Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
CHAPTER TITLE
NO. PAGE
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Statement of problem
1.3 Objectives of the study
1.4 Significance of the study
1.5 Research methodology
1.6 Period of study
1.7 Limitation
15 Feedback of performance
15 Feedback of performance
Human resource plays an important role for the success of an organization because most of
the problems in organizations are human based and social based rather than physical or
technical. So, a good quality of work life not only attracts new talent but also retains the
existing talent. Quality of work life involves job security, good working conditions, adequate
fair and good compensation and equal employment opportunity to all together. Quality of
work life aims to meet the twin goals of enhanced effectiveness of organization and also it
improves the quality of life at work. In today’s environment, many employees work for the
salary and they may hop from one company to another company where the salary is more and
good working conditions. They never see the intrinsic satisfaction of their mind. So, Quality
work life is the existence of a certain set of organization condition or practice,. Many
definitions related to QWL argues that that a high quality of work life exists when democratic
management practices are used, employee’s jobs are enriched, employees are treated with
dignity and safe working conditions exist. It generally tries to instil in employees the feelings
of security, equality, pride, autonomy, responsibility, and flexibility.
The sustainability or the growth of an organization depends upon the Quality of work life
environment in which human and natural resources are not consumed but renewed. Work
place needs to be humanized by empowering the people which allows releasing the potential
of individual to contribute to the common cause. (Praveen Kumar, 2007). So, Quality of work
life consists of active involvement in group working arrangements or problem solving that
are of mutual benefits to employees, based on lab our management co-operation.
Quality of work life in an organisation is essential for smooth running and success of its
employees. The work life balance must be maintained effectively to ensure that all employees
are running at their peak potential and free from stress and strain. The quality of work life
aeffect such things an employee to feel secure and like they are being through of and cared
for by the organisation in which they work.
Primary objective
Secondary objective
To study various facilities provided by the organisation to their employees for their
better working.
Research methodology is the specific procedure or technique used to identify, select, process
and analyse information about a topic. The data is collected for analysis in primary manner
and secondary manner.
1.5.4SOURCE OF DATA
Primary data
Primary data is collected from various customers by using structured questionnaire.
Secondary data
This were the data already published were it is collected from the earlier research
work, journals, magazines and websites.
For the analysis and interpretation of the data collected ,a tool like percentage, scaling,
statistical measure is used.
For the purpose of presentation of the data collected charts, tables and graph are used.
The study on quality of work life with special reference to edarikkode textiles mill is
conducted for a period of 21 days
1.7LIMITATION
The sample size was limited to 30.
The study has the inherent limitation of sampling techniques.
There may be errors due to bias of employees.
CHAPTER-2
THEORATICAL FRAMEWORK
2.1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Maryam Fallah (2006) in her dissertation entitled “Study and analysis of the
relationship between quality of work life and performance of Kosar economical
organization staff” concluded that there is a significant relationship between
quality of work life and performance of staff.
Bram Steijn, (2001) four different work systems is distinguished: the traditional
Tayloristic system, lean teamwork, socio-technical teamwork, and the
professional work system. Work system is an important factor for explaining
differences in the quality of working life and attitudes of workers; theTayloristic
work system clearly has detrimental effects on the well-being of workers.
R. S. M. Lau, Bruce E. May (1998), Growth and profitability of two groups of
publicly held companies were compared based on sales growth, asset growth,
return on equity, and return on assets. Study supports a paradigm that aligns the
interests of the investor, manager, and employee stakeholders into a win-win
situation.
Harry C. Katz, Thomas A. Kochan, and Kenneth R. Gobeille (1983) this study
analyses the relationship among plant-level measures of industrial relations
performance, economic performance, and quality-of working- life programs.
There searcher formulated the hypotheses that QWL efforts can improve
economic performance through their effects on industrial relations performance.
2.2 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
The economic interests of people drive them to work at a joined and employee
satisfaction depends at least partially, on the compensation offered. Par should
be fixed on the basis of the work done, responsibilities undertaken, individual
skills performance and accomplishment. Job security is another factor that is to
concern to employees. Permanent employment provides security to the
employees and improves their QWL.
