Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Microgeneration
Dr. Inmaculada Zamora, Jose Ignacio San Martin, Angel Javier Mazón,
José Javier San Martı́n, and Victor Aperribay
Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
2. GAS MICROTURBINES
Fuel
H2O H2O
HEATING / COOLING COMBUSTOR
TURBO
ALTERNATOR 3
Axis
G
COMPRESSOR TURBINE
1
AIR FILTER
DC BUS
A
B
C
N
RECTIFIER INVERTER
OUT
150-480 V
BATTERY 50 Hz
Microturbines have got regulation units that allow doing the following
functions: controlling every subsystem, controlling the flow of fuel, converting
and adapting the electrical signals for their use in the conventional electric
network, voltage regulation and output frequency, etc.
It usually has sealed batteries that can be recharged with commercial
chargers or connection to the net. Batteries are necessary in order to start
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol3/iss2/art1092
Zamora et al.: Emergent Technologies In Electrical Microgeneration 3
without connection to the net “black start”. They allows managing the power
transients, supplying electric energy during the high peaks and absorbing
energy when power decreases quickly.
The used fuels can be natural gas, GLP (commercial butane and propane),
diesel, kerosene, biogas, hydrogen, etc.
Finally, related to the air emissions, they are very low when operating a
full load or even above 60-70% of full load. The main primary pollutants
emitted by microturbines are nitrogen oxides NOX and carbon monoxide CO.
CO emissions are strongly dependents of the load operation, showing peaks in
the starting up.
We + Qhr (2)
Eg =
Qf
Numerical analysis developed for different ambient temperatures [9] show
that with colder temperatures, efficiencies increase notably. By other hand,
although the electric efficiency of the gas microturbine is lower than the
bigger gas turbines, it must be keep in mind that microturbines will be
used mainly in combined systems (thermal and electric power) and the
global efficiency parameter plays an important roll in this case.
4.- Power quality. One of the key parameters to define power quality is
the harmonic content of the generated signal. In analyses developed for
different public and private entities, a light distortion in the voltage and
current waveforms can be appreciated (third harmonic). However the
power generated complies with the voltage distortion limits indicated in
the standards [10-11]. Also, it can be observed that with low loads,
waveform has a bigger but not very significant distortion. Finally, no
fluctuations in voltage stability have been recorded in any tests at any
electrical loads. Neither, have differences been found between the power
quality supplied when the turbine is operated as a stand-alone or as a grid
connected system.
− Stand-Alone systems.
− Grid Connected systems.
− Dual Mode systems with automatic transition between stand-alone
and grid operation modes.
− Multipack systems. This system consists on the interconnection of
many microturbines in parallel to produce a higher electrical output
and working together as a single system.
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol3/iss2/art1092
Zamora et al.: Emergent Technologies In Electrical Microgeneration 5
without
0,6 regenerator
T3 = 1465 K
0,5 t =T3 / T1 = 5
T1 = 273 K
0,4
T3 = 1092 K
t =T3 / T1 = 4
T1 = 273 K
0,3
T3 = 819 K
t =T3 / T1 = 3
0,2 T1 = 273 K
0,1
Pressure ratio , r
5 10 15 20 25
Table I
Microturbines characteristics
Electric Fuel Electric Exhaust Thermal NOx
recovered
power comsumption efficiency gas flow power emissions
Turbec
105 kW 350 kW 30% 0,80 kg/s 167 kW < 15 ppm / v
T 100
Bowman
80 kW 285,1 kW 27% 0,83 kg/s 150 kW N.A.
TG 80
3. FUEL CELLS
Hydrogen Fuel In
ANODE 2 H2 + 2 O-2 2H 2O + 4 e-
Load
O-2 ions through electrolyte Power Out
Oxygen (air) In
CATHODE O2 + 4 e- 2 O-2
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol3/iss2/art1092
Zamora et al.: Emergent Technologies In Electrical Microgeneration 7
As shown, hydrogen fuel enters the anode and combines with oxygen ions to
form steam and four electrons. These electrons are forced through a load as
electricity and enter the cathode to combine with oxygen to produce the
oxygen ions that flow through the electrolyte. The oxygen is provided by air.
The excess air exits at elevated temperature and can be used to run the
microturbine. The solid oxide runs at the highest operating temperature of all
types of fuel cells.
In figure 4, the connection of fuel cells to an electrical microgrid is shown.
