27-Oct-2018

To,

1. The Chief Secretary,

Government of Maharashtra,
Mantralaya – 400032.

2. Commissioner of Police, Mumbai (Mr. Subodh Jaiswal)

Crawford Market

Mumbai – 400 002.

Sub: Sanction of prosecution u/s 197 CrPC

Sir,

I had filed complaint with Dindoshi Police station as the chairman of our
society (with the committee members) is cheating us and other members
and spending LAKHS/MONTH under the garb of legal expenses from
society maintenance for defending his/their own wrongdoing further this
LAKHS/MONTH is then applied upon only our bill as we have filed the
complaint.

The then Dy. Registrar, P Ward (Rajendra Veer) via order u/s 79(2) MCS
Act dt 25-Apr-16 had directed that such upfront levy of legal charges is
illegal and only court can do so and directed them to rollback the nearly 50
lakh legal charges with interest. That Dy. Registrar was transferred and the
subsequent Dy. Registrar, P Ward (J.D. Patil) did not implement the order
and allowed them to further abuse funds.

The committee is cheating by collecting excess MAINTENANCE but also

then DIVERTING a significant part of it (LAKHS/ MONTH) for personal legal
expenses to cover their own wrongdoing. No details are provided to whom
it is spent and thus there is reason to believe that most of this money is
spent to bribe the Dindoshi Police and current Dy. Registrar, (J.D. Patil)
who are protecting the accused in return for a part of the society funds
being bribed on them. It is a symbiotic cycle for the authorities and society.
Collect excess -> bribe with excess -> further collect excess -> further bribe.
Tired of lack of action from Dindoshi Police and Dy. Registrar, P Ward we
approached court which was pleased to register FIR us 156(3) Cr.P.C. The
Dindoshi Police registered FIR upon the court order.

I was shocked when IO (Shri. Vilas Bhosale and DCP Vinaykumar Rathod)
BROUGHT PROPOSAL FROM ACCUSED that they are willing to rollback all
legal charges nearly (RUPEES FIFTY SIX LAKHS THEN) IF I WITHDRAW
THE CASE. The IO knows the wrongdoing but protecting the accused.

Since we did not AGREE to PRESSURE TO WITHDRAW THE MATTER, the

accused with the BLESSINGS OF THE IO VILAS BHOSALE and DCP ZONE-12
VINAYKUMAR RATHOD then FURTHER AGAIN spent around
LAKH/MONTH of society funds and bribed the Dindoshi Police.

Further, instead of collecting complainants witness statements, started

collecting statement of witnesses brought by the accused in the proforma
prepared by the accused and at the place of accused. Thus the IO is
manufacturing evidence (sec 193 IPC) to help the accused to work around
the Dy. Registrar order that such application of legal charges is illegal even
by passing resolutions.

Further he did not take any steps to arrest the accused or prevent further
commission of offence. Each month the accused further spends LAKHS OF
RUPEES PER MONTH FROM SOCIETY FUNDS AND BRIBES THE
AUTHORITIES.

When we requested progress of investigation, the IO refused to give any

details despite being the informant. On the other hand the IO is conducting
investigation TO PROTECT THE ACCUSED FROM PUNISHMENT. Also IO is
not even providing details and breakup of the amounts that are being spent
as legal charges, since now, after registration FIR even he is bribed with the
society funds. How can he provide break-up.

The Maharashtra State DGP Circular dated 19-Dec-12 No.

23/54/FIR/283/2013 (Para No. 2) In view of the above mentioned recent
directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, all Unit Commanders are
directed to follow the above direction scrupulously and bring these
instructions to notice of all subordinated in writing and further caution them
that any failure to comply with the above directions would make them liable
for disciplinary as well as penal action. Zero Tolerance will be exhibited
to this issue.

Earlier the Hon’ble Sessions Court in ABA/528/2017 in CR 211/2017 u/s

307 IPC had made the following observations against the IO (Vilas Bhosale)
– “in my view, it is desirable to note that since March till this date, applicant has not been
arrested. At the same time, what serious attempts have been made to collect best possible
evidence, are not appraised to this Court.”

Thus, the IO Vilas Bhosale has a history of faulty investigation and even the
above FIR C.R. 211/2017 u/s 307 IPC (victim 5 year old child) was
registered after intervention of the then DCP-Zone 12 (Kirankumar
Chavan). Now chargesheet is filed in C.R. 211/2017. Thus proving that non-
registration of FIR in C.R 211/2017 was grossly wrong by the IO PI Vilas
Bhosale and then Sr. PI Avinash Sawant. In fact, every single offence is
refused by Dindoshi Police station and therefore the accused have become
bolder and the rest of the society aware of the clout and control of the
accused over Dindoshi Police are reluctant to bring the truth.

In fact, all the offThe current DCP-Zone 12 (Vinaykumar Rathod) is also

favouring the accused.

Hence, Disciplinary action and penal proceedings against Vilas Bhosale (PI
/ IO) and Vinaykumar Rathod (DCP-Zone12) as per Maharashtra DGP-
Circular dated 19-Dec-2012 for

 Failure to register FIR and;

 Further manufacturing false evidence and conducting investigation in
manner to protect the accused;


Maharashtra has a BJP Govt that is working for a New-Corruption-Free-

India but the Police is brazenly breaking the law and protecting the accused
time and again. So we request the PM to look into what police under BJP
Govt in Maharashtra is doing.
Thus the IO (Vilas Bhosale) (DCP Zone-12Vinaykumar Rathod) have
committed the following offences;

A- Not registering FIR despite commission of Cognizable Offences in

violation of Maharashtra DGP Circular dated 19-Dec-13 based on Lalita
Kumari Judgement.

B- Allowing the accused to further spend LAKHS/MONTH for Bribe as

legal charges.

C- Not taking action against Dy. Registrar, P Ward (J.D. Patil) as initially
it was the stand of the Dindoshi Police and DCP-Zone 12 that it is the duty
of Dy. Registrar to register offence.

a) sanction us 197 of CrPC to prosecute the corrupt officers IO Vilas

Bhosale and DCP-Zone 12 Vinaykumar Rathod is sought us 166, 166A, 193
217, 218, 221 IPC. and of PC Act