OFFICE OF ORIGIN:

PROJECT:

CLIENT:

TITLE: DESIGN OF PILE FOUNDATION

FOR FIXED PIER FROM P332

DESIGN CALCULATION NO: GIL-EDMS-9211-D-PF-2001-41 DATE : 2/6/2019

PAGES: 1 TO
ANNEXURES, if any: Staad files

Prepared By Checked By
Date of Revision to incorporate observations of client
Revision vide their letter reference/minutes of meeting
Issue as the case may be, and as refered below: Name Sign Name Sign

2/6/2019 R0 First submission

APPROVED BY:
This design is the property of STRUCTCON DESIGNS PVT. LTD. It should not be used, copied or reproduced
without their written permission.
 Table of Contents
SR. NO. SECTION PAGE NO.
1 FACE SHEET 1
2 TOC 2
3 PREAMBLE 3
4 DESIGN DATA 4-7
5 FORCES FROM SUPERSTRUCTURE 8-9
6 PILE SYSTEMS 10
7 Sheet1 11 - 14
8 Sheet12 15
 i. Preamble

The following pages contain the design calculations for the Pile Foundation, Pile Cap for Piers in straight
portion for height 9.04 to 10m m from top of piercap to top of pilecap (LHS & RHS) of the Gangapath
Elevated corridor.

The Structure is 25.0m 2 span continious (deck continuity) with precast pretensioned I Girder sections
resting on POT/PTFE bearing. The bridge is divided into two separate structures Left & Roght
carriageway seperated by 3.50m. Each structure carries the traffic in one direction, has two lanes for
traffic and a 1.55m width footpath. Each structure is supported by a pier and pile foundation. The Pier is
solid rectangular in nature with a cantilever pier cap to support the superstructure. The Pier is in turn
supported on pile foundation and a rigid pile cap. The piles are founded on Firm strata to transfer the
vertical and horizontal loads from the structure.

The Load cases under consideration are Dead Load, Superimposed Dead Load, Live Load, Footpath Live
Load, breaking force, Wind Load, & Seismic Loads. The certain conditions which occur simultaneously
are taken together like, Braking and Live load. Bearing friction is considered along with each individual
permanent load case and not as an seperate load case. These loads are combined as per the
recommendations of IRC 6 with appropriate load factors. While preparing the load combinations the
worst effects of individual loads are taken to create the design loads.

Bending moment in the pile is calculated by spring constant anology calculated from horizontal &
vertical subgrade reactions. The geotechnical capacity of the pile is as per the pile capacity calculation
report. To calculate the forces in the piles which depend on the stiffness of the substructure, the fixity is
considered at the top of pile cap. For the purpose of design the pile foundation is modeled in STAAD
with spring constant & horizontal forces applied at the pile cap bottom. For the distribution of forces in
the piles, the pile cap is considered as rigid. The pile cap is designed as a flexural member for the critical
load case.
 STRUCTCON DESIGNS PVT. LTD. 02/06/2019

SUBSTRUCTURE DESIGN OF P125 5

1.0 DESIGN DATA

1.1 Reference Drawings

1 SC/866-S/B/GA-104 General Arrangement : ROB at SH 54(LHS - RHS)
Plan & Profile (Sheet 1 of 2)
2 SC/866-S/B/GA-104 Typical Cross sections(Sheet 2 of 2)

3 SC/866-S/B/RC-2301Layout of Pile,Pilecap,Pier
RC Details of Pilecap & Pier

1.2 Reference documents

- Relevant sections from Tender Document

- Reference Codes-
1 IRC 6:2014 Loads and stress
2 IRC 112:2011 Code of Practice for Concrete Road Bridges:
Limit State Design
3 IRC SP:105-2015 Explantory handbook to IRC:112

- Pile capacity recommendations

-As per Geotechincal Investigation Report

1.3 Superstructure information

Pile foundation system of a free pier supporting two spans of 24m length on either sides
has been designed and presented in this report.

