CHAPTER 4

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

OF DATA

This chapter presents the finding, analysis and interpretation of data

gathered to get the result of the Assessment of Different Guest Activity

Programming offered in Patar Beach Resort

Sub- problem 1: How do the local and foreign tourists assess the

different guest activities offered to Patar beach as to:

1.1 Skill Required

1.2 Activities
1.3 Time Frame
1.4 Nature of the Group
1.5 Facilities Needed

Table 4
Assessment of Patar Beach Resort in Terms of Skills Required

LOCAL FOREIGN COMPOSITE 　

　 TOURISTS TOURISTS VALUES RANK
1.1 SKILL REQUIRED WM VI WM VI WM VI 　

The Country's 1st PolytechnicU

1. Have experienced the
different activities offered. 3.07 G 4.06 S 3.57 S 　3
2. Have enough skills for the
activities 3.05 G 4.2 S 3.63 S 　2
3. Have enough strength to do
the activities. 3.37 G 4.03 S 3.7 S 　1
4. Have enough strategies to do
the activities 3.4 S 3.86 S 3.63 S 　2
5. Have enough agility to do the
activities 3.43 S 3.97 S 3.7 S 　1
OVER-ALL WM 3.26 G 4.02 S 3.64 S 　

All required skills rated are all satisfactory included the enough strength

and agility at the same weighted mean of 3.7, sufficient amount of skills

and strategies at the same weighted mean of 3.63, and lastly, experienced

the different activities offered at 3.57. As shown in the data the foreign

tourists give a higher rating of 4.02 while the local tourists evaluated the

activities with 3.26.

Overall, visitors rated the skills required in the activities of Patar Beach

Resort as satisfactory with the computed overall mean of 3.64.

Insert ret lit.
Table 5
Assessment of Patar Beach Resort in Terms of Activities

LOCAL FOREIGN COMPOSITE

　 TOURISTS TOURISTS RANKING
1.2 ACTIVITIES WM VI WM VI WM VI
1. Beach Volleyball 3.33 G 4.26 VS 3.8 S 　3
2. Sightseeing 3.93 S 4.6 VS 4.27 VS 　1
3. Camping and Bonfire 3.2 G 4.03 S 3.61 S 　5
4. Sunset Watching 3.8 S 4.31 VS 4.06 S 　2
5. Kayaking 3.07 G 4.03 S 3.55 S 　7
6. Day Trip Tours 3.05 G 4.14 S 3.6 S 　6

The Country's 1st PolytechnicU

 7. There are other
activities offered in the
destination. 3.48 S 3.8 S 3.64 S 　4
OVER-ALL WM 3.41 S 4.17 S 3.66 S 　

The top 3 gest activities assessed as from satisfactory to very

satisfactory included sightseeing with 4.27, sunset watching at 4.06, and

beach volleyball at 3.8. Camping and bonfire, day trip tours, kayaking and

other activities offered in the destination were not visible in the area. From

this table, both the local and foreign tourists expressed that the activities in

Patar Beach Resort are satisfactory. The foreign tourists rated it with a

weighted mean at 4.17 while local tourists with the weighted mean of 3.41.
Overall the respondents agreed that these activities are satisfactory in

the said destination.

Insert ret lit
Table 6
Assessment of Patar Beach Resort in Terms of Time Frame

LOCAL FOREIGN RANK

　 TOURISTS TOURISTS COMPOSITE ING
1.3 TIME FRAME WM VI WM VI WM VI 　
1. Activities have enough allotted
time offered. 3.43 S 3.8 S 3.62 S 　3
2. The activities are followed
according to the time planned. 3.05 G 3.97 S 3.51 S 　5
3. Activities has a limited time to
use. 3.32 G 3.83 S 3.58 S 　4
4. Activity is worth the price. 3.23 G 4.06 S 3.65 S 　2
5. Activity is enjoyable even with
the time limit/duration. 3.32 G 4.06 S 3.69 S 　1
OVER-ALL WM 3.27 G 3.94 S 3.62 S 　

The Country's 1st PolytechnicU

 As shown in the data local tourists assessed the enjoyment of the

activities even with the time limit or duration, price, allotted time offered,

limited time of use, and time planned followed as satisfactory with the

weighted mean 3.69, 3.65, 3.62, 3.58, and 3.51 respectively. According to

the table, the foreign tourists gave a higher rating of 3.94 is verbally

interpreted as satisfactory. while the local tourists assessed the time frame

of the activities with 3.27 evaluated as good.

Overall the respondents rated the time frame of the activities as

satisfactory with the weighted mean of 3.62.

