Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Tetraether (GDGT)
Yang Yu
1
Abstract
understand the earth’s past. Various biomarkers have been used to assist us in the
reconstruction of the paleoclimate. In recent year one molecule that is commonly found
glycerol tetraether (GDGT), is a lipid molecule that can record changes in temperature
be exclusive to extremophiles, GDGTs recently have been found in nearly every type of
GDGTs are poorly understood and puts certain constraints on their uses. Future works
2
Introduction
preferential use in the last two decades. These lipid molecules are can be robust in
environments where skeletal remains are not and are uniquely identifiable. One of the
popular biomarker used to great effect in the Paleocene is the alkenones and its UK37
index. Derived from marine haptophyte algae, it can accurately predict mid-paleocene
aged sea surface temperatures (SST) (Marlowe et al., 1984). Yet its limitation is just
that; the haptophyte algae species the index and biomarker is based on is a recently
evolved species (Marlowe et al., 1984). One cannot accurately assess whether ancient
ancestral algae produced the lipid molecules the same way under the same conditions.
Another limitation with alkenone calibration is the fact that the upper temperature limit is
around 28° C (Marlowe et al., 1984). This can be a problem for studies in the tropics or
Glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraether was first discovered in the 1970s via cultures
found in thermal hot springs as high as 90° C or even in high pressure low temperature
environments. Robust and nearly impenetrable to ions and protons, these membranes
help them survive such conditions (Tierney 2012). In recent decades, these Archaea
microbes have been found in more environment outside of extreme conditions. These
3
GDGTs have been the backbone of studies in the early 2000s by researchers interested
temperatures and pH; the reactions to these stressors have been well demonstrated in
both natural and culture samples (Tierney 2012). As environmental stress increases,
the GDGT structure will include more cyclopentane rings (Tierney 2012). One of the
theories as to why this happens is that these rings gives increased stability due to
denser packing of the GDGT molecule and also decreases the general permeability of
GDGT Types
Structurally, there are two distinct types of GDGT molecules: the isoGDGT and
the brGDGT. The isoGDGT is so called due to the inclusion of an isoprenoid functional
group with in their molecular structure as seen in figure 1 (Tierney 2012). isoGDGTs
consists of two head-to-head C40 isoprenoid chains and some variations includes
cyclopentane and cyclohexane rings that are connected by ether bonds to two terminal
glycerol groups (Tierney 2012). This type of GDGTs are produced by the Archaea
(Tierney 2012). Each species will often produce different kinds of isoGDGT. The
are applied to Thaumarchaeota is the ubiquitous producer such as oceans and lakes.
They can make up to 20% of the ocean’s picoplankton (Brochier-Armanet et al., 2008).
Though Thaumarchaeota can be found in soils, they do not produce significantly there
4
property in which they will produce GDGT crenarchaeols that has a cyclohexyl ring in
addition to the regular cyclopentane rings (Brochier-Armanet et al., 2008). This usually
happens under moderate to high temperature conditions and is a useful marker for such
The other GDGT, brGDGT is a bit less understood than the isoGDGTs. They
were first discovered not from bacterial cultures but from natural samples from a Dutch
peat (Naafs 2017). Unlike the isoGDGTs produces by microbes of the Archaea
Domain, the structure of brGDGTs indicates to researchers that they are more likely to
have been produces by bacteria (Naafs 2017). Even though like isoGDGTs they share
features such as ether bonds on terminal glycerol groups, the branched structure and
the stereochemistry of the glycerol groups points to bacterial origins (Figure 1) (Naffs
2017). Compared to isoGDGTs, brGDGTs are also more commonly found in soils and
peats and conversely, less so in pelagic marine environments (Tierney 2012). Even
though there are hints as to the terrestrial origin of the brGDGT lipids, the primary
producers for the compounds are poorly understood (Ding 2015). So far, one strain of
Acidobacteria have been proven to produce one of nine types of brGDGT (brGDGT-I)
(Tierney 2012).
