Sunteți pe pagina 1din 4

Referensi Medscape “Kidney Angiomyolipoma Imaging”

(https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/376848-overview#a1)

1. Rakowski SK, Winterkorn EB, Paul E, Steele DJ, Halpern EF, Thiele EA. Renal
manifestations of tuberous sclerosis complex: Incidence, prognosis, and predictive
factors. Kidney Int. 2006 Nov. 70(10):1777-82. [Medline].
2. Park BK. Renal Angiomyolipoma: Radiologic Classification and Imaging Features
According to the Amount of Fat. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Oct. 209 (4):826-
835. [Medline].
3. Flum AS, Hamoui N, Said MA, Yang XJ, Casalino DD, McGuire BB, et al. Update on the
Diagnosis and Management of Renal Angiomyolipoma. J Urol. 2016 Apr. 195 (4 Pt 1):834-
46. [Medline].
4. Jinzaki M, Silverman SG, Akita H, Nagashima Y, Mikami S, Oya M. Renal
angiomyolipoma: a radiological classification and update on recent developments in
diagnosis and management. Abdom Imaging. 2014 Jun. 39 (3):588-604. [Medline].
5. Song X, Liu Z, Cappell K, Gregory C, Said Q, Prestifilippo J, et al. Natural history of
patients with tuberous sclerosis complex related renal angiomyolipoma. Curr Med Res Opin.
2017 Jul. 33 (7):1277-1282. [Medline].
6. Ricketts R, Tamboli P, Czerniak B, Guo CC. Tumor-to-tumor metastasis: report of 2 cases
of metastatic carcinoma to angiomyolipoma of the kidney. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008 Jun.
132(6):1016-20. [Medline].
7. Williams TR, Oakes MF. Metastatic breast carcinoma to renal angiomyolipomas in tuberous
sclerosis. Urology. 2008 Feb. 71(2):352.e5-7. [Medline].
8. Blute ML, Malek RS, Segura JW. Angiomyolipoma: clinical metamorphosis and concepts
for management. J Urol. 1988 Jan. 139(1):20-4. [Medline].
9. Ellingson JJ, Coakley FV, Joe BN, Qayyum A, Westphalen AC, Yeh BM. Computed
tomographic distinction of perirenal liposarcoma from exophytic angiomyolipoma: a feature
analysis study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008 Jul-Aug. 32(4):548-52. [Medline].
10. Kim JY, Kim JK, Kim N, Cho KS. CT histogram analysis: differentiation of
angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging. Radiology.
2008 Feb. 246(2):472-9. [Medline].
11. Woo S, Suh CH, Cho JY, Kim SY, Kim SH. Diagnostic Performance of CT for Diagnosis of
Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma in Patients With Renal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-
Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Aug 23. W1-W11. [Medline].
12. Chen C, Kang Q, Xu B, Shi Z, Guo H, Wei Q, et al. Fat poor angiomyolipoma
differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at 320-slice dynamic volume CT perfusion. Abdom
Radiol (NY). 2017 Aug 21. [Medline].
13. Xie P, Yang Z, Yuan Z. Lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma: Differentiation from clear cell
renal cell carcinoma using wash-in and washout characteristics on contrast-enhanced
computed tomography. Oncol Lett. 2016 Mar. 11 (3):2327-2331. [Medline].
14. Schieda N, Hodgdon T, El-Khodary M, Flood TA, McInnes MD. Unenhanced CT for the
diagnosis of minimal-fat renal angiomyolipoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Dec. 203
(6):1236-41. [Medline].
15. Kim SH, Kim CS, Kim MJ, Cho JY, Cho SH. Differentiation of Clear Cell Renal Cell
Carcinoma From Other Subtypes and Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma by Use of Quantitative
Enhancement Measurement During Three-Phase MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Jan.
206 (1):W21-8. [Medline].
16. Silverman SG, Pearson GD, Seltzer SE, Polger M, Tempany CM, Adams DF, et al. Small (<
or = 3 cm) hyperechoic renal masses: comparison of helical and convention CT for
diagnosing angiomyolipoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Oct. 167(4):877-81. [Medline].
17. Bosniak MA, Megibow AJ, Hulnick DH, et al. CT diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma: the
importance of detecting small amounts of fat. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988 Sep. 151(3):497-
501. [Medline].
18. Patel U, Simpson E, Kingswood JC, Saggar-Malik AK. Tuberose sclerosis complex:
analysis of growth rates aids differentiation of renal cell carcinoma from atypical or
minimal-fat-containing angiomyolipoma. Clin Radiol. 2005 Jun. 60(6):665-73; discussion
663-4. [Medline].
19. Kim JK, Park SY, Shon JH, Cho KS. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation
from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT. Radiology. 2004 Mar. 230(3):677-
84. [Medline]. [Full Text].
20. Chaudhry HS, Davenport MS, Nieman CM, Ho LM, Neville AM. Histogram analysis of
