0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
21 vizualizări1 pagină
This document provides a schedule of client meetings and work outputs for an unnamed staff member from October 1-6. It shows that from Monday to Wednesday the staff member worked on two cases, "So Case" and "Pua Case", providing judicial affidavits and memos. On Thursday and Friday the staff member had several meetings with clients, co-workers and others regarding legal matters. The weekend included an interview and study leave.
This document provides a schedule of client meetings and work outputs for an unnamed staff member from October 1-6. It shows that from Monday to Wednesday the staff member worked on two cases, "So Case" and "Pua Case", providing judicial affidavits and memos. On Thursday and Friday the staff member had several meetings with clients, co-workers and others regarding legal matters. The weekend included an interview and study leave.
This document provides a schedule of client meetings and work outputs for an unnamed staff member from October 1-6. It shows that from Monday to Wednesday the staff member worked on two cases, "So Case" and "Pua Case", providing judicial affidavits and memos. On Thursday and Friday the staff member had several meetings with clients, co-workers and others regarding legal matters. The weekend included an interview and study leave.
Date October 1 October 2 October 3 October 4 October 5 October 6
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Client Output Client Output Client Output Client Output Client Output Client Output 8 - 9 am Filed Appellees' Judicial 9 - 10 am So Case Judicial Affidavit Pua Case Memo So Case Affidavit Filed Appellees' Recon with Judicial 10 - 11 am So Case Judicial Affidavit Pua Case Memo CLTA LML So Case Affidavit Filed Appellees' Recon with Judicial 11 am - 12 nn So Case Judicial Affidavit Pua Case Memo CLTA LML So Case Affidavit STUDY LEAVE Discussion Judicial 1 - 2 pm Pua Case Appellees' Memo Pua Case Update Legal Accts with ADA So Case Affidavit STUDY LEAVE So Case Judicial Affidavit Judicial Discussion Judicial 2 - 3 pm Pua Case Appellees' Memo So Case Affidavit Legal Accts with ADA So Case Affidavit So Case Judicial Affidavit
Judicial Judicial Interview with Benito
3 - 4 pm Pua Case Appellees' Memo So Case Affidavit Dr. Ang Meeting So Case Affidavit So Case So Review of So - Inquiry at Minutes of So Case/Pua Court/ Pua - Interview with Benito 4 - 5:30 pm Pua Case Appellees' Memo Health City Meeting Dr. Ang Meeting Case Collected PF So Case So Review of 5:30-6:00 Pua Case Appellees' Memo Health City Minutes of
I declare that the information above are true Approved by:
and correct:
Karen Mae R. Servan
[Staff Name] Ian Glenn V. Cruz Leandro M. Lontok Fernando R. Tullao Aldren D. Abrigo
Perjury and Lies by Judge Peter McBrien at the Commission on Judicial Performance: Whistleblower Leaked CJP Records Documenting False Statements and Perjurious Testimony by Hon. Peter J. McBrien Sacramento Superior Court - Judge Steve White - Judge Laurie Earl - Judge Robert Hight - Judge James Mize Sacramento County - California Supreme Court Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, Justice Goodwin Liu, Justice Carol Corrigan, Justice Leondra Kruger, Justice Ming Chin, Justice Mariano-Florentino Cuellar, Kathryn Werdegar Supreme Court of California
California Judicial Branch News Service - Investigative Reporting Source Material & Story Ideas