,
LD50 (rat, oral) 17 – 45 mg/kg [105, p. 1006]
p. 97] LD50 (mouse, oral) 4.3 – 12.9 mg/kg [100,
LD50 (rabbit, oral) 30 mg/kg [105, p. 1006]
p. 97] LD50 (rat, dermal) 4.2 – 4.7 mg/kg [100,
LD50 (chicken, oral) 28 mg/kg [105, p. 1006]
p. 97] LD50 (mouse, dermal) 40 – 50.2 mg/kg [100,
LD50 (dog, oral) 20 mg/kg [105, p. 1006]
p. 97] LD50 (rabbit, dermal) 16 – 33 mg/kg [20,
LD50 (chicken, oral) 28 mg/kg [105, p. 844]
p. 97] LC50 (rat, one-h 0.125 mg/L air [20,
LD50 (rat, dermal) > 1000 mg/kg [105, inhalation) p. 844]
p. 97] Rabbit: mildly irritating to eyes and skin [20,
LC50 (rat, 4-h inhalation) 0.30 mg/L air [105, p. 844]
p. 97] NOEL/NOAEL:
Rabbit: irritating to eyes [20, Chronic.
p. 815] Rat (2-year feed): 0.02 mg kg−1 d−1 [108,
Guinea pig: not a skin sensitizer [20, p. 385]
p. 815] −1 −1
Dog (2-year capsule): 0.025 mg kg d [108,
Nonmutagenic [105, p. 385]
p. 97] Human.
0.014 mg kg−1 d−1 [108,
p. 385]
ADI: 0.01 mg kg−1 d−1 [108, p. 385]
26 Acaricides
Halfenprox [111872-58-3]
LD50 (rat, oral) 132 – 159 mg/kg [20, Formetanate [22259-30-9]
p. 654]
LD50 (mouse, oral) 121 – 149 mg/kg [20, LD50 (rat, oral) 15 – 26 mg/kg [100,
p. 654] p. 1159]
LD50 (rat, dermal) 2000 mg/kg [20, LD50 (mouse, oral) 13 – 25 mg/kg [100,
p. 654] p. 1159]
LC50 (rat, 4-h inhalation) 0.36 – 1.38 mg/L air [20, LD50 (dog, oral) 19 mg/kg [100,
p. 654] p. 1159]
NOEL/NOAEL: LD50 (rabbit, dermal) > 10200 mg/kg [100,
Chronic. p. 1159]
Rat (2-year feed): 1.4 mg kg−1 d−1 [20, LD50 (rat, dermal) > 5600 mg/kg [100,
p. 654] p. 1159]
−1 −1
ADI: 0.014 mg kg d [20, p. 654] LC50 (rat, 4-h inhalation) 0.28 – 2.9 mg/L air [100,
p. 1159]
Rabbit: irritating to eyes [20,
p. 623]
Guinea pig: skin sensitizer [20,
p. 623]
Nonmutagenic [100,
p. 1159]
32 Acaricides
NOEL/NOAEL: NOEL/NOAEL:
Teratogenicity. Reproduction.
Not teratogenic [100, Rat (feed): 6.4 mg kg−1 d−1 [128,
p. 1159] p. 75]
Reproduction. Teratogenicity.
Rat (2-generation feed): 2.5 g kg−1 d−1 [106, Mouse (gavage): 10 mg kg−1 d−1 [128,
(parental and p. 1] (developmental) p. 75]
developmental) 40 mg kg−1 d−1 [128,
Chronic. (maternal) p. 75]
−1 −1
Rat (2-year feed): 0.52 mg kg d [20, Rat (gavage): 100 mg kg−1 d−1 [128,
p. 623] (maternal and p. 75]
−1 −1
Mouse (2-year feed): 8.2 mg kg d [20, developmental)
p. 623] Syrian hamster (gavage): 25 mg kg−1 d−1 [128,
Dog (one-year feed): 0.37 mg kg−1 d−1 [20, (maternal) p. 75]
p. 623] 12.5 mg kg−1 d−1 [128,
ADI: 0.037 mg kg−1 d−1 [20, p. 623] (developmental) p. 75]
Rabbit (gavage): 0.5 mg kg−1 d−1 [128,
(developmental) p. 75]
Chronic.
