Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Advantage
Module 3
Module Objectives
Describing a Collaborative
Regional Economic
Development Framework
Factor quantity,
From Porter (May, quality, cost
2000; 1990)
Businesses, Industries & Places
• Economic value is created by the business enterprise,
but industries and places help shape, nourish, sustain
or erode it
• The source of place prosperity in Porter’s diamond
theory is consistent with many other regional macro
theories
– Entrepreneurship
– Creative destruction,
– Endogenous growth
– Innovation
Regional Competitive Advantage
• Businesses are competitive to the degree they are
able to generate profits in contested markets
• Places are “competitive” to the degree their
residents are able to build wealth
• Local private sector businesses are not the sole
source of wealth building opportunities for
residents
– Other sources are government & non-profit
organizations, investments & transfers, non-local
businesses
Geography of Wealth Creation
• Origins of • Examples:
wealth – A business that draws on a regional
creation in labor pool to achieve productivity
a place are gains & thus profits
rarely – A supplier business serving a distant
strictly market
local – Faculty at a local university
conducting federally funded R&D
– Restaurants & hotels serving tourists
visiting multiple nearby destinations
– Consumer services industries
targeting retirees
Lessons
• We can think of the competitive advantage of a place
in terms of the sources of local wealth creation
• Some of those sources are regional, others are
national or global
– Moreover…the geographies of wealth creation are
becoming increasingly complex
• We can define the analysis supporting regional
strategic planning as an effort to identify the sources
of local wealth creation in a set of places for which
economic opportunities are jointly determined
II.
Organizing the Analysis
Five Overall Guides
• Building blocks of local wealth creation
• Flexible understanding of geography
• Comprehensive versus focused
• Analysis as ongoing inquiry, not a one-time
enterprise
• Analyze—report—interpret—adjust—analyze:
Build leadership into the analysis phase
1) Five Building Blocks
• A way to organize inquiry into the sources of
regional wealth creation
What you make, including ECONOMIC ENTRE- Your capacity to create
your existing & BASE PRENEURSHIP companies wholly new or
prospective industry from existing firms
clusters
More employment
Megaregion
40%
Geography as
35%
indicator
30%
25%
20% Employment growth
15%
by state, 1989-99
10%
5%
0%
US NC GA MA MI PA TX VA
3) Comprehensive vs. Focused Analysis
• We have a specific issue Comprehensive
or problem that needs to • We seek a full picture of
be addressed our region’s economy,
• We need analysis to in order to form a
know what to do about general strategy
it – Broad scope makes
– Clear problem statement analysis more complex
helps narrow the scope, and involved
methods and data – Potential for high costs
in time and effort
Focused
Comprehensive: Organize Findings
using SWOT Framework
External Appraisal Internal Appraisal
Threats &
Strengths &
Opportunities in
Weaknesses of Region
Environment
Creation of Strategy
4) Analysis as Ongoing Inquiry
• One-time studies of limited value
– Trends change quickly
– Data collection “start up” costs high
– After comprehensive studies, subsequent planning often
requires additional, focused analysis
– Regional planning process can be used as a way to build
“economic intelligence function”
• Wholly out-sourcing work not recommended
– Need an ability to do analysis to commission, interpret, and
implement analysis
5) Build Leadership into Analysis
• Heavy element of regional analysis is
interpretation, adjustment, and re-analysis
– It is fundamentally exploratory
• Assembled leadership team and stakeholders
for regional planning effort an important
source of expertise
• Analysis gains credibility if leadership
feedback is solicited and incorporated as work
is conducted
Example: Industry Cluster Analysis
Methods typically
quantitative, may Analysis of Industrial Base Ideal is analysis &
use benchmarks planning on an
Initial Target Clusters ID’d ongoing basis
Methods heavily
qualitative, focus
Analysis of Target Clusters: Regional SWOT
group modal
approach Key phase of
Leadership/Stakeholder Review industry cluster
analysis is
Target Refinement/Refocusing
leadership &
Methods heavily stakeholder
qualitative, key review
informant Analysis of Targets: Global Assessment
interviews modal
approach
Strategy Formulation
Strategy Implementation
State
Nation
Working
Region of
Neighbors
Identify Interactions
• Commuter Flows- Census Bureau Journey to Work
– Labor market area
– Net job exporter or net job importer?
– What industrial strengths does your jurisdiction have within the region?
• Trade Flows- Commodity flows
– Clusters of industry chains- industrial cluster analysis
– Value chains of major industries/services
• Demographic needs
– Elderly population, minority communities, school districts
• Existing Administrative Districts
– Federal Reserve Districts
– Homeland Security regions
What Makes Sense
• Sometimes neighboring counties don’t have
anything in common
• Don’t let state lines define regions
• Don’t be afraid to go beyond county lines to
identify townships or major cities for
rural/metro interests
• Find areas that share interests and goals
Planning Region as Labor Market
Legend
Commute Region
Non core
Micropolitan
Metropolitan
Census Urban Areas
Interstate
Highway
Commuting Flows Analysis
Using Regions
• A given place will often have multiple
overlapping and distinct “regions” that are
relevant for economic development
– Appropriate region will depend on strategies and
concerns at hand
• Some regions will only be used for data
analysis and comparison factors
• There is rarely a single definitive region for
any locality
IV.
