Sunteți pe pagina 1din 30

FRANCHISES

SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
STRAIGHT PROBLEMS and
MULTIPLE CHOICE

DE LEON/ DE LEON/ DE LEON


Parties to a franchise contract are (a) the franchisor
(owner) and (b) the franchisee (user). The franchisee
pays the franchisor 2 types of franchise fees:

1. Initial franchise fee – paid in consideration of the


right to use the franchisor’s name, products, and
processes, as well as for initial services to be
rendered by the franchisor; and

2. Continuing franchise fee – paid in consideration of


continuing services provided by the franchisor.
Substantial Performance

Is when the franchisor has no obligation to refund


any amounts already received nor intention to
forgive any amounts not yet collected AND that it
must have substantially performed the services
promised under the terms of the agreement
With Substantial Performance?

YES: Recognize Revenue NONE


Do not Recognize
Revenue

With Reasonable Without Reasonable Exemption:


Assurance of Collection Assurance of Collection DP 1. Non-refundable
2. Fairly represents
ACCRUAL METHOD INST. METHOD the services provided
RGP= Collection * GPR DP – earned
Recognize the entire
Note- uneraned
Revenue

REVENUE Int Bearing Note GPR: NIB Note


Contract Price Revenue
DP + PV of Note
(Cost)
Int Bearing NIB Note GP / Revenue
Note CP- UI DP + Inst Pymt DP +(Inst Pymt –
Collection
Contract DP + PV of Discount)
Price Note
DP + FA of Int= FA of Note * IR Disc= PV of Note
Note * DR
Exercise 1

(a) FA of Note 84,000


PV of Note (2.48685 x P28,000) 69,632
Discount/ Unearned Interest 14,368

Cash 56,000
Notes receivable 84,000
Discount on notes receivable 14,368
Revenue from franchise fees 125,632
(56,000 + 69,632= 125,632)

(b)
Cash 56,000
Unearned franchise fees 56,000
(c)
Cash 56,000
Notes receivable 84,000
Discount on notes receivable 14,368
Revenue from franchise fees 56,000
Unearned franchise fees 69,632
(P28,000 x 2.48685)
With Substantial Performance?

YES: Recognize Revenue NONE


Do not Recognize
Revenue

With Reasonable Without Reasonable Exemption:


Assurance of Collection Assurance of Collection DP 1. Non-refundable
2. Fairly represents
ACCRUAL METHOD INST. METHOD the services provided
RGP= Collection * GPR DP – earned
Recognize the entire
Note- uneraned
Revenue

REVENUE Int Bearing Note GPR: NIB Note


Contract Price Revenue
DP + PV of Note
(Cost)
Int Bearing NIB Note GP / Revenue
Note CP- UI DP + Inst Pymt DP +(Inst Pymt –
Collection
Contract DP + PV of Discount)
Price Note
DP + FA of Int= FA of Note * IR Disc= PV of Note
Note * DR
Exercise 2
a) Down payment made on January 1, 2018 P20,000.00
Present value of an ordinary annuity P16,000 *3.69590) 59,134.40
Total revenue (franchisor)/acquisition cost (franchisee) P79,134.40

b) Cash 20,000.00
Notes receivable 80,000.00
Discount on notes receivable 20,865.60
Unearned franchise fees 79134.40

FA of the Note 80,000.00


PV of the Note (P16,000 x 3.69590) 59,134.40
Discount on the Note 20,865.60
c) 1. P20,000 cash received from down payment . P 59,134.40
is recorded as unearned revenue from franchise fees.

2. P20,000 cash received from down payment.

3. None. (P20,000 is recorded as unearned revenue from


franchise fees.)
With Substantial Performance?

YES: Recognize Revenue NONE


Do not Recognize
Revenue

With Reasonable Without Reasonable Exemption:


Assurance of Collection Assurance of Collection DP 1. Non-refundable
2. Fairly represents
ACCRUAL METHOD INST. METHOD the services provided
RGP= Collection * GPR DP – earned
Recognize the entire
Note- uneraned
Revenue

REVENUE Int Bearing Note GPR: NIB Note


Contract Price Revenue
DP + PV of Note
(Cost)
Int Bearing NIB Note GP / Revenue
Note CP- UI DP + Inst Pymt DP +(Inst Pymt –
Collection
Contract DP + PV of Discount)
Price Note
DP + FA of Int= FA of Note * IR Disc= PV of Note
Note * DR
Problem 3: Note Receivable is interest-bearing.

