1.

Comparison of Tenders

Tenders will be evaluated based on scoring system, giving seventy points (70) weight
to the Technical Proposal and thirty points (30) weight to the Financial Offer as follows:

The Technical Proposal will be evaluated based on the scoring system on the following
tables, item T1 to T9 plus Fl. The tenderers score will be multiplied by 70/100 to give a
maximum score of 70.

The Financial Proposal will be scored as follows. The Tender that is determined to
be responsive to the requirements of these tender documents and which has
submitted the tender with the lowest corrected Tender Value will be given a score
of 30 points and the financial proposal from the other responsive tenderers will be
scored proportionately based on the lowest Tender Value.

Financial Points Obtained = 30 x (Lowest offer/ the Tenderer's offer)

1.1.1 Bid Price Evaluation

The tender will be awarded to the bid with the highest total Technical (70 points
maximum) plus Financial Points (30 points maximum). The Maximum possible
points will be 100%.

Table 1.1: Technical evaluation criteria

Completeness and quality of overall tender

T1 submission 5
(Compliance with the Instructions to Tenderers )

Experience in constructing project identical to the

scope of this project in the last 5 years (projects 12
T2 completed in the last 5 years) while acting as Main
Contractor A scale of 3 points shall be allocated for
each project meeting the criteria to a maximum of 12
Completed successfully the construction of projects
T3 12
of a contract value more than RO 1 million in Oman

Project Organization Chart

T4 The proposed organization covers and activates 12
management 25 and supervision requirements

All activities covered

Major activities not covered

Personnel are identified for each position

All personnel identified and CV available 4
Some personnel not identified for each position or CV
not 24
Available Personnel not identified for position and CV
not available
Qualifications and Experience of proposed Senior
personnel (ProjectEngineer,Resident Engineer, and
other key personnel, e.g., Hydrogeologist, Geologist,
QS,
Driller, Material Specialist, Civil Engineer, Surveyor,
etc.)
Resident Engineer/ Hydrogeologist/ Geologist/ Project
Engineer
experience with minimum qualification of Bachelor's
degree with 10
years' experience in Drilling/Construction wor s.
ommdted 100 /o at A, C 5
Site
Other personnel (drillers, civil engineers, QS,
materials specialist
welders, electricians, mechanics, etc). The scoring to
be distributed 5 based on qualification and
experience
 I

I 'RE/' ell OriHHing for D?..t:-'. P-:: lr 1 ri kbli, Nejd W _ �''rrt

I
I Mott MacDonald

I
I
I Proposed construction plant and equipment
The Tenderers submission shall cover all aspects of scope,
subcontractor plan and equipment shall be clearly identified.
The proposed plant and equipment's cover all
the project's
T4 requirements, organised per activity and source
is identified
an an equipment management is well explained and
I demonstrate
the process for achieving the targets (Completion on time
and quality).
The proposed plant and equipment missing some of
the project's requirements, and/or not organised per
activity.
Plant and equipment management is not well
explained and demonstrate the process for
achieving the targets
T5 Not provided

Methodology statement and compliance to time schedule

Provided clear and complete method statement and
workplan covering all aspects of project (project stages,

I
planning, communication, phases of deliverables and
reviews, etc.)
Provided partial method statement and work plan
covering all aspects of project (project stages,
communication, planning, phases of
deliverables and reviews, etc.)
Provided general method statement and work plan covering all
aspects
T6 of project (project stages, communication, planning, phases of 2
deliverables and reviews, etc.)
Safety Programme and management
Proposed Omani sub contractors, local material/products and local labour
Existing Omanisation in companies to be scored on pro-
T7 rata basis with a maximum score of 5 points using this
formula
Omanisation(%)@compani
es x 5
30
Bidder's Nr of Omani Employees x 5
5 28
T8
Highest Nr of Omani Employees
Local materials/products 7
Local sub-contractors (Allocation of at least 10% of the total value of
tender for small and medium companies as per circular number 7/2013 6
issued by the "Tender Board")
Experience of Design team/Sub-Consultant 5
T9 Quality Control and Quality Assurance 5
TOTAL OF TECHNICAL CAPABILITY SCORING 90

7 f!- 333059/OOG/O iliiVVi6/F 07 July 2011

sender Do.:um nt Volume I- Primo I)uoiiment
 PRE/1'x/15 - Wail Driilinl9 for Data '7° r r s Ci
Mott MacDonald

Financial Capability

1.25 and higher

Less than 1.25 and greater
than 1.0 Equal to 1.0
Less than 1.0

TOTAL OF FINANCIAL CAPABILTY SCORING

TOTAL SCORE FOR TECHNICAL EVALUATION

The Financial Proposal will be scored as follows: the lowest priced Tender will be given a perfect
score of thirty percent (30%) and the second lowest priced Tender and the rest will be
scoredproportionately based on the lowest Tender.

The Contract will be awarded to the tenderer whose Tender has the highest total score, who is
responsive to the requirements of the Tender and who satisfies the post-qualification
requirements in Paragraph 1.5.6 of the Instructions to Tenderers.

25 333050/0oG/ovivv/5/F 07 July 2014

Tender Document: Volume 1 - Prime Docwii nl