Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
KADAPA
I.A No.308/2018
In
O.S No.313/2018
V.Sailaja …Petitioner/plaintiff
Vs.
P.Pavan Kumar Reddy … Respondent/ Defendant
COUNTER FILED ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT
The above stated facts are verified and those facts are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief and signed
this at Kadapa on 9th Day of July 2018.
Filed by:
Sri. M. Ramjaneya Reddy, M.A., B.L.,
Sri. K. Venkata Reddy, B.Com., B.L.,
Advocates for respondent/ defendant,
Kadapa
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE COURT AT
KADAPA
I.A No. 560/2018
In
O.S No. 229/2018
1) V.Priyanka
2) Reddappa Reddy
…Petitioner/plaintiff
Vs.
1) V.Ramanjula Reddy
2) K.Vijaya Lakshmi
3) C.Lakshmi
4) P.Pavankumar Reddy
… Respondents/ Defendants
COUNTER FILED ON BEHALF OF THE FOURTH RESPONDENT
3. The petitioner filed this false and vexatious suit against this
fourth respondent/defendant unnecessarily even though this respondent
is nothing to do with suit schedule property. The petitioners should have
filed this suit for declaration and consequential injunction instead of filing
this false suit for partition and permanent injunction. The question of
permanent injunction does not arise in partition suit.
The above stated facts are verified and those facts are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief and signed
this at Kadapa on 9th Day of July 2018.
1) V.Priyanka
2) Reddappa Reddy
…Petitioner/plaintiff
Vs.
1) V.Ramanjula Reddy
And 3 others
… Respondent/ Defendant
Filed by:
Sri. M. Ramjaneya Reddy, M.A., B.L.,
Sri. K. Venkata Reddy, B.Com., B.L.,
Advocates for fourth respondent/
defendant,
Kadapa