Pavithra Samaranayake HSNS

206.pdf
by Pavithra Asangani Samaranayake

Submission date: 17-Dec-2018 11:58PM (UT C+1100)

Submission ID: 1058204371
File name:
156614_Pavithra_Asangani_Samaranayake_Pavithra_Samaranayake_HSNS_206_1445094_1923488736.pdf
Word count: 741
Character count: 4422
 1

8
9
10

11
Pavithra Samaranayake HSNS 206.pdf
ORIGINALITY REPORT

28 %
SIMILARIT Y INDEX
15%
INT ERNET SOURCES
1%
PUBLICAT IONS
26%
ST UDENT PAPERS

PRIMARY SOURCES

1
Submitted to University of New England
St udent Paper 15%
2
Submitted to Adtalem Global Education
St udent Paper 4%
3
consultations.health.gov.au
Int ernet Source 3%
4
Submitted to Flinders University
St udent Paper 2%
5
Submitted to Central Queensland University
St udent Paper 2%
6
www.fremantlemedicarelocal.com.au
Int ernet Source 1%

Exclude quotes Of f Exclude matches Of f

Exclude bibliography Of f
Pavithra Samaranayake HSNS 206.pdf
GRADEMARK REPORT

FINAL GRADE GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

15
Hi Pavithra,

T hank you f or submitting your essay.

/20
You have done very well in discussing and critically
analysing the relevant medication polices and
guidelines.

It is important to understand the role of ensuring

that the public has conf idence in the health system,
and ensuring appropriate management of
medications is pinnacle.

Some minor errors in grammar and punctuation.

Otherwise, a very good attempt.

Regards,

Marlo

PAGE 1

PAGE 2
 Comment 1
Who is the actual author?

Comment 2
Good

Comment 3
Use uppercase

Comment 4
According to what author?

Comment 5
T he use of ...

Comment 6
work within an

Comment 7
comma

Comment 8
Good.

What does this tell you?

T hat the nurse needs to practice with competency.

PAGE 3

Comment 9
Good

PAGE 4

Comment 10
Indent the 2nd and subsequent lines.
Comment 11
Please keep the text all unif ormed.
RUBRIC: HSNS20 6 A1 T3 20 18 74 / 10 0

CRIT ERIA 1 (40%) 75 / 100

Critically analyse the one of the relevant Registered nurse standards f or practice in relation to the case
study presented

HD Evidence of critical analysis in relation to one of the relevant Registered nurse

(100) standards f or practice has been undertaken and applied to the case study

HD Evidence of critical analysis in relation to one of the relevant Registered nurse

(95) standards f or practice has been undertaken and applied to the case study

HD Evidence of critical analysis in relation to one of the relevant Registered nurse

(85) standards f or practice has been undertaken and applied to the case study

D Evidence of critical analysis in relation to one of the Registered nurse standards f or

(80) practice been undertaken and applied to the case study

D Evidence of critical analysis in relation to one of the Registered nurse standards f or

(75) practice been undertaken and applied to the case study

C Evidence of analysis in relation to one of the Registered nurse standards f or practice

(70) has been undertaken and applied to the case study

C Evidence of analysis in relation to one of the Registered nurse standards f or practice

(65) has been undertaken and applied to the case study

P Minimal analysis of the medication one of the Registered nurse standards f or

(60) practice has been undertaken and applied to the case study

P Minimal analysis of the medication one of the Registered nurse standards f or

(55) practice has been undertaken and applied to the case study

P Minimal analysis of the medication one of the Registered nurse standards f or

(50) practice has been undertaken and applied to the case study

N No evidence of analysis has been undertaken and there is no application of one of

(45) the Registered nurse standards f or practice to the case study

N No evidence of analysis has been undertaken and there is no application of one of

(40) the Registered nurse standards f or practice to the case study

N No evidence of analysis has been undertaken and there is no application of one of

