Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
MANUAL
by
October 2015
1
TARLAC STATE UNIVERSITY
VISION
Tarlac State University is envisioned to be a premiere University in the
Asia-Pacific.
MISSION
Tarlac State University commits to promote and sustain the offering of
quality and relevant programs in higher and advance education ensuring
equitable access to education for people empowerment, professional
development, and global competitiveness.”
Towards this end, TSU shall:
1. Provide high quality instruction through qualified, competent and
adequately trained faculty members and support staff.
CORE VALUES
Q - uality
U - nity
2
GOALS
OBJECTIVES
3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION
1. Coarse Objectives & Learning Outcomes
2. Definition of terms
II. PLANNING THE RESEARCH
1. Categories
2. Research Topic
3. The Progressive Arrangement of the General content of the
proposal
III. GRADING STANDARDS
1. Appraisal guidelines
2. Grading system
3. Best in thesis
IV. THESIS FORMAT
1. Book
2. DVD Copy
3. Drawings
4. Abstract
V. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
1. Qualification of candidates
2. Groupings
3. Consultants
4. Jury Panel
5. Rules & Regulations
6. Book and Drawing requirements
7. Oral Defense
VI. PROGRAM OF ACTIVITIES
VII. THESIS FORMS
For Research:
a. Research Letter form
b. Title deliberation form
c. Letter of approval for the title form
d. Site inspection & evaluation form
e. Certificate of Appearance form
f. Certification form from the Landowner
g. Certification form from the proposed proprietor
h. Basis for Design Conceptualization form
i. Consultation certificate form
j. Space justification form
k. Letter of recommendation form
l. Endorsement letter form
4
m. Approval letter by the Thesis Committee form
n. Performance grading form during research
o. Book grading form
For Drawings:
p. Performance grading form during preliminary drawings
q. Performance grading form during final drawings
r. Preliminary Submission Checklist form
s. Final Submission Checklist form
For Deliberation:
t. Preliminary deliberation form
u. Final deliberation form
v. Letter for the Candidate’s Parent form
VIII. REFERENCES
5
I. INTRODUCTION
a.COARSE OBJECTIVES & LEARNING OUTCOMES
COARSE OBJECTIVES:
At the end of the course, the students should be able to:
1. Learn the importance of research in architecture
2. Select and research on an architectural problem of their own
preference
3. Discover new aspects of architectural planning, technology and
research
4. Solve complex problems based on their own selected research
focus.
5. Defend their architectural thesis proposal.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
1. Application of the methods and processes of research
2. Application of all collected information.
3. Application of creative skills.
4. Develop skills in Problem solving of complex problems
5. Spatial Translation
6. Form Concept Translation
7. Functional Concept translation
8. Economic Concept Translation
9. Successfully defend their ideas.
b. DEFINITION OF TERMS
1. Abstract- is a brief summary of a research/thesis and is often
used to help the reader quickly ascertain the paper's
purpose
2. Bubble diagram
-A tool that architects and designers use for representing
programs visually is a bubble diagram. A bubble diagram
represents spaces with simple circles or squares that are
sized relative to one another. Lines can connect the spaces
to represent corridors or hallways, and the shapes can be
grouped together quickly in multiple arrangements to see
which layouts achieve the needs and goals of the client
6
underlying logic, thinking, and reasoning for how you'll
design the structure.
4. Proprietor- a person or corporation who has the legal right or
exclusive title to something. (owner)
5. Site justification- is a site selection process. It is a comparative
analysis for choosing or acquiring site for a specific project.
6. Space justification- is a table of computation that shows and
establishes the minimum required area for a certain
space/room.
7. Space matrix- is a list of required spaces in a building that
shows the adjacency or proximity requirements of the
spaces.
