Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
CHAPTER 8
Convolutions appear on cotton fibres when it dries for the first time in
order to relieve internal stresses developed during desiccation process. Table 8.1
gives the data on number of convolutions and convolution angle of raw and
aqueous stretched samples of six varieties of cotton from Gossypium hirsutum
species. The number of convolutions counted in one centimetre of cotton fibre has
ranged from 47 to 66 in raw cottons. The frequency of convolutions is drastically
reduced on tension - dried samples. Even slack-dried fibres have shown less
number of convolutions compared to the control. Very few convolutions are seen
on tension-dried samples of 10% stretch. Correspondingly the convolution angle
is also decreased in all water stretched cottons. It is found that there is a higher
decrease in convolution angle of tension dried samples than slack-dried samples.
High coefficient of variation is found in all cases as individual fibres within a
variety showed high variation.
It is evident from the above data that water swelling followed by stretch has
removed the convolutions partly. In tension-dried samples, the deconvolution effect
produced is permanent, as the fibre, due to annealing action of the water sets its
structure permanently. In slack-dried samples, the drying takes place in slack-
condition and thus the fibre tends to pick up convolutions again due to stress
relaxation during the process of drying. The changes between drying conditions
159
Distance
No. of Convolu No. of
Cotton variet^state convolutions CV% tion angle C.V% between
reversals CV%
reversals
parent 6 per cm
cm
SRT-l-Raw 62 28 13.5 44 27 22 0.037
(0.98) (0.007) (036)
8% S.D 43 20 6.11 19 26 17 0.038
(1.08) (0.002) (064)
8% T.D 23 30 2.99 36 25 36 0.040
(0.97) (0.002) (1.28)
10% S.D 37 20 5.95 27 24 13 0.042
(1.04) (0.003) (0.46)
10% T.D 11 30 1.8 30 22 19 0.045
(0.48) (0.001) (0.59)
Deviraj-Raw 66 25 11.82 46 25 21 0.040
(2.27) (0.008) (0.72)
8% S.D 40 25 (1.2) 538 28 23 19 0.043
(0.002) (1.28)
8% T.D 25 10 3.24 36 22 27 0.045
(0.33) (0.002) (0.86)
10% S.D 28 23 3.6 30 20 17 0.050
(0.91) (0.002) (0.59)
10% T.D 15 50 152 20 18 25 0.056
(0.74) (0.001) (0.58)
Deviraj-mercerized - - 21 14 0.048
10% T.D (0.49)
Jayalakshmi-Raw
47 41 9.53 40 26 31 0.038
(2.72) (0.004) (1.14)
8% S.D 34 16 4.49 22 24 22 0.042
(0.78) (0.001) (0.85)
8% T.D 18 25 (1.6) 106 38 22 24 0.045
(0.002) (0.91)
10% S.D 22 33 194 40 23 22 0.043
(1.03) (0.002) (0.73)
10% T.D 10 40 1.0 6 (0.00) 20 14 0.05
(0.57) (0.41)
160
Distance
No. of Convolu No. of between
Cotton varietj/state convolutions GV% tion angle CV% reversals CV%
reversals
per cm e per cm
cm
B-1007-Raw 57 36 12.98 40 27 29 0.037
(2.28) (0.003) (1.13)
10% S.D 31 28 4.5 24 24 23 0.042
(1.22) (0.0(G) (0.78)
10% T.D 11 45 1.42 46 21 26 0.048
(0.86) (0.001) (0.72)
Sarada-Raw 60 9 (0.78) 11.8 32 25 35 0.045
(0.01) (1.09)
10% S.D 33 22 4.94 33 21 27 0.048
(1.01) (0.003) (0.8)
10% T.D 8 47 1.17 48 20 23 0.05
(0.84) (0.002) (0.64)
Bicanaire Narnia-Raw 66 19 (1.8) 12.14 43 29 30 0.03
(0.01) (1.2)
10% S.D 21 39 (1.2) 3.24 42 25 26 0.04
(0.002) (0.91)
10% T.D 9 44 (0.8) 1.26 47 22 17 0.045
(0.001) (0.48)
and cotton types and in between cotton types are found to be significant at 1%
level.
Several scientists have related convolution angle with x-ray and spiral
angles. They also found relation between convolution angle and strength of cotton
fibres. In this investigation too, comparision is made between the convolution angle
and various angles of orientation, (Figures 8.1 and 8.2) and between convolution
angle and strength (Figure 8.3) as the correlation coefficients on pooled data
(paired replicas) are found to be highest
The variation in the x-ray angle of different varieties of cotton has been
attributed to the variation in the convolution angle among the varieties. A
subtraction of mean convolution angle from the corresponding x-ray angle yields
a constant value of spiral angle of around 21° for most cottons. The aqueous
swelling and stretching treatment that has been given to few varieties of cotton has
led to a significant reduction in convolutions and it will be interesting to see the
effect of reduced convolution angle on x-ray angles and optical spiral angle.
