Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ADJUSTMENT?
The following essay looks at the issue of child temperament and the Chess and Thomas
(1984) theory of child temperament that categorizes children according to their behavioural
styles (as cited in Shiner et al., 2012). The essay will then look at the subsequent issues that
arise as a result of childhood temperament styles. For example, issues with personality
well as the effect temperament has on a child’s attachment type and therefore their ability to
form stable relationships in the future. Temperament is often defined as the way in which a
child behaves (Thomas & Chess, 1977). One of the most commonly used theories of
temperament is the Chess and Thomas (1984) approach (as cited in Shiner et al., 2012). This
approach looks specifically at the variations in children’s behaviour from early infancy and
labels the patterns in behaviour as different types temperament. Chess and Thomas (1984)
stated that all children fall into three temperament types (easy, difficult, and slow to warm up)
Following the development of this theory, psychologists began to look at the effect of
childhood temperament on the different aspects of development. Research has shown that the
(Caspi et al., 2003). Personality is an extremely well researched topic in psychology, and one
of the most established theories is that of Goldberg (1990), who suggested that there are 5
conscientiousness. The way in which these components of personality develop often influences
HOW DOES CHILD TEMPERAMENT RELATE TO SUBSEQUENT ADJUSTMENT? 2
a person’s risk of developing various issues. For example, research has shown that neuroticism
and openness often predict whether a person is likely to develop depression (Chioqueta &
Stiles, 2005), and extraversion often predicts global anxiety (Gershuny & Sher, 1998). Also, it
should be noted, that there is a high prevalence of personality disorders these days (Torgersen,
Kringlen, & Cramer, 2001), and therefore, psychologists have looked to find the factors that
predict the development of positive and negative personality traits to help prevent the
It was from this, that researchers began looking at the different aspects of child
development that may or may not influence the type of person you become in the future.
Because temperament is a childhood trait, and because childhood is a key developmental period
particularly for personality (Caspi, Roberts, & Shiner, 2005), psychologists assumed an
wealth of research looking to find types of childhood temperament that cause the development
of negative personality traits. Caspi and Silva (1995) studied this by looking at how a child’s
administered at age 18, the study found that uncontrolled and confident children were more
impulsive as adults, whereas inhibited children were much less impulsive as adults. However,
this study did not account for individual differences in child development. A child may be
uncontrolled and confident to begin with, but research has shown that individual life events
can affect the way a person’s personality develops (Block, Block, & Gierde, 1986) and
therefore not every uncontrolled and confident child will grow up to be impulsive.
Nevertheless, the findings of Caspi and Silva (1995) are significant and therefore it was
HOW DOES CHILD TEMPERAMENT RELATE TO SUBSEQUENT ADJUSTMENT? 3
concluded that children who were more difficult in temperament were subsequently more
impulsive as adults.
From these findings, psychologists began to see the link between childhood
temperament and future behaviour. Therefore, researchers have become increasingly interested
research of Caspi and Silva (1995), it was assumed that children who were more difficult in
temperament may be more aggressive and/or violent as a result an inability to inhibit their
behaviours and therefore act impulsively. In response to this, research began looking at specific
behavioural problems in order to form the basis for preventative techniques. Henry, Caspi,
Moffitt and Silva (1996) looked specifically at the link between childhood temperament at age
3 and future violent and non-violent convictions at age 18. They found that that childhood
temperament (i.e. lack of control) was a strong determinant of whether a person was convicted
of violent or non-violent crime in the future. This suggests that children who are more difficult
in temperament are more likely to commit a violent crime. Similarly, Veenstra, Lindenberg,
Oldehinkel, De Winter and Ormel (2006) found that temperament, in terms of the capacity to
voluntarily regulate behaviour and attention, was significantly associated with antisocial
behaviour, a behaviour that is closely linked to the likelihood of a person committing violent
and/or non-violent crime in the future (Loeber, 1982). These findings provide a strong basis
for the development of preventative techniques, to reduce the rate of crime. For example,
reduce antisocial behaviour and therefore reduce the rate of violent and non-violent crime.