One of the reasons that GDGTs were not utilized until recent decades is the
discovered in the 70s and observed in modern and ancient sedimentary deposits since
then but were hard to analyze using gas chromatography since the molecules were too
5
possible (Schouten et al. 2007). GDGTs can typically be analyzed in 60-70 minutes
after they are extracted and purified with column chromatography (Schouten et al.
2007). The extraction itself is relatively simple, commonly using dichloromethane and
The way that isoGDGTs respond to changes in temperature is crucial for its use.
GDGTs with higher number of rings will have a higher melting point and more stable at
higher ringed isoGDGTs were used by Schouten et al. (2003) to construct an index that
reflects the degree of cyclization of isoGDGTs. This index is called the TetraEther index
of 86 carbons, or TEX86 for short. The equation in figure 2 is used to calculate this index;
(Schouten et al. 2003). In Table 1, we see the TEX86 relationships with Sea Surface
0.92 for the original Schouten et al. calculations (2003). There are many different
indices used today, shown in Table 1, are the TEX86H and TEX86L developed by Kim et
al. (2010), and Powers’ et al. (2010) for lake surface temperatures (LST).
brGDGT data generally derives from empirical data derived from soil samples.
The lack of culture study hampers more detail studies and calibrations of the molecule.
6
Regardless, Weijers et al. (2007) managed to identify environmental parameters that
have contributed significantly to the brGDGT forms. The cyclization of brGDGT appears
in the equation in figure 3. The relationship between brGDGT is called the Cyclization
temperature the molecule will experience methylation (Weijers et al. 2007). The
figure 3 (Weijers et al. 2007). The correlation is around r2=0.62 for soil temperature
(represented by Mean Annual Air Temperature-MMAT) (Weijers et al. 2007). While this
correlation is not as strong as the TEX86 index for SST recent effort have attempted to
improve upon this general model. Various calibrations, mostly centered around the use
of 5 and 6 methyl brGDGTs have been able to increase the correlation for terrestrial
environments such as seen in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (r2= 0.82) and peats
(r2=0.76) (Ding et al., 2015 and Naafs et al., 2017). brGDGTs have also been found
abundantly in lake sediments (Tierney 2012). Recent studies of lake sediments have
shown promise, with some results even better than the terrestrial MAAT ones (Tierney
2012).
One of the earliest uses of the TEX86 index was by Schouten et al. (2003) in
application to the cretaceous era warmhouse conditions. The Cretaceous era was a
period where the temperatures on earth was significantly higher than that of today; sea
temperature was so warm that polar ice caps did not exist (Poulsen et al., 1999).
Previous studies have used stable isotope values such as δ18O to calibrate the sea
7
surface temperatures (Price and Hart, 1998). The oxygen isotope value depended on
fossil remains of forams in the Cretaceous sedimentary rocks (Price and Hart, 1998).