2. Research Topic:
The candidate can select three(3) titles from the given lists of
categories for architectural thesis. The candidate must prepare the
4S to justify the need for the Group A Category and 3S for the
Group B Category:
The 4S:
a. Statement of the Problem
b. Significance of the project
c. Scope & Delimitation
d. Site
The 3S:
a. Statement of the Problem
7
b. Significance of the project
c. Scope & Delimitation
8
Evaluation on professional practice
Innovations on architectural technology
Historical architectural research
Restoration projects
Newly conceived/formulated architectural theories
Evaluation of architectural theories
Newly conceived/formulated Landscape architecture theories
Investigative research on Tropical architecture theories
9
Infrastructure
Others
Site
Site selection process
Description
Technical description
Map/s
Sketch plan
Pictures
Utilities
Site Analysis
Others
Chapter IV:
Project
List of space requirements
Definition of spaces/rooms
Design criteria per spaces/rooms
Justification of spaces( computations)
Space matrix
Bubble diagram
Others
Chapter V:
Financial
Computation of Capital Investment
Lost acquisition cost
Building cost
Land development cost
Computation of Operation costs
Computation of Maintenance costs
Total Project Cost
Return of Investment or Benefits for projects w/o
ROI
Annual net income
ROI in years
Project funding/ sourcing Project funding/ sourcing
Chapter VII:
Architectural Solutions/Recommendations
Concept sheet
Site Development
Exterior perspective
Interior perspective
Floor plan/s
Elevation/s
Section/s
Structural/ architectural details
Others
10
Chapter VIII :
Conclusion
Annex
Research letter
Letter of Approval for the title
Letter of recommendation
Endorsement letter
Consultation Certificates
Editor
Architect/s
Civil Engineer/s
Electrical Engineer/s
Plumbing Engineer/s
Mechanical Engineer/s
Others
Tables
Illustrations
Graphs
Bibliography
11
III. GRADING STANDARDS
a. APPRAISAL GUIDELINES
ARCHITECTURAL THESIS APPRAISAL GUIDELINES
(Group A Category)
I. GRADING SYSTEM
a. Planning…………………………….....40%
b. Presentation & Drafting……………....20%
c. Concept & Character………………….20%
d. Feasibility & Research………….…….20%
Total………………………….100%
12
Is the proposal significant to the problem?
Is there a clear financial study? e.g ROI, Sustainability, or
Source.
Are the Data gathered enough?
Are the Data gathered significant?
Are the Data gathered accurate, true and applicable?
Other Basis for research
I. GRADING SYSTEM
a. Methodology……………………………....25%
b. Presentation……………..........................25%
c. Findings & Analysis……………………….25%
d. Originality / research……….……….…….25%
Total……………………..……….100%
b. Presentation
Communication skills
Visual aid
Backdrop & Table presentations
Sample Materials available
d. Originality/ Research
Is the hypothesis significant to the problem?
Is the study original?
Is the research cyclical?
Did it supported or rejected the hypothesis?
b. GRADING SYSTEM
13
DESIGN 09
1. Midterm
a. Esquisse……..25% Conceptualization study
b. Attendance…..10% Attendance sheet
c. Performance…25% Site Selection & Analysis study
Compliance to Due dates
d. Exam………….40% Title deliberation
2. Final term
a. Esquisse………25% Feasibility study
b. Attendance…….10% Attendance sheet
c. Performance…..25% Compliance to Due dates
Architectural Programming study
d. Exam…………..40% Final Checking of Book
DESIGN 10
1. Midterm
a. Esquisse……..25% Compliance to Due dates
b. Attendance…..10% Attendance sheet
c. Performance…25% Compliance to Due dates
d. Exam………….40% Preliminary Deliberation
2. Final term
a. Esquisse……..25% Compliance to Due dates
b. Attendance…..10% Attendance sheet
c. Performance…25% Compliance to Due dates
d. Exam………….40% Final deliberation
c. BEST IN THESIS
Article 01: In case there is only one thesis section in the department.
1. Grades during the preliminary and final deliberation will be considered for
purposes of determining their final standings in the BIT award process.
