Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Comparison table among paper powder-mixed plastic and other conventional paper and plastic materials
Water proofness Easy to deform No deformation in water Most plastic is water proof
Burning quality Non-toxic fumes. Burns well. Non-toxic fumes. Burns well. Some produces toxic fumes.
Status
•As the for the fork, the mix material could be 70%PP+30%BLF.
• M cup 100%PP = 15g
• M cup 70%PP+30%BLF = 16.88 g ( 10.85g + 6.03g ).
• Cost : fork + 11%, CoGS + %, CM + %,
• 12 month KQT ( 30 vs 30, 6 inspections) :
• 1 KQT at ambient conditions in BT Factory .
• 1 KQT at ambient condition in Australia .
• 1accelerated KQT at 35c + 70%RH at RDSG. Potential claim
• First injection trial was done the 7th October. The trial started with “The plastic part of cup is made with 20% with renewable resource
85%PP/15%BLF. Despite the adjustment injection parameters, it was not based materials”. The cardboard part of the cup is made from
possible to form a perfect cup and to eject it properly, the cup remained in 100% recycled cardboard.
the mould. Before any modification of the mould and the cup design or on
the ejection system, it has been decided to organize a new injection trial
to test slip agent. Environmental impact
• identified slip agent : AF Complex PE 990227 SL natur from AF-Color. The results show a 10% or 5% reduction for climate change or
cumulative energy demand between a 100% PP cup and a 70% PP
30% BLF cup, based on preliminary Cardia results. As a total of
Next the packaging system, this represents 5% or 3% reduction. It is
• Validate slip agent, all, November 2011. tangible improvement of one item in the packaging system which
• organize a new trial, all, December 2011. perfectly justifies going ahead with this development from an
environmental perspective. The evaluation has been done by NRC.