Table 8.2 shows the true 40%, 50%, 75% and mean orientation X-ray
angles and optical spiral angle with convolutions angle subtracted from the original
angles obtained by X-ray and Becke-line method. It may be observed that though
the effect of convolutions is eliminated, the X-ray angles are still found to be less
than the optical spiral angles. The first conclusion that emerges from this
observation is that the data supports the general assumption that the Becke-line
technique leads to a spiral angle at or near the fibre surface and that X-ray
method'fields a statistical distribution of the orientation through out the cell wall
Le., the mean orientation angle for the whole wall. Another conclusion is that the
structure of cotton fibres confirms to a constant pitch arrangement If cotton
possesses a constant angle structure, the X-ray angle and the optical spiral angle
would be equal or nearly equal if experimental errors do not come into play.
Moreover it may be observed from the data that the successive increases in the
amounts of stretch casue a gradual narrowing of the difference between X-ray
162
ANGLE (oC)
ORIENTATION
MEAN
AND BIREFRINGENCE
164
TENACITY (g m s /te x )
Cotton 40% X-ray 50% X-ray 75% X-ray Mean Optical Spiral
Variety/State angle - 0° angle - 0° angle - 0° orientation angle-0°
angle - 0°
SRT-1 - Raw 15.83 13.4 4.5 4.65 25.26
8% S.D. 20.36 17.74 8.51 10.74 2739
8% T.D. 18.55 15.23 8.76 12.13 2837
10% S.D. 20.2 17.11 8.37 10.9 29.83
10% T.D. 1532 12.56 7.2 10.61 2739
Deviraj - Raw 27.68 24.08 15.18 10.48 2737
8% S.D. 26.62 23.47 15.62 13.81 31.27
8% T.D. 25.61 22.14 14.45 14.44 31.22
10% S.D. 27.4 23.85 15.4 14.93 32.64
10% T.D. 20.17 17.48 10.17 13.16 26.27
Jayalakshmi • Raw 25.47 22.47 13.93 10.37 26.72
8% S.D. 23.97 20.51 13.21 12.77 27.07
8% T.D. 16.79 14.09 7.94 11.12 26.59
10% S.D. 20.06 18.06 11.56 12.07 25.71
10% T.D. 14.0 11.69 5.92 10.93 2136
B-1007 - Raw 20.02 16.02 7.02 6.75 24.17
10% S.D. 21.64 18.21 9.86 12.08 29.96
10% T.D. 19.45 17.08 10.32 11.5 27.77
Sarada - Raw 22.87 19.2 9.2 8.52 26.28
10% S.D. 2139 18.39 10.06 1232 313
10% T.D. 18.83 15.83 8.83 13.01 26.41
Bicanaire Namftaw 18.86 14.86 6.36 6.28 2633
10% S.D. 22.09 18.76 11.76 12.98 31.22
10% T.D. 18.07 15.74 8.74 12.55 2733
S. D. - Slack-dried Fibres
T. D. - Tension-dried Fibres
166
angles and optical spiral angle. This effect is explainable on the score that as the
helices are opened out due to the imposed stretch, the range of spiral angles
covering the fibre cross-section, is gradually narrowed down and this brings the
value of the optical spiral angle of the outer layer in close proximity with that
representing the average spiral angle for the whole wall. The concept of a constant
pitch structure for cotton throws a new light on the theory of X-ray diffraction of
fibres with a spiral structure. Stephens has made a reference to the bearing that
a constant pitch structure would have on the X-ray diffraction pattern.
It is Meredith (1946) who stated for the first time that the spiral angle
deduced from refractive indices is nearly the same for all varieties if the effect of
convolutions is corrected for. Later Betrabet et al (1963), Hebert (1967), Duckett
and Tripp (1967), Morosoff and Ingram (1970) and many others have supported
the view. More recently Iyer et al (1985) have shown a range of 7.7° that exists
between true spiral angles in air-dried cottons.
The never dried fibre has a cylindrical shape without any convolutions.
When it dries up, it takes up a flattened structure and convolutions appear. When
such a flattened tube is wetted in water and stretched, the convolutions are
removed and the fibre tends to take up a cylindrical form and come closer to its
own shape before boll opening.
168
fibre is stretched, lateral contraction occurs and the fibre elongates to the level of
stretch. Convolutions are not completely removed during this process and in slack-
dried samples they are picked up again during drying. Then, the extra length due
to stretch may be the result of partial deconvolution and straightening of fibrils.
The x-ray orientation and birefringence values clearly show that straightening of
fibrils has taken place in aqueous stretched samples. As a result, the frequency of
reversals on these stretched samples decreased, increasing the distance between
the reversals. The straightening of fibrils between reversals reduces the helix angle
and relieve the internal stresses between helices by wetting to a certain extent As
reversals are already the sources of high orientation, the collective force of the
fibrils increases thereby showing higher strength. This clearly shows the association
of reversals and its frequency with orientation and strength parameters and
convolutions (Figure 8.4).
83 CONCLUSION