Article 02: In case there are two or more thesis sections and advisers in the
department.
1. Each section shall have the “best in thesis” based on their final grades.
2. The candidates will undergo re-evaluation to qualify for the “Best in
Thesis Award”.
14
3. The panel of jurors tasked to do the re-evaluation shall consist of
minimum of 3 and maximum of 5 faculty Architects including the thesis
adviser/s.
4. Ranking system will be used to determine the “BIT” award.
5. Grades during the preliminary and final deliberation will be disregarded
for purposes of determining their final standings in the BIT award process.
6. Focus of re-evaluation will be:
- Completeness of requirements
- Oral defense
- Overall knowledge of the project
Based on the Resolution made by the CAFA Academic Council held last March 9, 2004
b. DVD COPY
1. DVD rewritable with labels using permanent marker with the
following information written in approximately 3mm height:
a. Name
b. Title
2. In a 3.5mm thk x 12.5cm x 14cm hard plastic Case.
3. Contents : Book (Microsoft word)
: Abstract (Microsoft word)
: Drawings (Autocad, PDF, Jpeg, Microsoft
Publisher, MP4)
c. DRAWINGS
Please be guided that the margin/boarder to be used in the final drawing will be as follows:
15
2. MARGINS : 1 cm on all sides
Project Title:
A Proposed Naval Academy
16
ABSTRACT
Passport Size
Title : “ A Proposed Building” Picture
Candidate : Juan Dela Cruz
School : College of Architecture & Fine Arts
Tarlac State University
________________________________________________________________
Font size # 12, Paper size Letter/ Book paper, Margins 1” all sides
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxx Statement of the Problem & Hypothesis
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxx Background of the Project
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Significance of the Project
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scope & Limitations
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxx
Site
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Conceptualization
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Financial
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
17
Passport Size
Title : “ An Alternative Material” Picture
Candidate : Juan Dela Cruz
School : College of Architecture & Fine Arts
Tarlac State University
________________________________________________________________
Font size # 12, Paper size Letter/ Book paper, Margins 1” all sides
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxStatement of the Problem & Hypothesis
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxx Background of the Project
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Significance of the Project
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Process Production & Testing
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scope & Limitations
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxx Findings, Data Analysis & Interpretation
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Conclusion
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
18
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Recommendations
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
19
V. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
1. Qualification of candidates
A candidate must be a bonafide architectural student of the Tarlac
State University College of Architecture.
A candidate must be from the graduating class or 5th year level
who have passed the pre-requisites for ARD 09 & ARD 10.
2. Groupings
Groupings for Theses are allowed for financial purposes but with a
maximum of two (2) members only and shall be the same
partners through out the completion of their research.
3. Consultants
To ensure utmost advise is given to all candidates for Thesis
Deliberation, candidates are encouraged to seek technical and
professional advise to members of the faculty of this college.
A candidate must have faculty consultants, at least one faculty
adviser for architectural and one faculty adviser for structural
aside from his/her thesis adviser, who is the overall coordinator
The candidate may also approach any technical person in any field
of specialization to seek advise and further advance their study.
A candidate must have technical consultants at least one for book
writing and editing, one for electrical, one for sanitary and
plumbing, one for mechanical and other specialization required
by his/her project proposal.
Advises of the consultants may be or may not be considered
depending upon the candidate’s discretion.
Thesis advisers’ role:
Guide and explain to the candidates the administrative
procedures of the thesis deliberation.
Guide the candidates during the preparation of the book and
drawings.
Monitor the candidates’ progress during the preparation of
their theses.
Evaluate and endorse candidates to Thesis Council, Dean
for Oral defense
Grade the candidates’ performance and during the final
deliberation.
Read the comments and recommendations of the jury.
Compute the grades of the candidates.
Announce the results
20
Organize and invite the jury.
Approve the schedule for deliberation.
Regulate the proceedings.
