Four Laning of Yamunanagar Panchkula Section of NH-73 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

(km 70.830 to km 115.400)

Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis

of
Minor Bridge at Ch. 71.650 km ( Bypass)
( Combined hydrological study has been carried out for ch. 71.945, 71.813 km and 71.650 Km)

Table of Content
S.No. Item Description
1.0 Summary Sheet
2.0 Introduction
3.0 Codes & References
4.0 Design Approch
5.0 Hydrological Calculation
6.0 Hydraulic Calculation
7.0 Scour Calculation
Four Laning of Yamunanagar Panchkula Section of NH-73 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis
(km 70.830 to km 115.400)

1.0 Summary Sheet

Summary of Hydrological Studies of Bridge

Sl. Chainage Catch-ment Average Dicken's method Rational method Design Remarks
No. (km) Area annual Discharge
(sq.km) rainfall adopted
(mm) (cumec)
Dicken co- Dicken Q Length of Level at Bed Level Fall in 100 year Discharge
efficient (cumec) Longest u/s of at Bridge Level, H return by Rational
Stream, L Stream (m) (m) period method Q
(km) (m) rainfall for (cumec)
24 hr (mm)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Comined
discharge Discharge
= 58.79 obtained
Cumec. from
Dicken's
Distributiv
1 71.650 8.320 800.00 12.00 58.79 3.92 269.00 265.973 3.03 260.00 46.53 method has
e been
discharge adopted as
for 71.650 design
Km= 19.59 discharge
cumec.

Summary of Hydraulic Studies of Bridge

As Per CA Hydraulic details of Bridge Scour Levels

Total
Sl. Chainage Existing Min. U/S
Skew Total Skew Square Bed level Velocity Vertical Vent Height Scour Remarks
No. (km) Vent Flow Area Design HFL with Required Apron D/S Apron
No. of Span Angle Clear Clear at Bridge at C/S Afflux (m) Clearance Required as per depth
Height (sq.m) HFL (m) Afflux (m) Soffit level Length Length (m)
(deg) Width (m) Width (m) (m/s) (m) Hydrology (m) dsm (m)
(m) (m) (m)
(m)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Proposed
1 span of
1 71.650 1 0 8.00 8.000 - 265.469 24.52 0.810 266.700 0.210 266.910 0.600 267.510 2.04 2.69 4.04 5.38
8 m Box
type

Notes: 1) Minimum proposed soffit level (m) in any case not be less than that of existing bridge.
2) In the event that bedrock is encountered above the calculated scour level, bridge pier(s) / abutments should be anchored to the bedrock.
Four Laning of Yamunanagar Panchkula Section of NH-73 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis
(km 70.830 to km 115.400)

Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis of Bridge at Km. 71.650

2.0 Introduction
The Hydrological and hydraulic calculations has been carried out for proposed minor
bridge at ch. 71.813 Km to justify the waterway required for the stream crossing
the alignment.

: Local River
CWC flood estimation Sub zone : Upper Indo Ganga Plain subzone 1(e)
Flow Direction : From Right to Left
Watershed Area A in sq.km. : 8.32
Watershed length L (Km) : 3.921
Point Rainfall Value (100 yrs) in mm : 260
Normal Annual Rainfall in mm : 800

3.0 Codes & References

IRC: SP-13:2004- Guidelines for design of small bridges & Culverts
IRC:5:1998- Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges section-I

IRC:89:1997- Guidelines for design and construction of River Training and control works for road bridges
IRC: SP-84: 2014- Manual of specifications and standards for four laning of highways through public private
partnership.
IRC-78:2014- Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges Section - VII
CWC- Flood Estimation report for subzone 1(e)

4.0 Design Approch

The detailed survey has been conducted at proposed bridge location in both upstream and
downstream directions which provide precise stream profile. The L-section and cross sections of the
stream are generated at all required locations including at bridge site, U/S & D/S of bridge location
from survey data.

Catchment area and main stream length has been marked on the toposheet as attached.

Discharge has been calculated using (i) Empirical method, (ii) Rational Method
. The highest value of these values is adopted as design discharge, provided it does not
exceed next highest discharge by more than 50 percent. If it does, restrict it to the limit.

The hydrological and hydraulic calculations has been done for 100 years return period.

