For Determining the Level

Table 3 - The level of Organization Learning of Local Government Employees in terms

of Budget Preparation

Budget Preparation Mean SD Description

Preparation of the Barangay Annual Highly

3.67 0.84
Investment Plan (AIP) manifested

Reviewing budget proposal as to the

3.73 0.78 Manifested
consistency with the AIP
Consultation with civil society,
Highly
accredited NGOs in the community 3.72 0.84
manifested
and private sector
Formulation of the Executive and Highly
3.67 0.84
Legislative Agenda (ELA) manifested

Formulation of a summary of financial

3.73 0.78 Manifested
statements in the budget document

Preparation of the executive issuance Highly

3.72 0.84
known as the Budget Call manifested
Facilitation of Budget
workshops/forum for the Highly
3.72 0.84
accomplishment of budget forms and manifested
documents
Highly
Overall mean 3.70 0.79
manifested
Legend:
1.00 – 1.79 Very Low 2.60 – 3.39 Moderate 4.20 – 5.00 Very High
1.80 – 2.59 Low 3.40 – 4.19 High
Table 4 - The level of System Thinking of Local Government Employees

Dimensions Mean SD Description

Budget preparation 3.43 1.02 Manifested

Highly
Budget authorization 3.49 0.90
manifested

Highly
Budget execution 3.37 0.92
manifested

Highly
Budget accountability 3.40 0.94
manifested

Highly
Overall mean 3.42 0.90
manifested
Legend:
1.00 – 1.79 Very Low 2.60 – 3.39 Moderate 4.20 – 5.00 Very High
1.80 – 2.59 Low 3.40 – 4.19 High
 For Comparative

Table 7 - The Capability of Barangay Officials on Local Budgeting Process in the

Municipality of Santo Tomas when grouped according to Educational Attainment

Capability on
Educational t- p-
Local Budgeting Mean SD Interpretation
Attainment value value
Process
Degree
4.11 0.63
Budget Holder
2.64 0.009 Significant
Preparation Non-degree
3.72 0.80
Holder
Degree
4.13 0.60
Budget Holder
3.34 0.001 Significant
Authorization Non-degree
3.67 0.75
Holder
Degree
4.09 0.61
Budget Holder
3.31 0.001 Significant
Execution Non-degree
3.59 0.85
Holder
Degree
4.15 0.56
Budget Holder
2.82 0.006 Significant
Accountability Non-degree
3.76 0.77
Holder
 For Correlation

Table 5 - Significance on the Relationship between Work Culture and System

Thinking of LGU employees

SYSTEMS THINKING
WORK
CULTURE Discussion
Partnership Personal
Interconnectedness and Overall
and Leverage Mastery
Dialogue
Organizational .379** .371** .366** .380** .390**
Decisions .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
.564** .582** .579** .559** .595**
Teamwork
.000 .000 .000 .000 .000
.380** .362** .413** .384** .402**
Role Clarity
.000 .000 .000 .000 .000

Physical Work .474** .453** .500** .463** .493**

Conditions .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
.496** .492** .534** .481** .522**
Recognition
.000 .000 .000 .000 .000
.520** .514** .542** .515** .520**
Overall
.000 .000 .000 .000 .000