Guide the jury during deliberation regarding grading systems
and time allotment for the proceedings.
Decide when required upon consulting with the Dean in
special cases that may arise during the deliberation.
4. Jury Panel
Jury for final deliberation shall consist of architects from the rosters
of the United Architects of the Philippines preferably from the
local chapter.
5. RULES & REGULATIONS
TITLE DELIBERATION:
a. Prepare at least three(3) project proposals
b. Support your proposals with 4S:
c. A candidate shall submit to the thesis adviser proposed titles three
days before the scheduled title deliberation for preliminary
evaluation.
d. There shall be at least three (3) members of the evaluating panel
which shall be conducted on a One-on-One basis: one faculty
member, College Chairman and the College Dean.
e. A candidate shall set the schedule for the title deliberation through
coordination with the members of the panel of jury depending on
their free time and availability.
f. A candidate shall pursue his/her research upon approval of the title.
No candidate shall change his/her title without prior notice and
approval by the panel of jury and thesis adviser.
g. A candidate must have faculty consultants, at least one faculty
adviser for architectural and one faculty adviser for structural aside
from his/her thesis adviser, who is the overall coordinator.
h. A candidate must have technical consultants at least one for book
writing and editing, one for electrical, one for sanitary and plumbing,
and other specialization required by his/her project proposal.
PRELIMINARY DELIBERATION:
1. A candidate shall submit all following requirements one(1) day
before the scheduled preliminary deliberation.
a. Thesis book
b. Drawings
b.1. Conceptual Sheet
b.2. Site development plan
b.3. Floor Plan/s
b.4. Elevations (4)
b.5. Sections (2)
b.6. Exterior perspective
21
b.7. Interior perspective
b.8. Details
Note: The thesis adviser will not accept late requirements.
2. No candidate shall proceed to the final deliberation if he/she fails to
submit all requirements on time or fails to defend his/her project
proposal.
FINAL DELIBERATION:
1. A candidate shall have at least 45 days from the day of preliminary
deliberation to finalize the drawings and prepare for final
presentation.
2. A candidate must submit all following requirements one(1) day
before the scheduled final deliberation.
Note: The thesis adviser will not accept late requirements.
3. No candidate can pursue his/her final deliberation if he/she fails to
submit all requirements in time.
4. A candidate who fails to defend the project proposal shall
automatically have a failing grade.
5. A candidate is allowed to present the thesis in approximately 2
hours.
6. A candidate’s turn to defend his/her thesis is determined through a
draw lot system.
7. Oral Defense
22
The proponent/s is required to come 60 minutes before his/her
scheduled defense. For candidates who will be late, the grace period
given is thirty (30) minutes after the given schedule. If the candidate fails
to comply with these requirements he/she will no longer be allowed to
present and therefore, shall automatically receive a failing grade.
