during execution of the work causing delay in timely completion of the work as well as loss to the public exchequer ‘That, the BRT corridor should have been preferably made elevated throughout its length which could jam and also catered have avoided the present traff by future increase in mixed traffic. Presently, the traffic congestion has been found at places where the BRT stations have been constructed At-Grid rather than underground. Further, the post BRT carriageway width for mixed traffic at the locations Of BRT bus stations have been reduced by 40% on average as compared to pre-BRT conditions. Moreover, the non-maintenance of uniform number of lanes for mixed traffic throughout BRT route had. created funnel like situation/bottleneck at the locations of BRT bus stations which added to the causes of traffic congestion. That, in Reach-III of the project at University Road, SME I EYe f ‘That, signals have been designed for pedestrian zebra crossings so that passengers could reach the center of road and move up to the elevated BRT corridor through elevator or escalator. Although such signals Will provide easy & safe access to the passengers but Will also result into mixed traffic congestion on the other hand. That, there was no provision in the revised PC-I for installation of louvers and sound barriers at elevated Portions of Reach-II of the project which are required to safeguard the privacy of the buildings and encounter the noise pollution in the vicinity. Moreover, the drainage system for elevated portion of the BRT project also needed to be properly designed. That, no pedestrian crossings other than BRT bus station approaches had been planned in the project. ‘That, the washrooms at BRT bus stations were being