Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
AT
2017 – 2019
(35914803917)
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT
This is to certify that I SHIVANI GUPTA had completed the Project titled A STUDY
ON EMPLOYEE JOB SATISFACTION in HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM
CORPORATION LIMITED under the guidance of DR. RAVINDERJEET in the partial
fulfillment of the requirement for the award of degree of MBA from Maharaja Agrasen
Institute of Technology (Affiliated to G.G.S.I.P. University), New Delhi. This is an
original piece of work and I had neither copied nor submitted it earlier elsewhere.
SHIVANI GUPTA
Date:
i
CERTIFICATE FROM GUIDE
ii
iii
iv
v
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
vi
an employee is not satisfied with the job there are chances for absenteeism, low
turnover, lower productivity. committing of mistakes, diverting energy for different types
of conflicts keeping this thing in view all organizations are trying to identify the areas
where satisfaction to be improved to get out of the above dangers In this connection a
survey was conducted on behalf of Hindustan petroleum corporation limited to identify
the level of satisfaction in terms of strongly agree to strongly disagree on various job
related factors.
vii
CONTENT
STUDENT DECLARATION.................................................................................i
COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE.............................................................................iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................vi
1. INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………...………1
1.1 OVERVIEW OF INDUSTRY………………………….…………………2
1.2 ABOUT THE ORGANISATION………………………….……………...8
1.2.1 PROFILE OF THE ORGANIZATION……………………………….8
1.2.2 COMPETITIVE STATUS…………………………………………...12
1.2.3 SWOT ANALYSIS OF THE ORGANIZATION………………..….13
2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY……………………………..…………….……20
2.1 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY…………………………………………21
2.2 SCOPE OF THE STUDY………………………………………………..21
2.3 RATIONAL / PURPOSE OF THE STUDY (MANAGERIAL USEFULNESS
OF THE STUDY)……………………………………….21
2.4 METHODOLOGY……………………………………………………….21
2.4.1 TYPE OF RESEARCH (QUALITATIVE OR QUANTATIVE)
2.4.2 RESEARCH DESIGN (EXPLORATORY OR CONCLUSIVE:
DESCRIPTIVE OR ANALYTICAL)
2.4.3 SOURCES OF DATA COLLECTION (PRIMARY AND SECONDARY)
2.4.4 SAMPLE DESIGN AND SAMPLE SIZE
2.4.5 TOOL OF PRIMARY DATA COLLECTION (QUESTIONNNAIRE,
OBSERVATION, INTERVIEW ETC.)
3. FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS …………………………………………………..23
4. LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY………………………………………...……..43
5. CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS/ RECOMMENDATION
5.1 FINDINGS…………………………………………………….…………45
5.2 CONCLUSION…………………………………………….…………….47
5.3 SUGGESTION…………………………………………….……………..49
APPENDICES………………………………………………….………………...51
BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………………..55
LIST OF TABLES:
INTRODUCTION
1
1.1 Overview of oil and petroleum Industry:
The oil and gas sector is among the six core industries in India and plays a major role
in influencing decision making for all the other important sections of the economy.
In 1997–98, the New Exploration Licensing Policy (NELP) was envisaged to fill the
ever-increasing gap between India’s gas demand and supply. India’s economic growth
is closely related to energy demand; therefore the need for oil and gas is projected to
grow more, thereby making the sector quite conducive for investment.
The Government of India has adopted several policies to fulfill the increasing
demand. The government has allowed 100 per cent Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
in many segments of the sector, including natural gas, petroleum products, and
refineries, among others. Today, it attracts both domestic and foreign investment, as
attested by the presence of Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) and Cairn India.
Market Size
India is expected to be one of the largest contributors to non-OECD petroleum
consumption growth globally. Oil imports rose sharply year-on-year by 27.89 per cent
to US$ 9.29 billion in October 2017. India’s oil consumption grew 8.3 per cent year-
on-year to 212.7 million tons in 2016, as against the global growth of 1.5 per cent,
thereby making it the third-largest oil consuming nation in the world.
