Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Host: Transcat
Presenters:
Jim Shields and Bob Crepps
Fluke Process Calibration Group
1
Agenda
• Instrument calibration, challenges and elements
– Reasons to calibrate
• Establishing a process calibration maintenance management
program
– Using Calibration Management Software (CMS) to:
• Manage process instruments and calibration records
• Interface with Field Documenting Process Calibrators
• Predict instrument performance, minimize maintenance costs
– Using Documenting Process Calibrators to :
• Manage procedures or tasks downloaded from CMS
• Perform field calibrations and adjustments
• Record field calibration results
• Upload field calibration results to CMS
• Paperless calibration management program benefits
Why Calibrate?
• Regulations, standards and trade
• Custody Transfer
• Internal/External Quality Programs (like ISO-9000)
• Plant Safety and Uptime
• EPA, FDA, NRC, OSHA and other mandated
regulations
Why Calibrate?
• All instruments change with
– Time, temperature, humidity, environmental
exposure, vibration, wear and tear
– No two instruments change exactly the same
• Scheduled calibrations reduce process
downtime risk
– Improves the performance and reliability of critical
assets
• Product Quality / Yield
– Calibration helps processes comparable to traceable
calibration standards
• Helps minimize process deviations
– Helps drive process optimization and cost savings
Industry changes
• Regulatory forces increasing
• The plant isn’t getting smaller but shrinking budgets are reducing
the maintenance staff
– Driving efficiencies and the need to “Do more with less”
• Experienced instrumentation professionals retiring
– Technical and Vocational Schools working to fill voids
• Plant modernizations lead to control system changes
• Competitive pressure offshore push the need for plant
optimization, streamlined operations and maintenance practices
Process Calibration
Elements:
• Calibration equipment, procedures, instrument documentation,
calibration management software (CMS), trained personnel
Benefits:
• Consistent process performance and efficiency, improved product
quality, reduced downtime, safety, regulatory compliance,
maximized use of skilled maintenance personnel
Calibration, definitions…
Calibration: Comparison of a measured value to a traceable
measurement standard
– Adjust to agree with the standard if necessary
• Accuracy: The closeness of agreement between an observed
value and that of a traceable measurement standard
• Adjustment: Manual or digital compensation of the output signal
of device with a known input value applied
– Necessary if a device is not performing as required
• Need to understand adjustment tolerance
• Need communication tool for digital adjustment
Adjustment is part of a calibration process, it is not calibration by
itself.
Traceability
• Unbroken chain of
National
calibration. Standards
• Documented
proof. Fluke Petrochemical Corporation
RESULTS FROM FLUKE 702 CALIBRATIONS
2-Feb-96
2-Feb-96
As found
RESULTSMeasure: 4.000
FROM FLUKE
Source:
Test Tolerance:
Serial: 6150203
Corporation
Loop Power: 24V
25-Jan-96
to CALIBRATIONS
702 20.000
40.0
mA
4:46
to 70.0
0.25%
°C Type: Pt100(3916) 2W RTD
By Tag ID
ITS-90
Tag ID:TT451 Serial: 987654321
Model: Test Strategy:
FLUKE 702 Serial: 6150203 3 ^v Task Name: Temp Transmitter RTD1234 User ID: JSmith 010
1,996.001.0025 Input
Cal. Value:
Status: 14 Units Output
Loop value:24V
Power: Units Error % Status MeasUEV
As found3.90625-Jan-96
mA 4:46 40.0 °C -0.59 Failed Disabled
11.9184.000
Measure: mA to 20.000 55.0 °C
mA -0.51 Failed Disabled
19.92340.0
Source: mA to 70.0 70.0 °C°C -0.48 Pt100(3916)
Type: Failed Disabled
2W RTD ITS-90
11.918 mA 55.0 °C -0.51 Failed Disabled
Test Tolerance: 0.25% Tag ID:TT451 Serial: 987654321
3.907 mA 40.0 °C -0.58 Failed Disabled
Test Strategy: 3 ^v Task Name: Temp Transmitter RTD1234
1,996.001.0025 Input Value: Units Output value: Units Error % Status MeasUEV
3.906 mA 40.0 °C -0.59 Failed Disabled
Model: FLUKE 70211.918 mA 6150203
Serial: 55.0 °C -0.51 Failed Disabled
User ID: JSmith 010
19.923 mA 70.0 °C -0.48 Failed Disabled
Cal. Status: 14 Loop Power: 24V
11.918 mA 55.0 °C -0.51 Failed Disabled
As left 25-Jan-96 4:53
3.907 mA 40.0 °C -0.58 Failed Disabled
Measure: 4.000 to 20.000 mA
Source: 40.0 to 70.0 °C Type: Pt100(3916) 2W RTD ITS-90
Test Tolerance: 0.25% Tag ID:TT451 Serial: 987654321
Test Strategy: 3 ^v Task Name: Temp Transmitter RTD1234
Model: FLUKE 702 Serial: 6150203 User ID: JSmith 010
1,996.001.0025 Input Value: Units Output value: Units Error % Status MeasUEV
Cal. Status: 14 Loop Power: 24V
3.998 mA 40.0 °C -0.01 Passed Disabled
As left 25-Jan-96 4:53
12.011 mA 55.0 °C 0.07 Passed Disabled
Measure: 4.000 to 20.000 mA
20.018 mA 70.0 °C 0.12 Passed Disabled
Source: 40.0 to 70.0 °C Type: Pt100(3916) 2W RTD ITS-90
12.016 mA 55.0 °C 0.10 Passed Disabled
Test Tolerance:4.003 mA 0.25% 40.0 °C 0.02 Tag ID:TT451
Passed Serial: 987654321
Disabled
Test Strategy: 3 ^v Task Name: Temp Transmitter RTD1234
1,996.001.0025 Input Value: Units Output value: Units Error % Status MeasUEV
3.998 mA 40.0 °C -0.01 Passed Disabled
12.011 mA 55.0 °C 0.07 Passed Disabled
20.018 mA 70.0 °C 0.12 Passed Disabled
12.016 mA 55.0 °C 0.10 Passed Disabled
4.003 mA 40.0 °C 0.02 Passed Disabled
Fluke
Fluke Petrochemical
Petrochemical Corp.
Corp.
By:
By:
Title:
Title:
Cert. No.:
Cert. No.: 1
1
2-Feb-96
RESULTS FROM FLUKE 702 CALIBRATIONS
2-Feb-96
Model: FLUKE 702 Serial: 6150203 User ID: JSmith 010
Cal. Status: 14 Loop Power: 24V
Model: FLUKE 702 Serial: 6150203 User ID: JSmith 010
As found 25-Jan-96 4:46
Cal. Status: 14
Measure: 4.000 to Loop Power: 24V
20.000 mA
As found 25-Jan-96 4:46
Source: 40.0 to 70.0 °C Type: Pt100(3916) 2W RTD ITS-90
Measure: 4.000 to 20.000 mA
Test Tolerance:
Source: 40.0 to 0.25%
70.0 °C Tag ID:TT451
Type: Pt100(3916) Serial: 987654321
2W RTD ITS-90
Test Strategy: 3 ^v Task Name: Temp Transmitter RTD1234
Test Tolerance: 0.25% Tag ID:TT451 Serial: 987654321
1,996.001.0025 Input Value: Units
Test Strategy: 3 ^vOutput value:
Task UnitsTemp Transmitter
Name: Error % Status
RTD1234 MeasUEV
3.906 mA 40.0 °C -0.59 Failed Disabled
1,996.001.0025 Input Value: Units Output value: Units Error % Status MeasUEV
11.918 mA 55.0 °C -0.51 Failed Disabled
3.906 mA 40.0 °C -0.59 Failed Disabled
19.923 mA
11.918 mA 70.0 °C
55.0 °C -0.48
-0.51 Failed
Failed Disabled
Disabled
11.918 mA
19.923 mA 55.0 °C
70.0 °C -0.51
-0.48 Failed
Failed Disabled
Disabled
3.907 mA
11.918 mA 40.0 °C
55.0 °C -0.58
-0.51 Failed
Failed Disabled
Disabled
3.907 mA 40.0 °C -0.58 Failed Disabled
Fluke
Fluke Petrochemical
Petrochemical Corp.