Rat (30-month feed): 6.4 mg kg−1 d−1 [128,
(males) p. 75]
4.4. Nitrophenyl Esters 8.1 mg kg−1 d−1 [128,
(females) p. 75]
Toxic Action. Uncoupling of oxidative Dog (one-year feed): 0.4 mg kg−1 d−1 [128,
p. 75]
phosphorylation; cataract formation [94, Eye cateracts in duck and 9 mg kg−1 d−1 [128,
p. 556]. rabbit: NOAEL (rabbit, p. 75]
gavage)
ADI: 0.001 mg kg−1 d−1 [128, p. 75]
Dinobuton [973-21-7]
LD50 (rat, oral) 140 mg/kg [124]
LD50 (mouse, oral) 2540 mg/kg [125]
LD50 (rat, dermal) > 5000 mg/kg [126]
NOEL/NOAEL: 4.5. Sulfonic Acid Ester
Chronic.
−1 −1
Rat (2-year feed): 3–6 mg kg d [127]
Dog (one-year feed): 4.5 mg kg−1 d−1 [127] Tetradifon [116-29-0]
LD50 (rat, oral) > 14700 mg/kg [20,
p. 1177]
LD50 (rabbit, dermal) > 10000 mg/kg [20,
Dinocap [39300-45-31] p. 1177]
LC50 (rat, 4-h inhalation) > 3 mg/L air [20,
LD50 (male rat, oral) 1581 – 2321 mg/kg [128, p. 1177]
p. 75] Rabbit: nonirritating to skin [20,
LD50 (female rat, oral) 510 – 1493 mg/kg [128, p. 1177]
p. 75] Rabbit: slightly irritating to eyes [20,
LD50 (mouse, oral) 150 – 180 mg/kg [128, p. 1177]
p. 75] Nonmutagenic [20,
LD50 (rabbit, oral) 2000 – 3000 mg/kg [128, p. 1177]
p. 75] Not teratogenic in rat and rabbit [20,
LD50 (dog, oral) 100 mg/kg [128, p. 1177]
p. 75] NOEL/NOAEL:
LD50 (rabbit, dermal) > 4700 [128, Reproduction.
p. 75] Rat (2-generation feed): ca. 10 mg kg−1 d−1 [20,
LC50 (rat, 4-h inhalation) 0.36 mg/L air [20, p. 1177]
p. 426] Chronic.
Rabbit: moderately to markedly irritating, to skin and eyes [20, Rat (2-year feed): 15 mg kg−1 d−1 [20,
p. 426] (males) p. 1177]
Nonmutagenic [20,
p. 426]
Acaricides 33
NOEL/NOAEL:
4.6. Halogenated Benzhydrol Reproduction.
Derivatives Rat (2-generation feed): 0.25 mg kg−1 d−1 [107,
(parental) p. 137]
2.1 mg kg−1 d−1 [107,
Bromopropylate [18181-80-1] (developmental) p. 137]
Teratogenicity.
LD50 (rat, oral) > 5000 mg/kg [99, Rat (gavage): 0.25 mg kg−1 d−1 [107,
p. 39] (maternal) p. 137]
LD50 (mouse, oral) 8000 mg/kg [99, 25 mg kg−1 d−1 [107,
p. 39] (developmental) p. 137]
LD50 (rabbit, oral) > 6000 mg/kg [99,
Rabbit (gavage): 0.4 mg kg−1 d−1 [107,
p. 39]
(maternal) p. 137]
LD50 (rat, dermal) > 4000 mg/kg [99,
4 mg kg−1 d−1 [107,
p. 39]
(developmental) p. 137]
LD50 (rabbit, dermal) > 2020 mg/kg [99,
Chronic.
p. 39]
LC50 (rat, 4-h inhalation) > 4458 mg/L air [99, Rat (2-year feed): 0.22 mg kg−1 d−1 [107,
p. 39] p. 137]
−1 −1
Rabbit: nonirritating to eyes and skin [99, Mouse (78-week feed): > 40 mg kg d [107,
p. 39] p. 137]
Guinea pig: not a skin sensitizer [99, Dog (one-year feed): 0.82 mg kg−1 d−1 [107,
p. 39] p. 137]
Nonmutagenic [99, ADI: 0.002 mg kg−1 d−1 [107, p. 137]
p. 39]
NOEL/NOAEL:
Reproduction.
Rat (2-generation feed): 9 mg kg−1 d−1 [99, 4.7. Organometallic Compounds
(parental and p. 39]
developmental)
Teratogenicity. Toxic Action. Interference with lymphocyte
Rat (gavage): 50 mg kg−1 d−1 [99,
(maternal) p. 39]
function; induction of heme oxygenase; de-
700 mg kg−1 d−1 [99, creased liver hemoprotein level [94, p. 353].