India is the fourth-largest Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) importer after Japan, South
Korea and China, and accounts for 5.8 per cent of the total global trade. Domestic
LNG demand is expected to grow at a CAGR of 16.89 per cent to 306.54 MMSCMD
by 2021 from 64 MMSCMD in 2015.
The country's gas production is expected to touch 90 Billion Cubic Meters (BCM) in
2040 from 21.3 BCM in 2017-2018 (Apr-Nov). Gas pipeline infrastructure in the
country stood at 16,470 km in September 2017.
Investment
According to data released by the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion
(DIPP), the petroleum and natural gas sector attracted FDI worth US$ 6.86 billion
between April 2000 and September 2017.
2
Following are some of the major investments and developments in the oil and gas
sector:
World's largest oil exporter Saudi Armco is planning to invest in refineries and
petrochemicals in India as it looks to enter into a strategic partnership with the
country.
Foreign investors will have opportunities to invest in projects worth US$ 300
billion in India, as the country looks to cut reliance on oil imports by 10 per cent by
2022, according to Mr. Dharmendra Pradhan, Minister of Petroleum and Natural
Gas, Government of India.
o During the bilateral meeting held in Tokyo between Mr. Dharmendra Pradhan,
Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India and Mr Hiroshige Seko,
Minister of Economy, Trade, and Industry of Japan, signed a memorandum of
cooperation on establishing a liquid, flexible and global liquefied natural gas (LNG)
market by exploring joint cooperation in the areas of sourcing, swapping and
optimization of LNG sources.
o State-owned Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) has come up with the new
blueprint to increase the crude oil production by 4 million tones and to double its
natural gas production by 2020 to curb the country’s import dependency by 10
percent. The company will raise its crude oil production from 22.6 million tons in
2017-2018 to 26.42 million tons in 2021- 2022.
3
HINDUSTAN OIL EXPLORATION COMPANY LTD (HOEC):
It was incorporated in 1983 for taking up exploration and production (E&P) activities
inter-alia by Late Mr. H T Parekh. HOEC was the first private company in India to
enter into field of oil and gas exploration
ESSAR
Essay Oil is a fully integrated oil & gas company of international scale with strong
presence across the hydrocarbon value chain from exploration & production to
refining and oil retail. Essar Oil has a portfolio of onshore and offshore oil & gas
blocks with about 1.7 billion barrels of oil equivalent in reserves & resources. Essar
Oil owns India’s second largest single site refinery at Vadinar, Gujarat, having a
capacity of 20 million metric tons per annum (MMTPA), or 405,000 barrels per day
(BPD). Vadinar Refinery has a complexity of 11.8, which is amongst the highest
globally. The refinery is capable of processing some of the toughest crudes and yet
produces high quality Euro IV and V grade products. The refinery has been set up at a
very competitive capex of US$ 12,746 /barrel, which is about half the global average.
GUJARAT GAS
Incepted in 1980, Gujarat Gas Co Ltd (GGCL) has since evolved to become one of
India’s largest players in distribution of natural gas. The company serves the entire
range of the retail end of the gas value chain - residential, industrial, commercial and
compressed natural gas (CNG). Gujarat Gas has its corporate headquarters in
Ahmedabad and current operational mandate in two key industrial districts of Gujarat
- Surat and Bharuch. The company presently supplies piped natural gas to more than
413,000 customers and retails CNG to over 200,000 users across its area of operation.
GAIL
GAIL (India) Ltd was incorporated in August 1984 as a central public sector
undertaking (PSU) under the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas (MoP&NG). The
company was initially given the responsibility of construction, operation and
4
maintenance of the Hazira-Vijaypur-Jagdishpur (HVJ) pipeline project. It was one of
the largest cross-country natural gas pipeline projects in the world. Originally this
1,800 Km long pipeline was built at a cost of Rs 1,700 cores (US$ 268.72 million)
and it laid the foundation for development of market for natural gas in India.
