Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Statistics is the science dealing with the collection, organizing, analysis and
interpretation of numerical data.
Measures of central tendency are measures of the location of the middle or the
center of a distribution. The definition of "middle" or "center" is purposely left
somewhat vague so that the term "central tendency" can refer to a wide variety of
measures. The mean is the most commonly used measure of central tendency. The
following measures of central tendency are discussed :-
1. ARITHEMATIC MEAN
In mathematics and statistics, the arithmetic mean, often referred to as
simply the mean or average when the context is clear, is a method to derive
the central tendency of a sample space.
MERITS OF MEDIAN
DEMERITS OF MEDIAN
Not as popular as mean as it does not take all the data into account.
If the gap between some numbers is large, while it is small between
other numbers in the data, this can cause the median to be a very
inaccurate way to find the middle of a set of values.
Lack of representative character: - Median fails to be a representative
measure in case of such series the different values of which are wide
apart from each other. Also, median is of limited representative
character as it is not based on all the items in the series.
Unrealistic:- When the median is located somewhere between the two
middle values, it remains only an approximate measure, not a precise
value.
Lack of algebraic treatment: - Arithmetic mean is capable of further
algebraic treatment, but median is not. For example, multiplying the
median with the number of items in the series will not give us the
sum total of the values of the series.
When the number of items are small, median may not be
representative, because it is a positional average.
3. MODE
In statistics, the mode is the value that occurs the most frequently in a data
set or a probability distribution. In some fields, notably education, sample
data are often called scores, and the sample mode is known as the modal
score.
MERITS OF MODE
Simple and popular: - Mode is very simple measure of central tendency.
Sometimes, just at the series is enough to locate the model value. Because of
its simplicity, its a very popular measure of the central tendency.
Less effect of marginal values: - Compared top mean, mode is less affected
by marginal values in the series. Mode is determined only by the value with
highest frequencies.
Graphic presentation:- Mode can be located graphically, with the help of
histogram.
Best representative: - Mode is that value which occurs most frequently in the
series. Accordingly, mode is the best representative value of the series.
No need of knowing all the items or frequencies: - The calculation of mode
does not require knowledge of all the items and frequencies of a distribution.
In simple series, it is enough if one knows the items with highest frequencies
in the distribution.
Extreme values (outliers) do not affect the mode.
It represents the most typical value in the distribution.
Allows you to see what value happened the most in a set of data. This can
help you to figure out things in a different way. It is also quick and easy.
It can be determined even if distribution has open end classes.
It is value around which more concentrations of observations and hence the
best representative of data.
DEMERITS OF MODE
Uncertain and vague: - Mode is an uncertain and vague measure of the
central tendency. It may not be uniquely defined
Example: X={1,1,2,2}, Mode(X)=1 or 2.
Not capable of algebraic treatment: - Unlike mean, mode is not capable of
further algebraic treatment.
Difficult: - With frequencies of all items are identical, it is difficult to
identify the modal value.
Complex procedure of grouping:- Calculation of mode involves
cumbersome procedure of grouping the data. If the extent of grouping
changes there will be a change in the model value.
Ignores extreme marginal frequencies:- It ignores extreme marginal
frequencies. To that extent model value is not a representative value of all
the items in a series.
It is not based on all observations.
It is not capable of further mathematical treatment.
It is much affected by fluctuations of sampling.
It is not suitable when different items of data are unequal importance.
When no values repeat in the data set, the mode is every value and is useless.
4. VARIANCE
In probability theory and statistics, the variance is used as one of several
descriptors of a distribution. It describes how far values lie from the mean. In
particular, the variance is one of the moments of a distribution. In that context,
it forms part of a systematic approach to distinguishing between probability
distributions. While other such approaches have been developed, those based on
moments are advantageous in terms of mathematical and computational
simplicity.
MERITS OF VARIANCE
This variance analysis can lead to the identification of certain types of task
that frequently overrun their budget whilst other tasks may be seen to
regularly come in under their budget.
Variance analysis is intrinsically connected with planned and actual results
and effects of the difference between those two on the performance of the
entity or company.
Excellent measure of manufacturing efficiency and productivity.
Helps you understand the root causes of deviations
impacting your Profit & loss.
Opportunities for improvement lie on both sides of the
Variance equation.
Variance analysis is a very important management tool to understand the
cost behavior and take appropriate actions for controls where necessary.
The analysis is used to monitor the areas where cost overrun are frequent to
assess if the standard costs fixed for the activity or materials is reasonable or
the process itself needs to be closely monitored.
The analysis also identifies the areas of efficiency within the processes and
can be used for rewarding the efficiency, just like it can be used to take
corrective actions for areas with adverse variance. It must however be noted
that this exercise must be properly carried out and analyzed before arriving
at any conclusions.
This variance analysis can lead to the identification of certain types of task
that frequently overrun their budget whilst other tasks may be seen to
regularly come in under their budget.
DEMERITS OF VARIANCE
The monitoring cycle can be so long that it renders the application of control
impossible. Typically, by the time a problem has been identified through
variance analysis it is too late to take corrective action. This is a major
shortcoming of variance analysis and highlights the need for a monitoring
system that depicts the current status of the project more effectively.
One of the major disadvantages of variance analysis is that it a post-facto
exercise and generally takes a longer time to assess the impact of the
variance and consequently results in delayed corrective actions.
This drawback can be effectively addressed by maintaining monitoring and
data collecting systems that work more on real time basis as opposed to the
traditional systems that provide the requisite data after a delayed gap after
incurrence. Besides, the positives out of this exercise far out-weigh the dis-
advantages associated with this exercise.
5. STANDARD DEVIATION
1. Squaring makes each term positive so that values above the mean do not
cancel values below the mean.
2. Squaring adds more weighting to the larger differences, and in many cases
this extra weighting is appropriate since points further from the mean may
be more significant.
3. The mathematics are comparatively convenient when using this measure in
subsequent statistical calculations.
The standard deviation is reported as the square root of the variance and the
units then correspond to those of the data set.The computation and notation of the
variance and standard deviation depends on whether we are considering the entire
population or a sample set.
Conclusion:
Despite the drawbacks mentioned above the standard deviation is the best measure
of dispersion and should be used wherever possible. Just as mean is the best
measure of central tendency (leaving exceptional cases) standard deviation is the
best measure of dispersion, excepting a few cases where mean deviation or quartile
deviation may give better results.
However since standard deviation gives greater weight to extreme items, it does
not find much favor with economists and businessmen who are more interested in
the results of the model class.