Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Introduction:
Being a multimillionaire can be boring at times when you have nothing to do with your
money. One day, Mrs. Copeland decided to ask the freshman class to design a tower for her.
Why you may ask? We have no idea. It was assumed that she ran out of ideas to spend her
money on so she decided to assign every group a random number of sides and plot size. We
ended up getting 18-side polygon on a 25 x 25 plot size. Mrs. Copeland specifically wanted the
polygonal floor to be maximized while still having the 3 feet boundary line and certain other
requirements such as an aquarium with required depths, thickness, and a specific amount of
She sought for a home that was near the ocean. Moana had become her favorite movie so
a beach-like theme would be a necessity. If Moana ever came to visit, this tower would be a
welcoming place just for her and friends. There is sand where Hei Hei can sneak up on Maui and
peck him while Pua enjoys the little mud area. So, it is our job to ensure that Moana has a nice
tower that Ms. Copeland would approve of, and to ensure that this tower is nice certain volumes,
areas, other measurements, etc. will be found throughout this paper before this tower can be
constructed.
Adeleke – Yu 2
Part 2:
In Figure 1, the maximized plot size and the base of tower is displayed. The base of tower
was made using 4 different polygons, each scaled in by a foot. In the upcoming figures, the
method to maximize the plot size and area of each polygon will be found. The blue represents
Polygon 1, the purple represents Polygon 2, the pink represents Polygon 3, and the
Figure 2, above, shows how plot size of the tower was maximized. As mentioned before,
the tower cannot be constructed within 3 feet of the plot dimensions (25 by 25). Because of this
reason 3 feet was subtracted from each side, turning it into 6 feet lost total making the
Adeleke – Yu 3
The figure above displays how the central angle of the four polygons are found. They all
share the central angle and the central angle is needed to find the area of each polygon. The
central angle was found by dividing 360° by the number of sides each polygon has (18). The
Figure 4. Polygon 1
In Figure 4, Polygon 1 and the triangle that will be used to find its area is displayed. The
length of the height of one triangle and the base length of the same triangle need to be found to
Adeleke – Yu 4
find the area. The only information that is known about this polygon is the side length of one of
the triangles and the central angle. The side length of one of the triangles is known because it
goes from the midpoint of one side to the center of the maximized plot side. In other words, it is
half of the width of the maximized plot size (19 by 19) making its length 9.5 feet.
A right triangle is also shown with the angles of 90° and 10° and a hypotenuse of 9.5 feet.
This right triangle is the original triangle that will be used to find the area of the polygon, but
split in half with a perpendicular bisector coming from the top point to the base of the triangle.
Therefore, the central angle is split in half, the side length of the original triangle is still the same
The base and height of this right triangle will be found, so it can be possible to solve for
the area of the polygon. Since this is a right triangle and another angle except for the right angle
is found and the hypotenuse is found, the trig. function sine (sin) will be used to find the base
because it is opposite of the 10° angle and sine (sin) involves the side length opposite angle A in
Sine (10) • 9.5 = o (½ base of orig. triangle) Multiplication Property of Equality (MPE)
Sine (10) • 9.5 • 2 ft. = 2o (base of orig.
Multiplication Property of Equality
triangle)
In Figure 6, the base of the original triangle was found. It was found by using the sine
formula and using few mathematical properties to get the final answer. The reason why the 4th
step shows the formula multiplied by 2 is because the original value of “o” (opposite side of
Adeleke – Yu 5
theta / angle A) is half of the original triangle’s base since the right triangle is the original
triangle cut in half, so each side is multiplied by 2 to get the full base of the original triangle. The
The trig. function cosine (cos) will be used to solve for the height of the triangle, in
Figure 7, since the hypotenuse, the degree of angle A is known, and the height is the adjacent
side of angle A which tan can be used to solve for the adjacent side.
In Figure 7, the height of the triangle was found. The exact length of the height was
found by using the cosine (cos) formula and using the substitution property and MPE. In this
case, the final formula did not need to be multiplied by 2 because when the original triangle was
cut in half, the height, “a” (adjacent side length of theta / angle A), was not cut in half. The exact
Since the base and the height of the original triangle was found in Figure 6 and 7. These
The area of Polygon 1 is found in the figure above. The area was found by multiplying
Adeleke – Yu 6
the base, found in Figure 6, by the height, found in Figure 7, by 0.5 and by 18. The area of
Figure 9. Polygon 2
The figure above displays Polygon 2, the triangle that will be used to find the area of it,
and a right triangle with the angles of 90° and 10°. This right triangle is the original triangle but
split in half with a perpendicular bisector / height coming from the top point to the base of the
triangle.