(developmental) p. 39]
Rabbit (gavage): 20 mg kg−1 d−1 [99,
(maternal) p. 39] Azocyclotin [41083-11-8]
120 mg kg−1 d−1 [99, LD50 (rat, oral) > 150 mg/kg [116,
(developmental) p. 39] p. 50]
Chronic. LD50 (rat, oral) 209 – 363 mg/kg [20,
Rat (2-year feed): 3.7 mg kg−1 d−1 [99, p. 69]
p. 39] LD50 (guinea pig, oral) 261 mg/kg [20,
Mouse (2-year feed): 16 mg kg−1 d−1 [99, p. 69]
p. 39] LD50 (mouse, oral) 870 – 980 mg/kg [20,
Dog (one-year feed): 2.7 mg kg−1 d−1 [99, p. 69]
p. 39] LD50 (rat, dermal) > 5000 mg/kg [116,
p. 50]
ADI: 0.03 mg kg−1 d−1 [99, p. 39]
LC50 (rat, 4-h inhalation) ∼ 0.02 mg/L air [116,
p. 50]
Rabbit: irritating to skin and eyes [116,
Dicofol [115-32-3] p. 50]
LD50 (rat, oral) 587 – 595 mg/kg [107, Guinea pig: not a skin sensitizer [116,
p. 137] p. 50]
LD50 (mouse, oral) 669 – 675 mg/kg [107, NOEL/NOAEL:
p. 137] Reproduction.
LD50 (rabbit, oral) 1820 mg/kg [107, Rat (2-generation feed): 1.0 mg kg−1 d−1 [129,
p. 137] p. 22]
LD50 (dog, oral) > 4000 mg/kg [107, Teratogenicity.
p. 137] Rabbit (gavage): 0.1 mg kg−1 d−1 [129,
LD50 (rat, dermal) > 5000 mg/kg [107, (maternal) p. 22]
p. 137] 1.0 mg kg−1 d−1 [129,
LD50 (rabbit, dermal) > 2500 mg/kg [107, (developmental) p. 22]
p. 137] Chronic.
LC50 (rat, 4-h inhalation) > 5 mg/L air [107, Rat (2-year feed): 0.25 mg kg−1 d−1 [129,
p. 137] p. 22]
Rabbit: nonirritating to eyes [107, −1 −1
Mouse (2-year feed): 2.14 mg kg d [129,
p. 137]
p. 22]
Rabbit: irritating to skin [107,
p. 137] Dog (2-year feed): 0.25 mg kg−1 d−1 [129,
Guinea pig: not a skin sensitizer [134] p. 22]
Nonmutagenic [107, ADI: 0.007 mg kg−1 d−1 [129, p. 22]
p. 137]
34 Acaricides
Buprofezin [69327-76-0]
LD50 (rat, oral) 1635 – 2355 mg/kg [98, Chinomethionate [2439-01-2]
p. 75]
LD50 (mouse, oral) > 1000 mg/kg [98, LD50 (rat, oral) 1800 – 4800 mg/kg [131]
p. 75] LD50 (guinea pig, oral) 1500 mg/kg [20,
LD50 (hamster, oral) > 10000 mg/kg [98, p. 198]
p. 75] LD50 (rat, dermal) > 5000 mg/kg [20,
LD50 (rabbit, oral) > 5000 mg/kg [98, p. 198]
p. 75] LC50 (rat, 4-h inhalation) 3.0 mg/L air [20,
LD50 (rat, dermal) > 5000 mg/kg [98, p. 198]
p. 75] Rabbit: slightly irritating to skin and eyes [20,
LC50 (rat, 4-h inhalation) > 4.6 mg/L air [98, p. 198]
p. 75] Nonmutagenic [102,
Rabbit: mildly irritating to skin [98, p. 27]
p. 75] NOEL/NOAEL:
Rabbit: nonirritating to eyes [98, Reproduction.
p. 75] Rat (one-generation feed): ca. 1 mg kg−1 d−1 [102,
Nonmutagenic [98, (parental and p. 27]
p. 75] developmental)
NOEL/NOAEL: Teratogenicity.
