“The difference between science and philosophy is that the
scientist learns more and more about less and less until she knows everything about nothing, whereas a philosopher learns less and less about more and more until he knows nothing about everything”
The topic 'Philosophy is the mother of science' arises a few
question in our mind. First being what is science and what is philosophy?
Etymologically, philosophy means the love of wisdom.
Philosophy is the hunt for the most general truths. Philosophy involves questioning, critical discussions, rational arguments and systematic presentation of those arguments. It asks whether it is possible to know anything and to prove it. Whereas science is a concept that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. It involves studying a phenomenon, trying to explain the phenomenon either by previously existing knowledge or by writing a new theory, keeping or discarding this theory and making changes to the already existing knowledge as the research increases.
Another question the comes up is that how do science and
philosophy differ?
On one hand, science defines the reality whereas philosophy
questions it. Science is based on facts. It is similar to every person. Whereas philosophy is a perspective, one can have a different opinion than another person. When a kite flies, a scientist will apply all the forces acting on it and will tell you how the kite flies, but a philosopher will tell you the kite flies because it is the only reason of its existence. The scientist will answer the question of HOW the kite flies, but a philosopher will tell you WHY the kite flies.
Philosophy is often regarded as the mother of all the sciences
because it were philosophers who first tried to study the nature of the world. Philosophy helped the evolution of science. Aristotle, a great philosopher, was the one who established Physics, Zoology, and Logic; few major components of what we call science. History says that Avicenna was heavily influenced by Aristotle, who then influenced Ockham who influenced Newton and hence, the whole of modern physics. Ancient and mideival philosophers didn’t stop at science, they studied everything, from physics to mathematics, to ethics, law, and politics, to psychology, sociology, and language. That is, aside from studying subjects that are specially philosophical, like how knowledge is obtained, what is knowledge, the existence of knowledge, is it possible to know etc.
Philosophy contains science, but science doesn't contain
philosophy. Isaac Newton, one of the greatest scientist, however, at his time, was a philosopher or a natural philosopher. This explains why he named his famous work: ‘Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica’
The methods of science are for answering well-defined questions.
The role of philosophy is to make sure the right questions are being asked. And if the right questions are not asked, science would be reduced to nothing. Without philosophy or philosophical methods, we cannot reach new information. And when we stop reaching new information, science would cease to grow. Philosophy, in constant repetition, opens new subjects to the sciences to discuss. I believe that philosophy is the mother of all knowledge because it was the starting point of most of the sciences that we study today, and if it wasn’t for those ancient philosophers (and a lot of modern philosophers) then nothing would’ve been as it is today. Also, because philosophy, is the most important science, because there is no field of knowledge that truly discusses who we are from our points of view, and I see that as something that is truly essential; we are everything to ourselves, and we need to know what we are to ourselves in order to understand ourselves. More importantly, philosophy studies perception which puts all other forms of knowledge on the edge, because every science strongly depends on it.
Hence, as philosophy was more or less the origin of all sciences
and it is the only way for all these sciences to grow, philosophy can be said to be the mother of all sciences.
Chi, M. T., Slotta, J. D., & de Leeuw, N. (1994) - From Things To Processes: A Theory of Conceptual Change For Learning Science Concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4 (1), 27-43.