PARTICIPATIVE MANAGEMENT
Participative management offers all employees opportunities to contribute to
workplace policies and decisions that achieve business goals while promoting
career satisfaction. As opposed to an autocratic management style, where the
manager assumes operational control and makes all the decisions unilaterally, a
participative manager asks for input from team members and considers all
opinions to find workable solutions to business problems and implement them
to meet deadlines. As a result, employees feel more valued and often work
harder on behalf of their employers under this style of management.
HEALTH AND SAFETY
Being safe at work is important. It is a responsibility shared by both the
employer and the employee. For employers, one of the fundamental principles
of workplace health and safety is risk assessment which identifies all the
hazards and potential for harm whilst working.
All workers are entitled to work in environments where risks to their health and
safety are properly controlled. Under health and safety law, the primary
responsibility for this is down to employers. Employers have a duty to consult
with their employees, or their representatives, on health and safety matters.
MOTIVATION
JOB SPECIFICATION
A job specification is the knowledge, skills and abilities that are required to
perform a job in an organization. Job specification covers aspects like
education, work-experience, managerial experience etc. which can help
accomplish the goals related to the job. Job specification helps in the
recruitment & selection process, evaluating the performance of employees and
in their appraisal & promotion. Job specification, along with job description, is
actually derived from job analysis. Collectively, job specification and job
description help in giving an overview of the job in terms of its title, position,
roles, responsibilities, education, experience, workplace etc.
COMPANY PROFILE
3.1 INDUSTRY PROFILE
Textile have been occupying a place and pride in India being home of textiles
since times memorial. The textile industry occupies a unique place in our
country. It accounts for 14% of the total industrial production contributes to
nearly 30% of the total exports and is second largest employment generator.
At present cotton textiles industry in the biggest organised industry in India. Its
contribution to the national economy in terms of output, employment and export
is considerable.
The former market is highly volatile and characterised by short production runs,
fast changing fashions and designs, aggressive marketing and higher mark ups.
In response to market instability, firms target smaller, more rapidly changing
market niches, which require quick attraction of market designs. Here, cost
advantages do not matter as much in the mass market segment.
3.2 COMPANY PROFILE
ORGIN OF ORGANISATION
In Kerala there are 29 textiles units both public and private sector. The total
number of workers in the sector is about 25000. The power looms and hand
looming in the state are mainly concentrated in the northern district of Kerala
like Kannur, Calicut, Palakladand Malappuram.
The Mill has an installed capacity of 24,960 spindles and has the capability for
producing combed, Carded warp and Hosiery yarn. The company is providing
job opportunity to around 225 workers which include lady workers.
The Mill’s foundation stone was laid by Shri.E. Ahamed, the Hon’ble Minister
for Industries on 09 OCT 1982.The first phase was completed and started its
commercial production with 12500 spindle capacity by 05 Dec 1986 which was
inaugurated by the Hon’ble Chief Minister of Kerala, late Shri.K.Karunakaran.
The Company upgraded its spindle capacity from 12500 to 24960 spindles
during the year 1996 which was inaugurated by Shri P.K Kunhalikutty, Hon’ble
Minister for industries. The first phase of modernization Program was
completed in the year 2007 whereas the second phase completed during the year
2010.
An edarikkode textile is producing cotton yarn from the cotton.it issued textiles
industry for the purpose of weaving. Yarn is the raw material of the weaving . It
is process of making cloth from for yarn.
The vision of the edarikkode textile to make it the profitable one within 5 years
by reducing the wastage, increasing the productivity, and reducing overall cost
of production. The company also want to be good reacting with trade unions.
FUNCTIONAL DEPARTMENTS
• Production department
• Store department
• Personnel department
• Finance department
• Marketing department
INFRASTUCTURAL FACILITIES
• Separate rest room and toilet facility for workers and staff.
Edarikkode Textiles state government award for providing the best working
condition and the employee's satisfaction.