These cells supply continuous current. An elevator converter adjusts the fuel
cell voltage level in order to feed an inverter. Thus, the inverter provides a
three-phase alternate current. Finally, a transformer connects the inverter to
the electrical microgrid. The transformer neutral point is connected to ground
and to the microgrid neutral conductor, [13].
A
FUEL CELL B
C
N
INVERTER
⎡ ⎤
R ⋅ T ⎜⎛ pH 2 ⋅ pO22 ⎟⎞ ⎥
1
⎢ (3)
V = N 0 ⋅ E0 +
r
ln − r ⋅ I rfc
fc
⎢ 2⋅ F ⎜ pH 2O ⎟ ⎥
⎣ ⎝ ⎠⎦
where:
E0 Voltage associated with free reaction energy (V)
PH 2 , PO2 , PH 2O Partial fractions of the component (N/m2)
N0 Number of cells
r Electric resistance of the fuel cell (Ω)
I rfc Reaction current or output current (A)
R Universal gas constant (J/mol K)
T Channel temperature, supposed as a constant (K)
F Faraday constant (Coulombs/mol)
Regarding the temperature, four models (AFC, PEMFC, DMFC, PAFC) are
considered of low temperature and two models (MCFC and SOFC) of high
temperature. Figure 5 shows the ranges, reactions and features of the different
fuel cells.
ANODE ELECTROLYTE CATHODE
EXTERNAL
REFORMER PAFC H2 O O2 (air)
H2 CO2 H+
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol3/iss2/art1092
Zamora et al.: Emergent Technologies In Electrical Microgeneration 9
In Table II, the fuel cells characteristics that are being developed currently are
presented. Polymeric and phosphoric acid cells are in a nearer stage of
commercialization than the other alternatives. This doesn’t mean that there is a
clear winner, since the different technologies are oriented towards different
sectors of the market.
Table II
Fuel cells characteristics
AFC PEMFC DMFC PAFC MCFC SOFC
40% (CH4)
Efficiency 55 - 60% 32 - 40% 36 - 45% 50 - 60% 50 - 60%
60% (H2)
4. PHOTOVOLTAIC PLANTS
4.1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
A
B
C
DC - DC DC - AC
PV CELL
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol3/iss2/art1092
Zamora et al.: Emergent Technologies In Electrical Microgeneration 11
There are several models to represent solar cell behaviour. One of the most
interesting is the equivalent electrical model with an only diode, which has a
moderate complexity [17]. The model includes temperature dependence of the
photo-current IL and the saturation current of the diode I0. A series resistance
RS is included, but not a shunt resistance. Also, a single shunt diode is used
with the diode quality factor set to achieve the best curve match. This model is
a simplified version of the two diode model. The equations which describe the
I-V characteristics of the cell are the following:
(
I = I L − I 0 e q(V + IRS ) / nkT − 1 ) ; I L = I L(T1 ) (1 + K 0 (T − T1 )) (4)
I L(T1 ) = G ∗ I SC(T1 ,nom) / G(nom) (
; K 0 = I SC(T2 ) − I SC(T1 ) / T2 − T1 )
I 0 = I 0(T1 ) ∗ (T / T1 ) n ∗ e
3 − qVg / nk ∗(1 / T −1 / T1 )
(
; I 0(T1 ) = I SC(T1 ) / e
qVOC ( T1 ) / nkT1
−1 )
qVOC (T1 ) / nkT1
RS = −dV / dIVOC − 1 / X V ; X V = I 0(T1 ) ∗ q / nkT1 ∗ e
where:
G Radiation in W·m2
T Temperature, in K
T1 25 +273, en K
k Boltzman Constant
q Electron load
VOC Open circuit voltage for the cell
ISC Short circuit current for the cell
n Ideality factor, 1< n <2, being typical n = 1.3
With these hypotheses, the power out of the photovoltaic plant is obtained
with the expression (5), [18].
Ga ⎡ M ⎛ NOCT − 20 ⎞⎤
PMax = N ⎢ PMax ,0 + µ PMax ⎜ Ta + Ga − 25 ⎟ ⎥ (5)
1000 ⎣ ⎝ 800 ⎠⎦
being:
N, Number of modules of the PV array
Ga , Radiation [W/m2]
M
PMax ,0 , Module maximum power under standard conditions
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol3/iss2/art1092
Zamora et al.: Emergent Technologies In Electrical Microgeneration 13
PV PV
DC
PV PV AC
MICROGRID
PV PV
DC
PV AC
DC
PV AC MICROGRID
PV PV
DC
AC
PV PV
MICROGRID
PV PV
DC
AC
PV PV
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol3/iss2/art1092
Zamora et al.: Emergent Technologies In Electrical Microgeneration 15
PV
DC
DC
PV
DC
AC
MICROGRID
PV
DC
DC
PV
5. EOLIC MICROTURBINES
Wind turbines standard IEC 1400-2, contemplate the small wind turbines,
establishing that they are considered like “wind turbines with a reception
surface lower than 40 m2 for producing electricity”. However, this issue is
pretended to be modified and one of the foreseen changes is embracing wind
turbines of almost 200m2 of swept area.
