13 Feb 2019 Page 1 of 3

Intern Name: Cira Davis

Internship: 18FA ETE 239

Submitted: Nov 29, 2018 Supervisor(s): Se Jeong Yang

Course/Term: ETE 239 - 1 : Practicum ELL III ( 18FA-ETE ) Mentor(s): Leslie Isbell
Assessor: Leslie Isbell (Mentor) Site: Hickory Grove Elementary School,
2514 W. Hickory Grove Rd., Dunlap
IL 61525
Comments: Cira did a fantastic job. She was eager to learn and work with the students. She has great enthusiasm Subject(s): ESL
and passion for working with students. She planned thoughtful lessons and created strong assessments to help
assess students level.
Grade(s): 2nd

Important Note

Important Note: As a requirement to pass this evaluation and the course the teacher candidate must earn a Mean Minimum of 2.5 score with no Emergent
rankings on the final.

Total points earned divided by 10.

The Learner and Learning

Proficient (3.000 pts) Developing (2.000 pts) Emerging (1.000 pts) N/A
Teacher candidate influenced a Not an option. The teacher candidate was
Positively
safe and healthy environment by challenged by one or more of the
influences a
being a good role model for ELL following: a) influencing a safe
safe and
students and following and and healthy environment; b) being
healthy
enforcing school rules. a good role model for all students;
environment
c) following and/or enforcing
1/2 (50%)
school rules.
Comments:
The teacher candidate modeled The teacher candidate was The teacher candidate was
appropriate technology and digital reminded on one occasion to reminded on more than one
Models
etiquette by refraining from: a) appropriately use technology or occasion to appropriately use
appropriate
speaking on cell phones; b) digit media. On one occasion the technology or digit media. On
technology
sending or receiving text teacher candidate did not refrain more than one occasion the
and digital
messages; and/or c) using from: a) speaking on cell phones; teacher candidate did not refrain
etiquette that
computers in the classroom b) sending or receiving text from: a) speaking on cell phones;
supports and
without permission from the messages; and/or c) using b) sending or receiving text
facilitates
cooperating teacher; or d) posting computers in the classroom messages; and/or c) using
responsible
professional or unprofessional without permission from the computers in the classroom
social
information on social media. cooperating teacher; or d) posting without permission from the
interactions
professional or unprofessional cooperating teacher; or d) posting
1/2 (50%)
information on social media. professional or unprofessional
information on social media.
Comments:
6.000 pts | 100 %

Content Knowledge

Proficient (3.000 pts) Developing (2.000 pts) Emerging (1.000 pts) N/A
Demonstrates Teacher candidate demonstrated The teacher candidate is working While communicating with ELL
a command of an appropriate command of to achieve an appropriate students and all school personnel,
the language: language: standard conventions, command of language: standard the teacher candidate was
standard written and oral, including volume conventions, written and oral, challenged when demonstrating
conventions, and tone while communicating including volume and tone while an appropriate command of
written and with ELL students and all school communicating with ELL students language: standard conventions,
oral, including personnel consistently. and all school personnel. written and oral, including volume
volume and and tone.
tone
1/1 (100%)

Comments:
3.000 pts | 100 %

Instructional Practice

Proficient (3.000 pts) Developing (2.000 pts) Emerging (1.000 pts) N/A
13 Feb 2019 Page 2 of 3
Tutors and By the end of the semester, the By the end of the semester, the By the end of the semester, even
mentors teacher candidate independently teacher candidate with some with a great deal of support from
students (one- tutored and mentored ELL support from the cooperating the cooperating teacher, the
on-one or students by implementing teacher tutored and mentored teacher candidate was challenged
small group) differentiated/sheltered ELL students by implementing in tutoring and mentoring ELL
by instructional activities and differentiated/sheltered students.
implementing collaboratively developing short instructional activities and
appropriate term (mini-lessons or lessons) collaboratively developing short
evidence- learning targets. term learning targets.
based
instructional
activities to
collaboratively
develop short
term learning
objectives for
student
success
1/2 (50%)

Comments:
Assists Teacher candidate made excellent The teacher candidate required The teacher candidate was
cooperating progress in taking initiative to consistent guidance when challenged when taking initiative
teacher to consistently assist the cooperating assisting the cooperating teacher and/or following the cooperating
develop and / teacher in planning and delivering in preparing and delivering teacher’s guidance to prepare and
or facilitate instruction to ELL students. instruction to ELL students. deliver instruction to ELL students.
instructional
tasks
1/2 (50%)