Petronet LNG Ltd, one of the fastest growing world-class companies in the Indian
energy sector, has set up the country's first LNG receiving and regasification terminal
at Dahej, Gujarat, and another
Terminal at Kochi, Kerala. While the Dahej terminal has a nominal capacity of 10
million metric tons per annum (MMTPA), the Kochi terminal has a capacity of 5
MMTPA. The company is in the process to build a third terminal at Gangavaram,
Andhra Pradesh.
Petronet LNG is at the forefront of India's all-out national drive to ensure the
country's energy security in the years to come.
MRPL
GE Oil & Gas is a part of the larger GE Energy group which also includes the GE
Energy Management and GE Power & Water divisions. GE Oil & Gas is a world
leader in advanced technology equipment and services for all segments of the oil and
5
gas industry, from exploration and production to downstream. Its services include
offshore and land drilling, subsea solutions, enhanced oil recovery solutions,
unconventional resources, full range LNG solutions, industrial power generation,
refinery & petrochemicals, gas storage and pipelines, among many others. The
company also produces many products which include the likes of subsea trees,
manifolds and connection systems, compressors, surface wellheads and many more.
CAIRN INDIA
Cairn India is one of the largest independent oil and gas exploration and production
companies in India with a market capitalization of around US$ 10 billion. It operates
around 30 per cent of India's domestic crude oil production. Through its affiliates,
Cairn India has been operating for close to 20 years playing an active role in
developing India’s oil and gas resources. Till now Cairn India has opened four frontier
basins with over 40 discoveries out of which 31 are in Rajasthan alone.
The Mangala field in Rajasthan, discovered in January 2004, is the largest onshore oil
discovery in the country in more than two decades. Mangala, Bhagyam and
Aishwariya fields, which are major discoveries in the Rajasthan block, have gross
ultimate oil recovery of over 1 billion barrels.
.
OIL INDIA PRIVATE LTD (OIL)
Oil India Private Ltd (OIL) was incorporated in 1959 to expand and develop the
newly discovered oil fields of Naharkatiya and Moran in India’s north-east. In 1961, it
became a joint venture (JV) company between the Indian government and Burmah Oil
Company Ltd, UK. In 1981, OIL became a wholly-owned Government of India
enterprise. Today, OIL is a premier Indian national oil company engaged in the
business of exploration, development and production of crude oil and natural gas,
transportation of crude oil and production of LPG. At present, the Government of
India is the promoter of the company, holding 68.43 per cent of OIL’s total issued and
paid-up capital. The balance 31.57 per cent of the equity capital is held by the public
and others including corporate bodies, mutual funds, banks, FIIs, resident individuals,
etc.
6
OIL has over 100,000 sq km of PEL/ML areas for its exploration and production
activities, most of it in the India’s north east, which accounts for its entire crude oil
production and majority of gas production. Rajasthan is the other producing area of
OIL, contributing 10 per cent of its total gas production. OIL currently owns and
operates 13 drilling rigs and 14 work-over rigs, besides charter hiring drilling rigs
based on operational requirement.
Established as an oil marketing entity on June 30, 1959, Indian Oil Company Ltd was
renamed Indian Oil Corporation Ltd (IOCL) on September 1, 1964, following its
merger with Indian Refineries Ltd. The integrated refining and marketing entity has
since grown into India’s largest commercial enterprise. It is the country’s number one
company in the prestigious Fortune ‘Global 500’ listing of the worlds largest
corporate. IOCL is currently at the 85th position in the list.
IOCL has a strong workforce of over 34,000 employees. In the company, operations
are strategically structured along the following verticals: Refineries, Pipelines,
Marketing, R&D Centre and Business Development – E&P, Petrochemicals and
Natural Gas.
Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) is India’s largest private sector company with
businesses in the energy and materials value chain. It is also the first private sector
company from India to feature in Fortune Global 500 list of ‘World’s Largest
Corporations’ and ‘World’s Top 100 companies’. The group's activities span
exploration and production...