Similarly, interventions that target children’s temperament may also reduce the rate of
substance abuse in adults. This is because it has been found that childhood temperament
HOW DOES CHILD TEMPERAMENT RELATE TO SUBSEQUENT ADJUSTMENT? 4
influences a person’s risk of drug and alcohol use, as well as substance abuse in general. Gerra
et al. (2004) did a study on whether a person’s score on the Zuckerman Sensation seeking scale,
the Eysenck personality questionnaire, the Buss-Durkee hostility inventory, and the parental
bonding instrument, predicted that person’s risk of life time alcohol and drug usage. The study
found that many different aspects of a person’s personality were associated with drug use and
alcohol abuse, and that these personality differences may be a result of temperament (Caspi &
Silva, 1995). However, the findings also suggested that temperament and personality are often
associated with the perception of poor parental care and low ratings of parental care often
resulted in early substance use. Therefore, it was concluded that there is a link between
temperament, perception of parental care, and a person’s risk of substance abuse. However, in
this case intervention at the age of childhood temperament (i.e. age 3) would not be appropriate.
This is because the research shows that it is not just temperament that increases the risk of
substance abuse. Therefore, interventions would have to incorporate techniques that target a
person’s need to sensation seek, aggression and low parental care as well as temperament,
which is much more invasive as it targets aspects of personality rather than just the child’s
behaviour.
Another predictor of substance abuse and crime is conduct disorder (Copur, Turkcan,
& Erdogmus, 2005), and research has shown that a person’s risk of conduct disorder may be
predicted by childhood temperament. Caspi, Henry, McGee, Moffitt and Silva (1995) sampled
800 children to see if temperament at age 3 effected behaviour at age 15. They found that Lack
of control at age 3 and 5 increased future externalizing problems such as conduct disorder. This
suggests that childhood temperament is a strong predictor of conduct problems in the future.
However, much like the study Caspi and Silva (1995) this study does not account for individual
developing conduct disorder may never develop it. However, other research has found similar
findings to Caspi et al., (1995). For example, Lahey et al. (2008) found that parentally rated
“difficult” temperament (i.e. fussiness, activity level, and predictability) during an infant’s first
year was predicted by early parenting style, and that this “difficult” temperament was a
predictor of conduct problems, suggesting that there is definitely a link between temperament
and conduct disorder. Therefore, supporting the link between temperament and substance
abuse/criminal activity.
Caspi et al. (2003) did another study that examined the same behavioural styles of
children at age 3 as Caspi and Silva (1995), and then looked at the subsequent personality traits
that resulted at age 18 and age 26. They found similar results in that children who appeared
uncontrolled at age 3 were more impulsive at age 18, but also at age 26 showing that these
personality traits are consistent over time. It was also found that uncontrolled children were
more emotionally sensitive at age 26 than children who were more inhibited. Because
personality disorder (BPD; Lynch et al., 2006), and because behavioural features of BPD are
similar to those of depression (Luca, Luca, & Calandra, 2012), it may be assumed that because
children who were more difficult in temperament are more emotionally sensitive (Caspi et al.,
2003) they may be more susceptible to future emotional problems such as depression (Clark,
Watson, & Mineka, 1994). Other theories suggest that temperament accounts for the variation
in the rate of depression between males and females (Cloninger, Syrakic, & Pryzbeck, 2006),
and acts as a moderator on stress responses subsequently effecting the ability to cope with
depression (Compas, Conner-Smith, & Jaser, 2004). Either way, it can be concluded that
predicts differences in the rate behavioural problems and a person’s susceptibility to emotional
temperament and subsequent attachment to a primary caregiver. Ainsworth and Bell (1970)
categorized infants in terms of the style of their attachment to a maternal figure. The strange
situation experiment identified three main attachment types, a secure attachment, and insecure
avoidant attachment, and an insecure ambivalent/resistant. There are many different things
that can affect a child’s attachment type. Research has suggested that significant predictors of
attachment types are both maternal sensitivity (Smith & Pederson, 1988) and child
temperament (Vaughn et al., 1992). Boom (1994) found that the children whose mothers had
received interventions in order to enhance their sensitivity and responsiveness in general had a
more secure attachment and increase exploration, suggesting that this is a significant predictor
of attachment type. Alternatively, Seifer et al. (1996) found that temperament moderately
predicted security of attachment, and that maternal sensitivity no longer accounted for
attachment when temperament was being accounted for; suggesting a strong link between
that a child’s attachment type effects certain aspects of their development and therefore
influences the sort of person they are in the future. For example, Hazan and Shaver (1987)
found that the way people experience romantic relationships as adults is similar to the
attachment type they have as a child. So much so that people who had secure romantic
relationships, were found to of had a secure attachment as a child, and people who rarely fall
in love, often had an insecure avoidant childhood attachment. From this we can conclude that
childhood temperament may have an indirect influence on how a person approaches future
relationships, because of the style of attachment a person once had to their primary caregiver.