5.0 Hydrological Calculation

5.1 Peak Design Discharge Calculation
The flood dicharge is computed by different methods as listed below. The values obtained are
compared and highest among these values has been adopted as peak design discharge.
(i) Empirical formula ( Dicken's method)
(ii) Rational method
Four Laning of Yamunanagar Panchkula Section of NH-73 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis
(km 70.830 to km 115.400)

5.1.1. Emperical Method

Dicken's Formula
3/4
Q = CA (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Cl.4.2)

Catchment Area A = 8.32 Sq. Km.

Coefficient C = 12
C = 11 -14 , where the annual rainfall is 60 -120cm.
= 14 -19, where the annual rainfall is more than 120 cm.
= 22 in western ghats
3
Peak Runoff in m /s
3
Q= 58.79 m /s

5.1.2 Rational Method

Catchment Area A = 8.32 Sq. Km. = 832 ha
Length of Longest River L = 3.921 Km.
Level at upstream of the stream = 269 m
Level at bridge location = 265.973 m
Height H = 3.027 m
Time of Concentration
3 0.385
tc = (0.87 x L /H) = 3.00 Hr. (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Eq.4.9)

100 Year Return Period rainfall for 24 hr, F = 260 mm

(CWC Flood Estimation Report for Sub Zone 1e)
Conversion ratio for tc hrs as per CWC Flood
Estimation Report = 0.48
tc Hr Rainfall = 124.8 mm
Intensity of Rainfall Ic
Ic = (F/T) x((T+1)/(tc+1)) = 6.77 cm/hr (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Eq.4.10a)

Spread Factor by f Curve from SP 13 = 0.99 (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Fig.4.2)

Permeability coefficient as per terrain
condition P from SP 13 = 0.3 (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Table 4.1)

Design Discharge Q100 = 0.0278 P f A Ic

3
= 46.53 m /s
Four Laning of Yamunanagar Panchkula Section of NH-73 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis
(km 70.830 to km 115.400)

5.2 Adopted Peak Design Discharge

3
Discharge by Dicken's method = 58.79 m /s
3
Discharge by Rational method = 46.53 m /s
Hence, Peak Design Discharge = 58.79 m3/s

There is no defined stream. U/S side Railway line exists and D/S is close to the bank of Yamuna River. There are
three minor bridge proposed and very close to each other. Thus common command area has been assessed and
design discharge shall be distibuted in each bridge by 33.33%
Thus , Design Discharge for MNB at ch. 71.945 Km = 19.59 cumec
Design Discharge for MNB at ch. 71.813 Km = 19.59 cumec
Design Discharge for MNB at ch. 71.650 Km = 19.59 cumec
5.3 Catchment area marking on Toposheets
Four Laning of Yamunanagar Panchkula Section of NH-73 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis
(km 70.830 to km 115.400)

6.0 Hydraulic Calculation

6.1 Longitudinal Section of Stream

Lowest
Distance
S.No. Elevation
(m)
(m)
1 0 265.765
2 5 265.774
3 30 265.74

Stream Slope Series1 Linear (Series1)

265.775

265.77

265.765

265.76

265.755

265.75

265.745
y = -0.001x + 265.77
265.74 R² = 0.8378
265.735
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Slope of channel(1 in ..) = 1/0.001 = 1000

Adopt channel slope as 1000
Four Laning of Yamunanagar Panchkula Section of NH-73 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis
(km 70.830 to km 115.400)

6.2 HFL Calculation

HFL for 100 Year flood

CROSS SECTION AT BRIDGE C/L (10m D/S)

3
HFL 266.7 Q100= 19.59 m /s
Min.
Natural
Offset Bed Level Channel Distance h Avg h Diff in h Area Perimeter
HFL
B.L.
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m2) (m)
0 265.557 266.7 265.469 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
10.43 265.88 266.7 265.469 10.430 0.820 0.410 0.820 4.276 10.462
18.04 265.57 266.7 265.469 7.610 1.130 0.975 0.310 7.420 7.616
28.9 265.469 266.7 265.469 10.860 1.231 1.180 0.101 12.820 10.860
Sum = 24.516 28.939
Wetted perimeter R = A/P R 0.847
(Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Table-5.1) Manning's Value n 0.035
Channel slope = 1 in 1000 S 0.00100
Velocity in channel (m/s) V 0.81
(Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Eq-5.2) K = (1/n) x A x R^(2/3) Keq 627.14
Calculated discharge (Cumec) Q 19.83
Max. depth below HFL (m) Dd (max) 1.231
Average depth = Dd (av) 1.167
Unobstructed width 21.000

Note: There is no defined stream at this location.U/S side railway line exists and D/d side close to the bank of
Yamuna River. Grounds are cultivable lands in D/S, hence flat cross sectional profile observed at this location.