(35) the Registered nurse standards f or practice to the case study

CRIT ERIA 2 (40%) 75 / 100

Critically analyse the relevant medication policies and guidelines, in relation to the case study presented

HD Evidence of critical analysis in relation to all of the relevant medication policies &
(100) guidelines has been undertaken and applied to the case study

HD Evidence of critical analysis in relation to all of the relevant medication policies &
(95) guidelines has been undertaken and applied to the case study

HD Evidence of critical analysis in relation to all of the relevant medication policies &
(85) guidelines has been undertaken and applied to the case study

D Evidence of critical analysis in relation to some of the relevant medication policies,

(80) guidelines been undertaken and applied to the case study

D Evidence of critical analysis in relation to some of the relevant medication policies,

(75) guidelines been undertaken and applied to the case study

C Evidence of analysis in relation to medication policies & guidelines has been

(70) undertaken and applied to the case study

C Evidence of analysis in relation to medication policies & guidelines has been

(65) undertaken and applied to the case study

P Minimal analysis of the medication policies & guidelines standards has been
(60) undertaken and applied to the case study

P Minimal analysis of the medication policies & guidelines standards has been
(55) undertaken and applied to the case study

P Minimal analysis of the medication policies & guidelines standards has been
(50) undertaken and applied to the case study

N No evidence of analysis has been undertaken and there is no application of any

(45) policies & guidelines to the case study

N No evidence of analysis has been undertaken and there is no application of any

(40) policies & guidelines to the case study

N No evidence of analysis has been undertaken and there is no application of any

(35) policies & guidelines to the case study

CRIT ERIA 3 (10%) 75 / 100

Structure, presentation\ngrammar and spelling.

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br
(100) />T opic - Introduction sentence & concluding sentence are succinct and ef f ective;
paragraphs are well-developed and have strong topic sentences<br /><br />Adhered
to grammatical conventions with no errors <br />Logically / well and succinctly
structured assignment

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br
(95) />T opic - Introduction sentence & concluding sentence are succinct and ef f ective;
paragraphs are well-developed and have strong topic sentences<br /><br />Adhered
to grammatical conventions with no errors <br />Logically / well and succinctly
structured assignment

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br
(85) />T opic - Introduction sentence & concluding sentence are succinct and ef f ective;
 paragraphs are well-developed and have strong topic sentences<br /><br />Adhered
to grammatical conventions with no errors <br />Logically / well and succinctly
structured assignment

D Mostly accurate and consistent adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions <br />
(80) <br />T opic - Introduction sentence & concluding sentence development are
competent; paragraphs are occasionally and/or underdeveloped; topic sentences are
generally good <br />Adhered to grammatical conventions with f ew errors<br /><br
/>Logically and well-structured assignment

D Mostly accurate and consistent adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions <br />
(75) <br />T opic - Introduction sentence & concluding sentence development are
competent; paragraphs are occasionally and/or underdeveloped; topic sentences are
generally good <br />Adhered to grammatical conventions with f ew errors<br /><br
/>Logically and well-structured assignment

C Partial but close adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br
(70) />Adequate<br />Introduction sentence and conclusion sentence. Paragraph
development have inconsistencies; topic sentences are present but are inef f ective
<br /><br />Adhered to grammatical conventions, but with f requent errors<br /><br
/>Mainly well- structured assignment, lacking cohesion in places

C Partial but close adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br
(65) />Adequate<br />Introduction sentence and conclusion sentence. Paragraph
development have inconsistencies; topic sentences are present but are inef f ective
<br /><br />Adhered to grammatical conventions, but with f requent errors<br /><br
/>Mainly well- structured assignment, lacking cohesion in places

P Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br />Introduction or

(60) conclusion sentences are inadequate or missing; paragraphs are underdeveloped or
weak; topic sentences are missing or unf ocused<br /><br />Minimal adherence to
grammatical conventions with multiple errors<br />Weakly structured assignment,
f requently lacking cohesion

P Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br />Introduction or

(55) conclusion sentences are inadequate or missing; paragraphs are underdeveloped or
weak; topic sentences are missing or unf ocused<br /><br />Minimal adherence to
grammatical conventions with multiple errors<br />Weakly structured assignment,
f requently lacking cohesion

P Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br />Introduction or

(50) conclusion sentences are inadequate or missing; paragraphs are underdeveloped or
weak; topic sentences are missing or unf ocused<br /><br />Minimal adherence to
grammatical conventions with multiple errors<br />Weakly structured assignment,
f requently lacking cohesion

N Little or no attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br

(45) />Introduction and conclusion sentences are missing. Sentence structure is poor.<br
/><br />Multiple grammatical errors with minimal attention to writing / spelling
conventions that signif icantly distract the reader f rom the content<br /><br />A poorly
structured assignment which lacks cohesion.
N Little or no attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br
(40) />Introduction and conclusion sentences are missing. Sentence structure is poor.<br
/><br />Multiple grammatical errors with minimal attention to writing / spelling
conventions that signif icantly distract the reader f rom the content<br /><br />A poorly
structured assignment which lacks cohesion.

N Little or no attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br

(35) />Introduction and conclusion sentences are missing. Sentence structure is poor.<br
/><br />Multiple grammatical errors with minimal attention to writing / spelling
conventions that signif icantly distract the reader f rom the content<br /><br />A poorly
structured assignment which lacks cohesion.

CRIT ERIA 4 (10%) 65 / 100

APA (6th Edition) and the application of evidence

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions
(100) within essay<br /> <br />Explicitly acknowledges all sources used throughout the
assignment as well as within the ref erence list

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions
(95) within essay<br /> <br />Explicitly acknowledges all sources used throughout the
assignment as well as within the ref erence list

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions
(85) within essay<br /> <br />Explicitly acknowledges all sources used throughout the
assignment as well as within the ref erence list

D Mostly of f ers accurate and consistent APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions
(80) within essay<br /><br />Principally acknowledges sources used throughout the
assignment as well as within the ref erence list inf requent errors (suggested: f ewer
than 1 error per page

D Mostly of f ers accurate and consistent APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions
(75) within essay<br /><br />Principally acknowledges sources used throughout the
assignment as well as within the ref erence list inf requent errors (suggested: f ewer
than 1 error per page

C A number of inaccurate and inconsistent APA (6th Edition) ref erences within the
(70) essay<br /><br />Mostly acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment and
the ref erence list f requency of errors detracts f rom strength of paper (suggested: 1-
2 errors per page

C A number of inaccurate and inconsistent APA (6th Edition) ref erences within the
(65) essay<br /><br />Mostly acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment and
the ref erence list f requency of errors detracts f rom strength of paper (suggested: 1-
2 errors per page

P Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA (6th Edition) ref erences within the essay<br
(60) /><br /><br />Minimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment
and ref erence list<br />f requency of errors obstructs clarity f or reader (suggested: 3-
4 errors per page)
P Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA (6th Edition) ref erences within the essay<br
(55) /><br /><br />Minimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment
and ref erence list<br />f requency of errors obstructs clarity f or reader (suggested: 3-
4 errors per page)

P Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA (6th Edition) ref erences within the essay<br
(50) /><br /><br />Minimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment
and ref erence list<br />f requency of errors obstructs clarity f or reader (suggested: 3-
4 errors per page)

N Did not adhere to the APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions or use APA
(45) ref erencing style<br /><br />Little or no acknowledgment of sources used throughout
the assignment<br />No ref erence list f ive or more errors per page

N Did not adhere to the APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions or use APA
(40) ref erencing style<br /><br />Little or no acknowledgment of sources used throughout
the assignment<br />No ref erence list f ive or more errors per page

N Did not adhere to the APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions or use APA
(35) ref erencing style<br /><br />Little or no acknowledgment of sources used throughout
the assignment<br />No ref erence list f ive or more errors per page