7
ONGC
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) is an Indian multinational oil and
gas company headquartered in Dehradun, India. It is a public sector undertaking
(PSU) of the Government of India, under the administrative control of the Ministry of
Petroleum and Natural Gas. It is India's largest oil and gas exploration and production
company.
Company profile
8
HPCL operates 2 major refineries[4] producing a wide variety of petroleum fuels &
specialties, one in Mumbai (West Coast) of 6.5 Million Metric Tons Per Annum
(MMTPA) capacity and the other in Vishakapatnam, (East Coast) .
HPCL is a Fortune 500 company, with an annual turnover of Rs. 1,08,599 Cores and
sales/income from operations of Rs 1,14,889 Cores (US$ 25,306 Millions) during FY
2009-10, having about 20% Marketingshare in India and a strong market infrastructure.
HPCL operates 2 major refineries producing a wide variety of petroleum fuels &
specialties, one in Mumbai (West Coast) of 6.5 Million Metric Tons Per Annum
(MMTPA) capacity and the other in Vishakapatnam, (East Coast) with a capacity of
8.3 MMTPA. HPCL holds an equity stake of 16.95% in Mangalore Refinery &
Petrochemicals Limited, a state-of-the-art refinery at Mangalore with a capacity of 9
MMTPA. In addition, HPCL is constructing a refinery at Bhatinda, in the state of
Punjab, as Mittle energy investments pvt.Lmt.
HPCL also owns and operates the largest Lube Refinery in the country producing Lube
Base Oils of international standards, with a capacity of 335 TMT. This Lube Refinery
accounts for over 40% of the India's total Lube Base Oil production.
HPCL was formed in 1974 on nationalization of ESSO India operations. The operations
of Caltex were merged in 1976. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited today is the
second largest integrated oil refining and marketing company in India and also a
fortune 500 company with a turnover of Rs.646.89 billion (US$ 14,709 Millions). The
Corporation has already been identified by the Government of India as a company
which has the potential to become a global giant. The company employs about 11,088
people and has a market value of US $2.73 billion as of 2005. It faces stiff competition
from Bharat Petroleum and Indian Oil Corporation. It is a mega Public Sector
Undertaking (PSU) with Navratna status.
9
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF HPCL:
PRODUCTS OF HPCL:
Petrol Known as Motor Spirit (MS) in Oil Industry. HPCL markets the product through
its retail pumps spread all over India. Its principle consumers are regular personal
vehicle owners.
Diesel Known as High Speed Diesel (HSD) in Oil Industry. HPCL markets the products
through its retail pumps as well as terminals and depots. Its consumers are not only
regular auto owners but also transport agencies, industries etc.
Aviation Turbine Fuel With major ASF(Air Service Facility) present in all major
airports of India, HPCL is a key player in this sector supplying ATF to major airlines. It
has an accomplishment of sorts to supply fuel to US Air Force 1.
10
1.2.2 Competitive Status:
PCLH HINDUSTAN
PETROLEUM
CORPORATION
LIMITED
11
COMPETITORS OF HPCL
TOTAL ASSETS
RELIANCE
IOC
BPCL
ESSAR
12
1.2.3 HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM SWOT ANALYSIS
REPORT:-
13
1.3 About the Topic
14
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
MEANING
Employee satisfaction is a measure of how happy workers are with their job and
working environment. Keeping morale high among workers can be tremendous
benefit to any organization n, as happy workers will be likely to benefit to any
company. There are many factors for maintaining high employee satisfaction, which
wise employers would do will to implement.
EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION
Many experts believe that one of the best ways to maintain employee satisfaction is to
make workers feel they are part of the family or team. Holding Office Events such as
parties and group outings can help close bonds among workers. Many companies also
participate in team building retreats that are designed strengthen the working
relationship of the employers in the non-working related settings. Company trips, pain
ball wars and guided back parking trips are versions of this type of team building
strategy, with which many employees have founded success.
Of course, few will not experience a boost in morale after receiving more and many
raises and bonuses can seriously affect employee satisfaction and should be given
when possible. Yet money cannot solve all morale issues and of a company with wide
spread problems for workers cannot improve their overall improvement, a bonus may
be quickly forgotten as daily stress of an unpleasant job continuous to mount.
