Sunteți pe pagina 1din 5

Grounds Prescriptive Period Effects on Filiation/Children Effects on Property Relation Significant Doctrine

Pertinent Provisions of Law Status of children born/conceived Property Relations Goitia vs. Campos-Rueda
(ARTICLE 45 FAMILY CODE) before termination –
1) ACP or CP shall be Marriage is an institution, the
Notes: LEGITIMATE dissolved and liquidated. maintenance of which in its purity
1. Unlike void marriages 2) If either spouse the public is deeply interested. It
which is invalid from the contracted marriage in is a relationship for life and the
beginning, VOIDABLE bad faith, he or she has parties cannot terminate it at any
MARRIAGES are no right to any share of shorter period by virtue of any
considered VALID UNTIL net profits earned by contract they make.
ANNULLED ACP or CP
2. Grounds are EXCLUSIVE 3) Net profits shall be Balogbog vs. CA
3. They must exist at the forfeited in favor of
time of the celebration common children, or if Under the Rules of Court, the
of the Marriage none, children of guilty presumption is that a man and a
spouse by previous woman conducting themselves as
marriage, or in default husband and wife are legally
thereof, the innocent married. This presumption may
spouse be rebutted only by cogent proof
4) All creditors of spouses to the contrary. The law favors
and of ACP or CP shall the validity of marriage, because
be notified of the the State is interested in the
proceedings for preservation of the family and
liquidation the sanctity of the family is a
5) Conjugal dwelling and matter of constitutional concern.
lot on which it is
situated shall be
adjudicated pursuant to
Art. 102 and 129.

Note: In both instances under


Articles 40 and 45, the marriages
are governed either by absolute
community of property or
conjugal partnership of gains
unless the parties agree to a
complete separation of property
in a marriage settlement entered
into before the marriage. Since
the property relations of the
parties is governed by absolute
community of property or
conjugal partnership of gains,
there is a need to liquidate,
partition and distribute the
property before a decree of
annulment could be issued. That
is not the case for annulment of
marriage under Article 36 of FC,
because the marriage is governed
by ordinary rules of co-ownership
(Dino v Dino, January 19, 2011)

1. Non-Consent (PAR. 1) Party to File the Suit Prescriptive Period Custody of Children – Presumptive Legitime
-Absence of consent to
contract marriage from the a. Parent or Guardian having a. Anytime before “no-consent During Pendency 1) Delivery of presumptive
parents, guardian or person Legal Charge of “non- party” reaches age of 1) Written legitime of all common
exercising substitute consent party” Twenty-one” 2) Absence thereof – court children computed as of
parental authority (in that “No-Consent Party” b. Within Five years after decides based on date of final judgment
order) over one or both of attaining Twenty-one interest of child and may without prejudice to
the parties is over 18 but award it in the following ultimate successional
below 21. order of preference: rights of children
a. Both parents jointly accruing upon death of
b. Either parent, may either or both parents
consider choice of 2) Shall be considered as
child over 7 years advances on common
unless parents children’s legitime.
chosen is unfit
c. Surviving
grandparent, if
several then choice
of child over 7 years
unless grandparent
chosen is unfit /
disqualified
d. Eldest brother/sister
over 21 unless unfit
/ disqualified
e. Any other person
deemed suitable by
court

After Decree
To the innocent spouse but no
child under 7 shall be separated
from the mother unless there are
compelling reasons

2. Unsoundness of Mind a. Sane Spouse without a. At any time before death of Child Support Donation Propter Nuptias
(PAR. 2) knowledge of insanity either party
- The true test is b. Relative, guardian or person b. At any time before death of During Pendency: 1) Shall remain valid,
whether the party having legal charge of insane either party 1) Written agreement unless done contracted
concerned could b. Insane spouse During lucid interval or after 2) No Written agreement, marriage in bad faith, in
intelligently consent regaining sanity from properties of ACP which case, donation is
that is, that he knew or CP revoked by operation of
what contract he was law
entering into (Hoadley After Decree: 2) No conflict with Art.
v Hoadley, 244 N.Y. Either parent/both may be 86(2) as such does not
424) ordered by court to give an require that marriage be
- Intoxication which amount necessary for support in annulled first before
results in lack of proportion to resources/means of donor may revoke
mental capacity to give giver and necessities of recipient donation – donor has 5
consent is equivalent to years from time he had
unsoundness of mind knowledge of lack of
(Mcknee v Mcknee, 49 consent; cannot revoke
Nev. 90) if there was knowledge
So is somnambulism at the before the marriage.
time of wedding (15 3) Conflict with Art 86(3)
Sanchez Roman 528) but Art 43(3) prevails –
more in harmony with
general purpose / intent
of act.

