Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The
indictment, filed under seal on May 1, 2018, charges Wickramasuriya with
two counts of wire fraud, two counts of money laundering and one count
of visa fraud. The charges stem from allegations that in early 2013,
Wickramasuriya and others embezzled about US $332,000 from the
Government of Sri Lanka (GoSL) in connection with a property purchased in
Washington D.C. that was intended to serve as the new Sri Lankan embassy.
He was also charged with committing immigration fraud in connection with
an immigration application that he signed in the United States in 2014. The
US Government has requested an arrest warrant for Wickramasuriya and
intends to arraign him before court.
Sri Lankan authorities have been aware of the case filed against
Wickramasuriya from at least early November
Wickramasuriya filed a petition at the Court of Appeal seeking
reinstatement of his diplomatic immunity
Wickramasuriya remains without diplomatic immunity, pending a final
determination by the Supreme Court
It is extremely rare for the US criminal justice system to become
intertwined in foreign politics
The former ambassador also faces the prospect of criminal charges
in Sri Lanka
The FCID investigations revealed that Paper Crown LLC is owned by Vinod
Basnayake- a close associate of Ambassador Wickramasuriya. According to
the ‘B’ Reports filed by the FCID, both Basnayake and Wickramasuriya were
meeting constantly at the Sri Lankan Embassy in Washington during the
latter’s tenure as the Ambassador.
Be that as it may, according to the now public case docket in the US District
Court of Washington DC, Sri Lankan authorities have been aware of the case
filed against Wickramasuriya from at least early November 2018, when the
District Court granted an order permitting US authorities to share
information about the charges with their Sri Lankan counterparts.
Before the charges were filed, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, by letter dated
October 23 2017, formally waived any immunity that Wickramasuriya held in
connection with the U.S. Government’s investigation of him for embezzlement
and laundering of public funds in connection with the 2013 embassy purchase.
As the decision to withdraw immunity was taken by the President, the Court
of Appeal ruled that it did not have jurisdiction to challenge an official act of
the President.
However, during November 2018, while Wickramasuriya’s first cousin former
President Mahinda Rajapaksa was serving as Prime Minister in the
unconstitutionally set-up Government and Sarath Amunugama acted as
Foreign Minister, an abortive attempt had been made to reinstate
Wickramasuriya’s immunity. There is no indication that either President
Maithripala Sirisena or ‘Prime Minister’ Mahinda Rajapaksa endorsed the
attempt at any stage, according to foreign ministry and law enforcement
officials who are familiar with the matter. Wickramasuriya remains without
diplomatic immunity, pending a final determination by the Supreme Court.
It’s stated that ‘in the last 10 days or so, there had been a change of
Government in Sri Lanka. The President of Sri Lanka had attempted to
remove the sitting Prime Minister and to replace him with former President
Mahinda Rajapaksa. Several media outlets have referred to the matter as a
constitutional crisis,’ the filing continues.
However, the Rajapaksa Government was tight-lipped about the US
Government’s request to the GoSL to remove Wickramasuriya as the
Ambassador and how the same accused was once again nominated to Canada
as the Sri Lankan Ambassador to that country
Foreign politics
It is extremely rare for the US criminal justice system to become intertwined
in foreign politics, according to diplomatic sources. However, US prosecutors
took the extraordinary step of disclosing to the District Court that they were
in close contact with US officials in Sri Lanka about the risk to their
prosecution from a potential political decision to reinstate Wickramasuriya’s
diplomatic immunity.
“We have been advised by United States officials in Sri Lanka that there will
be a meeting to discuss and/or determine the immunity issue on Sunday,
November 11, 2018, and they believe that advising the Sri Lankan authorities
of the fact that the defendant has been indicted will be of relevance and
assistance in making their determination. A resolution to the issue of whether
the government of Sri Lanka will assert immunity in this case is important to
the timely prosecution of this matter,” the motion said.
The US Department of Justice has stated that ‘sealing the documents and
withholding them from the public docket is necessary to protect sensitive
information, to ensure the defendant does not flee or destroy evidence, and to
protect civilian witnesses’.
Supporting the request to seal the case in May this year, the Justice
Department had informed Court that law enforcement believes that the
defendant is not aware of the full extent of the Government’s investigation or
that the Government has uncovered certain of the facts underlying the
allegations in the criminal investigation. These facts include information
provided by civilian witnesses familiar with the defendant’s ongoing criminal
enterprise’.
Criminal charges
The former ambassador also faces the prospect of criminal charges in Sri
Lanka pending the conclusion of the FCID investigation into this matter. Sri
Lankan authorities have jurisdiction to use the evidence gathered by US
prosecutors and additional records to frame additional charges, according to
senior Government officials familiar with the matter.
Specifically, US and Sri Lankan investigators have been exchanging material
on the basis of Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) requests, which form the gold
standard of the exchange of evidence between jurisdictions for criminal
prosecutions. Under Sri Lankan law, material received from the US in
response to an MLA request may be admissible as evidence in criminal
proceedings.
While Sri Lanka may not charge Wickramasuriya again for the same offences
he faces in the US, they may pursue other charges such as forgery, criminal
breach of trust and offences against public property.
The email stated that federal prosecutors in the US “wanted information what
they called the Rajapaksa regime and said they believed that this information
was highly sensitive. They seem to want to use Mr. Wickramasuriya as a
means to initiate investigation of many others in Sri Lankan Government both
former and current. They expressed concern that various government officials
were responsible for having misappropriated billions of dollars. They are
hoping that Mr. Wickramasuriya will cooperate with the hope that they build
cases of many other current and former government officials.”
“If he were to do this he would not go to jail in the United States, but there is
no guarantee. I think that he would benefit greatly if he were to cooperate
against other high ranking and low ranking officials in Sri Lanka,” the lawyer
recommended.
However, the writ petition was taken up in the Court of Appeal on February
6, Additional Solicitor General Yasantha Kodagoda appearing for the
Attorney General, raised a preliminary objection, stating that seeks the
decision to withdraw immunity was taken by President in his official capacity
and the only court with jurisdiction to reverse that is the Supreme Court
according to the Constitution.