Related lit

Table 7
Assessment of Patar Beach Resort in Terms of Nature of the Group

LOCAL FOREIGN RAN

　 TOURISTS TOURISTS COMPOSITE KING
1.4 NATURE OF THE GROUP WM VI WM VI WM VI
4.1
1. Management offers good service. 3.47 S 4 S 3.81 S 　2
4.1
2. Staffs are accommodating. 3.32 G 4 S 3.73 S 　3
4.2
3. Local people are approachable. 3.8 S 9 VS 4.05 S 　1
4. Souvenir vendors are easy to 4.2
reach or visible. 3.9 S 3 VS 3.07 G 　7
5. Local and Foreign tourists are
approachable. 2.81 G 4 S 3.41 S 　5
6. Facilitators are skilled and 3.9
knowledgeable. 3.45 S 7 S 3.36 G 　6
3.8
7. Adequate number of facilitator. 3.32 G 9 S 3.61 S 　4

The Country's 1st PolytechnicU

 4.0
OVER-ALL WM 3.44 S 9 S 3.77 S 　

As presented in the table, visitors assessed the approachability of the

local people was satisfactory with 4.05, good service offered by the

management with 3.81, hospitality of the staffs with 3.73, adequate

number of facilitators with 3.61, and approachability of the local and

foreign tourists with 3.41. Skilled and knowledgeable facilitators were

assessed as good with 3.36 and visibility and availability of souvenir

vendors with 3.07. As shown in the data local and foreign tourists

assessment is interpreted as satisfactory with 3.44 and 4.09 respectively.

In general the composite value of the evaluation of local and foreign

tourists regarding nature of the group is verbally construed as satisfactory

with the computed mean 3.77.

Insert ret lit

The Country's 1st PolytechnicU

 Table 8
Assessment of Patar Beach Resort in Terms of Facilities Needed

FOREIGN
LOCAL TOURIST COMPOSIT RANK
　 TOURISTS S E ING
1.5 FACILITIES NEEDED WM VI WM VI WM VI 　
1. Equipment for activities is well-
maintained. 3.07 G 4.14 S 3.61 S 　1
2. Equipment is always available. 3.17 G 4.03 S 3.6 S 　2
3. Safety gears are easily
accessible. 3.07 G 4 S 3.54 S 　3
4. Tools are user-friendly. 2.8 G 3.91 S 3.36 G 　5
5. Adequate number of equipment
for the activities. 3.38 G 3.66 S 3.52 S 4
OVER-ALL WM 3.1 G 3.95 S 3.53 S 　

The respondents confirmed that the four (4) satisfactory facilities

needed were the maintenance of the equipment with 3.61, followed by

availability of equipment at 3.6, accessibility of safety gears at 3.54, and

The Country's 1st PolytechnicU

 adequate number of equipment for the activities at 3.52. However, there

was good assessment regarding user-friendly tools at 3.36. Foreign

tourists expressed higher rating of 3.95 is verbally interpreted as

satisfactory, while local tourists assessed the facilities needed is verbally

interpreted as good with 3.1.

Overall the respondents differently evaluated the facilities as

satisfactory at 3.53.
Ret lit.
Table 9
Summary Assessment of Local and Foreign Tourists of Patar Beach

Resort

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT
LOCAL FOREIGN RAN
CRITERIA TOURISTS TOURISTS COMPOSITE KING
　 WM VI WM VI WM VI 　
1. SKILLS REQUIRED 3.26 G 4.02 S 3.64 S 3　
2. ACTIVITIES 3.41 S 4.17 S 3.66 S 2　
3. TIME FRAME 3.27 G 3.94 S 3.62 S 4　
4. NATURE OF THE GROUP 3.44 S 4.09 S 3.77 S 1　
5. FACILITIES NEEDED 3.1 S 3.95 S 3.53 S 5　
Overall values 3.29 G 4.03 S 3.64 S 　

As shown in the computed data, the local tourists of Patar Beach

Resort assessed skills required, activities, time frame, nature of the group, and

facilities needed as good with an overall weighted mean 3. 29 while foreign

tourists of Patar Beach Resort assessed the above criterion as satisfactory

with an overall weighted mean 4.03. Overall, both local and foreign tourists

The Country's 1st PolytechnicU

assessed skills required, activities, time frame, nature of the group, and

facilities needed as satisfactory with an overall weighted mean of 3.64.

Sub-problem no. 2: Does significant difference exist between the

assessments of the respondent on the given variables?

Legend:

Degrees of Freedom df 94
Level of Significance ls 0.05
Critical Value cv 1.980

Table 10

Comparison of the Assessment of the Respondents on the

Skills Required

Local Potential Computed t

Criteria VI Decision
WM SD WM SD values
1.1 Skills
Required 3.23 1.050 4.02 0.650 4.526 S Reject Ho

The table shows that the computed value of 4.526 is greater than the

critical value of 1.980. It is verbally interpreted as Significant which means,

there is significant difference in the assessment of local and foreign tourists on

The Country's 1st PolytechnicU

skills required. Thus, the null hypothesis of the study is rejected. The local and

foreign tourists expressed different assessment that Patar Beach Resort

requires skills to the activities.

Table 11

Comparison of the Assessment of the Respondents on the Activities

Compute
Local Potential Decisio
Criteria dt VI
n
WM SD WM SD values
1.2
Activitie Reject
s 3.41 1.338 4.17 0.712 3.600 S Ho

The table shows that the computed value of 3.600 is greater than the critical

value of 1.980. It is verbally interpreted as Significant which means, the

assessment of Local and Foreign Tourists has significant difference in terms of

Activities. Thus, the null hypothesis of the study is rejected.

The local and foreign tourists expressed similar assessment of the

activities that are satisfactory in Patar Beach Resort.

Table 12

Comparison

The Country's 1st PolytechnicU

The Country's 1st PolytechnicU