HFL_100
Cross Section at D/S bridge location C/S data
266.8

266.6

266.4
River Bed Level(m)

266.2

266.0

265.8

265.6

265.4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Chainage(m)
Four Laning of Yamunanagar Panchkula Section of NH-73 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis
(km 70.830 to km 115.400)

6.3 Afflux / Velocity Calculation under Bridge/ Culvert

6.3.1 Lacey's Waterway Calculation for 100 yr flood

Adopted Design Discharge Q = 19.59 Cumecs

Regime width L= 4.8 x Q0.5 = 21.25 m

6.3.2 Orifice Formula

Q = C0 X (2g)^0.5 X L X Dd X sqrt(( h + (1 + e ) X u2 / 2g) (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004,Cl. 15.3)

Design Discharge Q100
Lowest Bed Level at existing bridge = 265.469 m
Q target = 19.59 Cumec
Proposed No. of span = 1
C/C width of span = 8 m
No. of piers = 0
Average Piers Width = 0 m Proposed 1
Skew angle = 0 degree span of 8 m
Total square clear width = 8.0 m Box type
Obstructed width L = 8.00

Unobstructed width W = 21 m
L/W = 0.381
C0 = 0.893 (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Fig.15.4)
e = 1.05 (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Fig.15.3)
h = 0.21 m
Dd (avg) = 1.167 m
Velocity in section u = 0.81 m/sec
Q achieved = 19.5 Cumec
/
h (under Br) = 0.25 m
v (under Br) = 2.36 m/sec

6.3.3 Weir Formula

Q = 1.706 Cw L H(3/2) (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Eq.15.5a)
Cw = 0.94
Q = 19.59 Cumec
L = 8.00 m
H = 1.33 m
Velocity in section u = 0.81
Since, H = Du + u2/2g
Hence, Du = 1.29 m
Afflux h = Du- Dd = 0.13 m

Adopt afflux 0.210 m

HFL without Afflux = 266.700 m
HFL with Afflux = 266.910 m

Minimum Vertical clearance required = 0.6 m (Ref: IRC:SP-13-2004, Cl 106.2.1)

Minimum soffit level required = 266.91 + 0.6
= 267.510 m
Min. Vent Required = 267.51 -265.469
= 2.041 m
Four Laning of Yamunanagar Panchkula Section of NH-73 Hydrological and Hydraulic Analysis
(km 70.830 to km 115.400)

7.0 Scour Calculation

The mean depth of scour dsm shall be calculated below HFL as per the provision of
Clause 703.2 of IRC :78 -2014

dsm = 1.34 x ( Db2/Ksf)1/3

where,
dsm = Mean scour depth below HFL
Db = (Q/L) ,
Q= Discharge adopted for scour depth calculations
(after increasing the design discharge as per clause 703.2.2 of IRC 78: 2014)
L= Clear waterway after making deductions for obstruction upto HFL
Db = The design discharge for foundation per metre with effective linear waterway
Ksf = Silt factor for a representative sample of bed material obtained upto the level
of anticipated deepest scour
HFL = Highest flood level
3
Design Discharge Q = 19.59 m /s
HFL Calculated = 266.91 m
Lowest bed level at bridge = 265.469 m

Mean diameter of particles dm ( approx) = 0.505 mm

Ksf =1.76 dm^0.5 (IRC78, 703.2.2) = 1.25

(For Silty Sand)

Effective waterway L = 8m
3
Increase in design discharge by 30% (Q) = 25.471 m /s
Db = Q/L = 3.184 Cumec/m
Mean Scour Depth dsm = 2.692 m
Floor lengths in Box Type
Provide minimum upstream apron length
= 1.5 x dsm = 4.04 m
Provide minimum Downstream apron length
= 2 x dsm = 5.38 m
(Ref: SP 13: 2004, Article 21, Raft foundation)
Depth of cutoff wall =0.30 m below dsm = 262.48 m