ORGANISATIONAL CHART
MANAGING DIRECTOR
GENERAL MANAGER
ASST.MANAGER(SPINNING)
JUNIOR MANAGER
JUNIOR MANAGER
(SPINNIG)
SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR
WORKERS WORKERS
PRODUCTION PROCESS
MIXING
BLOW ROOM
CARDING
DRAWING
COMBING
SPINNING
WINDING
PACKING
CHAPTER-4
DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION
Table 4.1
Gender wise classification
Male 25 83
Female 5 17
Total 30 100
Chart 4. 1
Number of respondents
Male Female
17%
83%
Interpretation
The above chart shows that 83% of the respondents are male and 17% are of
female.
Table 4.2
Below 26 3 10
26-35 13 44
25-50 7 23
Above 50 7 23
Total 30 100
Chart 4.2
Age of respondents
Below 26 26-35 35-50 Above 50
10%
23%
23% 44%
Interpretation
In the above chart we can see that from the total 30 respondents 10% is below
26. 44% of the respondents between 26-35 and 23% of respondents comes
under 35-50 and 23% 0f respondents comes under above 50.
Table 4.3
Secondary school 9 30
Degree 6 20
total 30 100
Chart 4. 3
Educational Qualification
Secondary school Higher secondary school
Degree Any other technical qualification
23% 30%
20%
27%
Interpretation
From the above chart 30% of respondents come under secondary school. 27%
under higher secondary school and 20% at degree and 23% of the respondents
comes under any other technical qualification.
Table 4.4
Below 1 year 1 4
Below 5 year 16 52
Above 5 year 13 44
Total 30 100
Chart 4. 4
Series1
Interpretation
The above chart shows that, only 4% of the respondents are having one year
experience and 52% are having 1-5 year of experience and 44% of the
respondents were having more than 5 year of the experience in the organisation.
Table 4.5
Table showing working conditions in the organisation
Excellent 9 30
Good 4 13
Average 12 40
Poor 3 10
Very poor 2 7
Total 30 100
Chart 4. 5
12
10
0
Excellent Good Average Poor Very poor
Interpretation
The chart showing 30% of the respondents feel excellent working conditions in
the organisation and 13% of the respondents are feeling good and 40% of the
respondent’s response average and 10%are of poor and 7% of the respondent’s
response was poor.
Table 4.6
Table showing flow of communication and information between
departments
To great extent 23 77
To a little extend 7 23
No extend 0 0
Total 30 100
Chart 4. 6
25 23
20
15
10
7
5
0
0
To great extent To a little extend No extend
Interpretation
From the above it shows that 77% of respondents suggested that there is flow of
communication between departments to a great extent. 23% respondent
suggested that there is a little extends of flow of communication between
information between departments.
Table 4.7
Strongly agree 9 30
Agree 6 20
Neutral 13 43
Disagree 2 7
Strongly disagree 0 0
Total 30 100
Chart 4.7
2 0
9
13
Interpretation
The above chart shows 30% 0f respondents strongly agree that the training
program will improve the quality of work life of an employee and 20% of agree
to this 43% are of neutral and 7% have disagree to the point.
Table 4.8
Highly satisfied 13 43
satisfied 7 23
Neutral 5 17
Dissatisfied 3 10
Highly dissatisfied 2 7
Total 30 100
Chart 4.8
Working hours
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Highly satisfied satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly dissatisfied
Interpretation
The above chart shows that 43% of respondent are highly satisfied with the
work life in the organisation .23% of respondents are satisfied, 17% are of
neutral ,10% of respondents are dissatisfied and 7% of respondents are highly
dissatisfied in the organisation.
Table 4.9
Highly satisfied 3 10
satisfied 6 20
Neutral 7 23
Dissatisfied 8 27
Highly dissatisfied 6 20
Total 30 100
Chart 4.9
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Highly satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly
satisfied dissatisfied
Interpretation:
The above chart shows that only 10% of the respondents are highly satisfied
their salary, 20% are of satisfied ,23% of respondents are comes under neutral,
27%are of dissatisfied and 20% are highly dissatisfied in salary.
