LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY

HOMEWORK NO. 2 (Case Based Analysis)

Mittal School of Business Faculty of Business and

Arts

Name of the faculty member: Syed Tabrez Hassan

Course Code: MGN647 Course Title: Corporate Restructuring

Section (s): Q1509 G1

Max. Marks: 30 Allocation Date: 31-Jan-19 Submission Deadline: 7-Feb-19

Presentations will be done from 8th Feb. onwards. Any group can be called to present.

S. No Roll No Objectives Evaluation Expected

of Topic Parameters outcomes
Academic
Activity

1 All To improve Students in a group of 3-5 each will be As per rubrics, attached 1.Able to recall
Students the allotted a case study related in pg no 2 the
written and to subject. Individual students will management
communicatio prepare report that will be Group with cases theory
submitted for evaluation. Students are assigned, is attached in 2.Application of
n
expected to include the critical analysis / pg. no 4. Case Studies
skills of the solution/ recommendations of the case are uploaded on UMS the concepts
students for a given
assigned by the faculty in the report. under “reading material”.
along Submission will be business
with followed by Group discussion in the Student group has to situation
developing class as scheduled by the adhere to the
the capability faculty member. presentation date
to Students will be evaluated on: scheduled
study and Identification of the Main
analyze Issues/Problems: 2 Marks, Analysis of
the problems the issues: 5 Marks,
Comments on effective
underlying in
solutions/strategies 10 Marks, Links to
the course reading and additional research: 3
case and Marks and 10 marks for
giving group discussion. (Guidelines and
workable rubrics uploaded)
solutions Last date for uploading on UMS
is 7 Feb-2019.
Submission on UMS, has to be
done by every student
individually with own analysis
Any malpractices, copied,
plagiarized reports will attract
zero marks for whole assignment
 Evaluation Rubric: GROUP CASE STUDY
1. CONTENT
Parameters Marks Excellent (80%-100%) Good (60% to Fair (40% to Poor (0 to 40%)
80%) 60%)

Identifcation of 3 Identifies & understands Identifies and Identifies and Identifies and
the Understands
all of the main issues in Understands some of the understands few of the
Main the case study most of the issues in the case issues in case study
Issues/Problems study
main issues in
the case study
Analysis of the 7 Insightful and thorough Thorough analysis Superficial Incomplete analysis of
Issues of most of the analysis of
analysis of all the issues issues the issues
some of the
issues in the
case

Comments on 15 Well documented, Appropriate, well Superficial Little or no action

effective and/or
solutions/strategi Reasoned and pedagogically Thought out suggested, and/or
es comments about inappropriate inappropriate solutions to
appropriate comments on solutions to
(The solution may solutions, or proposals solutions, or some of the all of the issues in the
be in the case for solutions, to all proposals for issues case study
already or solutions, to
proposed by you) in the case study
issues in the case study most of the
issues in the case
study

Links to Course 5 Excellent research into Good research and Limited research Incomplete research and
and
Readings and the issues with clearly Documented Links to any readings
documented links to links to the Documented
Additional material reads links to any
Research class (and/or outside) readings
readings

2
Page 3 of 3
Marks Parameters

8-10 1. Student is a proactive participant showing a balance between listening,

initiating, and focusing discussion.
2. Displays a proactive use of the whole range of discussion skills to keep
discussion going and to involve everyone in the group.
3. Understands the purpose of the discussion and keeps the discussion focused
and on topic. Applies logics, knowledge, confidence, showing leadership and
sensitivity.
6-8 1. Student is an active participant showing a balance between listening, initiating,
and focusing discussion.
2. Demonstrates all the elements of discussion skills but uses them less
frequently and with less Confidence than the above level.
3. Keeps the discussion going but more as a supporter than a leader. Tries to 2. GROUP
involve everyone in the group. DISCUSSION
4. Demonstrates logic and knowledge but lacks the confidence to pursue them so
that the group takes longer than necessary to reach consensus.
5. Demonstrates a positive approach but is more focused on getting done than on
having a positive discussion.
4-6 1. Student is an active listener but defers easily to others and tends not pursue
personal point of view, lacking confidence.
2. Limits discussion skills to asking questions, summarizing and staying on topic.
3. Rarely demonstrates analysis skills and logics because doesn’t understand the
purpose of the discussion, and as a result, offers little evidence to support any
point of view.
2-4 1. Student shows effort and is willing to be involved in the discussion but lacks
the skills to get involved.
2. Asks clarifying questions as the main discussion skill.
3. Passively tries to find resources e.g. flipping through notes.
4. Lacks participation, logics resulting in little evidence with which to assess
skills.

0-2 1. Student demonstrates no participation or effort.

2. Participates only when prompted by the teacher. Only responds to others and
initiates nothing.
3. Provides limited responses that are often off topic.
4. Participates minimally so that it is impossible to assess analysis skills or
understanding of the issues.

3
Page 3 of 3
Reg no Name Roll
11503862 Virendra Verma RQ1509B37
11503480 Sagar Anand RQ1509B38 case 1 - bayer and Monsanto
11502524 Pankaj RQ1509B39 Date of CA - 15 Feb 2019
11501456 Netri Kapoor RQ1509B40

11501629 Mudde Mahesh Babu RQ1509B41

11501717 Mujjammil Billah RQ1509B42
11501108 Swati Chhetri RQ1509B43 case2 - Disney and Fox
11501286 Sobby RQ1509B44 Date of CA - 22 feb 2019

11506594 Aayushi Grover RQ1509B45

11506393 Suman kumar Sharma RQ1509B46 case3 - Microsoft and Linkedin
11506136 Gaurav Pratap Singh RQ1509B47 Date of CA - 1 Mar 2019
11505416 Anuj Jaiswal RQ1509B48

11504259 Shivani Thakur RQ1509B49

11504622 Sujan Das RQ1509B50 case4 - HUL and Dermalogica
11506949 Ritika Mehra RQ1509B51 Date of CA - 8 Mar 2019
11506482 Geetika Mohapatra RQ1509B52

11506665 Pradeep Kumar Tripathi RQ1509B53

4
Page 3 of 3
11506728 Ayush Kabir Z RQ1509B54 case5 - Target_Indian Shopper Walmart and Flipkart
11507463 Telikicherla Venkata Kameswara Goutham RQ1509B55 Date of CA - 15 Mar 2019
11507348 Shikhar Kapoor RQ1509B56

11507370 Nikita Sahu RQ1509B57

11507379 Aditya Bhardwaj RQ1509B58
11507881 Divyank RQ1509B59 case 6 - What Airline JVs Mean For Travelers
11507716 Anchal RQ1509B60 Date of CA - 22 Mar 2019

11507315 Shivam Mishra RQ1509B61

11507988 Sandeep Kumar Chaturvedi RQ1509B62 case5 - Target_Indian Shopper Walmart and Flipkart
11509525 Tushar RQ1509B63 Date of CA - 8 Feb 2019
11509736 Mohammed Ashil RQ1509B65

5
Page 3 of 3