Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Purpose/Goal
The purpose of this study is to determine the patterns of use, costs,
and factors associated with use of complementary/ alternative
therapies by women living in the Wabash Valley area who have been
diagnosed with breast cancer for at least 6 months. This study will
be a second site for a larger study being conducted through the Lee
Moffitt Cancer and Research Institute in Tampa Florida.
Specific Aims
Relevance Statement
Practitioners of conventional medicine have justifiably criticized
most complementary/alternative medical (CAM) therapies for the
relative lack of peer reviewed scientifically conducted analysis.
Nevertheless, use of these therapies has increased so dramatically
in the US and Europe, that it is unwise for medical science to
continue to ignore this potentially harmful situation (Cassileth &
Chapman, 1996a; Downer, et al., 1994). Documented use of
complementary/alternative therapies in both oncology and non-
oncology patients is estimated to be as high as 45% (Cassileth &
Chapman, 1996a; Downer, et al., 1994; Eisenberg, et al., 1993;
Munstedt, Kirsch, Milch, Sachsse & Vahrson, 1996).
Third, this study has relevance in that it will show the impact of
increasing out of pocket expenses for CAM treatments and
insurance coverage costs. Some of the CAM is relatively cost
effective, i.e, relaxation guided imagery tapes, and others may be
quite costly.
Fourth this study has relevance in that it will help identify reasons
women with breast cancer seek out complementary and alternative
therapies, and their relative satisfaction with the specific CAM
therapies they have tried. Information from this study will assist
traditional medicine to learn more about effective CAM and to offer
more integrative services. Results of this study will provide data for
further testing of specific therapies, which will give new empirical
evidence on the safety and efficacy of these therapies.
Background
Alternative/complementary therapies have recently become a
multimillion business in the US and several European nations, with
many patients paying more in out-of-pocket costs for these
treatments than they do for standard medical care. The use of these
therapies generate questions related to inadequate evaluation of the
costs, risks, and benefits of specific therapies, along with problems
related to possible suppression of effective conventional therapies
and motivation for profits received from desperate persons seeking
self-healing (Brigden, 1995; Guzley, 1992; Fletcher, 1992). Given
the ever increasing numbers of herbs, supplements and non-
conventional substances that are on the market, knowing which
ones our patients are likely to be using and the probable side effects
associated with these “popular” supplements will greatly assist
health care providers to provide appropriate patient education on
this topic, as well as altering us to watch for known side effects and
medication interactions (Montbriand, 1999; Zaloznik, 1994).
Theoretical Framework
The theory of reasoned action (Ajzen, 1980) provides a conceptual
framework within which to consider the use of complementary
therapies by persons with cancer. The theory of reasoned action
examines the relationships among subject attitudes, subjective
norms, intentions and behaviors. According to the theory, behavior
is the result of a specific behavioral intention. In this study, a
participant's positive response toward a specific complementary
therapy will be regarded as a behavioral intention. A behavioral
intention is determined by the attitude toward the behavior and the
subjective norm regarding that behavior. A participant's intention to
use a complementary therapy is a function of attitude, which can be
positive or negative. Attitudes reflect the participant's beliefs about
the consequences of participating in the behavior, and evaluations
of these consequences. For example, if a participant believes that a
specific complementary therapy will help in coping with the disease,
the attitude towards that therapy is positive. In addition to
attitudes, subjective norms also play a part in the decision making
process. Subjective norms are perceptions of what important
others are perceived to think about a certain subject. For example,
if a participant believes that significant others approve of the choice
to participate in a particular complementary therapy, there will be a
stronger intention to participate in the therapy. Both attitudes and
subjective norms play a part in the development of a behavioral
intention. In this study, the Complementary Therapy Rating Scale
II (CTRSII) will be used to measure the behavioral intentions of
rural persons with cancer towards the use of various complementary
therapies.
Methods
Instrument/Study Measures
The survey instrument to be used in this study is an enhanced
version of the Complementary Therapy Rating Scale, which was
used in the earlier investigations (Bennett & Lengacher, 1998;
Bennett & Lengacher, 1999). See appendix B for copies of articles.
Using standardized classifications of complementary therapies from
the Office of Alternative Medicine, several new categories have been
added to this instrument. Reliability data for the previously
published version of the Complementary Therapy Rating Scale was
.86 using odd-even split half reliability and .77 using coefficient
alpha. The scale has been revised in an effort to obtain more
complete data for this study. Additional questions concerning
reasons for using CAM, cost of use, and if the patient had informed
their physician about their use of CAM have been included. In
addition, questions related to patient recommendations for CAM
use, how helpful specific CAM therapies are, who provides the CAM
treatment and satisfaction with both conventional and CAM
therapies have been added.
References
Abu-Realh, M., Magwood, G., Narayan, M., Rupprecht, C., & Suraci,
M. (1996). The use of complementary therapies by cancer patients.
Nursing Connections, 9(4), 3-12.
Blais, R., Maiga, A., & Aboubacar, A. (1997). How different are users
and non-users of alternative medicine? Canadian Journal of Public
Health, 88(3), 159-162.
Crocerri, E., Crotti, N., Feltrin, A., Ponton, P., Geddes, M., & Buiatti,
E. (1998). The use of complementary therapies by breast cancer
patients attending conventional treatment. European Journal of
Cancer, 56(3), 324-328.
Downer, S., Cody, M., McClus, P., Wilson, P., Arnott, S., Lister, T., &
Slevin, M. (1994). Pursuit and practice of complementary therapies
by cancer patients receiving conventional treatment. British Medical
Journal, 309, 86-89.
Eisenberg, D., Davis, R., Ettener, S., Appel, S., Wilkey, S., Van
Rompay, M., & Kessler, R. (1998). Trends in alternative medicine use
in the United States, 1990-1997: Results of a follow-up national
survey. JAMA, 280(18), 1569-1575.
Eisenberg, D., Kessler, R., Foster, C., Norlock, F., Calkins, D., &
Delbanco, T. (1993). Unconventional medicine in the United States:
Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. The New England Journal of
Medicine, 38, 246-252.