Reproduction. Rat (gavage): 25 mg kg−1 d−1 [102,
Rat (one-generation feed): 6.4 mg kg−1 d−1 [98, (maternal and p. 27]
(parental and p. 75] developmental)
developmental) Rabbit (gavage): 30 mg kg−1 d−1 [102,
Teratogenicity. (maternal and p. 27]
−1 −1
Rat (gavage): 50 mg kg d [98, developmental)
(maternal) p. 75] Chronic.
166 mg kg−1 d−1 [98, Rat (2-year feed): 0.6 mg kg−1 d−1 [102,
(developmental) p. 75] p. 27]
Rabbit (gavage): 50 mg kg−1 d−1 [98, Mouse (21-month feed): 16 – 21 mg kg −1
d −1
[102,
(maternal and p. 75] p. 27]
developmental) Dog (one-year feed): 0.6 mg kg−1 d−1 [102,
Chronic. p. 27]
−1 −1
Rat (2-year feed): 0.9 mg kg d [98, ADI: 0.006 mg kg−1 d−1 [102, p. 27]
p. 75]
−1 −1
Mouse (2-year feed): 1.82 mg kg d [98,
p. 75]
Dog (2-year capsule): 2 mg kg−1 d−1 [98,
p. 75]
ADI: 0.01 mg kg−1 d−1 [98, p. 75]
36 Acaricides
13. D. A. Chant, Can. Entomol. 93 (1961) 437. 45. Stauffer, US 2 767 194, 1956 (L. W. Fancher).
14. C. B. Huffaker, M. Van de Vrie, J. 46. Novartis, BE 552 284, 1955 (E. Beriger, R.
A. McMurtry, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 14 (1969) Sallmann).
125. 47. Zeneca, GB 1 019 227, 1966 (G. V. McHattie).
15. U. Gerson, M. Van de Vrie, Proc. 4th Int. 48. Novartis, DE 2 249 462, 1973 (E. Beriger, J.
Congr. Acarology 1974, 629 – 635. Drabek).
16. C. R. Worthing: The Pesticide Manual, 6th 49. Novartis, NL 6 611 511, 1967.
ed., The British Crop Protection Council, 50. Bayer, DE 848 812, 1950 (G. Schrader, R.
Croydon, U.K., 1979. Mühlmann).
17. Ullmann, 4th ed., 7, 1. 51. Novartis, CH 319 579, 1953 (K. Lutz, O.
18. R. Wegler: Chemie der Pflanzenschutz- und Jucker).
Schädlingsbekämpfungsmittel, vol. 1, Springer, 52. AgrEvo, S. Afr. 68 08 471, 1968 (O. Scherer,
Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1970. H. Mildenberger).
19. C. D. S. Tomlin: The Pesticide Manual, 10th 53. Rhône-Poulenc, BE 575 106, 1961 (J.
ed., British Crop Protection Council, Croydon Metivier).
1994. 54. H. Riedl, S. S. Hoying, J. Econ. Entomol. 73
20. C. D. S. Tomlin: The Pesticide Manual, 11th (1980) 117.
ed., British Crop Protection Council, 1997. 55. Roussel-UCLF, FR 2 486 073, 1982 (J. Martel,
21. Union Carbide, FR 1 377 474, 1965 (L. K. J. Tessier, A. Teche).
Payne, M. H. J. Weiden). 56. FMC, GB 2 085 005, 1982 (J. F. Engel).
22. Shell, US 3 116 201, 1960 (R. R. Whestone, D. 57. Sumitomo, DE 2 231 312, 1973 (T. Matsuo et
Harman). al.).
23. Dow, FR 1 360 901, 1964 (R. H. Rigterink). 58. Sumitomo, DE 2 335 347, 1974.
24. Novartis, DE 910 652, (H. Gysin, A. Margot). 59. Mitsui Zoatsu, DE 3 708 231, 1987 (S.
25. Shell, US 2 956 073, 1960 (R. R. Whestone, D. Numaka et al.).
Harman). 60. I. R. Harrison et al., Pestic. Sci. 3 (1972) 679;
26. Cyanamid, US 2 494 283, 1948 (J. T. Cassady, 4 (1973) 901.
E. I. Hoegberg). 61. I. R. Harrison, A. Kozlik, J. F. McCarthy, B. H.
27. Bayer, DE 917 668, 1952 (W. Lorenz). Palmer, D. M. Weighton, Meded. Fac.
28. Du Pont, US 2 503 390, 1952 (A. G. Jenkins). Landbouwwet Rijksuniv. Gent. 37 (1972) 765.
29. Food Machenery and Chem. Corp., 62. AgrEvo, DE 1 169 194, 1962 (H. Peissker, A.
US 2 873 228, 1959 (J. L. Willard, J. F. Jäger, W. Steinhausen, G. Boroschewski).