Some uncertainties arose by using the δ18O isotope. The ecological properties of the
forams from that geological time can’t be positively connected with the modern day
forams and the way they incorporate oxygen (Wilson et al., 2001). The seawater pH
values and diagenetic overprinting especially in Ocean Anoxic Events often affect the
Schouten et al. (2003) selected the isoGDGT lipids to reconstruct the SST since
they are generously found in the cretaceous rock record, including in organic rich black
shales. They are easily identifiable and well preserved in these rock records. isoGDGT
across 4 different samples were subjugated to the TEX86 proxy which has a correlation
with SST of r2=0.92 (Schouten et al. 2003). The results can be seen in figure 4. The
distribution of isoGDGT species were similar across all the cretaceous rock samples
(Schouten et al. 2003). For isoGDGT I-VII, a high amount of crenarchaeol (V) and a
moderate amount of crearchaeol (VI) were found (Schouten et al. 2003). The 2-3
cyclopentane ringed lipids were also found in moderate abundance while isoGDGT-I,II
were in low abundance (Schouten et al. 2003). Since it has been proven that with
higher temperatures more cyclic GDGTs appears, that the high concentration of higher
temperatures (Schouten et al. 2003). Compared to modern day, the isoGDGT-I,II in the
tropics were of much higher concentrations now than the Cretaceous sedimentary rocks
(Schouten et al. 2003). So, the overall SST of the Cretaceous can exceed even the
warmest regions of modern day oceans. TEX86 values ranged from a lower bound of
8
0.69 in Aptian values to as high as 0.96 in samples from the OAE 2 (Cenomanian-
Turonian) event (Schouten et al. 2003). The SST calibrated from these TEX86 values
are from 27-32° C in the Aptian to 32-36°C in the OAE2, very high compared to present
calculated SST to be around (32-33 ±3°C) are in good agreement with the results of
GDGT based TEX86 index (Price and Hart 1998). Overall TEX86 index was exemplary in
its performance as a SST reconstruction tool in this early study. It was especially
foraminifera can be lacking for δ18O paleothermometry analysis. So, it is a very nice
The Tex86 index have also been successfully used in modern day lake sediments
for Lake Surface Temperature (LST) reconstruction. Tierney et al.’s (2010) work on the
1500 years. Lake Tanganyika is a region where there are limited recent temperature
reconstruction but abundant GDGTs present in the sediment for TEX86 to be applied
In figure 6, the LST trend obtained from TEX86 of the isoGDGTs in lake
amounted to an increase in temperature of up to 2°C in the last 150 years, much higher
than any periods in modern times (Tierney et al., 2010). The LST correlated extremely
well with global temperature recorded in air temperature and indicated global climate
change as the primary factor in LST increase (Tierney et al., 2010). The LST increase
9
was also negatively correlated with the loss of primary productivity in the lake due to an
brGDGTs are not found and used as much in marine sediments as isoGDGTs,
but are abundantly found in soil/peat samples where isoGDGTs are lacking. The use of
brGDGTs is great for terrestrial areas such as that shown in the Qinghai-Tibetan
plateau in the 2015 study by Ding et al. the brGDGT index were used as proxies for
mean annual air temperature (MAAT) and soil pH, with methylization of the molecule
being the primary response to temperature changes. In their articles they used a
recently discovered series of 6-methyl brGDGTs along with the previous 5-methyl
brGDGT to calibrate a more accurate MBT/CBT index for brGDGT the equation of
which is seen in figure 7 (Ding et al., 2015). 30 samples across the relatively arid
Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP) were analyzed and the 6-methyl brGDGTs were found
to be the most abundant brGDGT components (Ding et al., 2015). This is different from
global soil brGDGT levels since the 5-methyl brGDGT is generally the most abundance
(Ding et al., 2015). It shows that brGDGTs will adapt to local changes in conditions
such as moisture as wells temperature (Ding et al., 2015). The soil from which these
results were derived were also leaning towards the alkaline side and thus indicating
Acidobacteria is probably not the producer of these brGDGTs (Ding et al., 2015).
The new brGDGT index was constructed by Ding et al. (2015) after the original
MBT index calibrations showed too much scattering (figure 8). Its inclusion of the 6-
methyl brGDGT improved the overall r2 by 0.2 (Ding et al., 2015). Though Ding et al.
(2015) specified that the calibration for brGDGTs should be done against the local
10
environmental variables. The dry cold environment of the Qinghai Tibetan Plateau and
the abundance of 6-methyl brGDGTs necessitated such a calibration (Ding et al., 2015).
The overall results for MAAT correlation was excellent as seen in figure 9.
calibration for temperature and pH was introduced. Naafs et al. (2017) analyzed peats
in part because the environmental factors of temperature and pH and its effect on
brGDGT in peats as opposed to soil was not well defined (Naafs et al., 2017). 470
samples across 96 peatlands were obtained to construct this new calibration figure 10
The majority of brGDGTs found in peats are brGDGT-I and II (up to 99%
brGDGT-I in tropical peats), with some brGDGT-III dominance in high latitude peats
(Naafs et al., 2017). This is interesting as global brGDGTs are dominated by 4,5 and 6
methyl brGDGTs (Naafs et al., 2017). It was found that with increasing depth GDGT
et al., 2017) Yet oxygen content did not affect the distribution of brGDGTs as first
hypothesized based on similar situation in stratified lake systems (Naafs et al., 2017).