Table 4.10
Always 12 40
Very often 8 27
Sometimes 6 20
Rarely 3 10
Never 1 3
Total 30 100
Chart 4.10
15
10
0
Always
Very often
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
Interpretation:
From the above chart it shows that 40% of respondents suggested that there is
an employee involvement in decision making. 27% of the respondents side
thatvery often ,20% says sometimes and 10% of respondents says rarely and 3%
of the respondents said that there is never involvement in decision making.
Table 4.11
yes 17 57
No 13 43
Total 30 100
Chart 4.11
Recognition
yes No
43%
57%
Interpretation:
The table shows 57% of respondents get proper recognition and 43% of
respondent’s opinion saying that not get proper recognition.
Table 4.12
Excellent 10 34
Good 9 30
Fair 6 20
Poor 3 10
Very poor 2 7
Total 30 100
Chart 4.12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
Interpretation
The chart shows that 34% of the respondents feel that the incentives is
excellent, 30% are of good and 20% are fair and it has been noticed that 10% of
respondents are poor and 7% of respondents response that incentives are very
poor given by organisation.
Table 4.13
Very low 12 40
Low 11 36
Affordable 5 17
High 2 7
Very high 0 0
Total 30 100
Chart 4.13
12
10
0
Very low Low Affordable High Very high
Interpretation
From the above chart shows that 40% of respondents comes under very low
about the workload of employees and 36% are low and 17% are of affordable
and 7% of the respondents were high to the work load of employees.
Table 4.14
yes 16 53
No 14 47
Total 30 100
Chart 4.14
Security
yes No
47%
53%
Interpretation
In the above chart shows 53% of respondents agree proper job security is
provided by the organisation and 47% of respondents are not agree with the job
security provided by the organisation.
Table 4.20
Always 14 47
Often 7 23
Occasionally 6 20
Rare 3 10
Newer 0 0
Total 30 100
Chart 4.20
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Interpretation
The above chart shows 47% of respondents response that always get the
feedback to the performance and 23% shows often, 20% to occasionally ,10% to
never.
Table 4.16
yes 16 53
No 14 47
Total 30 100
Chart 4.16
47%
53%
Interpretation
The above chart shows that 53% of respondents says that there is the
organisation require health and fitness club and 47% are not response to it in the
organisation of health and fitness club.
Table 4.17
Excellent 12 40
Good 11 37
Fair 6 20
Poor 0 0
Very poor 0 0
Total 30 100
Chart 4.17
12
10
0
Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor
Interpretation
From the above chart the 40% excellence shows by the respondents in quality of
work life and, 37% shows good ,20% fair ,3%at poor.
Table 4.18
yes 14 47
No 16 53
Total 30 100
Chart 4.18
47%
53%
Interpretation
The table shows 47% of respondents get reward for outstanding work and 53%
of them are not get the rewards.
Table 4.15
Table showing
1. The
organisation
make
performance 9 9 7 4 1 30
appraisal on the
basis of merits
and performance
2 .Stress involved 3 5 7 7 8 30
in your work
3. The
compensation
provided by the
organisation 10 8 9 3 0 30
helps you in
maintain a
society desirable
standard of living
4. Do you feel
comfortable and
12 8 7 2 1 30
satisfied with
your job
Table 4.15
Variables 5 4 3 2 1 Mean
score
1. The organisation
make performance
45 36 21 8 1 3.7
appraisal on the
basis of merits and
performance
3. The compensation
provided by the
50 32 27 6 0 3.8
organisation helps
you in maintain a
society desirable
standard of living
4. Do you feel
comfortable and 60 32 21 4 1 3.9
satisfied with your
job
Interpretation
From the table above it is noted that organisation make performance appraisal
on the basis of merits and performance mean score is 3.7.and stress involved in
the organisation provide mean of 2.8,compensation provided helps to maintain
standard of living gets 3.8 of the mean and comfortable with the job it gets 3.9
Table 4.19
Table showing ranking of benefits expect from organisation
Factors Rank Rank Rank Rank Rank Rank
6 5 4 3 2 1
Better pay 10 8 11 9 9 8
Career 5 6 3 4 3 6
opportunity
Job security 8 6 6 8 9 9
Better 4 8 7 6 8 4
working
environment
Better 3 2 3 3 1 3
leadership
Table 4.19
Factors Rank Rank Rank Rank Rank Rank Weighted Rank
average
6 5 4 3 2 1
mean
score
Career 30 30 7 12 6 6 4.3 4
opportunity
Better 24 40 28 18 16 4 6.1 3
working
environment
Better 18 10 12 9 2 3 2.5 5
leadership
Interpretation
From the above table it is clear that the benefit expect from organisation
basically of respondent is better pay as the weighted mean score for the reason
is 9.3. and the next important is of job security provided by the enterprise of
weighted average 7.2 and other one is better working environment of weighted
mean 6.1,were better leadership is the least important factor that choose by the
respondents.
