By cannibalism we mean they sit on places on eating the dead after they are desease which is usually

cannibal by family members and also by paths the society where this individual is living. And our
mechanism is that we say the people who want to be eaten who say yes to this practice and we show
this consense by staying in that community or even Papuan community or Indian community ladies and
gentlemen. And they also acknowledge toward they whole community before they die. That I would like
to be eaten when I do finally have no more blame and we say that this should be allowed. And we also
mean that the people thinking in this practice on eating the dead also has shown their consen on many
part of that society. And those who not wish to be eaten can either say local community on Lead that
society and we say that we are not preventing towards the debate. In the negative side of the house has
debate whether we should allow even people watch or choose to do this they still not ok to do. We as a
the affirmative. I'm going to show you by giving 3 arguments. First on how we say this is the right of the
individual to be.... To this kind of cannibal. Secondly is how we respecting the cultural paths of that
society. And then my second speaker would talk about how maintaining government intensity in that
society. But before that.

Yes.

Poi : mam what about the fact that international society has already condemn this evil cultural cannibal
practices?

We don't see that international community is condemn. The international community condemn
practices that forcefully torture people in public which is the basic example is the Shaty practice when
people are fully torture and than burn alive. He said that this is not happening because this people had
even consense. And that's the reason why we allow this to happen in Papua and also in India.

They have to show why even though is not to force its still not allowed.

But going back to my argument. Back how we believe that define of this individual to be commerate to
this kind of this. We say that individuals have a right to life they also have a right to pursue habbits. And
in giving those right, we give this individual possession of their body. We give them bodily autonomy. So
that they can decide what they want to do with their body. Whether or not they choose to risk their
health to smoking or to activity such as bandy jamming. Whether they will choose that practice that we
all alow to happen to them. Because that define what they believe is the best pursuit of life.

We also say that this practice deciding of what you want to do with your life, also extense to how would
your possessions to be transfer to the future. That every single person has a right to decide how their
body or how their possessions would like to be used in the future. This is the reason why we have wills.
When we design who is going to in habbits out house who is going to in habbits out well. We also say
this is the reasons why we have practice of all Golgen nations. When we have people consentually
choosing to give up their kidney and their liver for the benefit of the society in the future where they
might not be there anymore.
We think that this right also applies to consensual cannibalism. Because we see that they are a group of
people who want to do this to their body that they want their flash to be passed on next generation that
this cultural. This people who live in this cultural practices belive what inside within them is the wisdom
and the teaching that lived in their lifetime. And they want this parents to continue on to the next
generation by allowing that flash to be eaten by living society so that they feel that left their body to be
carry on to the future. We also think that this is the right of the individuals to choose how that is inline
with how the individuals right now have a right to choose how they die. That even hindu has a right to
after they die be burn as a practices of ngaben. On a Chinese, Christian has a right to be Barry along with
their wealth inside their funurable. We said that same individual choice also be given to those who wish
to be Barry lying an besiding with the people who are living when they are eaten. And that's why we say
that in the end we pollen to you that this individual has a right to be consentually cannibalize.

Second of all we say that protecting the cultural practices of this part of society. We see almost all nature
are exist today. I'm not actually the original civilization that was deciding that as new common we have a
duty to respect this civilization that exists before us and continue to live today. This is the reason why we
say we allow the Papuan people to live their life still wearing the koteka eventhough we may not believe
that this is the best hygiene clothing for them. We also allow aborigines to conduct land of ceremonies
that dancing and singing because we see it as a cultural practices that unite this people that gives them
the identity of being Papuan or being aborigin. And we say that the practice of cannibalism should be
allowed because this is path of respecting the cultural identity and unity that many of old civilization on
highly dependent on the idea that the way they live their life should be based on the teaching of their
nenek moyang for say. And we say that they can manage this unity and this identity because they believe
that is so fun. The teaching of this nenek moyang has been carry to their parent generation. Because it is
given to cannibalism when we receive from nenek moyang to the current people and when this person
die it is transferred again to watch the people..... When they eat them desease after they die and we see
that this is what gives this people feeling that they are still unite that tare still infact carry the teaching of
the dead. Because they are carrying the wisdom of the ages to the current society and to the current
cultural practices that they are living today. And we as a government have a duty to respect this cultural
practices. We have a duty to let our society to choose to live how they want to live. We have a duty to let
every single individual choose how they want their possessions to be given on where their possessions
should be decided. And we think that we say we beg to propose.