15
If possible, provide amenities to your workers to improve morale. Make sure they
have a comfortable, learn, break, rooms which basic necessities such as a running
mates keep facilities
Such as clean bathroom stocked with supplies. While professionalism is necessary for
most business allowing workers to keep family photos or small trinkets on their desk
can make them fed more comfortable and nested at their workstation. Basic
consideration like these can improve employee satisfaction, as workers will fed well
asked for by their employers.
The backbone of employee satisfaction in respect for workers and the job they
perform. In every interaction with management, employees should be treated with
courtesy and interest. In easy avenue for employers to discuss problems, with upper
management should be maintained and carefully monitored. Even if management
cannot meet all the demands of employees. Showing workers that they are being
heard and putting honest dedications into compromising will often help to improve
morale.
16
• Brand of organization in business field and comparison with leading competitor.
Quantity of task.
Difficult level of task.
Level of coaching
Level of assignment for employee.
Treatment of Employee etc.
17
CORPORATE CULTURE FACTORS
DEFINITION OF TERMS
SALARY
OVERTIME ALLOWANCE
Overtime allowance in extra cash compensation for the hours that employees work in
excess.
DECISION MAKING
Decision making involves the selection of a suitable action from among two or more
possible alternatives in order to arrive at a solution to a problem.
PROBLEM SOLVING
18
Grievance handling means help to solve a problem of the person who is in trouble and
went some kind of help. It is to help such a person is a way that can give him justice
to his satisfaction.
WELFARE FACILITY
Welfare facilities' are those that are necessary for the well-being of your employees, such as
washing, toilet, rest and changing facilities, and somewhere clean to eat and drink during
breaks.
TEAM WORK
TRAINING
JOB SECURITY
It is the probability that an individual will keep his or her job. A job with a high level
of job security in such that a person with the job would have a small chance of
become employees.
EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION
WORK SHCEDULE
Employees work schedules vary from full fill time lo part time to job shares. All work
schedules have one thing in common; the employee is doing work under an employer.
Today's employers understand that flexibility is what employee requires in their work
schedules. If they don't employers should beware
19
CHAPTER 2
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
20
2.1 Objective of the Study
2.4 Methodology
RESEARCH DESIGN
The study was based on survey method. The aim of the study is to find satisfaction
level of employees. In this study descriptive research method is used to find
satisfaction level of employees.
TYPE OF RESEARCH:
Primary research is used to find research. The data needed for the study is collected
from the employees, through questionnaire. Analysis and interpretation has been done
by using the statistical tools and data presented through tables and charts.
DATA COLLECTION
21
The data collected for the study consists of both primary and secondary data.
PRIMARY DATA
In this study primary data were collected through by using questionnaire. The
questionnaire was administered to fifty employees of HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM
CORPORATION LIMITED.
QUESTIONNAIRE
In this study the researcher have used a questionnaire consisting of eighteen multiple
choice based questions based on employees opinion and design by using likert scale.
Five demographic questions based on employees personal information.
SECONDARY DATA
A sample design is a definite plan for obtaining sample from a given population.
PERIOD OF STUDY
This study on employee satisfaction was conducted during the period of thirty five
Days.
SAMPLE SIZE
Graphical Representation tool such as Bar Graphs and Pie Charts have been used for
the data analysis.
22
CHAPTER III
23
3.1: WORK EXPERIENCE OF EMPLOYEES
no. of respondant
30
25
20
15
10
0
Below 2 2-5 years above 10 yr
no. of respondant
INTERPRETATION
From the above table, 20% of employees have the working experience below 2 years
and 28% in between 2-5 years, at the time 82% employees’ work above 10 years in
this institution
24
3.2: SATISFACTION OF EMPLOYEES WITH TRAINNING PROGRAMES:
STRONGLY AGREE 20 40
AGREE 16 32
NEUTRAL 6 12
DISAGREE 5 10
STRONGLY DISAGREE 3 6
45
40
35
30
25
NO. OF RESPONDANT
20
PERCENTAGE
15
10
0
STRONGLY AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY
AGREE DISAGREE
INTERPRETATION
From the above table, 40% of employees are highly agree, 32% are less agree,12%
are neutral, 10% disagree and 6% are highly disagree with training programs.
