Sunteți pe pagina 1din 3

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

A. Bosi, B. Bartolozzi, and S. Guidi

ABSTRACT
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) requires the harvest of an adequate number
of stem cells (SC) from a histocompatible donor and their infusion into a patient following
a conditioning regimen. During the past 35 years, the role of HSCT has changed from an
experimental procedure for terminally ill patients to a curative treatment. In 2003, 1170
procedures were registered in Italy (Italian Group for Blood and Marrow Transplanta-
tion). The main reported indications were as follows: leukemia, lymphoproliferative
diseases, myelodysplasia, and nonmalignant diseases such as thalassemia and severe
aplastic anemia. Important changes have been observed in the last 5 years: the shift from
bone marrow to peripheral blood as the SC source, the increasing number of alternative
donors such as unrelated, partially matched family donors and cord blood SC, and the new
extra-hematological indications including solid tumors. Moreover, the development of
nonmyeloablative conditionig regimens have allowed physicians to perform HSCT in
patients with advanced age or important comorbidities. In contrast, the availability of the
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (STI-571) for treatment of patients affected by chronic myelog-
enous leukemia, which was formerly the main indication for HSCT, has produced a
dramatic decrease in the number of transplantations in this setting. HSCT performed in
the early phases of disease and in young patients offers more than a 50% cure rate. The
transplant-related mortality still represents the greatest obstacle, ranging from 20%–30%,
despite the less toxic conditioning regimens, high-resolution HLA typing, and better
supportive care. GvHD and infections remain the main causes of morbidity. As regards
relapses, they correlate with disease status at the time of transplantation. Promising results
have been recently obtained with haploidentical and with cord blood SC transplantation
also in adult patients.

data on all transplantation activity in Europe.4 According to


A LLOGENEIC hematopoietic stem cell transplanta-
tion (HSCT) is an increasingly used procedure. Its
role has changed from an emergency measure for dramatic
EBMT criteria,4 the Italian Authority for Health has estab-
lished the indications for HSCT.5
situations to a planned treatment for hematological and HSCT is a developing procedure; in the last few years there
nonhematological disease, both neoplastic and nonmalig- has been a change in the major indications and in the type of
nant. On the basis of the donor availability, the needs of the conditioning regimens. An increase in the number of trans-
patient and the disease, HSCT is performed from various plantations has been observed with the introduction of non-
types of donors: syngeneic, allogeneic related and alloge- myeloablative conditioning. The activity survey of the Italian
neic unrelated donors, and fully or partially matched do- Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (GITMO)
nors.1–3 HSCT often represents the only way to cure represents an important tool to provide a rapid description of
patients. It is an example of modern high-efficiency medical
technology that is associated with high mortality, morbidity,
From the BMT Unit, Department of Hematology, University of
and costs. For these reasons, HSCT is a procedure that has
Florence, Florence, Italy.
to be performed only in selected patients. Decision-making This work was supported in part by the University of Florence.
represents a challenge for treating physicians, patients, and Address reprint requests to Alberto Bosi, BMT Unit, Depart-
healthcare agencies. The activity survey of the European ment of Hematology, University of Florence, Viale Morgagui 85,
Bone Marrow Transplant (EBMT) organization collects 50139 Florence, Italy.

© 2005 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 0041-1345/05/$–see front matter


360 Park Avenue South, New York, NY 10010-1710 doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.06.087

Transplantation Proceedings, 37, 2667–2669 (2005) 2667


2668 BOSI, BARTOLOZZI, AND GUIDI

the status quo, assessment of trends, and determination of and promote cooperative studies. GITMO is linked to the Italian
factors influencing transplantation rates. This is important for Society of Hematology (SIE). The activity survey annually collects
the physicians involved in patient management. numbers of HSCT from each participating institution, by indication,
donor type, and stem cell (SC) source. For GITMO members, it is
mandatory to register all transplant recipients per year according to
METHODS GITMO rules. On the basis of reported transplantation activity
GITMO Activity (number of registered transplantations), Centers are accredited for
The GITMO started its activity in 1987 with the aim to allow autologous, familial allogeneic and unrelated donor transplantation.
physicians, researchers, and nurses involved in HSCT to share their Transplant National Registries are as follows: Allogeneic Transplant
experiences, perform analyses of transplantation activity and results, Registry located in Genoa (Hematology Department of S. Martino

Fig 1. GITMO data regarding allogeneic transplantations performed beetween 1990 and 2003. (a) Number of allogeneic transplan-
tations performed (N ⫽ 11,940); (b) type of transplant; (c) SC source; (d) age at transplantation; (e) transplantation indications 2003;
and (f) type of conditioning.
STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION 2669

