Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
EGA2 Project
Sr. No Observation or To be Encouraged (E) or Project End Date Narrative Suggested Action
Comment Problem to Avoided (P)? Affected? (Y/N)
Process
Lack of expeditor for It took lot of efforts from different people from different
procurement of materials and departments to work upon different MRF's due to the Procurement Engineer shall be mobilized to site for atleast 3 days a week and the
2 P Y other 2 days in HO
preparation of LPO. unavaialbility of this personnel in the site.
The ITP requirements were overridden by the construction 1. Construction team be aware of the minimum std. tolerances atleast from Engineer
Team, by not doing the proper survey and without level and to be strictly followed.
4 270 structure misalignment for P N following the sequence for grout release which lead to 2. Periodical training to the engineers, Supervisor and Surveyors required from QC
not following the ITP. (NCR) serious complications in the alignment of the main grids 2. The columns/grids shall not be relased to grouting or for the next level with out
and columns and lead to consequences. alignment by QC and Surveyor and Bolt tightening inspections (AS per ITP)
1. It shall be made mandatory to have a project quality Inductions just like safety for
every personnel prior (Relevant) to joining the project. Right from the Project
Though there were some Quality Inductions and sessions Manager through Workers.
Lack of Quality Inductions to the on Fit-up and welding, Flange management, Hydro Testing, 2. A quality Induction plan to be developed by the QA Engineer covering all the
7 required personnel and P Y grouting, etc. The required trainings/Inductions and daily different group of personnel in the project. This training/ induction to be done
awareness of the project quality tool box talks were not sufficinet enough to cover large periodically (Every 3 months or low) covering all the groups in the project with
requirements amount of scope of works. changes occurring at site.
3. One dedicated QA Engineer with an associate QA (If required) shall be made avail
from the beginning of the project.
Quality Management
The Site quality Manager/Lead shall be noimnated from the beginning of the project
The amount of QC Manpower required was verily to understand the actual project scope of works, to study the contract and for
underestimated which lead to the hiring of Manpower and preparation PQP.
Under estimation of QC man- caused an impact on budget as it was unplanned. Project quality Manpower shall be planned and prepared by the Division Quality
1 power required and their role in P Y The need for inspectors in different areas of site, covering Manager & Project Quality Manager during the initial histogram/ plan preparation
the project the different disciplines of the project, no of walkdowns, stage according to the project requirements, to make sure that the required
etc. was not taken into consideration from the beginning of personnel for the project are identified and mobilized in the right time.
the project. Manpower plan to be reviewed by Site QC Manager every month to meet the
project requirements.
Lack of; Periodical trainings and audits were not carried out to
2 Periodical Internal Audits P Y required extent convering the project manpower and with Internal sudits shall be carried out at perdiodic intervals as per the Project Quality
Internal Observations/NCR's. different trades. Plan and QA Engineer shall carry out unplanned Audits to raise NCR's.
Lack of; The shortfall of QA engineer can be clearely identified; The required logs are to be prepared according to project requirements and shall be
Timely Quality Logs for systems, 1. The Quality logs were found to be unupdated like under QA monitoring and to be mainstained BY QC DCC.
3 Unupdated existing logs P Y (System handover, PTR, Calibation, etc.) QA Walkdowns are to be conduted at required frequency suiting the project to
2. identify and Highlight the observations.
The repair % of the welders went upto 24 % in the project.
Firstly, RT on the welds from BPJV started 6 months after 1. This % of repair shall be monitored from Day 1 of the project per welder. The first
the welding commenced in the site and no one knew what two production welds by any welder shall be Radiogrphed and the quality of weld
was the quality of the welds from the beginning of project. has to examined. If the quality is found low, then the welder has to be sent for
The repair % Caluculation was not according the B 31.3 and further training and repeat the same.
the same was not conisdered by Target Quality Team. 2. In order to acheive the above, the NDE contractor has to be finalised before the
Lack of QC coverage for the welding activities in different beginning of the project, gate pass, safety inductions, and all approval need to be
areas of the site was one of the big setback as the required done and the crews to be made ready for the same. The LPO for NDE contractor
4 High weld repair % P Y Inspectors was a serious setback. shall be reviewed and accepted site Quality Lead as weel.
Unacceptable; Fit-up, consuambales usage and lack of 3. The client spec requirements shall be well read and understood by Site Quality
resurces like Wind protection Tent, Welder tools, Manager to agree and document the % caulucations in the beginning of the prject.
Continuous breakdown of the Mother Oven played a major 4. The QC inspectors, with previous experience and necessary certifications shall be
role in the welds failure. made avail in site in right time.
There were huge porosity problems with E7018-1 Adhor 5. Demo and testing of the welds done with Adhor E7018-1 electrodes shall be
eloectrodes which resulted in RT repairs. carried out prior to use of these electrodes in prouction from next projects.
Construction
The materials upon receiving, were not stacked and The material receiving procedure has clear instruction of storage/stacking of
Debris and Foreign materials preserved properly which resulted in damage to the project materials. Materials and Construction teams shall be trained by QA/QC.
1 insde the pipe and damaged P N materials and debris went inside the pipe. This resulted in Pipes prior to installation shall be checked for debris.
steel Addditional boroscopic inspection under Heavy some Pipes if procured by us, then the order shall uinclude End caps with Bevel protectors
unplanned budget and Causing delay in Project schedule. for the protection of bevels from mechanical damage.
Uncontrolled calibration cycle of There was no plan for the calibration of testing equipment A centralised Calibration log monitoring the in and out of the instruments, due date
5 the hydro Instruments to meet P Y as the requirement from BPJV was very stringent. for calibration per project requirements is required to to be maintained by Materials
the project requirements. with Qaulity DC.
General
Monthly incentives in the form Welders shall be encouraged enough for better quality in an unbiased and
1 of Etisalat/Du Cards for the E Y Appreciation certificates along with
professional approach
encouragement of welders
PBQ is one good process which can adapted in the future Upon screeing, workers to be selected and to be trained to work Quality in PBQ.
2 PBQ (People based Quality) E Y projects for the betterment of the Quality in the works and This can be utilized in unprofessional manner as well if not monitored properly.
make the people work more enthusiastic towards quality.
QC coverage for the Procument Site Quality Personnel shall be involved in the process of Vendor site visits and Audits to be considered in the budget for the Target
3 process of material Vendor E Y procurement process right from the MRF review, till the manufacured/Procured materials as per the contract.
Packages. final handover of the systems