Manner of Defense:
Introduction 5 minutes
Multi-media Presentation 10 minutes
Scrutiny of drawings 10 -20 minutes
Question & Answer 60 – 80 minutes
Deliberation of Grades 5 minutes
__________________________________________________
Total 120 minutes maximum
Dress Code:
For Females
Black Blazer
Knee high black skirt
Black closed leather shoes with 2” high heels
Black stockings
Light make-up
Proper hair style
For Males
Dark Coat
Long sleeve and necktie
Dark pants
Dark leather shoes and dark socks
Proper hair style
23
VI. PROGRAM OF ACTIVITIES FOR RESEARCH (TIME TABLE)
24
17 Final writing of the thesis book Writing
18 Submission of Book/Deliberation Final Exam
25
SAMPLE PROGRAM OF ACTIVITIES FOR DESIGN 10
PLANNED ACTUAL
NO. PROJECT PROPOSAL ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS WEEK WEEK REMARKS
PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS PRELIMINARY RESULTS 1 CONSULTATION W/ ADVISER/S
CONCEPT PROCESS 2 CONSULTATION W/ ADVISER/S
CONSULTATION W/ ADVISER/S
FLOOR PLANS TESTING 3 CONSULTATION W/ ADVISER/S
CONSULTATION W/ ADVISER/S
CONSULTATION W/ ADVISER/S
ELEVATIONS RESULTS 4-5 CONSULTATION W/ ADVISER/S
CONSULTATION W/ ADVISER/S
6 CONSULTATION W/ ADVISER/S
CONSULTATION W/ ADVISER/S
PERSPECTIVES ANALYSIS 7 CONSULTATION W/ ADVISER/S
CONSULTATION W/ ADVISER/S
OTHER CONCERNS INTERPRETATION 8 CONSULTATION W/ ADVISER/S
CONSULTATION W/ ADVISER/S
PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY
DELIBERATION DELIBERATION 9 MIDTERM EXAM
FINALIZING OF PRESENTATIONS
FINALIZING OF PRESENTATIONS
FINALIZING OF PRESENTATIONS
FINALIZING & CHECKING OF
CONCEPT SHEET PROCESS 10 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
FINALIZING & CHECKING OF
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 11 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
FINALIZING & CHECKING OF
FLOOR PLANS TESTING 12 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
FINALIZING & CHECKING OF
ELEVATIONS ACCOMPLISHMENTS
13
FINALIZING & CHECKING OF
26
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
SECTIONS RESULTS 14
FINALIZING & CHECKING OF
DETAILS 15 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
FINALIZING & CHECKING OF
EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE ANALYSIS 15 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
FINALIZING & CHECKING OF
INTERIOR PERSPECTIVE INTERPRETATION 16 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
FINALIZING OF PRESENTATIONS
17 FINALIZING OF PRESENTATIONS
FINALIZING OF PRESENTATIONS
SUBMISSION OF SUBMISSION OF DEADLINE FOR FINAL
REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS SUBMISSION
FINAL FINAL
DELIBERATION DELIBERATION 18 FINAL EXAM
27
VII. THESIS FORMS
For Research:
Research Letter form
Title deliberation form
Letter of approval for the title form
Site inspection & evaluation form
Certification form from the Landowner
Certification form from the proposed proprietor
Design Conceptualization form
Consultation certificate form
Space justification form
Letter of recommendation form
Endorsement letter form
Approval letter by the Thesis Committee form
Performance form during research
Book grading form
For Drawings:
Performance Checklist & evaluation form during Preliminary stage.
Performance Checklist & evaluation form during Final Term.
For Deliberation:
Preliminary deliberation form
Final deliberation form
Letter for the Candidate’s Parent form 01
Letter for the Candidate’s Parent form 01
28
Republic of the Philippines
TARLAC STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE AND FINE ARTS
San Isidro, Tarlac City
University Tel. Nos.: (045) 982-0717/982-2447/982-0295/TELFAX:982-0110/CAFA: 982-5162
Date ____________________________
________________________________
________________________________
________________________________
Dear Sir/Madam:
Any assistance you may extend will be highly appreciated. Thank you and God
Bless!
________________________________
B.S. Architecture V-A
Noted by:
________________________________
AR. ARLENE M. GUIEB, uap
Thesis Adviser
________________________________
AR. MARCO F. BILDAN, uap
Dean CAFA
29
TARLAC STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE & FINE ARTS
SAN ISIDRO, TARLAC CITY
TITLE DELIBERATION
CRITERIA RATING
_______________________________________________
JURY
OUTSTANDING……………………………..89-95
VERY SATISFACTORY……………………82-88
SATISFACTORY……………………………75-81
REEVALUATE……………………………….65-74
30
Republic of the Philippines
TARLAC STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE AND FINE ARTS
San Isidro, Tarlac City
University Tel. Nos.: (045) 982-0717/982-2447/982-0295/TELFAX:982-0110/CAFA: 982-5162
APPROVAL OF TITLE
Date ____________________________
Upon approval of this proposal, it is understood that I shall proceed with the
research work and submit it on the specified deadline. Justification and other
requirements for the proposal are attached.