Over surface layer, a typical equation that allows obtaining the wind variation
with the height is given by equation (6), [21].
⎡ ⎛ z ⎞ ⎤
v = 2.5 u ∗ ⎢ Ln ⎜ ⎟ + Ψ⎥ (6)
⎣ ⎝ zo ⎠ ⎦
being:
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol3/iss2/art1092
Zamora et al.: Emergent Technologies In Electrical Microgeneration 17
V1 Vturbine V2
1 π D 2 16
Pm = ρ V13 (7)
2 4 27
being:
µ, air viscosity
k, blades surface ruggedness
β, pitch angle
ψ, orientation rotation angle
Ω, angular speed
ΩD
Where a specific speed coefficient, λ, is defined as: λ= (10)
2V1
For a preset form machine it can be said that the power coefficient only
depends on λ and β.
Cp = f (β , λ ) (11)
The figure 12 shows a typical form of this functional dependency.
CP
0.4
0.3
0.2 β = 0º
2,5º
5º
0.1
10º
20º
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 λ
Figure 12: Power coefficient curves in function of specific blade tip speed,
λ and pitch angle, β
-3
Cq x10
20
15
β = 0º
10 2,5º
5º
5
10º
20º
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 λ
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol3/iss2/art1092
Zamora et al.: Emergent Technologies In Electrical Microgeneration 19
β = 0º
0.8
2,5º
0.6
0.4 5º
0.2
10º
20º
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 λ
Figure 14: Push coefficient curves in function of specific blade tip speed, λ
and pitch angle, β
Figure 15 shows the curves that give the power coefficient Cp, as a function of
the adimensional speed blade tip, λ, for different typical configurations of
wind turbines, maintaining fix the pitch angle. It can be observed like
machines with older design give smaller values of Cp and with smaller values
of λ.
Glauert limit Betz limit (CP=0,59)
0,6
0,5 3 blades
2 blades
Power coefficient (CP)
0,4
0,3
1 blade
Darrieus
0,2 rotor
Multiblade
rotor
0,1
Savonious
rotor
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Figure 15: Power coefficient curves in function of specific blade tip speed
λ, with pitch angle constant
RECTIFIER INVERTER
Figure 16: Small wind turbine connection to a microgrid
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol3/iss2/art1092
Zamora et al.: Emergent Technologies In Electrical Microgeneration 21
6. STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES
6.1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The most frequently used systems are shown in figure 17. They can be divided
in indirect and direct storage. The later have fewer energy transformations,
better energy efficiency and fewer devices than the former.
• Batteries
Artificial reservoir • Flywheels
• Pumped Hydro
INDIRECT • Heat
STORAGE • Compressed Air
• Hydrogen
Natural reservoir
ENERGY
STORAGE
Magnetically SMES
DIRECT
STORAGE
Electrically Supercapacitors
COMPRESSED
METAL-AIR AIR
BATTERIES FLOW BATTERIES
PUMP
STORAGE
NAS BATTERY
Maximum Discharge Time
ADVANCED
BATTERIES
LEAD-ACID BATTERIES
SUPERCAPACITORS
Minutes
HIGH ENERGY
FLYWHEELS
Seconds
1 kW 10 kW 100 kW 1 MW 10 MW 100 MW
6.2. BATTERIES
Lead Acid Batteries, available almost in any size, are the traditional method to
storage electrical energy. So, high number of uninterrupted supply systems
consists of batteries.
Usually, battery capacity is defined by the quantity of Ah that the battery is
capable of downloading after a load process. It depends on the applied current
to the battery during the downloading process, as well as the final voltage,
according with the values given by the manufacturer. New technologies have
increased the life cycle and energy density.
Unfortunately, their volume and weight make no possible their exclusive
use. Electrical power range that is able to supply is, at levels of 500 W to 10
kW, 72 hours. Lithium Ion Batteries, normally, provide 170 Wh/kg. In about
20 years, it is expected that they will evolve until providing 200-300Wh/kg.