Corp.
By:
By:
Title:
Title:
Cert. No.:
Cert. No.: 1
1
Process Calibration requires:
Traceable calibration tools, source functions:
– Temperature, electronic simulation of thermocouples or RTDs
• Does not test the sensor installed in a process
– Temperature, dry block or temperature bath calibrator
• Tests the temperature sensor and transmitter electronics
– Pressure, hand pump, or other means to apply pressure to the unit under
test
– Pressure measurement reference to measure the pressure generated (by a
pressure source) and applied to the UUT
• Transfer standard approach
– Other Electronic signals
• Frequency for flow, speed and rotation
• Current for I/P and analog I/O
• Voltage for signal conditioners and analog I/O
Process Calibration requires:
Traceable calibration tools, measurement functions:
– Temperature, thermocouple or RTD thermometer
• Measure the process temperature with a reference probe directly
and compare with control system
– Pressure, measure the pressure output from an I/P or other
pneumatic control signals
– Other Electronic signals
• Frequency for flow, speed and rotation
• Current for all transmitter mA loop signal outputs
• Voltage for signal conditioners other voltage output devices
– Many transmitters have voltage output instead of mA output.
Why document calibration, how?
Calibration Records may be:
– required for regulations
– required for quality standards
– required by your customers
Calibration records can:
– assist in understanding the performance of a process
– be used to determine a devices suitability for a process
– help assess if a device needs repair
– be used to help adjust maintenance intervals
• Calibration records can:
– be manually recorded on a paper form
– be recorded on a palm device or portable computer
– be recorded using a calibrator with documenting capabilities
Calibration management software + documenting calibrators enables easy
documenting and analysis of field calibrations
Calibration process, setup
• Identify critical instruments
– Safety instrumented systems
– Environmental critical (water and air outflow)
– Quality critical: directly effect product quality and value
– Revenue critical instruments:
• Custody transfer, trade related measurements
• Define the interval to maintain desired accuracy
– Instrument should perform in tolerance when tested
• Specifications and test tolerances need careful consideration
– Manufacturers claimed accuracies can be misleading
– Test tolerances should be specified by process engineer
– The accuracy of both the instrument being tested and the calibrator need to
be considered
• Define the procedures for the identified tags
Calibration process; execution
• Identify the tags that need calibration
• Organize the work into logical routes
• Collect the necessary procedures, documentation and tools
• Isolate the device from the process
– Lock-out, Tag-out procedure if warranted
• Connect the calibrator, begin to calibrate
– Perform the As-Found test, document the results
– Adjust the transmitter if the measured errors are greater than the
adjustment threshold defined by the procedure.
– Perform the As-Left test, document the results
– Complete the documented record with Tag#, time, date, Serial numbers of
the TAG, the test equipment used and its’ calibration data
Documented Calibration Requires – As Found Data
• Testing the instrument to Graph of Percent Error
determine “As-Found” performance 0.4
0.3
% Error
0
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
30
90
– The sourced value and measured values -0.1
need to be traceable
-0.2
-Tolerance
– The total uncertainty of the source should -0.3
Input % of Span
be 3 to 4 times better than the device
under test
• Adjustment required!
Documented Calibration Requires – As Found Data
Graph of Percent Error
0.3
0.1 +Tolerance
condition of the transmitter after
% Error
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
30
90
100
0
adjustment -0.1
-0.2
-0.4
-Tolerance
documented Input % of Span
42
Questions or Comments?
Email Nicole VanWert-Quinzi
nicole.vanwert@Transcat.com
Transcat: 800-800-5001
www.Transcat.com
For related product information, go to:
www.Transcat.com/Fluke