25
3.3: OPINION OF EMPLOYEES ABOUT SAFETY MEASURES OF
INSTITUTION
STRONGLY AGREE 22 44
AGREE 9 18
NEUTRAL 10 20
DISAGREE 8 16
STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 2
NO. OF RESPONDANT
25
20
15
10
0
STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE
NO. OF RESPONDANT
INTERPRETATION
From the above table, 44% of employees are highly agree, 18% are less agree,20%
are neutral, 16% disagree and 2% are highly disagree with safety provide by the
institute.
26
3.4: SATISFACTION LEVEL OF EMPLOYEES REGARDING LEAVE
PROVIDED:
STRONGLY AGREE 17 34
AGREE 15 30
NEUTRAL 12 24
DISAGREE 4 8
STRONGLY DISAGREE 2 4
NO. OF RESPONDANT
INTERPRETATION
From the above table, 34% of employees are highly agree, 30% are less agree,24%
are neutral, 8% disagree and 4% are highly disagree with leave obtained
27
3.5: SHOWING WHETHER THE JOB REALISE PROMOTION BASED ON
PERFORMANCE:
STRONGLY AGREE 28 56
AGREE 7 14
NEUTRAL 13 18
DISAGREE 3 8
STRONGLY DISAGREE 4 4
Diagrammtitel
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE
INTERPRETATION
From the above table, 56% of employees are highly agree, 14% are less agree,18%
are neutral, 8% disagree and 4% are highly disagree with promotion based on
performance.
28
3.6: OPINION OF EMPLOYEES REGARDING SALARY PROVIDED:
STRONGLY AGREE 15 30
AGREE 14 28
NEUTRAL 7 14
DISAGREE 9 18
STRONGLY DISAGREE 5 10
NO. OF RESPONDANT
STRONGLY AGREE
AGREE
NEUTRAL
DISAGREE
STRONGLY DISAGREE
INTERPRETATION
From the above table, 30% of employees are highly agree, 28% are less agree,14%
are neutral, 18% disagree and 10% are highly disagree with salary providing polices.
29
3.7: OPINION OF EMPLOYEES ABOUT INCENTIVE PROVIDER:
STRONGLY AGREE 17 34
AGREE 7 14
NEUTRAL 4 8
DISAGREE 14 28
STRONGLY DISAGREE 8 16
NO. OF RESPONDANT
STRONGLY AGREE
AGREE
NEUTRAL
DISAGREE
STRONGLY DISAGREE
INTERPRETATION
From the above table, 34% of employees are highly agree, 14% are less agree,8% are
neutral, 28% disagree and 16% are highly disagree by incentive provider by institute.
30
3. 8: SATISFACTION OF EMPLOYEE BY WATER DRINKING FACILITY
STRONGLY AGREE 21 42
AGREE 13 26
NEUTRAL 6 12
DISAGREE 9 18
STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 2
60
50
40
PERCENTAGE
30
NO. OF RESPONDANT
20
10
0
STRONGLY AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY
AGREE DISAGREE
INTERPRETATION
From the above table, 42% of employees are highly agree, 26% are less agree,12%
are neutral, 18% disagree and 2% are highly disagree by drinking facility inside the
institute.
31
3.9: OPINION OF EMPLOYEES ABOUT REST TIME:
STRONGLY AGREE 23 46
AGREE 15 30
NEUTRAL 4 8
DISAGREE 4 8
STRONGLY DISAGREE 4 8
50
45
40
35
30
25 NO. OF RESPONDANT
20 PERCENTAGE
15
10
0
STRONGLY AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY
AGREE DISAGREE
INTERPRETATION
From the above table, 46% of employees are highly agree, 30% are less agree,8% are
neutral, 8% disagree and 8% are highly disagree with training programs.