HOW DOES CHILD TEMPERAMENT RELATE TO SUBSEQUENT ADJUSTMENT? 7
to warm up. Research has suggested that a child’s temperament type effects the development
of their personality traits and subsequently increases their risk of the development of poor
emotional adjustment resulting in disorders such as depression, anxiety, and BPD. There is also
evidence to suggest that temperament influences how aggressive a person is in the future, and
whether a person is at increased risk of substance abuse and/or crime, either directly or
indirectly due to an increased risk of conduct problems. It has also been found that temperament
effects a child’s attachment to their primary caregiver and this subsequently effects the way
they approach future relationships. These findings all provide a solid basis for the development
preventative techniques and see how much they reduce difficult temperament and then how
much they reduce the subsequent issues that result from temperament styles.
HOW DOES CHILD TEMPERAMENT RELATE TO SUBSEQUENT ADJUSTMENT? 8
References
Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bell, S. M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated
67.
Block, J. H., Block, J., & Gjerde, P. F. (1986). The personality of children prior to divorce: A
Caspi, A., & Silva, P. A. (1995). Temperamental qualities at age three predict personality traits
66(2), 486-498.
Caspi, A., Harrington, H., Milne, B., Amell, J. W., Theodore, R. F., & Moffitt, T. E. (2003).
Children's behavioral styles at age 3 are linked to their adult personality traits at age
Caspi, A., Henry, B., McGee, R. O., Moffitt, T. E., & Silva, P. A. (1995). Temperamental
origins of child and adolescent behavior problems: From age three to age fifteen. Child
Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and
Chioqueta, A. P., & Stiles, T. C. (2005). Personality traits and the development of depression,
hopelessness, and suicide ideation. Personality and individual differences, 38(6), 1283-
1291.
HOW DOES CHILD TEMPERAMENT RELATE TO SUBSEQUENT ADJUSTMENT? 9
Compas, B. E., Connor-Smith, J., & Jaser, S. S. (2004). Temperament, stress reactivity, and
Copur, M., Turkcan, A., & Erdogmus, M. (2005). Substance abuse, conduct disorder and
Gerra, G., Angioni, L., Zaimovic, A., Moi, G., Bussandri, M., Bertacca, S., ... & Nicoli, M. A.
personality traits, and parental care perception. Substance Use & Misuse, 39(2), 345-
367.
Henry, B., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Silva, P. A. (1996). Temperamental and familial
Lahey, B. B., Van Hulle, C. A., Keenan, K., Rathouz, P. J., D’Onofrio, B. M., Rodgers, J. L.,
& Waldman, I. D. (2008). Temperament and parenting during the first year of life
predict future child conduct problems. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 36(8),
1139-1158.
Loeber, R. (1982). The stability of antisocial and delinquent child behavior: A review. Child
Luca, M., Luca, A., & Calandra, C. (2012). Borderline personality disorder and depression: an
Lynch, T. R., Rosenthal, M. Z., Kosson, D. S., Cheavens, J. S., Lejuez, C. W., & Blair, R. J.
McCrae, R. R., Costa Jr, P. T., Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., Hřebíčková, M., Avia, M. D., ...
& Saunders, P. R. (2000). Nature over nurture: temperament, personality, and life span
Seifer, R., Schiller, M., Sameroff, A. J., Resnick, S., & Riordan, K. (1996). Attachment,
Shiner, R. L., Buss, K. A., McClowry, S. G., Putnam, S. P., Saudino, K. J., & Zentner, M.
Smith, P. B., & Pederson, D. R. (1988). Maternal sensitivity and patterns of infant-mother
Thomas, A., & Chess, S. (1977). Temperament and development. Oxford, England:
Brunner/Mazel.
Torgersen, S., Kringlen, E., & Cramer, V. (2001). The prevalence of personality disorders in a
Vaughn, B. E., Stevenson-Hinde, J., Waters, E., Kotsaftis, A., Lefever, G. B., Shouldice, A.,
... & Belsky, J. (1992). Attachment security and temperament in infancy and early
473.
Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Oldehinkel, A. J., De Winter, A. F., & Ormel, J. (2006).
422-432.