3. Fraud (as defined in Art. c. Injured party c. Within five years after Spousal Support Insurance Policy Buccat vs. Buccat
46, Family Code) discovery of Fraud
Any of the following shall During Pendency Innocent spouse has the choice Even assuming that the
constitute fraud: 1) Written Agreement of revoking or maintaining as annulment is based on the fact
a. Non-disclosure of a 2) In absence of WA, from beneficiary in the insurance policy that at the time of the marriage,
previous conviction by properties of ACP or CP, the other spouse who acted in defendant was pregnant by a
final judgment of the considered as advance bad faith. If the innocent spouse man other than her husband,
other party of a crime to be deducted from opts to revoke, he/she can do so there would still be no ground
involving moral share during liquidation even if the designation is because the law is explicit. There
turpitude 3) Restitution if after final irrevocable. should have been a concealment
b. Concealment by the judgment court finds Art 50; Art 43 (4) of such fact. If the defendant was
wife of the fact that at that person providing already about 6 months pregnant
the time of the support pendent lite is at the time of marriage, there
marriage, she was not liable can be no possibility of
pregnant by a man concealment. At such an
other than her husband advanced stage of pregnancy,
c. Concealment of a concealment would be
sexually-transmissible impossible.
disease, regardless of
its nature, existing at Aquino vs. Delizo
the time of the Concealment of the wife the fact
marriage; that at the time of the marriage
d. Concealment of drug she was pregnant by a man other
addiction, habitual than his husband constitutes
alcoholism, fraud and is a ground for
homosexuality or annulment of marriage.
lesbianism, existing at
the time of the
marriage
NOTE: The enumeration of
possible grounds is EXCLUSIVE:
No other kind of fraud is ground
for the annulment of the
marriage.
-
4. The consent of either party a. Injured Party a. Within Five years from time
was obtained by Force, ( aggrieved spouse NOT the force, intimidation or undue
intimidation, or undue parents) influence disappeared or
influence (PAR. 4) a. ceased
Unless: The same having
disappeared or ceased, such
party thereafter freely cohabited
with the other as husband and
wife

a. FORCE- there is violence


when in order to wrest
consent, serious or
irresistible force is
employed.
b. INTIMIDATION- there is
intimidation when one of
the contracting parties is
compelled by a reasonable
and well-grounded fear of
an imminent and grave evil
upon his person or
property, or upon the
person or property of his
spouse, descendants, to
give his consent”
UNDUE INFLUENCE- control
over one’s will.
5. Impotence- physical Injured party Within Five Years after the Jimenez vs. Caňizares
incapability of marriage ceremony
consummating the marriage - The presumption is in favor of
with the other potency. The lone testimony of
Provided: such incapacity the husband that his wife is
continues and appears to be physically incapable of sexual
incurable intercourse is insufficient to tear
asunder the ties that have bound
NOTE: Refer to lack of power of them together as husband and
copulation and not to mere wife.
sterility - Whether the wife is really
c. impotent cannot be deemed to
have been satisfactorily
established, because from the
commencement of the
proceedings until the entry of the
decree she had abstained from
taking part therein. Although her
refusal to be examined or failure
to appear in court show
indifference on her part, yet from
such attitude the presumption
arising out of the suppression of
evidence could not arise or be
inferred, because women of this
country are by nature coy,
bashful and shy and would not
submit to a physical examination
unless compelled to by
competent authority.

6. Sexually-Transmitted a. a. Succession
diseases (serious and
appears to be incurable) 1) Spouse in bad faith
disqualified to inherent
from innocent spouse
2) If both spouses of
subsequent marriage
acted in bad faith,
testamentary
dispositions made by
one in favor of the other
are revoked by
operation of law

Some Applicable Jurisprudence:

Succession: Van Dorn vs. Romillo


An American husband granted absolute divorce in his country is estopped from asserting his rights over property allegedly held in the Philippines as conjugal property by him and his former wife. To maintain, as the
husband does, that under our laws, the wife has to be considered still married to him and still subject to a wife's obligation under the Civil Code cannot be just. Petitioner wife should not be obliged to live together
with, observe respect and fidelity, and render support to her husband. The husband should not continue to be one of her heirs with possible rights to conjugal property. SHE SHOULD NOT BE DISCRIMINATED
AGAINST IN HER OWN COUNTRY IF THE ENDS OF JUSTICE ARE TO BE SERVED.

Ground: Anaya vs. Paraloan


The non-disclosure by the husband of a premarital relationship with another woman is NOT a ground for the annulment of the marriage.

S-ar putea să vă placă și