small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell
carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Feb. 198(2):377-83. [Medline].
21. Martin J, Puig J, Falco J, et al. Hyperechoic liver nodules: characterization with proton fat-
water chemical shift MR imaging. Radiology. 1998 May. 207(2):325-30. [Medline].
22. Hood MN, Ho VB, Smirniotopoulos JG, Szumowski J. Chemical shift: the artifact and
clinical tool revisited. Radiographics. 1999 Mar-Apr. 19(2):357-71. [Medline]. [Full Text].
23. Kido T, Yamashita Y, Sumi S, et al. Chemical shift GRE MRI of renal angiomyolipoma. J
Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997 Mar-Apr. 21(2):268-70. [Medline].
24. Flum AS, Hamoui N, Said MA, Yang XJ, Casalino DD, McGuire BB, et al. An Update on
the Diagnosis and Management of Renal Angiomyolipoma. J Urol. 2015 Nov 20. [Medline].
25. Schieda N, Dilauro M, Moosavi B, Hodgdon T, Cron GO, McInnes MD, et al. MRI
evaluation of small (<4cm) solid renal masses: multivariate modeling improves diagnostic
accuracy for angiomyolipoma without visible fat compared to univariate analysis. Eur
Radiol. 2015 Oct 20. [Medline].
26. Hakim SW, Schieda N, Hodgdon T, McInnes MD, Dilauro M, Flood TA. Angiomyolipoma
(AML) without visible fat: Ultrasound, CT and MR imaging features with pathological
correlation. Eur Radiol. 2015 Jun 3. [Medline].
27. Israel GM, Hindman N, Hecht E, Krinsky G. The use of opposed-phase chemical shift MRI
in the diagnosis of renal angiomyolipomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Jun. 184(6):1868-
72. [Medline].
28. Hindman N, Ngo L, Genega EM, Melamed J, Wei J, Braza JM. Angiomyolipoma with
minimal fat: can it be differentiated from clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using standard
MR techniques?. Radiology. 2012 Nov. 265(2):468-77. [Medline].
29. Sasiwimonphan K, Takahashi N, Leibovich BC, Kawashima A. Adrenal hematoma after
nephrectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Dec. 195(6):1334-7. [Medline].
30. Scialpi M, Di Maggio A, Midiri M, Loperfido A, Angelelli G, Rotondo A. Small renal
masses: assessment of lesion characterization and vascularity on dynamic contrast-enhanced
MR imaging with fat suppression. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Sep. 175(3):751-
7. [Medline]. [Full Text].
31. Siegel CL, Middleton WD, Teefey SA, McClennan BL. Angiomyolipoma and renal cell
carcinoma: US differentiation. Radiology. 1996 Mar. 198(3):789-93. [Medline].
32. Forman HP, Middleton WD, Melson GL, McClennan BL. Hyperechoic renal cell
carcinomas: increase in detection at US. Radiology. 1993 Aug. 188(2):431-4. [Medline].
33. Surabhi VR, Menias C, Prasad SR, Patel AH, Nagar A, Dalrymple NC. Neoplastic and non-
neoplastic proliferative disorders of the perirenal space: cross-sectional imaging
findings. Radiographics. 2008 Jul-Aug. 28(4):1005-17. [Medline].
34. Cohen MD. Genitourinary tumors. Cohen MD, ed. Imaging of Children With Cancer. St
Louis, Mo: Mosby Year Book; 1992. 552-88.
35. Baert J, Vandamme B, Sciot R, et al. Benign angiomyolipoma involving the renal vein and
vena cava as a tumor thrombus: case report. J Urol. 1995 Apr. 153(4):1205-7. [Medline].
36. Helenon O, Merran S, Paraf F, et al. Unusual fat-containing tumors of the kidney: a
diagnostic dilemma. Radiographics. 1997 Jan-Feb. 17(1):129-44. [Medline].
37. Strotzer M, Lehner KB, Becker K. Detection of fat in a renal cell carcinoma mimicking
angiomyolipoma. Radiology. 1993 Aug. 188(2):427-8. [Medline].
38. Kurosaki Y, Tanaka Y, Kuramoto K, Itai Y. Improved CT fat detection in small kidney
angiomyolipomas using thin sections and single voxel measurements. J Comput Assist
Tomogr. 1993 Sep-Oct. 17(5):745-8. [Medline].
39. Lemaitre L, Robert Y, Dubrulle F, et al. Renal angiomyolipoma: growth followed up with
CT and/or US. Radiology. 1995 Dec. 197(3):598-602. [Medline].
40. Mitchell TL, Pippin JJ, Devers SM, et al. Incidental detection of preclinical renal tumors
with electron beam computed tomography: report of 26 consecutive operated patients. J
Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000 Nov-Dec. 24(6):843-5. [Medline].
41. Simpson E, Patel U. Diagnosis of angiomyolipoma using computed tomography-region of
interest < or =-10 HU or 4 adjacent pixels < or = -10 HU are recommended as the diagnostic
thresholds. Clin Radiol. 2006 May. 61(5):410-6. [Medline].
42. Lim RS, Flood TA, McInnes MDF, Lavallee LT, Schieda N. Renal angiomyolipoma without
visible fat: Can we make the diagnosis using CT and MRI?. Eur Radiol. 2017 Aug
4. [Medline].

S-ar putea să vă placă și