32
3.10: OPINION OF EMPLOYEES ABOUT BREAK DURATION:
STRONGLY AGREE 24 48
AGREE 14 28
NEUTRAL 7 14
DISAGREE 3 6
STRONGLY DISAGREE 2 4
50
45
40
35
30
25 NO. OF RESPONDANT
20 PERCENTAGE
15
10
5
0
STRONGLY AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY
AGREE DISAGREE
INTERPRETATION
From the above table, 48% of employees are highly agree, 28% are less agree,14%
are neutral, 6% disagree and 4% are highly disagree with BREAK GIVEN IN
INSTITUTION..
33
3.11: OPINION OF EMPLOYEES ABOUT FOOD PROVIDED INSIDE
INSTITUTE:
STRONGLY AGREE 6 12
AGREE 6 12
NEUTRAL 10 20
DISAGREE 7 14
STRONGLY DISAGREE 21 42
NO. OF RESPONDANT
25
20
15
10 NO. OF RESPONDANT
0
STRONGLY AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY
AGREE DISAGREE
INTERPRETATION
From the above table, 12% of employees are highly agree, 12% are less agree,20%
are neutral, 14% disagree and 42% are highly disagree with FOOD.
34
3.12: OPINION OF EMPLOYEES ABOUT JOB SECURITY:
STRONGLY AGREE 19 38
AGREE 8 16
NEUTRAL 11 22
DISAGREE 9 18
STRONGLY DISAGREE 3 6
60
50
40
30 PERCENTAGE
NO. OF RESPONDANT
20
10
0
STRONGLY AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY
AGREE DISAGREE
INTERPRETATION
From the above table, 3% of employees are highly agree, 16% are less agree,22% are
neutral, 18% disagree and 6% are highly disagree with JOB SECURITY.
35
3.13: OPINION OF EMPLOYEES ABOUT TIMING OF WORK
STRONGLY AGREE 16 32
AGREE 9 18
NEUTRAL 15 30
DISAGREE 8 16
STRONGLY DISAGREE 2 4
35
30
25
20
NO. OF RESPONDANT
15 PERCENTAGE
10
0
STRONGLY AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY
AGREE DISAGREE
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table, 32% of employees are highly agree,18% are less agree,30% are
neutral, 16% disagree and 4% are highly disagree with timing.
36
3.14: OPINION OF EMPLOYEES ABOUT REWARD GIVEN BY INSTITUTE:
STRONGLY AGREE 28 56
AGREE 7 14
NEUTRAL 8 16
DISAGREE 4 8
STRONGLY DISAGREE 3 6
NO. OF RESPONDANT
STRONGLY AGREE
AGREE
NEUTRAL
DISAGREE
STRONGLY DISAGREE
INTERPRETATION
From the above table, 56% of employees are highly agree, 14% are less agree,,16%
are neutral, 8% disagree and 6% are highly disagree with reward given by institute..
37
3.15: OPINION OF EMPLOYEES ABOUT LEAVE POLICIES
STRONGLY AGREE 22 44
AGREE 5 10
NEUTRAL 16 32
DISAGREE 3 6
STRONGLY DISAGREE 4 8
45
40
35
30
25
NO. OF RESPONDANT
20
PERCENTAGE
15
10
0
STRONGLY AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY
AGREE DISAGREE
INTERPRETATION
From the above table, 44% of employees are highly agree, 10% are less agree,32%
are neutral, 6% disagree and 8% are highly disagree with leave policies.