So that the area of Poly. 2 can be found, the base and height of this right triangle will be
found. The trig. functions cosine (cos) and tangent (tan) will be used this time to solve for the
height and base respectively. The reason sine is replaced by tangent in this case will be revealed
Since Polygon 2 is scaled in by a foot from Polygon 1, the height is 1 ft. smaller than the
height of Poly. 1. The new height is found by taking the height of the former polygon using
cosine and subtracting 1. The height of Polygon 2 is equal to cos (10) • 9.5 – 1.
In Figure 12, above, the base of the original triangle is found. It was found by using the
tangent formula and using few mathematical properties to get the final answer. Tangent was used
this time because the “a” (height / adjacent side of the angle) and theta was known. The reason
why the last step has the formula multiplied by 2 is because the original value of “o” (opposite
side of theta / angle A) is half of the original triangle’s base. The base is equal to Tan (10) • (Cos
The area of Polygon 2 is found in the figure above. The area was found by multiplying
the base, found in Figure 11, by the height, found in Figure 10, by 0.5 and by 18. The area of
As shown in Figure 13, 2 right triangles are displayed with a hypotenuse of 7.5 ft. where
the triangle was split by a perpendicular bisector. One of the right triangles will be used to find
the area of Polygon 3. The angle remains 10° because the central angle does not change. The
Because the property line is 3 feet wide and this is the second polygon, the height is 2 ft.
less than the height of Polygon 1. As mentioned in Figure 10, the new height can be found by
using cosine and subtracting 1 from the original height. The height of Polygon 3 turns into cos
Figure 15 displays the base of the original triangle. It was found by using the tangent
formula since the adjacent side length was known. In the last step, the tangent formula was
multiplied by 2 because it was originally half the length of the original triangle. After the
calculations, have been done, the base comes to be tan (10) • (cos (10) • 9.5 – 2) • 2 feet.
The figure above shows how the area of Polygon 3 was found at which resulted as
In this figure, a right triangle split from the perpendicular bisector is shown with a
hypotenuse of 6.5 ft. The angle of the triangle is still 10° because it is half of the central angle of
an 18-sided polygon. The base and height will be found in future figures.
As mentioned in Figure 14, the property line is 3 feet wide. Since Polygon 4 is the
innermost line, the height is 3 ft. less than the height of Polygon 1. Cosine and the subtraction of
3 from the original height of Polygon 1 is used to find the new height. The height of Polygon 4
Figure 19, above, represents the calculation of the base length. It was found the same way
as shown in Figure 15. The result is tan (10) • (cos (10) • 9.5 – 3) • 2 = 2o (base of triangle) feet.
Figure 20 exhibits the finding of Polygon 4’s area at which the outcome is approximately
Part 3
In the figure, above, the dimensions of the footing of the tower are displayed. The footing
Adeleke – Yu 12
is 3.5 feet deep and 3 feet wide (the distance from Polygon 4 to Polygon 1).
The volume of the concrete needed for the footing is displayed in the figure above. The
height for the prism was the depth of concrete shown in Figure 21, 3.5 feet. The volume was
found by taking the area of Polygon 1 and multiplying that by the height of the prism then by
taking the area of Polygon 4 and multiplying that by the height of the prism. After those two
values are found, they were subtracted from one another. The volume of the concrete becomes
The figure above represents the dimensions of the floor. Because the floor had to extend
from Polygon 4, the length of the base is the same (shown in Figure 19). The floor also had to be
4” deep.
Adeleke – Yu 13
This figure shows the volume of the floor. As mentioned in Figure 23, the floor is 4”
deep and has to be converted into feet. The height would end up 1/3 ft. since 4/12 inches is
equivalent to that. The result of the volume would be approximately 42.74 feet3.
In Figure 25, the aquarium dimensions are shown. The aquarium is located inside of
polygon 4 having the same dimensions of a base of approximately 2.24 ft. and a height of 3.5 ft.
The figure, above, displays the volume of the water in the aquarium. The water fills up
the space 75% of the way. The volume was found by finding 75% of the height (3.5) then
multiplying that the by the side length of the base. The volume of the aquarium water is
In Figure 27, above, the cost of the concrete was found. The cost was found by taking the
volume of the concrete needed for footing (found in Figure 22) then dividing that by 27 because
a cubic yard of concrete costs $115, to convert the cubic yard into feet it is necessary to divide by
27. After the quotient is found that is rounded up because a fraction of a bag of concrete cannot
In the figure, above, the cost for the Plexiglas is displayed. The cost was found by taking
the area of Polygon 4 (displayed in Figure 20) and dividing it by 32 because the cost is $1100 for
each 48” x 96” x 4” sheet of Plexiglas. The height of the floor and width of the Plexiglas is both
Adeleke – Yu 15
4 inches, the 48” x 96” needs to be converted into feet. 48 and 96 are both divided by 12
resulting in 4” x 8”, multiplying those two numbers result in 32. After the area is divided by 32
round up because you can buy a fraction of Plexiglas then multiply the answer by 1100, resulting
Part 4:
Figure 29 displays the dimensions of the outer base polygon (Polygon 2) and one of the
outer lateral walls. The length of the base for the polygon is approximately 2.95 feet and the
height of the prism was found by doubling the length of the base which is around 5.89 feet.
