Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Sections
PDF
Tools
Share
Abstract
The widespread application of computed tomography (CT) in different
clinical situations has increased the detection of intussusception,
particularly non–lead point intussusception, which tends to be
transient. Consequently, determining the clinical significance of
intussusception seen at CT poses a diagnostic challenge. Patients
with intussusception may or may not be symptomatic, and symptoms
can be acute, intermittent, or chronic, making clinical diagnosis
difficult. In most cases, radiologists can readily make the correct
diagnosis of intestinal intussusception by noting the typical bowel-
within-bowel appearance at abdominal CT. However, the CT findings
that help differentiate between lead point and non–lead point
intussusception have not been well studied. Nevertheless, although
there is considerable overlap of CT findings, when a lead mass is
seen at CT as a separate and distinct entity vis-à-vis edematous
bowel, it can be considered a reliable indicator of a lead point
intussusception. Differentiating between lead point and non–lead
point intussusception is important in determining the appropriate
treatment and has the potential to reduce the prevalence of
unnecessary surgery.
© RSNA, 2006
LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR TEST 2
After reading this article and taking the test, the reader will be able to:
Introduction
Approximately 5% of all intussusceptions occur in adults, accounting
for 1% of all bowel obstructions (,1). It has often been stated that
intestinal intussusception in adults is frequently caused by serious
underlying disease, with 70%–90% of cases having a demonstrable
cause based on discharge diagnosis or surgical results (,1,,2). The
growing use of computed tomography (CT) for abdominal imaging
has led to increased detection of transient intussusceptions with no
underlying disease. Consequently, determining the clinical
significance of intussusception detected with CT poses a fresh
diagnostic challenge. In this article, we review the pathophysiologic
features and classification of intussusception. We also discuss and
illustrate the clinical and CT manifestations of lead point versus non–
lead point intussusceptions and of small bowel versus large bowel
intussusceptions.
Pathophysiologic Features of
Intussusception
Intussusception is the invagination of a bowel loop with its mesenteric
fold (intussusceptum) into the lumen of a contiguous portion of bowel
(intussuscipiens) as a result of peristalsis. Intraluminal polypoid
lesions have a greater tendency to cause invagination of the bowel as
peristalsis drags the lesion forward. Although the exact mechanism
precipitating intussusception, especially intussusception without a
lead point, is not well understood, this condition has been ascribed to
dysrhythmic contractions.
Classification of Intussusception
Intussusceptions are classified according to location (enteroenteric,
ileocolic, ileocecal, or colocolic) and cause (benign, malignant, or
idiopathic). Intussusception in an adult can be further classified on the
basis of whether a lead point is present (,Table 1).
Intussusception without a lead point tends to be transient. Although
an intussusception with a lead point tends to be persistent or
recurrent, it can also be transient. Transient nonobstructing
intussusception without a lead point is known to occur in both adults
and children and occurs more frequently than was previously
reported (,3–,5). Transient intussusception of the small bowel has
been reported in adults with celiac disease (,2) and Crohn disease
(,6) but is most frequently detected incidentally and is presumed to be
innocuous. On rare occasions, transient tumor-related colocolic
intussusception can occur (,7).
Manifestations of Intussusception
Intussusception without a Lead Point
Intussusception without a lead point may manifest as vague
abdominal pain; however, most cases are discovered incidentally at
CT performed for other reasons. An intussusception without a lead
point does not generally cause proximal bowel obstruction (,8). It
typically appears as a targetlike or sausage-shaped mass, depending
on the axial projection (,9). Distinct anatomic features, including the
entering wall, mesenteric fat and vessels, returning wall, and
intraluminal space, can be clearly seen at CT (,Figs 1, ,2). At
abdominal CT, the presence of a bowel-within-bowel configuration
with or without mesenteric fat and mesenteric vessels is
pathognomonic for intussusception (,Fig 3,,).
Meckel Diverticulum
Meckel diverticulum is the most common congenital anomaly of the
gastrointestinal tract, occurring in 2%–3% of the population. Common
complications include hemorrhage, small bowel obstruction, and
diverticulitis. A Meckel diverticulum may invaginate or invert into the
lumen of the small intestine. Once inverted, the diverticulum may
serve as a lead point for an ileoileal or ileocolic intussusception (,Fig
6,,) (,14). Typically, an inverted Meckel diverticulum appears at CT as
a central core of fat attenuation surrounded by a collar of soft-tissue
attenuation. Provided this typical appearance is recognized at CT, the
diagnosis can be made prospectively (,15).
Venous Malformations
Venous malformations of the gastrointestinal tract may manifest with
bleeding, with anemia, or, if they form a mass, with intussusception
(,Fig 7,,,) (,16). The cecum is the most common site of venous
malformations, followed by the right colon and the jejunum. Patients
with venous malformations tend to be elderly with a history of
cardiovascular disease. In younger patients, venous malformations
tend to occur at atypical sites such as the small bowel (,17).
Lymphoma
Primary lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract accounts for
approximately 20%–40% of all malignant tumors in the small bowel
(,20,,21). Common presenting symptoms include abdominal pain,
weight loss, small bowel obstruction, and acute abdomen. Most T-cell
lymphomas manifest as ulcerated plaques or strictures in the
proximal small bowel, whereas B-cell lymphomas tend to manifest as
annular or polypoid masses in the distal and terminal ileum (,21). CT
is increasingly being used for the evaluation of patients with known or
suspected gastrointestinal lymphoma, since it allows evaluation of
both the mural and extramural components of the disease. CT
findings of regional or mesenteric lymphadenopathy associated with a
bowel wall mass can help distinguish lymphoma from other bowel
diseases. When CT demonstrates mild bowel wall thickening with
small lymph nodes, the detection of the underlying cause of
intussusception may be difficult because differentiation from bowel
wall edema may not be possible (,Fig 9,,).
Colocolic Intussusception
Lipoma.—
Lipomas are the most common benign cause of colocolic
intussusception in adults. Next to adenomatous polyps, these
mesenchymal tumors are the most common benign tumors of the
colon. Lipomas of the colon are within the submucosa in 90% of
cases, are usually solitary, and may be sessile or pedunculated (,26).
Lipomas are often discovered incidentally at endoscopic or radiologic
examination and can easily be diagnosed with CT due to their typical
fat attenuation (,Fig 12). Close observation of consecutive axial
images can help avoid misinterpreting entrapped mesentery and
subserosal fat as a lipoma. Multiplanar reformation may be used to
confirm the diagnosis of intussusception when axial views raise
suspicion for such a diagnosis. Lipomas are almost always
asymptomatic until they cause abdominal pain, sometimes due to
intussusception.
Adenocarcinoma.—
Adenocarcinoma of the colon is the most common malignant
neoplasm associated with colonic intussusception (,Fig 13,). Typical
signs and symptoms of adenocarcinoma of the colon include
bleeding, obstruction, a palpable abdominal mass, and abdominal
pain. The individual layers of the intussuscepted bowel wall are more
easily distinguished from the lead mass in this intussusception.
Differentiation of the lead mass from bowel wall edema at CT is
generally easier in large bowel intussusception than in small bowel
intussusception due to the greater caliber of the colon.
Conclusions
Intussusceptions without a lead point are increasingly being identified
at routine CT and pose a diagnostic challenge.
Abdominal CT can be helpful in distinguishing between lead point
intussusception and non–lead point intussusception and has the
potential to reduce the prevalence of unnecessary surgery. Although
there is considerable overlap of CT findings, identification of a lead
mass that is separate and distinct from edematous bowel can help
make this distinction.