Nickel Metal Hydride Batteries provide approximately 100Wh/kg. Dry
Lithium Polymer Cells advance that, in 2007, they will be able to provide a
energy density around 200Wh/kg. By contrast, traditional Lead Acid Batteries,
of low cost, have an energy density about 45Wh/kg.
Table III shows the most relevant properties of these devices.
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol3/iss2/art1092
Zamora et al.: Emergent Technologies In Electrical Microgeneration 23
Table III
Batteries features
Maximum Discharge Response Energy
TECHNOLOGIES Efficiency Lifetime
power rating time time related cost
Advanced battery
50 kW ~ 2 hours < 5 ms 0.7 > 10 years 200 €/kWh
Zn/Br
Advanced battery
300 kW ~ 1 hour ─ 0.7 5 years 245 €/kWh
Na/S
Table IV
SMES features
Maximum Discharge Response Energy
TECHNOLOGIES Efficiency Lifetime
power rating time time related cost
6.4. FLYWHEELS
Flywheel storage devices store electric power in a kinetic way of a revolving
mass.
1
kinetic Energy = ⋅ I ⋅ ω 2 , where I = moment of inertia
2
Table V
Flywheels features
Maximum Discharge Response Energy
TECHNOLOGIES Efficiency Lifetime
power rating time time related cost
Flywheel:
1650 kW 3 – 120 sec < 20 ms 0.9 20 years 300 €/kWh
Low speed
Flywheel:
750 kW ~ 1 hour < 20 ms 0.93 20 years 25000 €/kWh
High speed
6.5. SUPERCAPACITORS
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol3/iss2/art1092
Zamora et al.: Emergent Technologies In Electrical Microgeneration 25
Capacity values are of hundred of Farads, several times bigger than the
capacity of a conventional capacitor. They have efficiencies typically from
85% to 98%, bigger than the best battery and can operate in a wide range of
temperatures and humidity conditions. There are commercial products with
ratios of 2MVA and with 400 kJ of storage energy.
Supercapacitors are interesting in the field of fuel cells, because they are
complementary devices. On this way, whereas cell is able to produce electric
energy in a continuous way, supercapacitor is able to supply peaks of energy.
Both devices are connected in parallel, coordinated by means of an interface.
Table VI shows the most relevant properties of these devices.
Table VI
Supercapacitors feautures
Maximum Discharge Response Energy
TECHNOLOGIES Efficiency Lifetime
power rating time time related cost
10.000 82.000 €/
Supercapacitors 100 kW 10 sec < 5 ms 0.9
cycles kWh
Table VII
CAES features
Maximum Discharge Response Energy
TECHNOLOGIES Efficiency Lifetime
power rating time time related cost
Table VIII
Pumped hydro features
Maximum Discharge Response Energy
TECHNOLOGIES Efficiency Lifetime
power rating time time related cost
7. CONCLUSIONS
Modern energy generation microsystems are acquiring more importance
because they are implying DG in the residential and domestic area. Some
technologies like microturbines, fuel cells and photovoltaic systems of low
cost have just been incorporated to microgeneration. Besides, because of
dimensions of the areas where they are focused, they have a strategic
importance.
This paper has presented the most relevant properties of these
microgeneration technologies, power range, operation modalities, efficiencies,
operation temperatures, electronic devices associated to their integration in
microgrids, etc.
Modifications in the electric system operation standards and the
integration in the network of small generators, suggest a promising future in
this field. Several technologies have already been highlighted by their high
efficiency and contribution to the sustained development.
A very high potential market exists for the installation of these
technologies of electric microgeneration, which also include heat and cold
production, and energy storage. Nevertheless, they require to be investigated
more in depth to get a better knowledge about their characteristics.
In relation to the storage technologies, currently investigations are being
developed focused to the adaptation of the big ones to the power ranges of the
electric microgeneration.
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol3/iss2/art1092
Zamora et al.: Emergent Technologies In Electrical Microgeneration 27
REFERENCES
[1] Ph. Strauss, W. Kleinkauf, J. Reekers, G. Cramer, G. Betzios: Kythnos Island 19 Years
Experience of Renewable Energy Integration. International Conference Renewable
Energies for Islands, Chania / Kreta, Greece, 14-16 June 2001.
[2] P.G. Pligoropoulos, E.K. Bakis (PPC) Athens (Greece). A Engler, M. Vandenbergh, P.
