Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
(a)
labeled with “0” require at most nmax bits for lossless simulation. A 5-level wavelet decomposition quantized to
representation. Now, we split the “1” labeled quadrants nearest integers using filers is simulated through
into four 23−2 × 23−2 element quadrants and test each of MATLAB. The test images are encoded upto the last bit
these four new quarter-size quadrants, whether or not all of plane. The encoding of images is done at 1bpp. After
its elements are smaller than 2nmax. processing, these images are decoded at different bit rates
as shown in the figure. Variation of PSNR with bits per
pixel (bpp) is given in the chart below. We can see in the
chart that the degradation in image quality ( PSNR) is
almost negligible when data is lost in transmission. This
result shows that the quality of image remains almost same
even if the 20% or 50% data is lost. So this scheme of
compression is very reliable when image is transmitted on
a noise prone channel. We get decent quality of image even
after half of the data is lost.
Figure 5(b): portioning 4x4 array further into 2x2 PSNR (in dB)
according to significance 50% 25%
Image bpp All data
packet data
Again, we label these new 2x2 quadrants with “1” received
lost lost
or “0”, depending whether any element in the quandrant is
0.5 28.1504 27.4272 27.8091
significant, i.e., pj ≥ 2nmax or not, respectively. Again any
“0” labeled quadrant requires nmax bits for lossless Lena 0.25 23.9964 23.9009 23.8903
representation of its elements. Quadrant labeled “1” is 0.125 21.1391 21.1354 21.1421
again split into four equal parts (quadrisected), with each 0.5 23.9682 22.9702 23.709
part tested again whether its elements exceed the threshold
2nmax. This procedure of quadrisection and testing is Barbara 0.25 20.9343 20.8579 20.9181
continued until the „1‟-labeled quadrants are split into 4 0.125 19.0213 18.7791 18.7501
single elements, whereupon all the individual elements 0.5 33.1238 31.045 32.3067
greater than or equal to 2nmax are located. These elements
are known to be one of the 2nmax integers from 2nmax to Goldgate 0.25 29.3595 28.482 29.0553
2nmax+1 − 1, so their differences from 2nmax are coded with 0.125 27.6008 27.2018 27.5061
nmax bits and inserted into the bitstream to be transmitted. 0.5 23.9899 21.6488 23.3081
The single elements less than 2nmax can be coded now with
nmax bits. What also remains are sets of sizes 2 × 2 to 23−1 House 0.25 21.3282 20.3638 21.0944
× 23−1 labeled with “0” to indicate that every element 0.125 19.8207 19.2443 19.6856
within these sets is less than 2nmax. Figures are shown Table1 Variations in PSNR with change in bit rate for test
above to understand level and types of decomposition. images
Three levels of splitting and labeling is done. But the
algorithm would not be efficient by finding sets requiring 5.1 Comparative analysis of Coding efficiencies with data
just one less bit for representation of its elements. So, the lost during transmission
threshold is lowered by a factor of 2 to 2nmax−1 and above Using the data from the simulation results, the
procedure of quadrisection is repeated and labeling is done degradation in quality of images is compared when no data
on the “0”-labeled sets already found. is lost during transmission, when 50% data is lost during
In this way, SPECK coding exploits the clustering or transmission and when 25% data is lost during
accumulation of energy in frequency and space in the transmission.
hierarchical structures of wavelet transformed images. For 5.1.1 LENA Image
reconstructing the compressed image, inverse of SPECK Through simulation we have represented a coding
coding is done at the decoder. efficiency, when no data is lost during transmission
(represented by red line), when 50% data is lost during
V. SIMULATION RESULT transmission (represented by black line), and when 25%
data is lost(represented by blue line).
To evaluate the performance of the presented
method through MATLAB, the standard Lena image,
Barbara image, Goldgate and House images (with 512*512
pixels and 8 Bpp bitrate) are used as the test images in the
Figure 8 : coding efficiency for LENA image Figure 10 : coding efficiency for GOLDGATE image
REFERENCES
[1] Y. Wang, M.T. Orchard, V.A. Vaishampayan, & A.R.
Figure (b) : Image when 50% data is lost Reibman. (2001). Multiple description coding using
Figure 11 : Final output images of GOLDGATE at 0.5 bpp pairwise correlating transforms. IEEE Transactions on
Image Processing, 10(3), 351-366.
5.1.4 HOUSE Image [2] S. D. Servetto, K. Ramchandran, & V.A
This is the last image tested on our coding. The Vaishampayan. (2000). Multiple description wavelet based
comparative graph plotted for percentage of data lost is image coding. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,
shown in figure 4.5, with red line representing the 9(5), 813-826.
efficiency when no data is lost, black line representing [3] V. K. Goyal & J. Kovacevic. (2001). Generalized
when 50% data is lost, and blue line when 25% data is lost. multiple description coding with correlating transforms.
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 47(6), 2199-
2224.
[4] V.K. Goyal. (2001). Multiple description coding:
Compression meets the network. IEEE Signal Processing
Magazine, 18(5), 74-93.
[5] A. Said & W.A. Pearlman. (1996). A new fast and
efficient image codec based on set partitioning in
hierarchical trees. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and
Systems for Video Technology, 6(3), 243–250.
[6] A. Islam & W.A. Pearlman. (1999). An embedded and
efficient low-complexity hierarchical image coder.
Available at:
https://www.ecse.rpi.edu/~pearlman/papers/vcip99_ip.pdf.
[7] W.A. Pearlman, A. Islam, N. Nagaraj, & A. Said.
Figure 12 : coding efficiency for HOUSE image (2004). Efficient, low-complexity image coding with a set-
partitioning embedded block coder. IEEE Transactions on
VI. CONCLUSION Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 14(11), 1219–
1235.
In this paper, a simple, fast and efficient [8] K. Sayood. (2000). Introduction to data compression.
compression scheme using MDC is presented. This (2nd ed.). Academic Press, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
scheme provides reliable transmission through busty [9] G. Strang & T. Nguyen. (1996). Wavelets and filter
channels. Both bandwidth efficient MDC and SPECK banks. Cambridge: Wellesley-Cambridge Press.
coder require lesser computational power. MDC [10] Li Ze-Nian, Drew Mark S. (2004). Image
implemented provides reliability even if the considerable compression standards in Fundamentals of multimedia.
amount of data is lost. Transmitting data over two Prentice-Hall.
channels, reducing the congestion in wireless transmission [11] Lewis A. S. & Knowles G. (1992). Image
network reduces overhead charges significantly. SPECK compression using the 2-D wavelet transform. IEEE
coding used here is also very simple and fast. The SPECK Transaction on Image Processing, 244-250.
coder used in this work fully exploits the clustering of
energy in lower frequency bands by DWT, improving the
efficiency of the compression scheme. Though the SPECK
used here requires more memory than the listless SPECK,
but this drawback is optimized by the increased efficiency
and reliability. Sorting in the SPECK used in our work is
done in hierarchy, starting from high magnitude crucial
104 Copyright © 2018. IJEMR. All Rights Reserved.