Dwarka Package- II
 STRUCTCON DESIGNS PVT. LTD. 02/06/2019

SUBSTRUCTURE DESIGN OF P125 6

1.4 Representation of Pier and Pier Cap

FRL 61.144 M

12.40

58.679

0.5
58.179

1.25
56.929 Pier Cap

0.1 5.2

1.80

Pier

Section of Pier Cap

2.00

58.679 2.80
0.4
0.5
58.179

1.25
56.929

0 0.00

Dwarka Package- II
 STRUCTCON DESIGNS PVT. LTD. 02/06/2019

SUBSTRUCTURE DESIGN OF P125 7

1.80

Elevation of the Pier Cap

1.4 Representation of Piles and Pile Cap

1.039 4.79

1.5 Traffic direction

1.5 1.039 1.5

1.5
Pile

Pile Cap
0 0

#VALUE!
Plan of Pile Cap

Pier
Pile Cap
#VALUE! Ground level
Top of Pile Cap
#VALUE!
45.750

Dwarka Package- II
 STRUCTCON DESIGNS PVT. LTD. 02/06/2019

SUBSTRUCTURE DESIGN OF P125 8

Bottom of Pile Cap

45.75 Pile
MSL
25
#REF!
Fixity Level

20.75
Founding Level
Section of Pile Foundation

Pile configuration 8 Pile system Type 1

Y
C-C dist between piles in x direction = 3.6 m
Edge distance from pile center in x direction = 0.85 m

= 1.30 m
X
c-c dist between piles in y direction = 4.80 m
Edge distance from pile center in y direct = 0.85 m

= 2.40 m
Depth of pile cap = 2.50 m

Column Size in x direction = 1.80 m

Column Size in y direction = 2.20 m

Total pile cap dimension in x direction = 12.50 m

Total pile cap dimension in y direction = 6.50 m

3
Dwarka Package- II
6
STRUCTCON DESIGNS PVT. LTD. 02/06/2019
5
SUBSTRUCTURE DESIGN OF P125 9
4

0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Longitudinal Direction (Traffic direction)

Dwarka Package- II
 2. Forces on Structure from Superstructure

2.1 Dead Load

A B C

0.9 1 6.5 3 13.65

Left Span Left Span

Sectional Area at
Section A = 16.5 m2
Section B = 6.75 m2
Section C = 5.9 m2

Total Span = 40 m c/c of pier

Span with Section A = 2 m
Span with Section B = 13 m
Span with Section C = 27.3 m
Density of Concrete = 25 KN/m3
Span centre to centre of bearing = 38.8 m

UDL due to Dead Load of Box Girder =

2.2 CRASH BARRIER & UITILITIES

Load of crash parapet = 11.0 Kn/m

Load for Noise barrier = 0.0 kN/m
Additional Load for Services = 2.0 kN/m at outer side of both crash barrier
Total = 13.0 kN/m

2.2 WEARING COAT

Wearing coat (75mm + 50mm= 125 mm

= (125/1000)X22
= 2.75 kN/sqm
2.3 LL EFFECTS ON GIRDER

Vehicular Live Loads

* Impact Factor = 4.5 L= 23

6+L
= 0.155 For class A
= 0.155 For Cla 70R as per Fig. 5, IRC-6-2014
* Congestion Factor = 0.15 as perTable 3, IRC-6-2014
* Reduction Factor are applied as per Cl. 205, IRC 6:2014
For three lanes = 10%
For Four Lnaes = 20%
Live Load Cases
1 Lane Class A
2 Lane Class A
3 Lane Class A
4 Lane Class A
1 Lane Class 70R
2 Lane Class 70R
70R + Class A
70R + 2 Lane Class A
4 Pile system
c-c dist between piles in x direction 3.6 7 Pile no. x y pile cap Piles Pier
Edge distance from pile center in x directio 0.85 1 -1.8 -2.4 0 0 0.85 0.85 1.75 2.15
6
c-c dist between piles in y direction 4.8 2 1.8 -2.4 5.3 0 4.45 0.85 3.55 2.15
Edge distance from pile center in y directio 0.85 5 3 1.8 2.4 5.3 6.5 4.45 5.65 3.55 4.35
4 -1.8 2.4 0 6.5 0.85 5.65 1.75 4.35
Total pile cap dimension in x direction 5.3 4 Summatio 12.96 23.04 0 0 1.75 2.15
Total pile cap dimension in y direction 6.5
3
Column Size in x direction 1.8
2
Column Size in y direction 2.2
1

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6

6 Pile system
c-c dist between piles in x direction 3.6 7 Pile no. x y pile cap Piles Pier
Edge distance from pile center in x directio 0.85 1 -3.6 -2.4 0 0 0.85 0.85 3.55 2.15
6
c-c dist between piles in y direction 4.8 2 0 -2.4 8.9 0 4.45 0.85 5.35 2.15
Edge distance from pile center in y directio 0.85 5 3 3.6 -2.4 8.9 6.5 8.05 0.85 5.35 4.35
4 3.6 2.4 0 6.5 8.05 5.65 3.55 4.35
Total pile cap dimension in x direction 8.9 4 5 0 2.4 0 0 4.45 5.65 3.55 2.15
Total pile cap dimension in y direction 6.5 6 -3.6 2.4 0.85 5.65
3 Summatio 51.84 34.56
Column Size in x direction 1.8
2
Column Size in y direction 2.2
1