Hospital, Genoa) and Autologous Registry in Rome (Hematology DISCUSSION


Department, La Sapienza University, Rome).
The data show a progressive increase during the last 10
years of HSCT activity and, in particular, in the allogeneic
Participating Teams unrelated donors.6,7 This phenomenon may probably be
In 2003, 75 transplantation teams were accredited for autologous, due to the expansion of the unrelated donor registries.8 As
50 for allogeneic, and 47 for unrelated donor transplantations shown by EBMT data,4,6,8 in the last few years there has
(accreditation criteria: at least 10 transplantations per year for been a change in trends in SC source and in the type of
autologous or allogeneic and 20 allogeneic transplantations for conditioning. These changes, in particular the increase in
unrelated in 2 consecutive years). nonmyeloablative conditioning with the reduction in trans-
plant toxicity, have allowed physicians to perform trans-
RESULTS plantations on older patients and with comorbidities. The
outcome for HSCT patients varies depending on the phase
Numbers of HSCT by indication, donor type, and SC source of the disease at the time of transplantation; better results
are made available to participating members every year. are obtained when the transplant is treated in the earlier
One thousand one hundred seventy allogeneic transplanta- phase of the disease.9
tions were performed in 2003 (Fig 1a), including 56% from The GITMO activity represents an important tool be-
HLA-identical siblings, 16% family nonidentical, 25% from cause it reflects the transplantation status in Italy each year.
alternative donors, and 1% from twins (Fig 1b). The main Providing assessment of trends and determination of factors
indications were acute followed by chronic myeloid leuke- influencing transplantation rates allows it to be a central
mia (CML) and thalassemia (Fig 1e). The SC source was base for many physicians and patients in decision-making. It
46% bone marrow and 50% peripheral blood (Fig. 1c). The serves as a quality-control instrument for individual teams.
type of conditioning was 41% myeloablative and 30% Moreover, it may be the starting point for the design of both
nonmyeloablative (Fig 1f) with an increased number of retrospective and prospective cooperative studies.
transplantations performed in patients older than 60 years
of age (Fig 1d). HSCT outcomes were expressed in terms of
REFERENCES
overall survival, disease-free survival, transplant-related
mortality, and relapse incidence. We report the results in 1. Thomas DD: Bone marrow transplantation: a review. Semin
terms of overall survival of HLA identical sibling transplan- Hematol 36(suppl 7):95, 1999
2. Lennard AL, Jackson GH: Stem cell transplantation. BMJ
tations performed between 1990 and 2003 regarding the 321:433, 2000
main indications: acute leukemias, CML, and thalassemia. 3. Baron F, Storb R, Little M: Hematopoietic cell transplanta-
The overall survival rate of patients affected by acute tion: five decades of progress. Arch Med Res 34:528, 2003
myeloid leukemia (AML) (1456 patients) was 68% (95% 4. Urbano-Ispizua A, Schmitz N, de Witte T, et al: For the
confidence limit [CL]: 64 –71) for those in first complete European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation: Alloge-
neic and autologous transplantation for haematological diseases,
remission (CR); 56% (95% CL: 47– 64) for those in second solid tumours and immune disorders: definitions and current
CR; and 25% (95% CL: 19 –29) for those with more than practise in Europe. Bone Marrow Transplant 29:639, 2002
second CR. The overall survival rate for patients affected by 5. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana 227:34, 30/09/
acute lymphoblastic leukemia (950 patients) according to 2001
6. Gratwohl A, Schmid O, Baldomero HC: Accreditation Com-
the phase of disease at the time of transplantation was 57% mittee of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplan-
(95% CL: 50 – 62) for those in first CR; 47% (95% CL: tation: Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in Eu-
40 –53) for those in second CR, and 19% (95% CL: 14 –24 rope 2002. Changes in indication and impact of team density. A
for those beyond second CR. Survival for CML (945 report of the EBMT activity survey. Bone Marrow Transplant
patients) was 63% (95% CL: 58 – 67) for subjects in the 34:855, 2004
7. Gratwohl A for the EBMT JACIE Accreditation Office:
chronic phase; 50% (95% CL: 41–57) for the accelerated Overview of transplant activity in Europe. Hematol J 5:29, 2004
phase; and 28% (95% CL: 16 –39) for the blastic phase. 8. Dini G, Cancedda R, Locatelli F, et al: Italian Bone Marrow
Overall survival rate for patients affected by thalassemia (n Transplant Group (GITMO): unrelated donor marrow transplan-
⫽ 966) was 86% (95% CL: 79 – 89) for patients who tation: an update of the experience of the Italian Bone Marrow
Group (GITMO). Haematologica 86:451, 2001
underwent transplantation between 1997 and 2003 and 80% 9. Bacigalupo A, Sormani MP, Lamparelli T, et al: Reducing
(95% CL: 76 – 83) for patients who underwent transplanta- transplant-related mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem
tion between 1990 and 1996. cell transplantation. Haematologica 89:1238, 2004

S-ar putea să vă placă și