In fact, the only affect that anoxic conditions in peat seems to have is to increase the
overall production of brGDGTs (Naafs et al., 2017). This might be because in peat the
primary producers of brGDGTs might be anaerobes, where they are more active in
shallow layers and increasing in abundance deeper into the peat layers (Naafs et al.,
2017).
11
The TEX86 index constructed from isoGDGTs and MBT/CBT index are
demonstrated to be great tools for SST, LST and MAAT reconstruction. GDGTs are still
relatively new and several factors must be considered that can put a constraint on the
oceans. Yet there are debates to as how much contribution come from other Archae
family members, of which there are many different types. For example, the mesophilic
marine environments (Schouten et al., 2008). Special care must also be taken when
dominate, since they can produce significant amounts of isoGDGTs 0-3 (Wakeham et
al. 2003). One such problem was examined by Zhang et al. in a 2016 study in a
stratified lake with anoxic conditions showed that the temperature predicted by the
TEX86 index was much lower than the other index techniques. In fact, this is a trend in
anoxic areas across the globe, where there is a certain cold bias when applying the
standard TEX86 index to oxygen deprived areas (Zhang et al. 2016). This is because
the previously mentioned Archaea species will contribute high amounts of isoGDGT 0-3,
inflating its concentration and making the end TEX86 value to be lower than it normally is
depth (100-200m) as well as sea-surface (Huguet et al., 2007). This creates the
possibility that TEX86 index can sometimes reflect temperatures in the subsurface ocean
rather than the SST (Huguet et al., 2007). The good news is that SST is strongly
12
correlated with subsurface temperature nearly everywhere in the ocean. The problem
areas come around the near-shore and upwelling zones, where TEX86 will biased
toward subsurface temperatures (Huguet et al., 2007). Additionally, there are some
For brGDGTs, the main concern is that only one producer for brGDGTs have
problem since there are 9 different species, of which brGDGT-V and VI are widely
temperature and pH on, the index accuracy and understanding can suffer (Tierney
pH, moisture level, and oxygen content (Ding et al. 2015). It may be that brGDGTs
and a global calibration of soil brGDGTs not as useful (Ding et al. 2015).
Local calibrations are important for lake surface temperatures for both brGDGTs
and isoGDGTs. Both of which are affected by oxygen level in the lake and brGDGTs
affected by the pH values (Zhang et al. 2016). Different species of Archaea living can
also affect isoGDGT distribution when using the TEX86 indices (Zhang et al. 2016).
Though there are recent calibrations accounting for that (Power et al., 2010).
As for degradation of lipid molecules, the GDGTs are quite robust molecules that
do not get altered much as it falls through the water column after the organism dies
(Tierney 2012). Much of which is consumed and deposited rapidly as fecal matter,
13
preserving it in the sedimentary records (Tierney 2012). There is a concern with
thermal maturation, at 240C-300C GDGT will began to crack and degrade (Tierney
2012). Thus, GDGTs should not be used with thermally mature samples (Tierney
2012).
GDGTs overall represent a new and robust way to characterize and reconstruct
paleotemperature profiles. They can be used for terrestrial, marine and lacustrine
environmental across a significantly wide range of temperature and geologic age. Much
of the field remains to be refined, providing space for many future endeavors to
investigate.
14
References
• Brochier-Armanet, C., Boussau, C., Gribaldo, S., and Forterre, P., 2008.
• Ding, S., Xu, Y., Wang, Y., He, Y., Hou, J., Chen, L., and He, J.S., 2015.
• Gliozzi, A., Paoli, G., De Rosa, M., and Gambacorta, A., 1983. Effect of
234-242.