DTD
Cash 4,687,500
Note receivable 3,125,000
DFR – IFF 7,812,500

Deferred Franchise cost 1,875,000


Cash 1,875,000

Cash 1,175,781.25
Note receivable 781,250
Interest revenue (P3,125,000 x 10%) 312,500
FR – CFF (1,640,625 x 5%) 82,031.25
YEA

Accrual Method

DFR – IFF 7,812,500


FR – IFF 7,812,500

Franchise Cost 1,875,000


Deferred Franchise cost 1,875,000

Therefore, RGP = P7,812,500 less P1,875,000 = P5,937,500


Installment Sales Method

FR – IFF 7,812,500
Franchise Cost 1,875,000
DGP – Franchises 5.937,500

DGP – Franchises 4,156,250


RGP 4,156,250

(P4,687,500 + P781,250) x 76% = P4,156,250


With Substantial Performance?

YES: Recognize Revenue NONE


Do not Recognize
Revenue

With Reasonable Without Reasonable Exemption:


Assurance of Collection Assurance of Collection DP 1. Non-refundable
2. Fairly represents
ACCRUAL METHOD INST. METHOD the services provided
RGP= Collection * GPR DP – earned
Recognize the entire
Note- uneraned
Revenue

REVENUE Int Bearing Note GPR: NIB Note


Contract Price Revenue
DP + PV of Note
(Cost)
Int Bearing NIB Note GP / Revenue
Note CP- UI DP + Inst Pymt DP +(Inst Pymt –
Collection
Contract DP + PV of Discount)
Price Note
DP + FA of Int= FA of Note * IR Disc= PV of Note
Note * DR
Problem 4 – Note receivable is non-interest-bearing

Present Value Computations

FA (P 1,093,750 x 5) P 5,468,750
PV (P 1,093,750 x 2.990) 3,270,312.50
UI (Discount on NR) P 2,198,437.50

DTD
Cash 3,281,250
Note receivable 5,468,750
Discount on Note receivable 2,198,437.50
UFR – IFF 6,551,562.50
(3,281,250 + 3,270,312.50)

Deferred franchise cost 1,965,468.75


Cash 1,965,468.75
Expenses 46,875
Cash 46,875

Cash 21,875
FR – CFF (P437,500 x 5%) 21,875

Cash 1,093,750
Note receivable 1,093,750

Discount on Note receivable 654,062.50


Interest revenue 654,062.50

3,270,312.50 x 20% = 654,062.50


YEA

Accrual Method

UFR – IFF 6,551,562.50


FR – IFF 6,551,562.50

Franchise cost 1,965,468.75


Deferred franchise cost 1,965,468.75

Therefore, RGP: P6,551,562.50–P1,965,468.75=P4,586,093.75


Installment sales Method

FR - IFF 6,551,562.50
Franchise cost 1,965,468.75
DGP – Franchises 4,586,093.75

DGP – Franchises 2,604,656.25


RGP 2,604,656.25

[P3,281,250 + (P1,093,750 – P654,062.50)] x 70%


MULTIPLE CHOICE ITEMS

1. A
FR – IFF P 137,500
FR – CFF (P1,100,000 x 5%) 55,000
Total franchise revenue P192,500
MULTIPLE CHOICE ITEMS

2. D

No revenue shall be recognized for entities Yellow and Green since:


1. There is no substantial performance of initial services having
completed 25% and 10% for Yellow and Green, respectively.
2. Period of refund has not yet expired for both entities, thus
amount paid is still refundable.

Harrynawa Production can recognize revenues for Black and Beige


using ACCRUAL method since it is LIKELY that the balance will
be collected. Recognition is computed as followsas follows:

DP NOTE TOTAL
BLACK 125,000 750,000 875,000
BEIGE 125,000 750,000 875,000
Total revenue from initial franchise fee P 1,750,000
With Substantial Performance?

YES: Recognize Revenue NONE


Do not Recognize
Revenue

With Reasonable Without Reasonable Exemption:


Assurance of Collection Assurance of Collection DP 1. Non-refundable
2. Fairly represents
ACCRUAL METHOD INST. METHOD the services provided
RGP= Collection * GPR DP – earned
Recognize the entire
Note- uneraned
Revenue

REVENUE Int Bearing Note GPR: NIB Note


Contract Price Revenue
DP + PV of Note
(Cost)
Int Bearing NIB Note GP / Revenue
Note CP- UI DP + Inst Pymt DP +(Inst Pymt –
Collection
Contract DP + PV of Discount)
Price Note
DP + FA of Int= FA of Note * IR Disc= PV of Note
Note * DR
MULTIPLE CHOICE ITEMS

3. C
FR – IFF P 550,000
Interest revenue (P500,000 x 6%) 30,000
FR – CFF (P250,000 x 4%) 10,000
Franchise cost (325,000)
Expenses ( 31,250)
Net income P 233,750
With Substantial Performance?