38
3.16: SATISFACTION OF EMPLOYEES IN ESTABLISHES STRONG
RELATIONSHIP INSIDE INSTITUTE:
STRONGLY AGREE 23 46
AGREE 17 34
NEUTRAL 6 12
DISAGREE 2 4
STRONGLY DISAGREE 2 4
70
60
50
40
PERCENTAGE
30 NO. OF RESPONDANT
20
10
0
STRONGLY AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY
AGREE DISAGREE
INTERPRETATION
From the above table, 46% of employees are highly agree, 34% are less agree,12%
are neutral, 4% disagree and 4% are highly disagree in establishing relationship with
other employees
39
3.17: OPINION OF EMPLOYEES ABOUT INVOLVING IN BUSINESS
ACTIVITIES
STRONGLY AGREE 21 42
AGREE 6 12
NEUTRAL 8 16
DISAGREE 10 20
STRONGLY DISAGREE 5 10
NO. OF RESPONDANT
25
20
15
10
0
STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE
NO. OF RESPONDANT
INTERPRETATION
From the above table, 42% of employees are highly agree, 12% are less agree,16%
are neutral, 20% disagree and 10% are highly disagree in involving business
activities.
40
3.18: OPINION OF EMPLOYEES ABOUT EMPLOYEE GRIVANCE POLICY:
STRONGLY AGREE 7 14
AGREE 2 4
NEUTRAL 3 6
DISAGREE 14 28
STRONGLY DISAGREE 24 48
NO. OF RESPONDANT
30
25
20
15
10
0
STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE
NO. OF RESPONDANT
INTERPRETATION
From the above table, 14% of employees are highly agree, 4% are less agree,6% are
neutral, 28% disagree and 48% are highly disagree with employee grievances
policies.
41
3.19: OPINION OF EMPLOYEES ABOUT COMPENSATION PROVIDED
STRONGLY AGREE 18 36
AGREE 14 28
NEUTRAL 7 14
DISAGREE 6 12
STRONGLY DISAGREE 5 10
NO. OF RESPONDANT
20
18
16
14
12
10
0
STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE
NO. OF RESPONDANT
INTERPRETATION
From the above table, 36% of employees are highly agree,28% are less agree,14% are
neutral, 12% disagree and 10% are highly disagree with compensation provided
42
CHAPTER IV
Limitations of the Study
43
LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
This is subjected to the basis and prejudices of the respondents; hence 100%
of accuracy cannot be assured.
The research was carried out in a short span of time, where in the research
could not widen the study.
The period of study was too short. So it was not possible to collect the relevant
information with in that period.
The findings are based on the answers given by the employees, so any error or
bias may be affect the validity of the finding
44
CHAPTER V
FINDINGS
45
5.1 FINDINGS
46
CONCLUSION
47
5.2 CONCLUSION
From the study it was identified that the most of the employees are satisfied with the
job. Majority of the employees are satisfied with the salary structure, promotional
programs, working condition, allowances provided by the organization. They are also
satisfied with the employer-employee relationship and communication channel in the
organization. But still only 40% of the employees get opportunities to participate in
decision making. Also majority of the employees are not provided with the welfare
measures. If the firm concentrates of the findings and suggestions of their survey, we
hopefully believe that the organization can further bring out their labor with full
satisfaction and obtain good result.
48
SUGGESTIONS
49
5.3 SUGGESTIONS
50
APPENDIX
51
APPENDIX
QUESTIONNAIRE
NAME:
SEX:
POSITION:
PERSONAL INFORMATION
AGE:
Education Qualification:
Monthly Income:
People production
Yes no
52
Incentives
4. provider
Drinking
5. facility
6. Rest time
Break
7. duration
8. food
Time
schedule of
9. work
Reward
10. provider
Leave
Policy of
11. Company
Promotion
based on
12. performance
Cohesive
relationship
with team
13. members
Feeling of
14. job security
Able to
adjust with
colleagues
and
15. mannerism
Fair
employee
grievance
16. policy
53
Compressed
work week
17. policy
Providing
18. leave salary
Job
Improving
Social
19. Status
54
Bibliography
55
BOOKS:-
WEBSITES:-
http://www.hindustanpetroleum.com/retailhome
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindustan_Petroleum
http://www.extension.iastate.edu/foodsafety/toolkit/communication/OverviewofSOP
s.pdf
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1583440/standard-operating- procedure-
SOP
http://yourbusiness.azcentral.com/sop-retail-17046.html
56