Henahan). 63. Murphy Chem., GB 1 019 451, 1961 (M.
30. H. Ogawa, Jpn. Pest. Info 1985, 11. Pianka, D. J. Polton).
31. Novartis, DE 1 148 806, 1960 (K. Lutz, M. 64. Rohm & Haas Co., US 2 526 660, 1946, (W. F.
Schuler). Hester, W. E. Craig).
32. M. Pinda, Chem. and Ind. 1961, 324. 65. R. D. Clifford, D. A. M. Watkins, D.
33. Novartis, DE 2 119 488, 1971 (E. Beriger). Woodcock, Chem. Ind. (London) 1965, 1654.
34. Bayer, NL 6 508 556, 1966. 66. U.S. Dept. Agriculture, Agricultural Research
35. K. Rüfenach (Novartis), Helv. Chim. Acta Division, Method 580-0.
(1968) 518. 67. N. V. Philips’ Gloeilampenfabrieken, DE
36. Bayer, US 912 895, 1962 (E. Schegk, G.
1 023 761, 1958 (J. Meltzer, H. O. Huisman).
Schrader, K. Wedemeyer).
68. Agripat, CH 471 065, 1965 (K. Gubler).
37. Du Pont, US 3 576 834, 1971 (J. B. Buchanan).
69. S. Reuter, K. R. S. Ascher, Experientia 12
38. Shell, US 2 685 552, 1952 (a. R. Stiles).
(1956) 316.
39. Novartis, US 2 908 605, 1959 (E. Beriger, R.
70. Rohm & Haas Co., US 2 812 280, 1954 (H.
Sallmann).
F. Wilson, E. Y. Shropshire, W. E. Craig).
40. Bayer, DE 1 251 304, 1962 (G. Oertl, A.
71. I. Hamman, K. H. Büchel, K. Bungarz, L.
Dörken).
Born, Pflanzenschutz Nachr. 31 (1978) 60.
41. Du Pont, US 3 530 220, 1968 (J. B. Buchanan).
72. E. Krause, R. Pohland, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges.
42. Bayer, DE 1 011 416, 1955 (G. Schrader).
57 (1924) 532.
43. Cyanamid, US 2 586 655, 1948 (E. O. Hook,
73. W. E. Allison, A. E. Doty, J. L. Hardy, E. E.
Ph. H. Moss).
Kenaga, W. K. Whitney, J. Econ. Entomol. 61
44. Rhône-Poulenc, FR 1 482 025, 1966 (J.
(1968) 1254.
Metivier).
40 Acaricides
74. H. Zimmer, I. A. Hornberg, M. Jayawant, J. 105. Pesticide Residues in Food-1986, FAO Plant
Org. Chem. 31 (1966) 3857. Prod. Prot. Paper 78/2 (1987).
75. J. Putter et al., Exoerientia, 37 (1981) 963. 106. Pesticide Residues in Food-1980, FAO Plant
76. K. K. Siccama, R. Heynderickx, M. Asada En, Prod. Prot. Paper 26 Sup. (1981).
H. F. A. de Lange, Meded. Fac. Landbouwwet. 107. Pesticide Residues in Food-1987, FAO Plant
Rijksuniv. Gent. 42 (1977) 1479. Prod. Prot. Paper 84 (1987).
77. Nihon Noyaku, DE 2 824 126, 1978 (K. Ikeda, 108. 1972 Evaluations of some Pesticide Residues
H. Kanno, M. Yasui, T. Harada). in Food, WHO Pesticide Residues Series, No.
78. Novartis, DE 2 619 724, 1976 (D. Duerr, W. D. 2 (1973).
Traber). 109. 1975 Evaluations of some Pesticide Residues
79. Bayer, DE 1 088 965, 1958 (K. Sasse, R. in Food, WHO Pesticide Residues Series, No.
Wegler, G. Unterstenhöfer). 5 (1976).
80. K. Sasse, R. Wegler, G. Unterstenhöfer, F. 110. Pesticide Residues in Food-1985, FAO Plant
Grewe, Angew. Chem. 72 (1960) 973. Prod. Prot. Paper 72/2 (1986).