________________________________
B.S. Architecture V-A
Recommending approval:
________________________________
AR. EDUARDO T. QUINTERO, uap
Thesis Adviser
Approved by:
________________________________
AR. MARCO F. BILDAN, uap
Dean CAFA
31
Tarlac State University
College of Architecture & Fine Arts
San Isidro, Tarlac City
Name : ______________________________________________
Title : ______________________________________________
Location : ______________________________________________
DATA REMARKS
32
Republic of the Philippines
TARLAC STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE AND FINE ARTS
San Isidro, Tarlac City
University Tel. Nos.: (045) 982-0717/982-2447/982-0295/TELFAX:982-0110/CAFA: 982-5162
LANDOWNER’S
CERTIFICATION
Date: __________________
Dear Sir:
Thank you!
Respectfully yours,
______________________________
Landowner
33
Republic of the Philippines
TARLAC STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE AND FINE ARTS
San Isidro, Tarlac City
University Tel. Nos.: (045) 982-0717/982-2447/982-0295/TELFAX:982-0110/CAFA: 982-5162
PROPRIETOR’S
CERTIFICATION
Date: __________________
Dear Sir:
After examining the proposal, it is found viable and worth pursuing for
educational purposes.
Thank you!
Respectfully yours,
______________________________
34
Owner
35
PROCESS OF CONCEPTUALIZATION
Project Objectives
o The owner’s goals and objectives regarding the project
o Expected impact of the project
o Main Perception to the project that the owners want to create.
o Issues to be resolved in hierarchal arrangement
Design Objectives
o The architect’s goals regarding the design of the project
o Based from the different theories of design
o In hierarchal arrangement
o Influenced by designers values
o Designer’s response to issues
Design Considerations
o Strategies needed to achieve designer’s goal
o In hierarchal arrangement in corresponding to the design objectives set
forth
o Specific design statements
o Recommend Standard design criterions
o In a measurable level
Design Concept
o Design Objective plus Design consideration as the basic formula for
Design Concept.
o Design Concept starts with the formula in a form of a phrase and is
expanded through discussion which is bounded by the most significant
objectives and considerations.
36
Tarlac State University
College Of Architecture & Fine Arts
San Isidro, Tarlac City
FORMULATION OF CONCEPT
Title: ____________________________________________________________
Fill up the following to formulate the basic design concept for your project:
Project Objectives
1. _____________________________________________________________
Design Objectives
1. _____________________________________________________________
Design Considerations
1. _____________________________________________________________
Design Concept
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
37
Republic of the Philippines
TARLAC STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE AND FINE ARTS
San Isidro Campus, Tarlac City
CAFA Tel. No. (045) 493-1863, WEB SITE: cafasanisidro.webs.com
Date: ________________
TECHNICAL CONSULTATION
CERTIFICATE
Concept
Planning
Presentation
Structural
Plumbing
Mechanical
Electrical
Book/Research
38
SPACE JUSTIFICATION FORM
39
Republic of the Philippines
TARLAC STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE AND FINE ARTS
San Isidro, Tarlac City
University Tel. Nos.: (045) 982-0717/982-2447/982-0295/TELFAX:982-0110/CAFA: 982-5162
LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION
Date ____________________________
Dear Sir:
Location: _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
The candidate has completed all the pre-requisites and is eligible to present
his/her design proposal. I therefore recommend the candidate for evaluation and
deliberation. I remain.
