Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
TECHSEAR(8)2017/2015-2020
Agriculture Update
Volume 12 | TECHSEAR-8 | 2017 | 2015-2020
Visit us : www.researchjournal.co.in
ARTICLE CHRONICLE : SUMMARY : Aim of research work is to study the effect of foliar nutrition on growth, yield, and quality
Received : of black gram (Vigna mungo L.). The field experiment was conducted in College of Agriculture, Latur
00.00.2017; farm during the kharif season 2016-2017 with black gram variety TAU-1 as test crop. The result reveled
Accepted : that foliar nutrition along with RDF had significant effect on growth parameter of black gram. Application
00.00.2017 of 19:19:19 @ 1.0% at vegetative stage, 00:52:34 @ 1.0% at flowering stage and 13:00:45 @1.0% at grain
filling stage along with RDF recorded significantly higher plant height, number of branches, leaves,
leaf area, root nodules and pods plant-1 of black gram. The application of 19:19:19 @ 1.0% at vegetative
stage, 00:52:34 @ 1.0% at flowering stage and 13:00:45 @1.0% at grain filling stage along with RDF
recorded highest plant height as 16.11, 30.73, 44.52, 45.25 cm and number of branches as 3.73, 6.20, 8.13,
8.33 at 30, 45, 60 DAS and harvest, respectively; leaves plant-1 15.33, 22.67, 10.67 and leaf area plant-1
334.33, 621.73 and 176.33 cm2 at 30, 45, 60 DAS, respectively; root nodules plant-1 20.33 (45DAS) and
34.20 (60 DAS) and pods plant-1 12.27 (60 DAS) and 15.07 (harvest) over control.
KEY WORDS :
Black gram, Height, How to cite this article : Jadhav, S.M., Takankhar, V.G., Raja, D. and Kumbhar, C.S. (2017). Influence of foliar
Leaf area, Branches, nutrition on growth characters of black gram [Vigna mungo L.] under rainfed condition. Agric. Update, 12
Root nodules, Pods (TECHSEAR-8) : 2015-2020; DOI: 10.15740/HAS/AU/12.TECHSEAR(8)2017/2015-2020.
in vitamin A, B1, B3 and has small amount of thiamine, available phosphorous and high in available potassium.
riboflavin, niacin and vitamin C in it. It contains 78 % to The experiment consist of 8 treatments viz., T1 - Control,
80 % nitrogen in the form of albumin and globulin. The T2 - RDF + Water Spray, T3 - RDF + 19:19:19 @ 1.0 %
dry seeds are good source of phosphorus. It also has at vegetative stage, T4 - RDF + 00:52:34 @ 1.0 % at
very high calorie content. 100 gm of black gram has 347 flowering stage, T5 - RDF + 13:00:45 @ 1.0 % at grain
calories. Therefore, black gram is the cheapest available filling stage, T6 - RDF + 19:19:19 @ 1.0 % at vegetative
source of protein for the poor and vegetarians. Foliar stage + 00:52:34 @ 1.0 % at flowering stage, T7 - RDF
application of nutrients is best than soil application + 00:52:34 @ 1.0 % at flowering stage + 13:00:45 @ 1.0
because less quantity of fertilizer is required for the foliar % at grain filling stage and T8 - RDF + 19:19:19 @ 1.0 %
application as compare to soil application. The prices of at vegetative stage + 00:52:34 @ 1.0 % at flowering
fertilizers are increasing day by day and therefore, it is stage + 13:00:45 @ 1.0 % at grain filling stage.
necessary to reduce the cost of fertilizers by using foliar Recommended dose of fertilizer (25:50:00 kg ha-1) viz.,
application of fertilizer to increase yield of legume crops. nitrogen and phosphorus were applied in respective plots
During last three years, it was observed that in as per the recommendation by using the urea and SSP.
Maharashtra there was continuous dry spell of 15 to 35 Growth parameters like plant height, number of branches,
days during kharif season. Which severely affect the leaves, leaf area, root nodules and pods plant -1 were
growth and yield of kharif crops. It is evident from the analyzed at various growth stage of black gram by
literature that the foliar nutrition with N, P and K help in selected five random plants per plot. Data recorded on
increasing drought resistance in plant and reduces the growth parameter was subjected to analysis of variance
loss of water through evapotranspiration. Foliar feeding (ANOVA, p d” 0.05) and means comparisons were done
is a technique of a feeding nutrient to plant by applying at Pd” 0.05. Percentages were computed using the least
liquid fertilizer (either in solution or suspension) directly square means from respective ANOVA and tables and
to the crop canopy. If used wisely, it can more efficient, figures were drawn using MS excel 2007 program.
economical, environmental friendly, target oriented when
used supplement soil fertilization now days, foliar feeding OBSERVATIONS AND ANALYSIS
is widely adopted strategy in modern crop management
Growth characters viz., plant height, numbers of
where it is used to ensure higher or optimum crop
branches, number of leaves, leaf area plant-1, number of
performance by enhancing crop growth at certain growth
nodules plant-1, number of pods plant-1 were recorded
stage, correcting the nutrient deficiency in crop and
during the course of field experiment and the results
enhancing crop tolerance to adverse condition for crop
obtained.
growth. Foliar application overcome soil fertilization
limitations soil unsuitable for fertilizer precipitation,
Plant height :
antagonism between certain nutrients, heterogenic soil
Effect of foliar nutrition on plant height presented in
unsuitable for low dosages and fixation, absorption
Table 1. It was evident from the results that the plant
reaction like in the case of potassium. Therefore, attempts
height was significantly affected due to foliar nutrition at
were made to know the effect of foliar nutrition on growth
different stages of the crop and it was increased with
and yield of black gram. Accordingly the field experiments
advanced stage. The taller plants were observed with
on “Studies on foliar nutrition in black gram [Vigna
treatment T8 at all the growth stages of black gram (Fig.
mungo (L.)] under rainfed condition.” was conducted.