Adeleke – Yu 16
In the figure, above, the dimensions of the door, except for the height and side length of
polygon, are displayed. The base of the door is 2.7 feet while the height of the door is 4.5 feet.
The radius of the 9-gon (9–sided polygon) is 1.35 feet since its radius is half of the base.
The height of the polygon and the side length of the polygon will be found in the
In the figure, above, the height of the nonagon was found. The exact length of the height
was found by using the cosine (cos) formula since the hypotenuse was known as 1.35 feet and
the angle of the right triangle that was used (10 degrees). The height of the nonagon is
In Figure 33, above, the base of the door polygon is found. It was found by using the
tangent formula. Tangent was used because the “a” (height / adjacent side of the angle) and theta
was known. The reason why the last step has the formula multiplied by 2 is because the original
value of “o” (opposite side of theta / angle A) is half of the original triangle’s base. The base is
equal to Tan (10) • (Cos (10) • 1.35) • 2 feet so approximately 0.47 feet.
Adeleke – Yu 18
Area of Door = (Br • Hr) + (9 • 0.5 • Bdp • Hdp) Area Formula of Door
Area of Door = (2.7 • 4.5) + (9 • 0.5 • 0.47 •
Substitution Property
1.33)
Area of Door = 12.15 + 2.80 Multiplication Property
In Figure 34, the area of the door was found. The area was found by multiplying the base
and height of the rectangle (Br & Hr) and multiplying separately the base and height of the door
polygon (Bdp & Hdp) by 0.5, one half multiplied by base and height is the area formula of a
triangle, and by 9, because there were 9 triangles with that base and height in the door polygon.
After those two products were found they were added together to get approximately 14.96 square
In the figure, above, the dimensions of one of the windows are shown. The base of the
window is found by dividing it up into 18 triangles and using the radius known as approximately
Adeleke – Yu 19
1.35 feet to find the base and height of the window as about 0.47 feet and around 1.33 feet
The area of the two windows that are required in the tower are found in the above figure.
The area is found by multiplying 0.5 by the base of the window by the height of the window and
by 18, because the window was divided into 18 triangles to find that base and height, then
multiply the product by 2 because there are two windows. The area of the windows combined is
The lateral surface area (LSA) of the outer prism was found in Figure 36. It was found by
multiplying the base and height of the lateral wall (BLW & HLW) by 18 because there is 1 wall on
each side making 18 lateral walls and separately adding the area of the door and windows (AD &
AW) together then subtracting the combined area of the windows and door from the surface area
Adeleke – Yu 20
of all the doors. The area of the windows and door was subtracted because those were mean to be
removed when calculating the surface area. The lateral surface is around 286.41 square feet.
Part 5:
In the figure displayed above are the dimensions needed to construct the inner walls of
Polygon 3. Because it was extended to Polygon 3, the base becomes approximately 2.59 ft.
This figure represents the dimensions of the lateral wall of the inner prism. The base is
around 2.59 ft. since it is directly on Polygon 3 and the height is approx. 5.89 ft.
Figure 39 represents the volume of the inner prism. As shown in Figure 16, the area of
Polygon 3 is 171.73 ft2. The height was found by doubling the base length of Polygon 2. After
multiplying the area of base and height of prism, the volume becomes approx. 1012.04 feet3.
Part 6:
In the figure, above, a pyramid is shown with the Polygon 2 as the base and its base side
length of about 2.95 ft. The slant height, height, and angle between the pyramid base and
Adeleke – Yu 22
pyramid face at the bottom of slant height will be found in the upcoming figures.
The calculations of how to find the height of the outer pyramid is displayed in the figure
above. The height of the pyramid was required to be 3 times larger than a side length of the
pyramid base (side lengthPB). The height of the pyramid is approximately 8.84 feet.
In Figure 41, it shows the usage of the Pythagorean theorem to find the slant height. The
height comes down at a right angle to the base with the slant height as the hypotenuse. The
height of the right triangle (HeightR) was found in Figure 40 while the height of Polygon 2
(HeightP2) was found in Figure 10. Therefore, the slant height ends up being approximately
Figure 42. Angle at Foot of Slant Height Between Pyramid Base & Face
Adeleke – Yu 23
The angle between the pyramid base and a pyramid face was found in the figure above.