• Huget, C., Schimmelmann, A., Thunell, R., Lourens, L, Sinninghe Damste, J.s.,
and Schouten, S., 2007 A study of the TEX86 paleo thermometer in the water
22, PA3203.
• Kaiser, J., Schouten, S., Kilian, R., Arz, H.W., Lamy, F., Sinninghe Damaste,
J.S., 2015. Isoprenoid and branched GDGT-based proxies for surface sediments
• Kim, J., Van Der Meer, J., Schouten, S., Helmke, P., Willmott, V., Sangiorgi, F.,
Koc, N., Hopmans, E., Sinninghe Damste, J. S., 2010. New indices and
15
lipids: Implications for past sea surface temperature reconstructions. Geochimica
• Liu, Z., Pagani, M., Zinniker, D, Deconto, R., Huber, M., Brinkhuis, H., Sha, S.,
Leckie, R., and Pearson, A., 2009. Global cooling during the Eocene-Oligocene
• Marlowe, I., Green J., Neal, A., Brassell S., Eglinton, G., and Course P., 1984.
alkenones and other lipids and their taxonomic significance. British Phycological
• Naafs, B.D.A., Inglis, G.N., Zheng, Y., Amesbury, M.J., Biester, H., Bindler, R.,
Blewett, J., Burrows, M.A., Castillow Torres, del D., Chambers, F.M., Cohen,
A.D., Evershed, R.P., Feakins, S.J., Galka, M., Gallego-Sala, A., Gandois, L.,
Gray, D.M., Hatcher, P.G., and Pancost, R.D., 2017. Introducing global peat-
• Poulsen, C.J., Barron, E.J, Peterson, W.H., and Wilson, P.A., 1999. A
Hopmans, E. C., Schouten, S., 2010. Applicability and calibration of the TEX86
16
• Price, G.D., and Hart, M.B., 1998. Low-Latitude sea-surface temperatures for the
• Schouten, S., Hopmans, E.C., Forster, A., Van Breugel, Y., Kuypers, M.M.M.,
• Schouten, S., Huguet, C., Hopmans, E.C., Kienhuis, M.V.M., and Sinninghe
• Schouten, S., Van Der Meer, Hopmans, E., and Sinninghe Damste, J.S., 2008.
5342-5346.
• Thierstein,H., Geitznaeur K., and Molfino B., Shackleton, N., 1977. Global
• Tierney, J.E., Russell, J.M., Huang, Y., Sinninghe Damste, J.S., Hopmans, E.C.,
17
distributions in tropical east African Lake sediments. Geochimica et
• Wakeham, S.G., Lewis, C., Hopmans, E.C.., Schouten, S., and Sinninghe
euxinic waters of the black sea. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 67, 1359-
1374.
• Weijers, J.W.J., Schouten, S., Sluijs, A., Brinkhuis, H., and Sinninghe Damste,
• Weijers, J.W.J., Schouten, S., Van Den Donker, J.C., Hopmans, E.C., and
703-713.
• Wilson, P.A., and Norris, R.D., 2001. Warm tropical ocean surface and global
• Zhang, Z., Smittenberg, R.H., and Bradley, R.S, 2016. GDGT distribution in a
18
Table 1: TEX86 calibrations (Tierney 2012)
19
Figure 1: a general overview of the GDGT molecular structures (Tierney 2012).
Figure 4: Holocene TEX86 Index calibrations used with Cretaceous rock sediments (gray
Figure 5: Cretaceous SST juxtaposed with present day values as obtained with TEX86
Figure 6: LST of Lake Tanganyika in the last 1500 years as calculated with TEX86
Figure 7: New MBT/CBT equation for 6-methyl branch brGDGT heavy soil (Ding et al.,
2015).
Figure 9: New plot using new equation shows much better correlation with mean annual
Figure 10: Equations used for MBT/CBT calculations for brGDGT in peat (Naafs et al.,
2017)
20
Figure 1
Figure 2
21
Figure 3
Figure 4
22
Figure 5
Figure 6
23
Figure 7
Figure 8
24
Figure 9
Figure 10
25