111. G. L. Kennedy, Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 6
81. Fisons, EP 5 912, 1979 (J. H. Persens).
(1986) 423.
82. Hooker Chemical Corp., US 2 908 723, 1959
112. Pesticide Residues in Food-1984, FAO Plant
(J. T. Rucker).
Prod. Prot. Paper 62 (1985).
83. Hooker Chemical Corp., US 2 934 470, 1960 113. WHO/PCS/95.2 (1995).
(J. T. Rucker). 114. Regulatory Affairs Department, SDS Biotech
84. AgrEvo, DE 1 015 797, 1954. K. K., J. Pesticide Sci. 16 (1991) 337.
85. Lilly Eli, EP 380 264, 1950 (W. I. Glaisby). 115. 1973 Evaluations of some Pesticide Residues
86. Nihon Noyaku, EP 234 945, 1987 (H. R. M. F. in Food, WHO Pesticide Residues Series, No.
Hamaguchi et al.). 3 (1973).
87. Duphar, EP 117 320, 1984 (M. S. Brouwer, 116. Industrieverband Agrar e.V. Frankfurt (M.):
A. C. Grosscourt). “Physikalisch-chemische und toxikologische
88. Shell, US 161 019, 1985 (M. Anderson). Daten”,Wirkstoffe in Pflanzenschutz- und
89. Nippon, DE 3 037 105, 1981 (I. Iwakaki, M. Schädlingsbekämpfungsmitteln, 2nd ed.,
Kaeriyama, N. Matsui). Frankfurt (Main) 1990, p. 50.
90. Novartis, EP 179 022, 1986 .(J. Drabek, M. 117. Pesticide Residues in Food-1988, FAO Plant
Boeger). Prod. Prot. Paper 93/2 (1989).
91. U.S. Rubber Co., US 3 272 854, 1963 (R. 118. “Fenvalerate”, WHO Environmental Health
A. Covey, A. E. Smith, W. L. Hubbard). Criteria 95 (1990).
92. Nissan, JP 62 67 076, 1987 (H. Suzuki, M. 119. Pesticide Residues in Food-1979, FAO Plant
Kawashima, Z. Ogura). Prod. Prot. Paper 20 Sup. (1980).
93. Mitsubishi, EP 289 879, 1988 (I. Okada, S. 120. C. M. Parker, D. R. Patterson, G. A. van Gelder,
Okui, Y. Takahashi, T. Fukuchi). F. B. Gordon, M. G. Valerio, W. C. Hall, J.
94. C. D. Klassen, M. O. Amdur, J. Doull (eds.): Toxicol. Environm. Health 13 (1984) 83.
Casarret and Doull’s Toxicology, 3rd ed., 121. Y. Okuno, S. Ito, T. Seki, T. Hiromori, M.
Macmillan Publ. Co., New York 1986 p. 556. Murakami, T. Kadota, J. Miyamoto, J. Toxicol.
95. R. L. Baron, T. L. Merriam, revs. Environm. Sci. 11 (1986) 53.
Contaim. Toxicol. 105 (1988) 1. 122. Pesticide Residues in Food-1986, FAO Plant
96. WHO/PCS/93.34 (1993). Prod. Prot. Paper 77 (1986).
97. WHO/PCS/95.2 (1995). 123. Pesticide Residues in Food-1990, FAO Plant
98. WHO/PCS/92.52 (1992). Prod. Prot. Paper 102 (1990).
99. WHO/PCS/94.4 (1994). 124. T. B. Gaines, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 14
100. W. J. Hayes, E. R. Laws (eds.): Handbook of (1969) 515.
125. NIOSH Registry: Tracor Jitco. U.S.
Pesticide Toxicology, Academic Press, New
Government Printing Office, Washington, DC,
York 1991.
1982.
101. “Dimethoate”, WHO Environmental Health
126. R. T. Meister (ed.): Farm Chemical Handbook,
Criteria 90 (1989).
Meister Publishing Co., Willoughby, Ohio,
102. Pesticide Residues in Food-1987, FAO Plant
1980 – 1982.
Prod. Prot. Paper 86/2 (1988). 127. H. Martin, C. R. Worthing (eds.): Pesticide
103. WHO/PCS/92.52 (1992) 151. Manual, 5th ed., British Crop Protection
104. WHO/PCS/91.47 (1991). Council, Croydon1977.
Acaricides 41
Accumulators → Batteries
Acenaphthene → Hydrocarbons