2). The treatment T8 recorded significantly higher plant
height at 30 DAS (16.11 cm), 45 DAS (30.73 cm), 60
RESOURCES AND METHODS DAS (44.52 cm) and at harvest (45.25 cm) followed by
The field experiment was conducted in College of T6. While significantly lowest plant height was observed
Agriculture, Latur farm during the kharif season 2016- with treatment T1 at all the critical growth stages of black
2017. This experiment was laid out in randomized block gram viz., 30 DAS (10.25 cm), 45 DAS (15.07 cm), 60
design with 3 replication and 8 treatments. The DAS (22.59 cm) and harvest stage (23.63 cm). Among
experimental soil was clayey in texture, slightly alkaline the different treatments it was observed that the treatment
reaction, low in content of available nitrogen, medium in T3, T4, and T5 were at par with each other in case of
Table 2: Effe ct of foliar nutrition on mean number of branches plant-1 of black gram
Mean number of branches plant -1
Treatments
30 DAS 45 DAS 60 DAS At harvest
T 1 : Control 2.60 3.87 6.07 6.20
T 2 : RDF + Water spray 2.87 4.13 6.67 6.80
T 3 : RDF + 19:19:19@1.0% at vegetat ive stage 3.47 5.07 7.13 7.27
T 4 : RDF + 00:52:34@1.0% at flowering stage 3.40 4.80 7.00 7.13
T 5 : RDF + 13:00:45@1.0% at grain filling stage 3.53 4.27 6.80 6.93
T6: T3 + T4 3.47 5.73 7.53 7.67
T7: T4 + T5 3.40 5.33 7.27 7.40
T8: T3 + T4 + T5 3.73 6.20 8.13 8.33
S.E.± 0.09 0.17 0.15 0.12
C.D. (P=0.05) 0.28 0.53 0.45 0.37
Table 3: Mean leaf area plant-1 (cm 2) as influenced by different foli ar treatments at various growth stages of black gram
Mean leaf area plant -1
Treatments
30 DAS 45 DAS 60 DAS
T 1 : Control 206.33 512.42 117.67
T 2 : RDF + Water spray 232.00 528.50 122.50
T 3 : RDF + 19:19:19@1.0% at vegetat ive stage 288.75 560.33 150.33
T 4 : RDF + 00:52:34@1.0% at flowering stage 276.50 546.75 146.41
T 5 : RDF + 13:00:45@1.0% at grain filling stage 268.00 543.33 133.67
T6: T3 + T4 318.27 592.43 162.42
T7: T4 + T5 296.67 575.50 166.00
T8: T3 + T4 + T5 334.33 621.73 176.33
S.E.± 3.52 3.02 1.07
C.D. (P=0.05) 10.67 9.16 3.25
parameter of black gram was observed due to treatment to date of sowing and growth regulator to physiological
T8 (RDF + 19:19:19 @ 1.0% at vegetative stage + parameter and seed yield. Bharatiya Krishi Anusandhan
00:52:34 @1.0% at flowering stage + 13:00:45 @ 1.0% Patrika., 9 : 38-42.
at grain filling stage) at all critical growth stages of black Godse, M.M., Deshmukh, S. B., Raundal, P. U., Kunjir, N. T. and
gram. Among all treatments taller plants, higher number Thawai, D. W. (2014). Effect of different foliar spray of nutrients
of branches, leaves plant-1 and number of pods plant-1 on growth, yield and quality of summer green gram. J. Agric.
were observed with the treatment T 8. Among the Res. Technol., 39 (1) : 011-015.
treatments, application of 19:19:19, 00:52:34 and 13:00:45 Mamathashree, C.M., Shilpa, H. D., Sadashivanagouda, S. N.,
combination along with RDF showed superiority over all Tahshildar, M.and Amrutha, T. G. (2014). Effect of foliar spray
the treatments in all the respect which might be due to of water soluble fertilizers on growth parameters of pigeonpea.
fact that there was positive and significant response Trends in Biosciences, 7 (24) : 4140-4142.
among these three foliar nutrient combination as Manivannan, V.K., Thanunathan, Imayavaramban, V. and
compared to individual or combined application of two Ramanathan, N. (2002). Effect of foliar application of NPK and
nutrients along with RDF. chelated micronutrients on rice-fallow urdbean. Leg. Res., 25
(4) : 270-272.
Authors’ affiliations : Ramesh, K. and Thirumurugan, V. (2001). Effect of seed pelleting
V.G. TAKANKHAR, College of Agriculture, Ambajogai, BEED. (M.S.) and foliar nutrition on growth of soybean. Madras Agric. J.,
INDIA
88 : 465-46.
D. RAJA, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Science,
RAICHUR (KARNATAKA) INDIA Venkatesh, M.S. and Basu, P. S. (2011). Effect of foliar
C.S. KUMBHAR, Department of Soil Science a nd Agricu ltu re application of urea on growth, yield and quality of chickpea
Chemistry, College of Agriculture, (V.N.M.K.V.) , LATUR (M.S.) INDIA under rainfed conditions. J. Food Legumes., 24 (2) : 110-112.
Venkatesh, M.S., Basu, P. S. and Vedram (2012). Effect of foliar
REFERENCES application of nitrogenous fertilizers for improved productivity
Baghel, M.S. and Yadav, H.S.(1992). Response of black gram of chickpea under rainfed conditions. Legume Res., 35 (3) :
231-234.