CHAPTER-5
FINDINGS, SUGGESTIONS &
CONCLUSION
5.1 FINDINGS
Majority of respondents are male
Majority of respondents fall in age group of 26-35
Majority if the respondents are SSLC holders
Most of the respondents involved in the decision making process
Most of the workers are having more than 5 years’ experience in the
organisation
It is found that most of the employees are satisfied with work life and
they think it is necessary for the improving the overall performance in the
organisation
The employees are not satisfied with their salary given by the employer.
Only few workers are satisfied their salary.
From the study it is found that the company provides training programs
and most of the respondents agree that training will act as a catalyst in
motivating them.
Most of the respondents agree they get proper recognition for their
contribution.
Most of the respondents strongly agree training will improve the quality
of work life.
Most of the respondents suggested that there is flow of communication
and information between departments.
In this study it is found that most of the respondents were strongly agree
that workload among workers are very high.
In this organisation maintain a good employer and employee
relationship.
It is found that most of the respondents are satisfied the better working
environment in the organisation.
The study shows that most of the respondents are satisfied with incentives
provided by the organisation.
Minority of the respondents are satisfied the quality of work life
measures.
Organization provide health and fitness club to respondents.
In this organisation provide better feedback to their performance to
respondents.
Most of the respondents are attracted by better pay.
5.2 SUGGESTIONS
For the better performance and satisfaction of employees should provide
better salary.
The satisfaction of the employees can be improved further by giving
rewards for their contribution.
For the better performance of employees the workload should be reduced.
Better leadership should be provided for improve efficiency of workers.
Employees should be given career opportunities.
5.3 CONCLUSION
From the study, it is clear the quality of work life of employees in Edarikkode
Textiles Mill is good. In this research highlights some of the small gaps in
employee’s satisfaction towards company.
A happy and healthy employee will give better turnover, make good decisions
and positively contribute to organisational goal. The participative management,
career opportunities and working environment are the factors that determine the
quality of work life.
Comparing to other companies, this company also equally provide good quality
of work life. To further improve it should concentrate on proving better salary,
rewards and recognition to employees, better leadership, and should
communicate with employees while taking decisions.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS
WEBSITES
www.indialine.com
www.humanresourse.com
www.ask.com
www.chrmglobal.com/article/183/1/quality-of-workl-ife
APPENDIX
QUESTIONNAIRE
Dear Respondent,
1. Name:
5. Designation:
6. Since how many years you have been working in the company?
Yes No
8. How is the physical working condition in the company?
10. Does the company provide training for enriching the skills of employees?
12. At what extend you are satisfied by the personal relation between you and
employer?
13. Does the organisation provide satisfactory salary according to your work?
15. Do you get proper recognition for your contribution from your organisation?
Yes No
18. Do you agree the job security provided in your organisation satisfy your
work life?
YesNo
Yes No
Statements SA A N D SD
21. Do you feel to offer comments and suggestions in your work environment?
Yes No
22. Is the organisations employee grievance handling cell fulfils and overcome
your grievances?
Yes No
Yes No
24. What type of benefits you expect from the organisation. Rank the following:
Alternatives Rank
Better pay
Career opportunity
Job security
Better environment
Better leadership
YesNo
If yes,
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………….
………………………………………………………