Future Directions

We plan to apply for funding to follow up this study with a replication using
the perception of the student of MDA. This will allow us to obtain a much
larger sample size and thus be able to make more definitive conclusions.
Importantly, this will also allow to us test whether my effects depend on
participant characteristics, such as gender.

Because of the small sample size in the present study, we could not
look at male versus female participants’ differences in perceptions of target
groups. This is important to test given that several studies indicate that
there are differences nin the way men and women view. It would also be
interesting to see how other factors such as religiosity, gender orientation,
and personal sexual and gender identity affect perceptions as well.

The next step will be to apply this information to the legal context. We
plan to extend my previous findings about puitiveness toward gay and
lesbian sex offenders to bisexual and transgender offenders as well, to see
how the interaction of sexual orientation and gender further might be
different for these groups.

Our past studies indicated that people were more different

perspectives about religion and their different diversity . The present results
reflect a negative correlation and differences diversity of religion and this
new research between sexual fixedness and moral outrage. If this pattern
holds true after the replication, perhaps putting this into a legal context will
produce a more consistent result.

If not, we will at least be able to make more definitive conclusions

about how the intersection of gender and sexuality affect prejudice.
Conclusion

As a result of this study, it is the researchers hope that attitude

towards LGBT people are clearly understood by the readers. Overall, this
study had already attained what it wants. The data shows that support and
admiration is the top attitude that the respondents showed towards the
LGBT people.

The perceptions of people differ from how they see the LGBT
community. Therefore, there are still negative attitudes remained such as
pity, tolerance, and repulsion but majority are of them are positive attitudes.
Thus, their views shape their attitudes towards LGBT people.

Acknowledgement

The researcher wishes to express appreciation and profound gratitude to the

following persons who gave their support, cooperation and consideration for
the success of this study.

First and foremost, praises and thanks to God, the Almighty, for His showers
of blessings throughout our research work to complete the research
successfully;

Our parents, for their love, prayers, caring and sacrifices for educating
preparing us for our future;
Summary Recomendation

The summary of the research addressed the attitudes of people

towards LGBT that it differs on how they see. The answer of a respondents
have a big impact in comes of rating. Based on the findings and conclusion
presented, the following recommendations are suggested.

1. The researchers recommend no matter what is the gender of an individual

it should be respected and views equally.

2. The researchers recommend that gender equality should be addressed in

the society.

3. The researchers recommend that People should continue supporting

LGBT.

4. The researchers recommend that rights and protection should be

implemented among the individuals of LGBT for the fact that there is still
discrimination among the third sex community.

5. People should be open-minded about LGBT.

Appendix

Bradford JB, Cahill S, Grasso C, Makadon HJ. Policy Focus: How to Gat ger
Data on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Clinical Settings. 2011.

Dodge B, Schnarrs P, Goncalves G, Malebranche D, Martinez O, Reece M,

Rhodes SD, Van Der Pol B, Nix R, Fortenberry DJ. The Significance of Privacy
and Trust in Providing Health-Related Services to Behaviorally Bisexual Men
in the United States. AIDS Education and Prevention. 2012;24(3):242–256.
[PMC free article] [PubMed]

Gay & Lesbian Medical Association. Guidelines for Care of Lesbian, Gay,
Bisexual, and Transgender Patients. 2006.

Grant JM, Mottet LA, Tanis J, Herman JL, Harrison J, Keisling M. National
Transgender Discrimination Survey Report on Health and Health Care. 2010.

Hanssmann C, Morrison D, Russian E. Talking, Gawking, or Getting It Done:

Provider Trainings to Increase Cultural and Clinical Competence for
Transgender and Gender-Nonconforming Patients and Clients. Sexuality
Research & Social Policy. 2008;5(1):5–23.

Heck JE, Sell RL, Gorin SS. Health care access among individuals involved in
same-sex relationships. American journal of public health.
2006;96(6):1111–1118. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef]

Joint Commission. Advancing Effective Communication, Cultural

Competence, and Patient- and Family-Centered Care for the Lesbian, Gay,
Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Community: A Field Guide. Oak Brook, IL:
Oct, 2011.

Kaestle CE, Waller MW. Bacterial STDs and perceived risk among sexual
minority young adults. Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.
2011;43(3):158–163. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] Marrazzo J,
Coff