The inverse of cosine, a trigonometric function, was used because the adjacent side (height of
Polygon 2) and hypotenuse (slant height on pyramid face) was known, but not the degree of the
angle. The inverse of cosine finds the angle measure. The angle between the base and face and is
Part 7:
In the figure, above, the dimensions of a lateral face of the outer pyramid is shown. The
height of the triangle is approx. 12.16 feet, the base of the triangle is approx. 2.95 ft., and the
angle measurements of the triangle are Angle A ≈ 14°, Angle B is approximately 83°, and Angle
C is about 83°. The slant height shown in the previous figure, Figure 41, is the height of the
triangle. The method of calculating all the angle measurements will be discussed in the
upcoming figures.
Adeleke – Yu 24
The method used to calculate the measurement of Angle A is found in the figure above.
The inverse of tangent was used because the opposite and adjacent side of Angle A was known,
the opposite side was the height of the triangle and the adjacent side is half of the base length.
After that degree was found it was multiplied by 2 because the altitude from point A bisects the
angle, so multiply by 2 to get the full measure of Angle A. The measure of Angle A is
approximately 14 degrees.
The method used to calculate the measurement of Angle B is found in the figure above.
For further reference on why the inverse of tangent was used refer to Figure 44. The measure of
In Figure 45, the measurement of Angle C was found. For further reference on why the
inverse of tangent was used refer to Figure 44. The measure of Angle C is about 83 degrees.
After looking at the answers for Figure 44 and 45, the angles are the same meaning the triangular
Figure 46 shows the calculation made to find the area of the lateral face of the outer
pyramid. The base length was used from Polygon 2 and the height was from the slant height that
was produced in Figure 41. The area turned out to be about 17.92 ft2.
Figure 47, above, displays how to find the lateral surface area of the outer pyramid. The
Adeleke – Yu 26
polygon given for this tower was 18-sided. To make matters simple, the area of the lateral faces
(found in Figure 46) was multiplied by 18 because there was a total of 18 triangles. After
Part 8:
In the figure, above, the dimensions of the inner pyramid are shown, the base of the
pyramid is Polygon 3. The height of the pyramid is about 7.78 ft.; the base side length of the
inner pyramid is about 2.59 ft. because its side length is the same length as a side of Polygon 3.
The methods used to calculate the height of the pyramid will be mentioned in the upcoming
figures.
In Figure 50, the height of the inner pyramid is found. The height of inner pyramid is
Adeleke – Yu 27
required to be 3 times longer than the base side length. The height of the inner pyramid is
Figure 51 represents the volume of the inner pyramid. The area of base from Polygon 3
was used (calculated in Figure 16) and multiplied by 1/3 because it is a pyramid. The volume
Part 9:
The figure, above, displays what the completed tower looks like.
Adeleke – Yu 28
LSA = LSAOuter Prism + LSAOuter Pyramid Lateral Surface Formula for Tower
The total surface area of the tower was calculated in Figure 53. The surface area was
calculated by adding the lateral surface area of the outer prism (Figure 36) and outer pyramid
(Figure 47) together. The surface area of the whole tower is about 609.00 ft2.
In Figure 54, the volume of the completed tower was found. The volume of the tower was
found by adding the volume of the inner prism (Figure 39) and inner pyramid (Figure 48) to each
other. The volume of the whole tower becomes approximately 1457.50 ft3.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, throughout this paper certain measurements and math topics were covered
and found using multiple math properties and trigonometric functions. The volume of the whole
tower came to be about 1457.50 cubed feet and the surface area came to be about 609.00 sq. feet.
In the figures, approximate values were listed but exact values were used in calculations unless it
was said otherwise in the explanation of the figures (examples include Figure 27 and Figure 28).
Some advice for people doing this project in the future is to take your time when cutting
and constructing and do not procrastinate the building. Otherwise, you will be in the position of
Adeleke – Yu 29
some students who rush and burn themselves or have multiple cuts. Major key is to HAVE
PATIENCE because it takes pure patience and staying the three Cs (calm, cool, and collected) to
have your roof meet perfectly at the apex or have someone that is good with architecture and
crafts help build it. It can be helpful to not rush because the tower might end up looking better
and the better it looks and is constructed, the better the pay. Also, remember try to have fun, it
will be a pain in the derrière if you don’t try to have fun and are stuck with building a tower. No
All in all, we hope our multimillionaire client likes our Moana- themed tower because a
lot of sleep was lost and a lot of sweat, pain, and crying was put in over this building process.
Now that leaves the question if you were given the task of building a tower under a certain
deadline, what would be your approach to building this tower and what theme would you want