Respectfully yours,
________________________________
AR. EDUARDO T. QUINTERO, uap
Thesis Adviser
Approved by:
________________________________
AR. MARCO F. BILDAN, uap
Dean CAFA
40
Republic of the Philippines
TARLAC STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE AND FINE ARTS
San Isidro, Tarlac City
University Tel. Nos.: (045) 982-0717/982-2447/982-0295/TELFAX:982-0110/CAFA: 982-5162
Date ____________________________
Dear Sir:
Respectfully yours,
________________________________
AR. EDUARDO T. QUINTERO, uap
Thesis Adviser
Approved by:
________________________________
AR. MARCO F. BILDAN, uap
Dean CAFA
41
Republic of the Philippines
TARLAC STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE AND FINE ARTS
San Isidro, Tarlac City
University Tel. Nos.: (045) 982-0717/982-2447/982-0295/TELFAX:982-0110/CAFA: 982-5162
APPROVAL SHEET
___________________________ __________________________
Member Member
___________________________ __________________________
Member Member
_________________________________
Chairman
Noted:
_____________________________
AR. EDUARDO T. QUINTERO, uap
Thesis Adviser
42
TARLAC STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE AND FINE ARTS
San Isidro, Tarlac City
PERFORMANCE CHECKLIST FOR A THESIS BOOK
NAME:
TITLE:
43
TARLAC STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE AND FINE ARTS
San Isidro, Tarlac City
GRADING RUBRICS FOR A THESIS BOOK
NAME:
TITLE:
RATING
CRITERIA 1 2 3 4 5
1 COVER PAGE
2 DEDICATION & ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
3 OUTLINE
4 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
Is the problem researchable?
5 BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT
6 CONCEPTUALIZATION PROCESS
Project objectives/Design objectives/Design Concept
7 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PROJECT
8 SCOPE & LIMITATION
9 REVIEW OF THE RELATED LITERATURE
10 DEFINITION OF TECHNICAL TERMS
11 TECHNICAL DATA
e.g. Socio-economic profile
12 SITE
Description/ Pictures/ Technical descriprtion/ Site analysis/ Maps
Site selection process/ Occular inspection checklist
13 PROJECT
Definition of the title/ List of space requirements/ Definition of spaces
Design criteria per space/ Computation of spaces/ Space matix
Bubble diagram
14 FINANCIAL STUDY
44
SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME
RATING: POOR=1, FAIR=2, GOOD=3, VERY GOOD=4, EXCELLENT=5
45
CHECKLIST & EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE
DURING PRELIMINARY STAGE
DATE: _____________
CANDIDATE:
NO. 1 2 3 4 5
THESIS TITLE:
CONCEPT
1
SITE DEVELOPMENT
2
FLOOR PLANS
3
ELEVATIONS
4
SECTIONS
5
EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE/S
6
INTERIOR PERSPECTIVE/S
7
DETAILS
8
PRELIMINARY BOOK
9
TOTAL
GRADE
RATING: 1 POOR
2 FAIR
3 GOOD _______________________________________________
4 VERY GOOD THESIS ADVISER’S SIGNATURE
5 EXCELLENT
46
DURING FINAL TERM
DATE: _____________
CANDIDATE:
NO. 1 2 3 4 5
THESIS TITLE:
CONCEPT
1
SITE DEVELOPMENT
2
FLOOR PLANS
3
ELEVATIONS
4
SECTIONS
5
EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE/S
6
INTERIOR PERSPECTIVE/S
7
DETAILS
8
FINAL BOOK
9
10 ABSTRACT
TOTAL
GRADE
RATING: 1 POOR
2 FAIR
3 GOOD _______________________________________________
4 VERY GOOD THESIS ADVISER’S SIGNATURE
5 EXCELLENT
47
Republic of the Philippines
Tarlac State University
COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE
Tarlac City
TOTAL RATING………………………..__________
______________________________________
Jury
48
Republic of the Philippines
Tarlac State University
COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE
Tarlac City
TOTAL RATING………………………..__________
______________________________________
Jury
49
Republic of the Philippines
TARLAC STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE AND FINE ARTS
San Isidro Campus, Tarlac City
Date : ___________________________
CAFA Tel. No. (045) 493-1863, WEB SITE: cafasanisidro.webs.com
To : Candidates & Parents/Guardian
Dear Sir/Madam:
To ensure utmost advise is given to all candidates for Thesis Deliberation, candidates
are encouraged to seek technical and professional advise to members of the faculty of
this college. The following are their fields of specialization.