Comments:
6.000 pts | 100 %

Professional Responsibilities

Proficient (3.000 pts)
When offered constructive criticism
the teacher candidate reacted
professionally as indicated by
Demonstrates
body language, tone of voice,
acceptance of
and / or through written
constructive
communication. Furthermore, the
criticism and
teacher candidate adjusted his or
adjusts
her actions (teaching practices) as
teaching
a response to the cooperating
practices
teacher’s constructive criticism.
1/5 (20%)
Comments:
With the exception of an
emergency, the teacher candidate
consistently arrived to the
classroom on time with no more
Demonstrates than two absences. If an absence
professionalism was necessary, the teacher
through candidate notified the cooperating
scheduled teacher before the start of the
attendance school day in writing. Note: (If the
and punctuality teacher candidate was absent two
1/5 (20%) or less times but did not notify the
cooperating teacher before the
beginning of the school day, then
he or she should receive a
“Developing” for this criterion.)
Comments:
Displays Every day the teacher candidate
appropriate displayed appropriate personal
personal appearance and grooming for the
appearance classroom professional activities,
and grooming including meeting the guidelines
for the as indicated in the school’s Code
classroom of Conduct for piercings, tattoos,
professional hair color, hair styles, jewelry, and
activities clothing.
1/5 (20%)
Developing (2.000 pts)
When offered constructive criticism
by the cooperating teacher, the
teacher candidate reacted
professionally as indicated by
body language, tone of voice,
and / or through written
communication. However, either
by willful choice or inability, the
teacher candidate did not adjust
his or her actions (teaching
practices) as a response to the
cooperating teacher’s constructive
criticism.
With the exception of an
emergency, the teacher candidate
was late to class on one occasion.
and/or The teacher candidate was
absent from class three times;
however, notified the cooperating
teacher before the start of the
school day.
On one occasion, the teacher
candidate did not display
appropriate personal appearance
and grooming for the classroom
professional activities; therefore,
not meeting the guidelines as
indicated in the school’s Code of
Conduct for piercings, tattoos, hair
color, hair styles, jewelry, and / or
clothing.
Emergent (1.000 pts) N/A
When offered constructive
criticism, the teacher candidate
reacted unprofessionally as
indicated by body language, tone
of voice, and / or through written
communication. In addition, by
willful choice or inability, the
teacher candidate did not adjust
his or her actions (teaching
practices) as a response to the
cooperating teacher’s constructive
criticism.
With the exception of an
emergency, the teacher candidate
was late to class on more than
one occasion. and/or The teacher
candidate was absent from class
three or more times; however, did
not notify the cooperating teacher
before the start of the school day
on at least one occasion.
On two or more occasions, the
teacher candidate did not display
appropriate personal appearance
and grooming for the classroom
professional activities; therefore,
not meeting the guidelines as
indicated in the school’s Code of
Conduct for piercings, tattoos, hair
color, hair styles, jewelry, and / or
clothing.
13 Feb 2019 Page 3 of 3
Comments:
Each day the teacher candidate Not an option. On more than one occasion, the
modeled professional behaviors teacher candidate did not model
that reflected responsibility and professional behaviors that
Models respect: a) valued ELL students’ reflected responsibility and
professional cultural backgrounds and respect. Therefore, the teacher
behaviors that languages; b) came prepared with candidate was challenged in one
reflect appropriate dispositions, or both of the following areas: a)
responsibility materials, and resources to valuing ELL students’ cultural
and respect support ELL students’ individual backgrounds and languages; b)
1/5 (20%) needs. coming prepared with appropriate
dispositions, materials, and
resources to support ELL
students’ individual needs.
Comments:
The teacher candidate The teacher candidate required The teacher candidate was
Collaboratively collaboratively worked with the consistent guidance when working challenged in collaboratively
works with cooperating teacher to support with the cooperating teacher to working with his or her cooperating
cooperating ELL students’ language support ELL students’ language teacher. Even with tremendous
teacher to development and academic development and academic support, the teacher candidate
support success by effectively performing success. experienced difficulties much of
student assigned tasks. the time in performing tasks to
success support ELL students’ language
1/5 (20%) development and academic
success.
Comments:
15.000 pts | 100 %