Tools & Data Overview
Foundations: ECONOMIC
BASE
ENTRE-
PRENEURSHIP
Profiling basic
conditions in the INNOVATION
TALENT & IDEAS
region & regional Location, Infrastructure,
Amenities, Factor Costs
characteristics
IEDC Data Standards as Guide
• 1,200 data elements, 25 • Benchmark one place
spreadsheets against others, observe
• 2/3 of data is available weaknesses/strengths
from public data • Tailor planning
sources, the rest is local approaches
knowledge • Advantages beyond site
• Develop the extensive selection, a yearly
database over time, update and way to track
focus on key indicators the process of your
economy
Location
• Key indicators • Leading employers, new &
• Other expanding companies
indicators • Research bases, R&D personnel
• Population and labor force
demographics
• Available land and buildings
• Data Sources • Business Directory, Reference
USA, BLS, Census, Dun &
Bradstreet, cbre.com,
economicmodeling.com,
LocationOne
Amenities
! Key indicators • Quality of life data- climate,
housing, healthcare
! Other indicators • Environmental conditions
• Higher education resources,
vocational schools, community
colleges
• Census, ERS Amenities Scale,
! Data Sources nces.ed.gov,
epa.gov/water/region,
epa.gov/air/data/, hhs.gov
Infrastructure
! Key indicators • Utilities
! Other indicators • Transportation Modes- air, rail,
water, road
• International Resources
• Government
! Data Sources • Transtats.bts.gov, fra.dot.gov,
FAA, nerc.gov/regional,
usatradeonline.gov
Costs
! Key • Real and personal property tax,
indicators average costs of sites, average salary
by occupation, worker’s
compensation & unemployment
insurance, percent of workforce
organized, cost of living
! Data Sources • BLS/CEW, Office of Workers’
Compensation/BLS,
Unionstats.com,
taxsites.com/state.html,
payrolltaxes.com, coli.org, National
Assn of Realtors
Understanding the ECONOMIC ENTRE-
PRENEURSHIP
BASE
Regional
Economic Base with INNOVATION
Second “mapping”
Sectors to clusters
Regional
Projected
Growth
Target: Gaps Regional
Historical
Target: Emerging Opportunities Performance
Projected Growth
Regional Specialization
Under-represented in Region
Example Scanning Analysis
National growth,
post-recession?
Concentrated in U.S . '02-'06 LA '02-'05
Louisiana or LA S pecialization G row th G row th
region?
Full Chain
Full Chain
Full Chain
Linked
Linked
Linked
Core
Core
Core
ID Industry NAICS LA or
O il, G as & Energy region
6 O il & gas extraction 211 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 growth?
53 P etroleum & coal product mfg 3241 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0
129 P ipeline transportation 486 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1
84 A gricultural, construction & mining machinery mfg 3331 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
12 W ater, sewage and other systems 2213 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1
10 P ower generation & supply 2211 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1
150 A rchitectural & engineering services 5413 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
11 Natural gas distribution 2212 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
9 Nonmetallic mineral mining & quarrying 2123 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0
105 Misc electrical equipment mfg 33599 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1
7 Coal mining 2121 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
Full Chain
Full Chain
Full Chain
Linked
Linked
Linked
Core
Core
Core
ID Industry NAICS
LA or
Inform ation Technologies region
140 Data processing & related services 5182 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1
152 Com puter system s design & related services 5415 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 growth?
139 W eb publishing, broadcasting, ISPs & search portals 51A 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
133 Software publishers 5112 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1
94 Com m unications equipm ent m fg 3342 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
96 Sem iconductor & electronic com ponent m fg 3344 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
Assessment:
Core small, mix limited, little depth
Good US growth
Strong recent LA performance
PROSPECTIVE
Reminders
• A type of analysis that views firms, and therefore
industries, as interdependent, not isolated
– Interdependence has three dimensions: Functional,
spatial/geographic, temporal
• A way of understanding a region’s economic base at
a given point in time
• Not a means of identifying fixed competitive
strengths
• Therefore, must be exploratory, spatial and dynamic
in approach and perspective
Talent: ECONOMIC ENTRE-
BASE PRENEURSHIP
Understanding
Regional INNOVATION
TALENT
Workforce Skills
& IDEAS
Innovation
Capacity TALENT
INNOVATION
& IDEAS
General knowledge
Entrepreneurship
Capacity TALENT
INNOVATION
& IDEAS
•Youth leaders
•Community programmers
•Club leaders Entrepreneurship High growth
businesses
The unemployed
Innovators
Youth
Retirees
Self- Employed
Assessment Approaches
• Quantitative • Qualitative
– Public Data & Previous – Surveys & Interviews
reports • Community specific
• Provides basic scope of existing • Gathered on the ground
entrepreneurship • Richest data available but local
• Data are not extensive • Essential to effective policy
• Compare your area to other design and a deeper
regions, states understanding of
entrepreneurship
Previous Reports
63
Quantitative Assessment
Current Status Capacity
• BEA-REIS data • Educational attainment
• Census Bureau • Immigration and diversity
– Decennial Census
• Financial resources
– Nonemployer Statistics
• Business resources
• County Business Patterns
• SBUS Business Tracking
Longitudinal Studies Form hypotheses about
• Survey of Business Owners the entrepreneurial
• Current Population Survey activity & capacity of
your region
• American Community
Survey
Qualitative Assessment
Current Status Capacity
• Community surveys • Community readiness to
create programs
• Interviews
– Small businesses, self-
• Existing programs
employed, business leaders • The ability to create
• Group assessment tools programs
– Leadership and networks
– Community identifies goals
• Entrepreneur identification
Focused
– Assess ambitions and needs investigation
tests hypotheses
formed partially
with quantitative
assessment
Entrepreneurship Mapping in
Perspective
Intensity of resources and time should reflect
intended outcomes, regional support and
anticipated participation