YES: Recognize Revenue NONE


Do not Recognize
Revenue

With Reasonable Without Reasonable Exemption:


Assurance of Collection Assurance of Collection DP 1. Non-refundable
2. Fairly represents
ACCRUAL METHOD INST. METHOD the services provided
RGP= Collection * GPR DP – earned
Recognize the entire
Note- uneraned
Revenue

REVENUE Int Bearing Note GPR: NIB Note


Contract Price Revenue
DP + PV of Note
(Cost)
Int Bearing NIB Note GP / Revenue
Note CP- UI DP + Inst Pymt DP +(Inst Pymt –
Collection
Contract DP + PV of Discount)
Price Note
DP + FA of Int= FA of Note * IR Disc= PV of Note
Note * DR
MULTIPLE CHOICE ITEMS

4. B

FR – IFF (P50,000 + P380,000) P 430,000


Interest revenue (P380,000 x 6%) 22,800
FR - CFF (P250,000 X 4%) 10,000
Franchise cost (325,000)
Expenses (31,250)
Net income P106,550

DP 50,000
PV of the Note 125,000 x 3.04 380,000
Revenue to be recognized 430,000
With Substantial Performance?

YES: Recognize Revenue NONE


Do not Recognize
Revenue

With Reasonable Without Reasonable Exemption:


Assurance of Collection Assurance of Collection DP 1. Non-refundable
2. Fairly represents
ACCRUAL METHOD INST. METHOD the services provided
RGP= Collection * GPR DP – earned
Recognize the entire
Note- uneraned
Revenue

REVENUE Int Bearing Note GPR: NIB Note


Contract Price Revenue
DP + PV of Note
(Cost)
Int Bearing NIB Note GP / Revenue
Note CP- UI DP + Inst Pymt DP +(Inst Pymt –
Collection
Contract DP + PV of Discount)
Price Note
DP + FA of Int= FA of Note * IR Disc= PV of Note
Note * DR
MULTIPLE CHOICE ITEMS

5. D
FR – IFF (P984,375 + P2.531,250) P3,515,625
Less Franchise cost 1,125,000
DGP – Franchises P2,390,625
GPR (P2,390,625 / P3,515,625) 68%

RGP (P984,375 + P506,250) x 68% P 1,013,625


FR – CFF (P248,906 x 3%) 7,467
Interest revenue (P2,531,250 x 15%) 379,688
Expenses ( 225,000)
Net income P 1,175,780
With Substantial Performance?

YES: Recognize Revenue NONE


Do not Recognize
Revenue

With Reasonable Without Reasonable Exemption:


Assurance of Collection Assurance of Collection DP 1. Non-refundable
2. Fairly represents
ACCRUAL METHOD INST. METHOD the services provided
RGP= Collection * GPR DP – earned
Recognize the entire
Note- uneraned
Revenue

REVENUE Int Bearing Note GPR: NIB Note


Contract Price Revenue
DP + PV of Note
(Cost)
Int Bearing NIB Note GP / Revenue
Note CP- UI DP + Inst Pymt DP +(Inst Pymt –
Collection
Contract DP + PV of Discount)
Price Note
DP + FA of Int= FA of Note * IR Disc= PV of Note
Note * DR
DP P 1,000,000
PV (P375,000 x 3.04) 1,140,000
FR - IFF P 2,140,000
Franchise cost (617,500)
DGP - Franchises P 1,522,500
GPR (P1,522,500 / P2,140,000) 71.14%
MULTIPLE CHOICE ITEMS

6. D

Date Payment Discount Applied Balance


to Principal of Principal

Jan 2 1,140,000

Jun 30 375,000 136,800 238,200 901,800

Dec 31 375,000 108,216 266,784 635,016

RGP: (P1,000,000 + P238,200 + P266,784) x 71.14% P1,070,646


MULTIPLE CHOICE ITEMS
7. B
DP 2.5 M
PV OF NOTE 2.5M * 2.4 6.0 M
TOTAL REVENUE 8.5 M

(1) ACCRUAL METHOD


RGP= Revenue – cost
= 8.5M – 1,275,000
= 7,225,000

(2) INSTALLMENT METHOD


RGP= Collection x GPR
= ( DP + Inst Pymt – Discount) x GPR
= (2.5M + 2.5M – 1,440,000) x 85%
= P 3,026,000

GPR= 7,225,000/ 8.5M = 85%


Discount= PV of Note x DR= 6M x 24%= 1,440,000

S-ar putea să vă placă și