Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The historical assessment pyramid is being flipped upside down (Piper and Dufournaud,
Assessment For, As, and Of Learning, 2018, slide 12). Rather than small amounts of assessment
as/for learning (formerly referred to as diagnostic and formative) and large amounts of
assessment of learning (evaluation) schools, teachers, and students are realizing that there
should be less assessment of learning and more assessment as learning. I personally agree with
this sentiment. Not every comment, feedback, advice, critique, and mark that a teacher gives
needs to be recorded as an evaluation. In fact, giving more assessment for learning actually
shows the student that teachers care for them and care more about their learning than their
grade. One example from my practicum was students working on three review math questions
at the beginning of every class. This “Bell Work” was a routine that got students settled and
engaged their minds with previous content. They had working documents that they did their
work on so that every single day I could mark the students bell work and they could see
feedback the very next day. Each week would have a particular content focus. Assessment for
learning happened all week, every day. The last day of the week, after lots of practice,
feedback, and further instruction as necessary based on student difficulties and questions, the
bell work would be evaluated. By shifting the emphasis onto assessment for learning rather
than assessment of learning, we subtly shift our educational philosophy. No longer is the final
grade and percentage the end goal, but rather we prioritize the students learning the content.
The focus becomes student development, in reference to their previous abilities, and the road
to making life-long learners is freed from the weight of grades and marks. The school culture
When assessment for learning happens, it becomes clear how instruction needs to be
it became apparent that many students were struggling. After giving local pairings specific
feedback and the collective class some further instruction we were able to clear up some of the
confusion.
variety of data sets given to them. The graphs were hung up around the room and students
were given sticky-notes to give peer feedback based on a few guiding questions. The students
became involved in the feedback process, thus engaging their thinking about success criteria.
The next day, after personally reviewing the peer-feedback given, we as a class could use that
assessment to guide our learning (e.g. many students gave feedback about the increments on
the graph so we spent some time in focused learning about scales and increments on graphs).
learning the teacher is clueless about where to start instruction (no diagnosis of student
knowledge), how fast to pace instruction (no regular check-ins on student comprehension), and
segment could transition to final evaluation when very few students have been able to grasp
the concept. Therefore, assessment must be interwoven with instruction because, as Growing
their professional development and growth. I have already observed that any opportunities I
seasons for rapid professional growth. Furthermore, I think we can invite students to assess our
teaching practice as they can then see firsthand how descriptive feedback is implemented to
Piper, John and Agnes Dufournaud, Assessment For, As, and Of Learning: Assessment Practices