Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
*FACTS:
Fortune Motors obtained loans in different dates from the Metropolitan Bank and Trust company.
In order to pay, the petitioner mortgaged certain real estate properties to the respondent bank.
The petitioner failed to pay the loan upon maturity. Because of this, the bank initiated extrajudicial foreclosure proceedings,
foreclosing the real estate mortgaged.
The extrajudicial foreclosure was actually conducted by Senior Deputy Sheriff Pablo Y. Sy who had sent copies of the Notice
of Extrajudicial Sale to the opposing parties by registered mail.
Petitioner then filed a complaint for the annulment of the extrajudicial foreclosure.
RTC DECISION: the trial court granted the annulment complaint of extrajudicial foreclosure by the petitioner
Court of Appeals Decision: CA reversed the decision of the trial court; Also the motion for reconsideration of the
petitioner was denied
*ISSUE:
1. W/N the court of appeals erred in declaring that the publication of the notice of extrajudicial foreclosure was valid
2. W/N the respondent and the court of appeals erred in declaring that the notices of extrajudicial foreclosure
3. W/N that the court of appeals erred in failing to adjudge the irregularities in the bidding, posting, publication, and the
sale of fortune building
*OPINION:
1. No.
2. No. There was substantial compliance with the requirements when it was the Executive Judge of the Regional Trial Court
of Makati. Also the law does not require that the petitioner should receive a copy of the notices of extrajudicial foreclosure
and sale
3. No. Act 3135 does not require posting of the notice of sale on the mortgaged property. It only specifies that it should be
posted on 3 public properties
4. No. Act No. 3135 on the extrajudicial foreclosure of real estate mortgage had been duly complied with by Senior Deputy
Sheriff Sy.
CASE TIMELINE:
The newspaper need not have the largest circulation so long as it is of general circulation. (Banta v.
Pacheco, 74 Phil. 67).