Notice of Mistake Letter

I don’t know what you would do, but I know what I am going to do with this most recent “offer”
from government. I am going to let them know that there has been a mistake, and remove some
presumptions that they may have had. If you do not rebut any presumptions made then they
become fact and are therefore said to be true. You must rebut the presumptions! For example; in
the correspondence that I recently received from the Oregon Department of Justice, a reference
was made to “You” several times within the letter. “You” is an interesting word, you see it can
apply to plural individuals. When I say “Hey you!” in a room full of people, who exactly am I
talking to? I could be talking to one of them, or all of them, so I am simply asking for this to be
clarified and at the same time removing some key presumptions.
The following is the full text of the certified notice I am sending to the Attorney General for
Oregon, Ellen F Rosenblum along with the original correspondence from one of her thugs, I
don’t mess with lower officers… I go to straight to the boss.
Text of the notice I am sending:
USPS Certified Mail #7012 1010 0001 8888 9999
Ms Ellen F Rosenblum in her private capacity
Oregon Department of Justice
1162 Court Street NE
Salem, OR 97301-4096 or If a traffic ticket matter send to District Attorney Not the court.
Dear Ellen F Rosenblum:
We, thank Ms Rosenblum for her correspondence which we received 05-09-2013.
There appears to be a mistake as although the included correspondence was sent to JAMES T
DOE the correspondence implies that an ORDER/JUDGEMENT was against “You”. Would Ms
Ellen F Rosenblum in her private capacity kindly confirm who “You” is, and/or forward this
correspondence to You.
In the matter of SURETY for the LEGAL NAME, I believe that there has been a MISTAKE as
the SOLE BENEFICIARY has been INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIED as a party in this matter. If
I, AND/OR PERSONS AND/OR FRIENDS OF THE COURT AND/OR SUCH OTHER
PARTIES ACTING IN MY INTERESTS, have led the COURT or Ms Ellen F Rosenblum in her
private capacity or the OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE to believe by responding to
“You” and or “JAMES T DOE” and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION THIS COURT HAS
ADDRESSED ME AS, that I am the PARTY WITH SURETY in this matter, then that would be
a MISTAKE and please forgive me.
As I have no knowledge of who “You” and/or “JAMES T DOE” and/or SUCH OTHER
IDENTIFICATION THIS COURT/DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE HAS ADDRESSED ME AS,
I RESPECTFULLY ASK;
 1. by WHAT AUTHORITY is the COURT/DEPARTMENT ADDRESSING me as such?
As the SURETY BOND (BIRTH CERTIFICATE) has been deposited into the
COURT/DEPARTMENT, WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT/DEPARTMENT have
that I, as the SOLE BENEFICIARY of the TRUST have any SURETY in this matter? As
the GOVERNMENT is the SOLE SIGNATORY PARTY on the SURETY BOND
(BIRTH CERTIFICATE), with SOLE AND FULL SURETY as TRUSTEE for the
LEGAL NAME,
2. WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT/DEPARTMENT have that I am a TRUSTEE for
the LEGAL NAME. WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I am a TRUSTEE
and have ANY SURETY with respect to the LEGAL NAME?
3. WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT/DEPARTMENT have that I am an OFFICER, an
AGENT, a TRUSTEE or an EMPLOYEE of the United States of America corporation?
4. WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have of any WARRANT OF AGENCY for the
principal?
5. WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that there has been any meeting of the minds,
any PROPER NOTICE given, any considerable CONSIDERATION offered, or that I
have ANY INTENT to CONTRACT in this matter?

As such, I am returning your OFFER, DECLINED, for immediate DISCHARGE and

CLOSURE. I can only consider your offer to contract upon receiving full and complete answer
to the above questions.
Notice: Failure by Ms Ellen F Rosenblum in her private capacity to respond within ten days from
receipt of this correspondence shall constitute legal accord and satisfaction of all claims.

AUTHORIZED BY____________________________ SEAL _________

ON____________________________