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 Pile system Type 1

c-c dist between piles in x direction 3.6 7 Pile no. x y pile cap Piles Pier
Edge distance from pile center in x directio 0.85 1 -5.4 -2.4 0 0 0.85 0.85 5.35 2.15
6
c-c dist between piles in y direction 4.8 2 -1.8 -2.4 12.5 0 4.45 0.85 7.15 2.15
Edge distance from pile center in y directio 0.85 5 3 1.8 -2.4 12.5 6.5 8.05 0.85 7.15 4.35
4 5.4 -2.4 0 6.5 11.65 0.85 5.35 4.35
Total pile cap dimension in x direction 12.5 4 5 5.4 2.4 0 0 11.65 5.65 5.35 2.15
Total pile cap dimension in y direction 6.5 6 1.8 2.4 8.05 5.65
3 7 -1.8 2.4 4.45 5.65
Column Size in x direction 1.8 8 -5.4 2.4 0.85 5.65
2
Column Size in y direction 2.2 Summatio 129.6 46.08
1

0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

8 Pile system Type 2

c-c dist between piles in x direction 3.6 7 Pile no. x y pile cap Piles Pier
Edge distance from pile center in x directio 0.85 1 -3.6 -2.4 0 0 0.85 0.85 3.55 2.15
6
Distance from edge pile to intermediate layer pile in x direction 2 0 -2.4 8.9 0 4.45 0.85 5.35 2.15
1.3 5 3 3.6 -2.4 8.9 6.5 8.05 0.85 5.35 4.35
c-c dist between piles in y direction 4.8 4 3.6 2.4 0 6.5 8.05 5.65 3.55 4.35
Edge distance from pile center in y directio 0.85 4 5 0 2.4 0 0 4.45 5.65 3.55 2.15
Distance from edge pile to intermediate layer pile in x direction 6 -3.6 2.4 0.85 5.65
2.4 3 7 -2.3 0 2.15 3.25
8 2.3 0 6.75 3.25
2
Total pile cap dimension in x direction 8.9 Summatio 62.42 34.56
Total pile cap dimension in y direction 6.5 1

Column Size in x direction 1.8 0

Column Size in y direction 2.2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
 4.3 Evaluation of capacity of pile
Forces at the base of pilecap for 70R wheel vehicle

V HL HT Lever arm Lever arm ML

KN KN KN Long Trans KNm
Normal case
Dead load 4321
SIDL 690 -3.78
SIDL surfacing 551
FPLL 0 -4.75
LL 801
Seismic arrester & pedestal 121
PIER CAP 902
PIER 675
Load due to cusion on pilecap 434
Pile cap 693
Breaking Force 230 13.33 3061
Longitudinal seismic (Considering 25% extra for foundation as per IRC:6-2010)
Dead load 432.06 72.91 13.33 14.53 5758.90
SIDL 69.00 11.64 13.33 15.32 919.70
SIDL surfacing 55.11 9.30 13.33 15.32 734.61
FPLL 0.00 15.46
LL 13.52 16.66
Seismic arrester & pedestal 6.04 2.04 13.34 13.34 80.62
PIER CAP 45.11 15.22 12.05 12.05 543.73
PIER 33.77 11.40 6.34 6.34 214.10
Breaking Force 53.60 13.33 714.43
Transverse seismic (Considering 25% extra for foundation as per IRC:6-2010)
Dead load 129.62 243.03 13.33 14.53 1727.67
SiDL 20.70 38.81 13.33 15.32 275.91
SIDL surfacing 16.53 31.00 13.33 15.32 220.38
FPLL 0.00 15.32
LL 45.06 16.66
Seismic arrester & pedestal 1.81 6.80 13.34 13.34 24.19
PIER CAP 13.53 50.75 12.05 12.05 163.12
PIER 10.13 37.99 6.34 6.34 64.23
Breaking Force 53.60 13.33 714.43
Vertical seismic Upward / downward 253.06
 MT ML MT
KNm KNm KNm

-868

0
478 2367

1059.16
178.37
142.47
0.00
225.18
27.21
183.51
72.26

3530.54
594.57
474.91
0.00
750.59
90.70
611.70
240.86
2