Faculty member Fields of specialization
Ar. Marco F. Bildan School/Churches/Assembly/Residential/
Plumbing engineering
Ar. Gary Advento Residential/Plumbing engineering
Ar. Eduardo T. Quintero Housing/Hotel/Residential/Manufacturing
Plant/ Supermarket/Mall
Ar. Mateo Bondoc Housing/ Hospital/Residential
Ar. Paul Villegas Hospital/School/Residential
Ar. Alexis M. Lowe Residential/Plumbing engineering
Ar. Ferdinand S. Valencia Housing/Residential
Ar. Arlen M. Guieb Housing/Residential
Ar. Victor Ceasar Bondoc Housing/Residential
Mr. Ethelbert Escoto Interior Design
Engr. Jumar M. Valdez Structural concepts
Engr. Cesar M. Bartolo Structural concepts
The candidate may also approach any technical person in any field of specialization to
seek advise and further advance their study.
Note: Please make sure that the technical consultant accomplish the attached technical consultation certificates
I have read and understood the aforementioned details and I will guide and support my son/daughter
accordingly for the smooth facilitation of these guidelines.
Name of Parent/Guardian: ___________________________________ Signature:
_________________
Student’s Name: ___________________________________________ Signature: ______________
50
Republic of the Philippines
TARLAC STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE AND FINE ARTS
San Isidro Campus, Tarlac City
WEB SITE: cafasanisidro.webs.com
Date : ___________________________
To : Parents/Guardian of students enrolled in
Design 10(Architectural Thesis)
2nd Semester, SY 20____-____
Dear Sir/Madam:
Greetings!
I am very pleased to announce that the preparation for the Pre-Deliberation of different thesis proposals for
our students is already undergoing. The thesis class with the class adviser has just finished their one on one
consultations.
Midterm examinations are fast approaching and midterm examination for Design 10 is equivalent to their
grade in preliminary deliberation.
If there is any inquiry about the aforementioned details, please feel free to bring up them to me. As
adviser of the graduating class, it is my pleasure to assist and help your children. Thank you very much
and may god bless you always.
Noted by:
I have read and understood the aforementioned details and I will guide and support my son/daughter
accordingly for the smooth facilitation of these guidelines.
Name of Parent/Guardian: ___________________________________ Signature:
_________________
51
Student’s Name: ___________________________________________ Signature: ______________
52
VIII. REFERENCES
1. Wiesen G. (2015). Wisegeek, Clear Answers for Common
Questions. Retrieved September 24, 2015 from
www.wisegeek.com
2. Wikimedia ( 2015). Wikipedia, Free encyclopedia. Retrieved
October 01, 2015 from https://en.wikipedia.org
3. Encyclopedia Britanica (2015). Merriam Webster Dictionary,
Browse dictionary. Retrieved October 01, 2015 from www.merriam-
webster.com
4. www.vanseodesign.com
5. Leedy, P.D, Practical Research(Planning and Design). 3rd ed. New
York: Macmillan Publishing company.
6. Sicat, L. V. (2009). Work text in Research Writing. Romulo Blvd:
Tarlac State University.
7. Miracle B. (2012). Architecture and Design: Programming 101.
Retrieved October 23, 2015 from Blog archability.com
8. ManuelJAC/GopezMTVLajomGR (2014). Guidelines for
Architectural Thesis Book. Malolos: Bulacan State University-
CAFA.
9. ManuelJAC/GopezMTVLajomGR (2013). Guidelines for
Architectural Thesis. Malolos: Bulacan State University-CAFA.
53