Strauss. IEET. Kassel (Germany). Wind diesel battery systems for the Greek Islands.
2nd European PV-Hybrid and Mini-Grid Conference. Kassel, 2003.
[3] B. Buchholz, H. Frey, N. Lewald, T. Stephanblome, Z. Styczynski, C. Schwaegert, Otto
von Guericke. Siemens AG, Erlangen. EnBW, Karlsruhe. Stadtwerke, Karlsruhe GmbH.
EUS Gmbh, Dortmund. Universität Magdeburg. Germany.
[4] D. Satué, X. Vallvé, “Multi-User Solar Hybrid Mini-Grids for Electrification of Isolated
Sites” EuroCaribbean RES Conference. Saint Lucia, 2002.
[5] RESPIRE Project. Number NNES-2001-00740. Fifth Framework Programme “EESD”
ENERGIE. EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
[6] N. Hatziargyriou et al., “Energy Management and Control of Island Power System with
Increased Penetration from Renewable Energy Sources”, IEEE PES, Vol. 1, pp 335-339,
2002.
[7] P.A. Pilavachi, “Mini and Micro-gas Turbines for Combined Heat and Power”. Applied
Thermal Engineering, 22, 2003-2014, 2002.
[8] M. Nagpal, A. Moshref, G.K. Morison, et al., “Experience with testing and modelling of
gas turbines”, Proceedings of the IEEE/PES 2001 Winter Meeting, pp. 652-656,
Columbus, Ohio, USA, January/February 2001.
[9] J.C. Bruno, LI. Massagués, A. Coronas; “Power Quality and Air Emission Tests in a
Micro Gas Turbines Cogeneration Plant”. International Conference on Renewable
Energy and Power Quality. Vigo, Spain. 2003.
[10] “519 IEEE Recommended Practices and Requirements for Harmonic Control in
Electrical Power Systems”, 1992.
[11] “CENELEC EN 50160 Voltage Characteristics of Electricity Supplied by Public
Distribution Systems”, 1999.
[12] I. Zamora, J.I. San Martín, A.J. Mazón, S. Díaz, J.J. San Martín, J.Mª. Arrieta, V.
Aperribay “Performance analysis of fuel cells by modelling”. International Conference
on Renewable Energies and Power Quality. Zaragoza, Spain. March 2005.
[13] D. Audring, G. Balzer; “Supplying Micro-Grids with Stationary Fuel Cell Systems”.
17th International Conference on Electricity Distribution. Barcelona. Spain. 2003.
[14] J. Padullés, A. Dysko, J.R. McDonall, “Modelling and Control aspects of a fuel cell
power plant exposed to transients in power output”, IEE UKACC International
Conference on Control, Cambridge, September 2000.
[15] Y. Zhu, K. Tomsovic, “Development if models for analysing load following
performance of microturbines and fuell cells”, Electric Power Systems Research 62, pp
1-11, 2002.
[16] A. Creus, “Renewable Eenergies”, Technical Editorial.CEYSA, 2004.
[17] J.A. Gow, C.D. Manning. “Development of a Photovoltaic Array Model for Use in
Power-Electronics Simulation Studies”, IEE Proceedings on Electric Power
Applications, vol. 146, no. 2, pp. 193-200, March 1999.
[18] European Project Large Scale Integration of Micro-Generation to Low Voltage Grids.
WORK PACKAGE A. December 2003.
[19] E. Lorenzo, “Solar electricity: Engineering of photovoltaic systems”, IES. UPM. 1999.
[20] P. Sanchis, I. Arocena, “Present state and perspectives about renewable energies,
photovoltaic and eolic systems”, Ed. Ulzama Digital, 2004.
[21] J.L. Rodríguez, J.C. Burgos, S. Arnalte “Aeolic Systems for the Production of Electric
Energy”. Rueda Editorial S.L., Madrid. Spain. 2003.
[22] S. J. Chapman “Electric Machinery Fundamentals”, 2nd edition, New York: McGraw-
Hill, 1991.
[23] P.C. Krause, “Analysis of Electric Machinery”, IEEE Press, 1994.
[24] N. Hatziargyriou et al., “Modelling New Forms of Generation and Storage”, CIGRE
Brouche TF 38.01.10, April 2001.
[25] “Study of Electricity Storage Technologies. Final Report Project-RE/HC/03/001.
Funded by SEI, 2004.
http://www.bepress.com/ijeeps/vol3/iss2/art1092